Nickel

    group 10 · period 4 · d-block · transition metal

    fullNickel is regulated in drinking water (WHO 70 µg/L, EU 20 µg/L) mainly because it leaches from plated taps and stainless steel, it has a CWW BAT-AEL of 5 to 50 µg/L and a US metal finishing limit, and its plating, stainless steel pickling and metal complex dye effluents are the industrial homes of the ledger; in water it is one ion, Ni²⁺, and it leaves water only by precipitation, ion exchange or membranes.

    Typical wastewaters

    • nickel electroplating and electroless nickel rinse water Ni²⁺, held through the hydroxide window by ammonia, citrate, EDTA and hypophosphite in electroless rinses; 3.98 daily maximum and 2.38 mg/L monthly average
    • chemical sector effluent total nickel 5.0 to 50 µg/L after precipitation and solids separation
    • textile dyeing and leather tanning (metal complex dyes) nickel from metal complex dyes; 0.2, 0.1 and 0.05 mg/L by ZDHC level
    In the ledger's plant and process records, discharged by: Phosphoric acid (wet process) (Chemicals) · Speciality inorganic pigments (iron oxide, chromium oxide, CIC, zinc sulphide, lithopone) (Chemicals) · Base metal ores (Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn) (Mining) · Industrial minerals (potash, salt, kaolin, magnesite and others) (Mining) · Iron ore and other metalliferous ores (Co, Cr, Mn, Mo, V, W) (Mining) · Precious metal ores (Au, Ag, Pt): gold and silver extraction (Mining) · Uranium ore (Mining) · Processes involving heavy metals (Pharmaceuticals) · Reduction of aromatic nitro compounds (Pharmaceuticals)

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Ni, 28
    Oxidation states in water
    +2 only: Ni(H₂O)₆²⁺ is the predominant form in natural water at pH 5 to 9, with hydroxide, sulfate, bicarbonate, chloride and ammonia complexes formed to a minor degree in that range (WHO background document 2021); nickel leached from plated fittings is in the same form. Ni(OH)₂ and NiCO₃ are far less soluble than the salts, and the sulfides less still (WHO). 0 as the metal and its alloys, which release Ni²⁺ by passive leaching rather than corrosion.
    Note
    The element entry gives the green salts, the hydroxide that precipitates in alkali and the ammine and cyanide complexes; the chapter uses them. Nickel has no redox chemistry in water, so no oxidation step helps or hinders removal.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Dissolution from nickel bearing strata, above all ultramafic and laterite terrain; acid rain increases nickel mobility in soil and so in groundwater (WHO). Pristine surface water is near the analytical limits.
    Anthropogenic sources
    Leaching from nickel or chromium plated taps and from stainless steel pipe, well casing and fittings, the primary source in drinking water (WHO); nickel plating and electroless nickel rinse waters, stainless steel pickling, nickel refining and smelting (Sudbury), batteries, nickel catalysts, and metal complex dyes in textile dyeing (ZDHC lists nickel among heavy metals from raw materials such as metal complex dyes); the ledger's mining, chemical and textile chapters carry the plant level figures.
    matrixtypical rangenote
    groundwater, Netherlands7.9 (urban) to 16.6 (rural) µg/Lregion-dependentaverages; up to 980 µg/L measured in groundwater below pH 6.2
    surface water, Rhine and Meusebelow 7 µg/Laverage dissolved nickel (RIWA 1994)
    drinking water, typicalbelow 25 µg/LUK medians 1.36 (England and Wales), 1.14 (Northern Ireland), 0.3 (Scotland) µg/L with 97.5th percentiles 4.63, 4.47 and 1.95 µg/L; Denmark and Finland below 1 µg/L
    drinking water, first draw from plated fittings and stainless wellsup to 490 (chromium plated tap, overnight); 8 to 395 mean, 1 to 5 mg/L in some cases (Arizona stainless steel wells) µg/Lstagnation time dependentlow values after flushing; new stainless steel pipe leaches below 6 µg/L and the leaching diminishes after a few weeks; concentrations may reach 5 mg/L where nickel is released from alloys (fact sheet)
    groundwater and tap water, polluted or nickel mobilised areas100 to 2,500 µg/LhistoricalSudbury and similar; fell after smelter emissions dropped in the 1970s

