Zinc

    group 12 · period 4 · d-block · transition metal

    fullZinc is the metal that galvanised pipe, brass fittings and corrosion inhibitors put into drinking water, a taste and acceptability parameter for WHO and the US EPA, a BAT-AEL metal in the EU chemical and textile sectors, and a routine effluent limit in metal finishing, mining and viscose.

    Typical wastewaters

    • chemical sector effluent (raw materials, plant corrosion, cooling water inhibitors) Zn²⁺ in metal bearing streams 5.6 to 250 mg/L before treatment, final effluent generally at or below 300 µg/L
    • viscose rayon and acrylic fibre spinning Zn²⁺ from zinc sulfate spin baths and zinc chloride solvent; 6,796 (viscose) and 3,325 (acrylic) µg/L daily maximum
    • electroplating and metal finishing total zinc 2.61 daily maximum and 1.48 mg/L monthly average
    • mine drainage (copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver ores) Zn²⁺ in mine drainage, 1.5 daily maximum and 0.75 mg/L monthly average
    • cooling tower blowdown (zinc corrosion inhibitors) Zn²⁺ from zinc based cooling water treatment, 1.0 mg/L total zinc
    • municipal sewage (galvanised pipe corrosion, zinc orthophosphate) Zn²⁺ in sewage; urban wastewater treatment plants were the largest single source of zinc to water in the 2010 E-PRTR the WHO zinc document names corroding galvanised pipe and brass, and the EPA 2016 corrosion control guidance names zinc orthophosphate, as the loads behind it
    • textile dyeing (zinc containing cationic dyes, viscose) total zinc 0.04 to 0.5 mg/L BAT-AEL, up to 0.8 mg/L with viscose fibres or zinc containing cationic dyes
    In the ledger's plant and process records, discharged by: Speciality inorganic pigments (iron oxide, chromium oxide, CIC, zinc sulphide, lithopone) (Chemicals) · Phosphoric acid (wet process) (Chemicals) · Silicones (polydimethylsiloxane) (Chemicals) · Superphosphates (Chemicals) · Viscose fibres (staple, filament, lyocell) (Chemicals) · Base metal ores (Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn) (Mining) · Bauxite, alumina, magnesite and ilmenite (Mining) · Industrial minerals (potash, salt, kaolin, magnesite and others) (Mining) · Iron ore and other metalliferous ores (Co, Cr, Mn, Mo, V, W) (Mining) · Precious metal ores (Au, Ag, Pt): gold and silver extraction (Mining) · Uranium ore (Mining) · Processes involving heavy metals (Pharmaceuticals)

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Zn, 30
    Oxidation states in water
    +2 only, Zn²⁺ and its hydrolysis products, carbonate and sulfide solids; 0 as the sacrificial metal of galvanised steel and zinc anodes, which corrode to Zn²⁺.
    Note
    The element entry covers the ores, smelting and the amphoteric chemistry in outline; this chapter is the pipe, the effluent and the sludge.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Weathering of sphalerite and other zinc sulfides; natural soil zinc 1 to 300 mg/kg; surface water usually below 10 µg/L and groundwater 10 to 40 µg/L (WHO background document).
    Anthropogenic sources
    Corrosion of galvanised iron pipe, brass and zinc alloy fittings, most in soft, acidic, carbon dioxide rich water (WHO); corrosion of plant pipework, tank insulation and roofs, raw materials, viscose fibre production and zinc based cooling water corrosion inhibitors in the chemical sector (CWW BREF section 2.4.3.9); zinc orthophosphate dosed for lead and copper control, which raises zinc loads to the sewage works (EPA OCCT 2016); electroplating and metal finishing, zinc and lead mine drainage, battery manufacture and cooling tower blowdown, each with its own US effluent limit. In the E-PRTR for 2010, 115 chemical installations emitted 150 t of zinc to water, 6 percent of a total of 2,513 t, and urban waste water treatment plants were the largest single source (CWW BREF section 1.2.3.11).
    matrixtypical rangenote
    surface waterbelow 10 µg/Lusually; the fact sheet says surface water normally does not exceed 0.01 mg/L
    groundwater10 to 40 µg/L
    region-dependent; the well figure reflects corrosion and acid soils
    normally not above 0.05 mg/L (fact sheet); up to 24 mg/L in a survey of almost 6,000 Finnish wells
    tap waterbelow 20 (median) to 1.1 (maximum) µg/L to mg/Lsingle national surveyFinnish survey; the median is µg/L, the maximum 1.1 mg/L, from leaching of piping and fittings
    seawater0.0049 mg/L
    single abundance figure, no range
    estimated oceanic abundance, Jefferson Lab via PubChem
    industrial wastewater, chemical sector final effluentup to 300 µg/Laverage effluent levels of directly discharging chemical WWTPs are generally at or below 300 µg/L; seven of 57 plants reported more, one of them from contaminated groundwater
    industrial wastewater, metal bearing streams before treatment5.6 to 250 mg/L
    three plant examples, not a survey
    5.6 mg/L influent to one chemical plant pretreatment (Table 3.36); 50 to 250 mg/L feed to a crystallisation reactor (Table 3.40); 100 mg/L influent to a biological sulfide precipitation plant (Table 3.112)

