Titanium

    group 4 · period 4 · d-block · transition metal

    minorTitanium has no drinking water guideline or discharge limit anywhere read, and dissolved titanium is negligible because Ti(IV) is fully hydrolysed to insoluble TiO₂; its water story is threefold and all particulate or structural: titanium dioxide nanoparticles entering sewers at hundreds of µg/L and mostly settling into sludge, TiO₂ as the photocatalyst of advanced oxidation research, and titanium metal as the corrosion proof material of desalination condensers, reverse osmosis hardware and chlor-alkali anodes.

    Typical wastewaters

    • municipal sewage particulate TiO₂ (pigment and nanoparticle) from sunscreens, paints, coatings and foods, 100 to nearly 3,000 µg/L in raw sewage, mostly in particles larger than 0.7 µm Westerhoff and others 2011: treated effluent below 25 µg/L at ten plants, with 4 to 30 nm titanium oxide spheres seen by electron microscopy

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Ti, 22
    Oxidation states in water
    +4 only in practice, as TiO₂ (rutile, anatase, amorphous) and hydrous titanium oxide colloids; dissolved Ti(OH)₄ and its hydroxo complexes exist only at trace levels. +3 is a reducing laboratory state with no water occurrence. 0 as the metal, passivated by its own oxide.
    Note
    The element entry covers the ninth most abundant element, ilmenite and rutile, TiCl₄ and the pigment industry. In water titanium is a particle.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Ilmenite, rutile and sphene grains and TiO₂ bearing clays in suspended sediment; dissolved titanium in natural water is at trace levels because of the insolubility of TiO₂ (element entry).
    Anthropogenic sources
    Titanium dioxide pigment and nanoparticle products (sunscreens, paints, coatings, foods) washed into sewers; titanium dioxide pigment plant effluent (sulfate and chloride process wastes in the ledger's chemical chapter); TiO₂ photocatalyst slurries in research and pilot plants; titanium metal releases nothing measurable.
    matrixtypical rangenote
    raw sewage, USA100 to nearly 3,000 µg/LKiser and others 2009; particles larger than 0.7 µm carried most of it
    raw sewage, ten US wastewater treatment plants181 to 1,233 (median 321) µg/LWesterhoff and others 2011
    treated wastewater effluentbelow 5 to 15 (2009 study); below 25 at all ten plants (2011 study) µg/Lmostly in particles smaller than 0.7 µm; spherical titanium oxide nanoparticles of 4 to 30 nm seen in effluents by electron microscopy
    wastewater solids (biosolids)1 to 6 µg/mgtitanium accumulated in solids; TiO₂ adsorbs onto activated sludge biomass in batch and sequencing batch tests

    3 · Speciation

    Ti(IV) hydrolyses completely; whatever titanium enters water ends as TiO₂ or hydrous titanium oxide particles, from single nanoparticles and 50 to a few hundred nanometre aggregates to pigment grains. Dissolved titanium is negligible and has no speciation story worth a table. The treatment relevant property is the particle: it is removed with solids and it photocatalyses under near ultraviolet light.

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    any natural waterTiO₂ (s) particles and aggregates; trace Ti(OH)₄ (aq)particle bound in every fraction
    sewage and activated sludgeTiO₂ particles adsorbed on biomass flocsthe removal mechanism (Kiser and others 2009)
    Solubility
    TiO₂ is insoluble and chemically inert (element entry); no dissolved titanium concentration was read.
    Hydrolysis
    Complete at any natural pH.
    Complexation
    Fluoride and peroxide complexes exist in the laboratory; none matter in water treatment.
    Precipitates
    TiO₂ (anatase, rutile, amorphous) and hydrous titanium oxide.

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    engineered nanoparticles passing to receiving water
    the fraction of TiO₂ finer than 0.7 µm, seen as 4 to 30 nm spheres in effluent, escapes settling
    effluents below 25 µg/L at all plants studied, so the load is small but continuous (Westerhoff and others 2011)
    titanium in biosolids
    more than 96 percent of influent titanium adsorbs to activated sludge and leaves with the solids
    1 to 6 µg/mg in solids; land application is the route to soil (Kiser and others 2009)
    as a reagent
    TiO₂ photocatalyst (heterogeneous photocatalysis, an advanced oxidation process)
    a semiconductor with a band gap of 3 to 3.2 eV absorbing light below about 400 nm; the excited electron and the hole react with oxygen and water to superoxide and hydroxyl radicals that oxidise organics non selectively
    slurry or immobilised films and nanotubes; efficiency limited by electron hole recombination; the review addresses laboratory and pilot work, not full scale plants, and states that bulk TiO2 has little or no environmental application without modification (Arun and others 2022)
    titanium metal as a material
    passive oxide film resists seawater and chloride
    desalination condensers, reverse osmosis hardware and chlor-alkali anodes (element entry)

    5 · Removal and control

    activated sludge and clarification
    adsorption of TiO₂ particles onto biomass and settling with the sludge
    full scale municipal plants
    Efficiency
    more than 96 percent of influent titanium; effluent below 25 µg/L (Westerhoff and others 2011); below 5 to 15 µg/L (Kiser and others 2009)
    Interferences
    the sub 0.7 µm fraction passes

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    ICP-OES or ICP-MS after acid digestionno numbered water standard read; titanium is not an analyte of EPA 200.8 (the method text was searched this session and contains no titanium)not readTiO₂ is refractory: the wastewater studies used digestion before ICP and size fractionation by filtration (0.7 µm) and electron microscopy for the nanoparticles
    single particle ICP-MS and electron microscopynot standardisednot readfor nanoparticle number and size
    Sampling pitfalls
    Dissolved titanium is meaningless; report size fractions. Incomplete digestion of TiO₂ underestimates total titanium.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ, EU DWD 2020/2184, US EPA NPDWRno guideline titanium appears in none of the three (the EU annex was checked; the US primary and secondary tables have no row; WHO has no fact sheet)
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902)not set
    Abu Dhabi ADS 23/2017 (marine) and DoE Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022 (sewer)not set region-dependentno titanium row in either table
    industry thresholds
    sectorbodylimitnote
    textile and leatherZDHC Wastewater Guidelines v₂.1 (2022)not set titanium is not a ZDHC wastewater parameter

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Not addressed in the sources read for ingestion via water; the element entry describes TiO₂ as inert.
    Bioaccumulation
    Not addressed in the sources read.
    Ecotoxicity
    The wastewater studies were motivated by the possible ecological risk of nanoparticles in effluent; no criterion or figure was read.

    Flags

    • Kiser and others 2009 and Westerhoff and others 2011 were read as abstracts.
    • The photocatalysis mechanism is from a 2022 review read as a summary; no full scale water treatment plant using TiO₂ photocatalysis was found in it.
    • The desalination and chlor-alkali material uses are cross referenced to the element entry, not to a water source read.

    Gaps

    • No natural water dissolved titanium concentration was read.
    • No toxicity or ecotoxicity figure for TiO₂ nanoparticles in water was read.
    • Titanium dioxide pigment plant effluent figures belong to the ledger's chemical chapter and were not read here.
    • No analytical detection limit for titanium was read.

    Sources

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.