    3 · Speciation

    Across the pH of natural water nickel is the hexaaqua ion and its weak ion pairs; it is not hydrolysed at neutral pH, not adsorbed strongly, and passes conventional treatment as a dissolved cation. In alkali it precipitates as Ni(OH)₂, with the minimum solubility at high pH (about 10 to 11 in the textbook curves), so hydroxide precipitation runs higher than for copper or zinc and the effluent must be neutralised afterwards. Nickel sulfide is far less soluble and sulfide precipitation reaches lower residuals. The plating chemist's problem is complexation: ammonia, citrate, EDTA and the hypophosphite bath of electroless nickel hold Ni²⁺ in solution through the hydroxide window, so complexed rinses need breaking (oxidation, sulfide, or a chelating resin) before precipitation.

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    natural water, pH 5 to 9Ni(H₂O)₆²⁺ (Ni²⁺); minor NiSO₄, NiHCO₃⁺, NiCl⁺, NiOH⁺WHO background document
    plating rinse, acid, sulfate or chlorideNi²⁺ with sulfate and chloride ion pairs; boric acid presentWatts type baths; nickel at grams per litre in the drag-out
    electroless nickel and ammoniacal rinsesNi(NH₃)n²⁺, nickel citrate and other chelateshydroxide precipitation fails until the ligand is destroyed
    lime or caustic to pH 10 to 11Ni(OH)₂ (s)the treatment window; redissolves only slightly in strong alkali compared with zinc or chromium
    sulfidic, anoxicNiS (s)sulfide precipitation and sediment sink
    Solubility
    Ni(OH)₂ controls in alkaline treatment and NiS in sulfide treatment; both far below the salts. No solubility products quoted because the sources read print none.
    Hydrolysis
    Weak; NiOH⁺ is minor below pH 9 (WHO), so nickel salts are only faintly acidic in water.
    Complexation
    Minor with the natural ligands (OH⁻, SO₄²⁻, HCO₃⁻, Cl⁻, NH₃) in the pH 5 to 9 range (WHO); strong with ammonia, EDTA and citrate in process baths; organically bound in food. Humic substances improve coagulation removal (WHO).
    Precipitates
    Ni(OH)₂ (treatment), NiCO₃ and basic carbonates, NiS (sulfide treatment and sediments), nickel co-precipitated in Fe(OH)₃ and Al(OH)₃ flocs and in calcium carbonate softening sludge.
    NiX2++HX2ONiOHX++HX+\ce{Ni^2+ + H2O <=> NiOH^+ + H+}
    the only hydrolysis step that matters below pH 9, and it stays minor there (WHO background document), which is why nickel salts are only faintly acidic and why nickel travels as a free cation through conventional treatment; no constant is printed in the sources read
    NiX2++2OHXNi(OH)X2(s)\ce{Ni^2+ + 2 OH- -> Ni(OH)2 (s)}
    lime or sodium hydroxide; the CWW BREF lists chemical precipitation as hydroxide for heavy metals; minimum solubility near pH 10 to 11 (Metcalf and Eddy chapter 6 solubility curves, from the chapter, not re-read)
    NiX2++HSXNiS(s)+HX+\ce{Ni^2+ + HS^- -> NiS (s) + H+}
    sulfide precipitation (sodium sulfide, sodium hydrosulfide or organosulfide) at pH 8 to 9; lower residuals than hydroxide; the BREF lists sulfide precipitation among the chemical precipitation variants
    NiX2++6NHX3Ni(NHX3)X6X2+\ce{Ni^2+ + 6 NH3 <=> Ni(NH3)6^2+}
    ammoniacal rinses and electroless baths; the complex keeps nickel dissolved through the hydroxide window (Stumm and Morgan chapter 6, from the chapter, not re-read)
    NiX2++COX3X2NiCOX3(s)\ce{Ni^2+ + CO3^2- -> NiCO3 (s)}
    carbonate precipitation with soda ash, and the basic carbonates that form in lime softening sludge; Metcalf and Eddy chapter 6 on chemical precipitation, from the chapter, not re-read
    2RH+NiX2+RX2Ni+2HX+\ce{2 RH + Ni^2+ -> R2Ni + 2 H+}
    chelating ion exchange, R the iminodiacetate resin in the hydrogen form; it takes Ni^2+ against a large excess of calcium and magnesium, and acid regeneration runs the equation backwards and returns a concentrated nickel solution for recovery; WHO reports 83.5 to 90 percent on groundwater