    3 · Speciation

    Zinc is Zn²⁺ over the whole natural pH range; hydrolysis to ZnOH⁺ begins only around pH 9, so free and ion paired zinc dominates in most waters. Its solids are Zn(OH)₂ and hydrozincite type basic carbonates in alkaline water, ZnCO₃ (smithsonite) in carbonate rich water, and ZnS in sulfidic sediments and anaerobic sludge, which holds zinc at very low solubility. The hydroxide is amphoteric and redissolves as zincate above about pH 11, so precipitation plants have a pH window on both sides.

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    oxic or anoxic water, pH 5 to 8.5Zn²⁺, ZnSO₄ and ZnHCO₃⁺ ion pairs, zinc bound to natural organic matter and sorbed on iron and manganese oxidesno redox chemistry; solubility set by carbonate and sorption, not by oxidation state
    alkaline water, pH 9 to 11ZnOH⁺, Zn(OH)₂ (s), basic zinc carbonatethe lime and caustic precipitation window; ZnCO₃ where carbonate is high
    strong alkali, pH above about 11Zn(OH)₃⁻ and Zn(OH)₄²⁻ (zincate)amphoteric redissolution; the reason overdosed lime leaks zinc (CWW BREF, amphoterism)
    sulfidic, anaerobic sediment or sludgeZnS (s)the basis of sulfide precipitation and of biological sulfate reduction treatment
    water in galvanised pipeZn²⁺ released from the zinc coating; basic zinc carbonate scale on the pipe wallsoft, acidic, carbon dioxide rich water is the most corrosive (WHO)
    Solubility
    Zinc salts of the common anions (chloride, sulfate, nitrate) are freely soluble; Zn(OH)₂, ZnCO₃ and ZnS are the controlling solids. Chemical precipitation can reach about 1 to 10 mg/L for a single metal with lime and lower values with sulfide (CWW BREF citing VITO 2010); the solubility products themselves are not printed in the sources read.
    Hydrolysis
    Stepwise to ZnOH⁺, Zn(OH)₂, Zn(OH)₃⁻ and Zn(OH)₄²⁻; the first hydrolysis constant is near pK 9 (Stumm and Morgan chapter 6, from the chapter, not re-read), which is why zinc stays as the free ion in neutral water and why hydroxide precipitation needs pH 9 or more.
    Complexation
    Sulfate and bicarbonate ion pairs; natural organic matter; chelating agents such as EDTA keep zinc dissolved and make hydroxide precipitation incomplete (CWW BREF). Constants are not quoted because the sources read print none.
    Precipitates
    Zn(OH)₂, basic zinc carbonate (hydrozincite), ZnCO₃, ZnS; zinc phosphate on pipe walls where zinc orthophosphate is dosed.
    ZnX2++HX2OZnOHX++HX+\ce{Zn^2+ + H2O <=> ZnOH^+ + H+}
    first hydrolysis step, pK near 9 at 25 C; negligible below pH 8 (Stumm and Morgan chapter 6, from the chapter, not re-read)
    ZnX2++2OHXZn(OH)X2(s)\ce{Zn^2+ + 2 OH^- -> Zn(OH)2 (s)}
    lime or caustic precipitation, pH about 9 to 10; the textbook solubility minimum for Zn(OH)2 lies near pH 9.5 (Metcalf and Eddy chapter 6, from the chapter, not re-read)
    Zn(OH)X2(s)+2OHXZn(OH)X4X2\ce{Zn(OH)2 (s) + 2 OH^- -> Zn(OH)4^2-}
    amphoteric redissolution as zincate in strong alkali, above about pH 11; the reason for the pH window in precipitation plants (CWW BREF names the amphoterism, not the equation)
    ZnX2++COX3X2ZnCOX3(s)\ce{Zn^2+ + CO3^2- -> ZnCO3 (s)}
    carbonate rich alkaline water and soda ash precipitation; smithsonite is also the ore
    ZnX2++HSXZnS(s)+HX+\ce{Zn^2+ + HS^- -> ZnS (s) + H+}
    sulfidic, anaerobic; chemical sulfide dosing or biological sulfate reduction; far lower residual than the hydroxide
    2Zn+OX2+2HX2O2Zn(OH)X2(s)\ce{2 Zn + O2 + 2 H2O -> 2 Zn(OH)2 (s)}
    corrosion of the zinc coating of galvanised pipe in aerated water; the hydroxide converts to basic carbonate scale in bicarbonate water; low pH, high carbon dioxide and low mineral content dissolve it as Zn^2+ instead (WHO). Electron balance written here, not printed by WHO
    5ZnX2++6OHX+2COX3X2ZnX5(OH)X6(COX3)X2(s)\ce{5 Zn^2+ + 6 OH^- + 2 CO3^2- -> Zn5(OH)6(CO3)2 (s)}
    hydrozincite, the basic carbonate that forms the protective scale inside galvanised pipe in bicarbonate water and the solid that actually caps zinc in alkaline carbonate water; less soluble than the hydroxide, which is why a hard alkaline water passivates galvanised steel and a soft one does not
    Zn(s)ZnX2++2eX\ce{Zn (s) -> Zn^2+ + 2 e-}
    the anodic half reaction; the standard potential of about minus 0.76 V puts zinc well below iron, which is the whole point of galvanising and of sacrificial anodes, and is also why the zinc goes into the water first and the steel only after the coating is gone
    ZnX2++CX10HX14NX2OX8X2ZnCX10HX12NX2OX8X2+2HX+\ce{Zn^2+ + C10H14N2O8^2- -> ZnC10H12N2O8^2- + 2 H+}
    chelation by EDTA, written with the diprotonated ligand that dominates near neutral pH; a chelated zinc rinse from plating or cleaning does not respond to lime at any pH, which is why the BREF insists on treating complexing agents at source or destroying the complex before precipitation

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    taste and appearance
    dissolved zinc
    5 percent of a panel could tell zinc sulfate at 4 mg/L; water at 3 to 5 mg/L is opalescent and forms a greasy film on boiling; WHO acceptability threshold 3 mg/L, US secondary standard 5 mg/L for metallic taste
    corrosion of galvanised pipe and brass
    zinc dissolves preferentially from galvanised steel and brass; soft, acid, carbon dioxide rich water is worst
    tap water up to 1.1 mg/L and well water up to 24 mg/L in Finnish surveys; corrosion control is the EPA's recommended method for iron, copper and zinc, and it does not remove zinc already in the source (EPA secondary standards page)
    Zn(s)+2HX2COX3ZnX2++2HCOX3X+HX2(g)\ce{Zn (s) + 2 H2CO3 -> Zn^2+ + 2 HCO3^- + H2 (g)}
    soft, acid, carbon dioxide rich water; carbonic acid both supplies the proton and carries the zinc away as the bicarbonate ion pair instead of laying down a carbonate scale, which is why the worst zinc levels come from low alkalinity supplies and from standing water in new galvanised pipe
    inhibition of biological treatment
    Zn²⁺ toxic to activated sludge
    threshold inhibiting concentration 5 to 20 mg/L (CWW BREF Table 3.115); a UK compilation gives inhibition at 0.08 to 0.5 mg/L dissolved with no rate reduction stated; zinc is only partly removed in biological plants, about 50 to 90 percent at six chemical WWTPs
    zinc load from corrosion inhibitors
    zinc orthophosphate dosed for lead and copper control passes to the sewer; zinc in cooling water inhibitors goes to blowdown
    EPA 2016 guidance: zinc in zinc orthophosphate typically 1:1 to 1:10 zinc to phosphate by weight; recent research found no lead or copper benefit over orthophosphate alone, and the zinc can raise sludge zinc and inhibit biological treatment at the sewage works; cooling tower blowdown at power plants is limited to 1.0 mg/L zinc (40 CFR 423.13(d))
    sludge
    every mg precipitated ends as zinc hydroxide or zinc sulfide sludge, usually classed as chemical waste
    CWW BREF cross-media effects of precipitation; zinc hydroxide and zinc sulfide sludges of viscose and pigment plants are waste streams in the ledger's chemical chapter
    as a reagent
    corrosion inhibitor: zinc orthophosphate
    zinc and orthophosphate form a protective phosphate film on lead, copper and iron surfaces; the zinc is thought to speed film formation
    3ZnX2++2POX4X3ZnX3(POX4)X2(s)\ce{3 Zn^2+ + 2 PO4^3- -> Zn3(PO4)2 (s)}
    zinc to phosphate weight ratios 1:1 to 1:10; EPA 2016 guidance reports no additional lead or copper control over orthophosphate alone and warns of zinc loading to the wastewater plant and to land applied sludge; the film is written as the simple zinc phosphate, the EPA describing its formation only in outline, and at a 1:1 to 1:10 zinc to phosphate weight ratio most of the dosed phosphate is there for the lead and copper films, not for this one
    corrosion inhibitor in cooling systems
    zinc salts in cooling water treatment programmes deposit on cathodic sites; the zinc leaves with the blowdown
    named by the CWW BREF (section 2.4.3.9, citing the industrial cooling systems BREF) as a source of zinc in chemical sector effluent; the steam electric ELG limits cooling tower blowdown to 1.0 mg/L total zinc
    zinc sulfate in viscose spin baths and zinc chloride in acrylic fibre solvent spinning
    process chemical, not a water treatment reagent; carries zinc into fibre plant effluent