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    leaching from taps, fittings and stainless steel
    passive release of Ni²⁺ from nickel and chromium plated surfaces and new stainless steel, highest after stagnation
    WHO: the most important control is product specification and certification of materials in contact with drinking water; flush plated taps after stagnation, particularly nickel sensitised people
    poor removal in conventional treatment
    dissolved cation, no redox step, weak adsorption
    WHO: coagulation, sedimentation and filtration achieve 35 to 80 percent depending on coagulant dose, pH and activated carbon age
    complexed nickel in plating effluent
    ammonia, citrate, EDTA and hypophosphite hold Ni²⁺ against hydroxide precipitation
    the reason electroless nickel rinses are segregated
    nickel in sludge
    all removed nickel ends in hydroxide or sulfide sludge
    ZDHC sludge threshold 20 mg/kg dry weight (textile)
    systemic contact dermatitis in sensitised people
    oral bolus of nickel
    WHO: the 70 µg/L value is protective by a margin of exposure of about 16
    as a reagent
    none
    nickel is not a water treatment reagent; nickel alloys and copper-nickel are materials of desalination tubing (element reactivity text) and nickel hydroxide is a treatment product, not an input

    5 · Removal and control

    hydroxide precipitation, settling and filtration (industrial effluent)
    lime or caustic to the Ni(OH)₂ minimum, flocculation, clarifier and sand or membrane filter, then neutralisation
    NiX2++2OHXNi(OH)X2(s)\ce{Ni^2+ + 2 OH- -> Ni(OH)2 (s)}
    pH 10 to 11; the CWW BAT-AEL of 5 to 50 µg/L is what good precipitation and solids separation reach
    Efficiency
    to the BAT-AEL of 5 to 50 µg/L in the chemical sector; to the US metal finishing limit of 2.38 mg/L monthly with simpler plants
    Interferences
    complexing agents; carry-over of fine hydroxide floc; co-precipitated zinc and chromium redissolving if the pH overshoots
    sulfide precipitation
    sodium sulfide or organosulfide precipitates NiS, less soluble than the hydroxide and less sensitive to complexing agents
    NiX2++HSXNiS(s)+HX+\ce{Ni^2+ + HS^- -> NiS (s) + H+}
    pH 8 to 9, sulfide dosed to a small excess; hydrogen sulfide control needed
    Efficiency
    lower residuals than hydroxide; no figure printed in the sources read
    Interferences
    excess sulfide in the effluent; colloidal NiS needs a coagulant
    chelating ion exchange (groundwater and rinse water)
    iminodiacetate or similar chelating resin binds Ni²⁺ selectively against calcium and magnesium; regenerated with acid, giving a concentrated nickel solution for recovery
    2RH+NiX2+RX2Ni+2HX+\ce{2 RH + Ni^2+ -> R2Ni + 2 H+}
    WHO: effective for groundwater; specialised resins
    Efficiency
    83.5 to 90 percent (WHO background document)
    Interferences
    complexed nickel; iron and manganese fouling
    coagulation, sedimentation and filtration (surface water)
    adsorption on and co-precipitation with hydroxide flocs; better with humic substances and high turbidity, higher pH and added powdered activated carbon in low solids water
    optimum pH about 8 on activated carbon; nickel otherwise poorly adsorbed on activated carbon (WHO)
    Efficiency
    35 to 80 percent (WHO background document)
    Interferences
    low turbidity, low pH
    source control
    certification of materials in contact with drinking water; flushing plated taps
    WHO: the most important means of control