    the OCPSF guideline allows viscose rayon 6,796 µg/L and zinc chloride acrylic 3,325 µg/L daily maximum instead of the general 2,610 µg/L; the CWW BAT-AEL for zinc may not apply where the load comes from viscose fibre production (footnote 29)

    5 · Removal and control

    hydroxide precipitation with lime, dolomite, caustic soda or soda ash, then settling and filtration
    Zn(OH)₂ or basic carbonate precipitated at high pH, flocculated with iron or aluminium salts and polymers
    ZnX2++2OHXZn(OH)X2(s)\ce{Zn^2+ + 2 OH^- -> Zn(OH)2 (s)}
    pH about 9 to 10; overdosing redissolves zinc as zincate; chelating agents such as EDTA block precipitation; best applied at source before dilution
    Efficiency
    5,600 to below 50 µg/L, 99 percent, at one chemical plant pretreatment (CWW BREF Table 3.36); achievable end concentrations for single metals with lime about 1 to 10 mg/L (VITO 2010 as cited)
    Interferences
    complexing agents, mixed metals with different optimum pH, carbonate and phosphate consuming reagent
    sulfide precipitation, chemical (sodium sulfide) or biological (sulfate reducing bacteria)
    ZnS is far less soluble than the hydroxide; in the biological variant sulfate in the effluent is reduced to sulfide, which precipitates the metals
    ZnX2++HSXZnS(s)+HX+\ce{Zn^2+ + HS^- -> ZnS (s) + H+}
    closed tanks with off-gas treatment because hydrogen sulfide can escape; biological plants need an electron donor and anaerobic conditions
    Efficiency
    biological removal 99.8 percent to 0.05 to 0.15 mg/L from 100 mg/L influent (CWW BREF Table 3.112); chemical sulfide reaches lower levels than hydroxide (BREF text)
    Interferences
    excess sulfide in the effluent; oxygen; the metal sulfide sludge
    crystallisation in a pellet reactor
    zinc precipitated on seed grains as pellets with soda or caustic soda at pH 10, giving a dry, recoverable product instead of sludge
    ZnX2++COX3X2ZnCOX3(s)\ce{Zn^2+ + CO3^2- -> ZnCO3 (s)}
    feed 50 to 250 mg/L, pH 10 (CWW BREF Table 3.40); reagents overdosed to reach the result
    Efficiency
    1 mg/L zinc in the effluent
    Interferences
    suspended solids and complexing agents that stop pellet growth
    ion exchange
    cation resin exchanges Zn²⁺; regenerated with acid; the eluate goes to precipitation or metal recovery
    2RH+ZnX2+RX2Zn+2HX+\ce{2 RH + Zn^2+ -> R2Zn + 2 H+}
    reported by chemical WWTPs as a zinc pretreatment together with other metals (CWW BREF section 2.4.3.9); polishing rather than bulk removal. R is a strong acid cation exchange site, shown in the hydrogen form as it is run for metal recovery; the exchange releases acid, so an unbuffered rinse drops in pH across the bed, and the acid regenerant returns the zinc as a concentrated sulfate or chloride liquor
    Efficiency
    not quoted
    Interferences
    calcium and magnesium compete; suspended solids foul the bed
    conventional coagulation and filtration (drinking water)
    particulate and sorbed zinc removed with the floc; dissolved zinc only partly
    the EPA secondary standards page lists coagulation and filtration among treatments that remove iron, manganese and zinc; corrosion control is the cost effective route where the zinc comes from the pipes
    Efficiency
    not quoted
    Interferences
    zinc leached after treatment in the distribution system is untouched
    biological treatment (activated sludge)
    sorption to biomass and precipitation in the sludge
    incidental; zinc is abated less than copper or chromium
    Efficiency
    about 50 to 90 percent at six chemical sector WWTPs (CWW BREF)
    Interferences
    inhibition above 5 to 20 mg/L

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    flame AASISO 8288; Standard Methods 3111 B50 µg/L direct air acetylene flame; 0.5 to 1 µg/L after chelation with APDC and extraction into MIBK (WHO background document)the most widely used method in the WHO review
    ICP-MSEPA 200.8; ISO 17294-2; Standard Methods 3125EPA 200.8 instrument detection limit 0.2 µg/L scanning and 0.07 µg/L selected ion monitoring at mass 66; ICP-MS lower limit of application about 1 µg/L in the CWW BREFthe method named for ZDHC and CWW compliance monitoring (EN ISO 17294-2)
    ICP-OESEN ISO 11885; Standard Methods 3120limit of quantification about 1 µg/L (Germany, CWW BREF); Flanders treats zinc as not quantifiable below 25 µg/L and France sets the LOQ at 10 µg/Lthe CWW BAT 4 monitoring standard for metals is any of the EN standards available
    zincon colorimetryStandard Methods 3500-Zn Bnot readfield and small laboratory method; not read this session
    Sampling pitfalls
    Galvanised fittings, brass taps and rubber tubing contaminate samples; distinguish first draw from flushed samples when the question is the pipe. Acidify to pH below 2 for total zinc; filter 0.45 µm in the field for dissolved zinc. Zinc is ubiquitous in laboratory dust and gloves, so blanks matter at the µg/L level.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ 4th ed. with addenda (2022)no guideline not of health concern at levels found in drinking water; may affect acceptability; JECFA PMTDI 1 mg/kg body weight (1982); assessment 1993
    WHO GDWQ, acceptability3 mg/Labove 3 mg/L water may not be acceptable to consumers (chapter 10 reference in the fact sheet); opalescence and greasy film above 3 to 5 mg/L
    EU DWD 2020/2184not set zinc is not a parameter of Annex I
    US EPA5 mg/LNational Secondary Drinking Water Regulation, non enforceable; effect listed as metallic taste
    US EPA health advisory (2018 table)2 mg/Llifetime health advisory; one day and ten day 6 mg/L, RfD 0.3 mg/kg per day, DWEL 10 mg/L
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902), direct discharge to a receiving water20 to 300 µg/Lyearly average, applies if the emission exceeds 30 kg/yr; lower end where little zinc is used or produced; may not apply to inorganic effluents from heavy metal compound production, to contaminated solid inorganic raw materials, or where the load comes from viscose fibre production (footnotes 24 to 26 and 29)
    EU textiles BAT-AEL (Decision 2022/2508), all processes, direct and indirect discharge0.04 to 0.5 mg/Lupper end may be up to 0.8 mg/L when treating viscose fibres or dyeing with zinc containing cationic dyes (footnote 34)
    US EPA 40 CFR 433.13, metal finishing (BPT)2.61 daily maximum; 1.48 monthly average mg/L total zincwith cadmium 0.69 and 0.26, silver 0.43 and 0.24 mg/L
    US EPA 40 CFR 414.91, OCPSF direct dischargers with biological treatment (BAT)2,610 daily maximum; 1,050 monthly average µg/L total zincviscose rayon 6,796 and 3,325 µg/L; zinc chloride solvent acrylic fibre 3,325 µg/L monthly; mass limits derived from metal bearing stream flows
    US EPA 40 CFR 440.102(a), mine drainage from copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver mines (BPT)1.5 daily maximum; 0.75 30-day average mg/Lmolybdenum ore mines 1.0 and 0.5 mg/L (paragraph (e))
    US EPA 40 CFR 423.13(d), steam electric cooling tower blowdown (BAT)1.0 mg/L total zincsame value daily and 30-day; with total chromium 0.2 mg/L; for chemicals added for cooling tower maintenance
    Abu Dhabi ADS 23/2017, discharge to the marine environment (EAD)0.5 mg/L
    region-dependent; marine discharge only
    Table 1 maximum allowable concentration at the point of discharge
    Abu Dhabi DoE Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022, discharge to sewer1 mg/L
    region-dependent; sewer discharge, not receiving water
    Table A₄ maximum allowable concentration for trade effluent to the sewer network; unusually, close to the marine value
    industry thresholds
    sectorbodylimitnote
    textile and leatherZDHC Wastewater Guidelines v₂.1 (2022), Table 25 foundational; 1 progressive; 0.5 aspirational mg/Lmethods ISO 17294, EPA 200.8, 6010C, 6020A; zinc borate (Table 1N) reported as total zinc with a 100 µg/L reporting limit for textiles; sludge total zinc threshold 400 mg/kg dry weight (Table 4A)

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Essential: nearly 200 zinc enzymes; requirement 15 to 20 mg/day for adult men; JECFA PMTDI 1 mg/kg body weight. Acute: vomiting above about 500 mg zinc sulfate, mass poisonings from acidic drinks kept in galvanised containers; chronic excess causes copper deficiency (zinc therapy at 150 to 405 mg/day); no health based guideline value (WHO).
    Bioaccumulation
    Homeostatically regulated in animals, absorption 10 to 90 percent and biological half time about one year in humans (WHO); not a bioaccumulating contaminant in the mercury sense. Zinc toxicosis in livestock is copper deficiency.
    Ecotoxicity
    US EPA aquatic life criteria, dissolved zinc: freshwater 120 µg/L acute and 120 µg/L chronic at hardness 100 mg/L as CaCO₃ (hardness dependent, Appendix B equations), saltwater 90 and 81 µg/L (1995). Activated sludge inhibition threshold 5 to 20 mg/L (CWW BREF).

    Flags

    • The WHO concentration ranges are 1980s and 1990s compilations (Finnish surveys, Nriagu 1980); no recent survey was read.
    • The seawater figure (4.9 µg/L) is a single abundance figure from Jefferson Lab via PubChem.
    • The hydrolysis pK near 9 and the Zn(OH)₂ solubility minimum near pH 9.5 are cited to textbook chapters from memory, not re-read this session.
    • The zincate, carbonate, sulfide and galvanised corrosion equations are electron and mass balances written here; the sources name the reactions but do not print them.
    • CWW BREF Table 3.36 is one plant's pretreatment data and Tables 3.40 and 3.112 are single reference plants, not sector statistics.
    • The activated sludge inhibition range 0.08 to 0.5 mg/L (UK Environment Agency 1997 as cited by the BREF) carries no rate reduction figure and conflicts with the 5 to 20 mg/L threshold of Table 3.115.
    • Abu Dhabi values: marine outfall 0.5 mg/L, sewer 1 mg/L; other GCC states not read.
    • EPA 2018 health advisory row for zinc read from a PDF table whose column alignment was verified against the cadmium row.

    Gaps

    • No source read gives zinc in municipal wastewater as a concentration; the CWW BREF only says urban WWTPs are the largest E-PRTR source.
    • No solubility products or hydrolysis constants are printed in the sources read; Stumm and Morgan has them but was not re-read.
    • No detection limit was read for the zincon method or for ISO 8288 beyond the WHO figure.
    • Zinc in mine drainage and smelter effluent as concentrations is in the ledger's mining chapter, not here.
    • Other GCC discharge standards (Saudi, Oman, Qatar) were not read.
    • The reagent chemistry of zinc orthophosphate film formation is described by the EPA only in outline; the equation added here is the simple zinc phosphate solid, not a measured film composition.
    • The hydrozincite, zinc anodic half reaction and EDTA chelation equations are from Stumm and Morgan chapters 6 and 8, from the chapter, not re-read; no stability constants, solubility products or electrode potentials beyond the standard zinc value were read.

    Sources

    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), chapter 12 chemical fact sheet, Zinc (p. 482)
    WHO, Zinc in Drinking-water, background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/17 (2003; text of 1996)
    Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast), Annex I Parts B and C and Annex III Table 1
    US EPA, Secondary Drinking Water Standards: Guidance for Nuisance Chemicals
    US EPA, 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories Tables, EPA 822-F-18-001 (March 2018)
    US EPA, Optimal Corrosion Control Treatment Evaluation Technical Recommendations for Primacy Agencies and Public Water Systems, EPA 816-B-16-003 (March 2016), sections on orthophosphate and zinc orthophosphate inhibitors
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 4 and BAT 12 Table 3 with footnotes 24 to 29
    Best Available Techniques Reference Document for Common Waste Water and Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical Sector (CWW BREF 2016), sections 2.4.3.9 (zinc), 3.3.2.3.4.2 (chemical precipitation, Table 3.36), 3.3.2.3.4.3 (crystallisation, Table 3.40), 3.3.2.3.5.3 (biological removal of sulphur compounds and heavy metals, Table 3.112) and Table 3.115 (activated sludge inhibition thresholds)
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2508 establishing BAT conclusions for the textiles industry, BAT 8 and Tables 1.3 and 1.4 (BAT-AELs for direct and indirect discharges) with footnotes 31, 34 and 41
    40 CFR 433.13, Effluent limitations representing BPT, metal finishing point source category
    40 CFR 414.91, Effluent limitations representing BAT, organic chemicals, plastics and synthetic fibers (OCPSF) direct discharge point sources that use end-of-pipe biological treatment
    40 CFR 440.102, Effluent limitations representing BPT, ore mining and dressing, subpart J (copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver and molybdenum ores)
    40 CFR 423.13, Effluent limitations guidelines representing BAT, steam electric power generating point source category (cooling tower blowdown, FGD wastewater, gasification wastewater)
    Abu Dhabi Specification ADS 23/2017, Environmental Specifications for Land-Based Liquid Discharges to the Marine Environment (Environment Agency Abu Dhabi), Table 1
    Abu Dhabi Department of Energy, Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022 (DoE/PD/R01/005, effective 1 January 2022), Appendix Table A4
    ZDHC Wastewater Guidelines Version 2.1 (November 2022), Table 1M (organotins), Table 2 (heavy metals) and Tables 4A and 4B (sludge)
    US EPA, National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, Aquatic Life Criteria Table and Appendix B (hardness equations)
    US EPA Method 200.8, Revision 5.4 (1994), Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by ICP-MS, Table 1 instrument detection limits
    ISO 17294-2:2023, Water quality. Application of ICP-MS. Part 2: Determination of selected elements including uranium isotopes
    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (online edition), 3111 Metals by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
    Standard Methods (online edition), 3125 Metals by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry
    Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J., Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 1996), chapter 6 (metal ions in aqueous solution: hydrolysis and complexation) and chapter 7 (precipitation and dissolution)
    Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill, 2014), chapter 6 (chemical precipitation of heavy metals: hydroxide and sulfide solubility)
    PubChem element summary for zinc; estimated oceanic abundance 4.9 x 10^-3 mg/L from Jefferson Lab

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.