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    ICP-MSEPA 200.8 (mass 60); ISO 17294-2; Standard Methods 3125EPA 200.8 instrument detection limit 0.2 µg/L scanning, 0.07 µg/L selected ion monitoring; WHO 0.5 to 5 µg/L across ICP-MS, ICP-AES and GFAAS
    ICP-OESEPA 200.7; ISO 11885; Standard Methods 3120about 10 µg/L (WHO background document, ISO 1996)
    flame and graphite furnace AASStandard Methods 3111; ISO 15586 (furnace); the ISO 1986 flame method cited by WHOflame 0.1 mg/L (fact sheet), range 0.1 to 10 mg/L (background document)
    Sampling pitfalls
    The sample defines the answer: first draw after overnight stagnation from a chromium plated tap can be a hundred times the flushed value (WHO: up to 490 µg/L against low values after flushing). State the stagnation time. Acidify to pH below 2; nickel is stable in solution, so the usual loss is adsorption on unacidified container walls. Bottled water surveys used detection limits of 1.9 to 25 µg/L, which decides what 'not detected' means.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ 4th ed. with addenda (2022)0.07 mg/L70 µg/L retained in 2021 although the TDI of 13 µg/kg body weight (20 percent allocation, 60 kg, 2 L/day) supports 80 µg/L; based on achievability, measurability and toxicology; reproductive toxicity (post-implantation loss in rats) the critical end point; also protective of systemic contact dermatitis; assessment 2021
    EU DWD 2020/218420 µg/LAnnex I Part B
    US EPAnot regulated nickel is not in the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations table read this session and has no secondary standard
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902), nickel, direct discharge to a receiving water5.0 to 50 µg/Lyearly average; applies if the emission exceeds 5.0 kg/yr; lower end where few nickel compounds are used or produced (footnote c); may not apply to inorganic effluents whose main load is from production of inorganic heavy metal compounds (footnote d)
    EU EQS (Directive 2013/39/EU), nickel and its compounds, priority substance 234 annual average (bioavailable); 34 maximum allowable µg/Linland surface waters; other surface waters 8.6 annual average and 34 maximum; the annual average refers to bioavailable concentrations
    US EPA 40 CFR 433.14, metal finishing (BAT), nickel (total)3.98 daily maximum; 2.38 monthly average mg/Lwith cadmium 0.69 and 0.26, copper 3.38 and 2.07, silver 0.43 and 0.24 mg/L
    Abu Dhabi ADS 23/2017, discharge to the marine environment (EAD)0.1 mg/L
    region-dependent; marine discharge only
    Table 1 maximum allowable concentration at the point of discharge
    Abu Dhabi DoE Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022, discharge to sewer10 mg/L
    region-dependent; sewer discharge, not receiving water
    Table A₄ Metals
    industry thresholds
    sectorbodylimitnote
    textile and leatherZDHC Wastewater Guidelines v₂.1 (2022), Table 20.2 foundational; 0.1 progressive; 0.05 aspirational mg/Ltextile and leather alike; methods ISO 17294, EPA 200.8, 6010C, 6020A; sludge total nickel threshold 20 mg/kg dry weight, textile only (Table 4A)

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Food dominates intake; water matters where it is polluted, where natural nickel is mobilised or where plated taps and stainless steel leach (WHO). TDI 13 µg/kg body weight from a BMDL₁₀ of 1.3 mg/kg per day for post-implantation loss in a two generation rat study with an uncertainty factor of 100. Inhaled nickel compounds are carcinogenic (IARC Group 1) and metallic nickel possibly so (2B), but there is no evidence of carcinogenicity by the oral route. Oral nickel can elicit systemic contact dermatitis in sensitised people; the acute LOAEL is 4.3 µg/kg, against which a glass of water at 80 µg/L gives a margin of exposure of about 16 (WHO fact sheet).
    Bioaccumulation
    Not addressed as a concern in the sources read; nickel in food is organically complexed and nickel does not biomagnify in the way mercury does.
    Ecotoxicity
    US EPA aquatic life criteria (1995, hardness 100 mg/L as CaCO₃): freshwater 470 µg/L acute and 52 µg/L chronic, saltwater 74 and 8.2 µg/L; the EU annual average EQS of 4 µg/L bioavailable is the tighter working ceiling in Europe.

    Flags

    • The Ni(OH)₂ minimum solubility pH and the ammine complex are cited to Metcalf and Eddy chapter 6 and Stumm and Morgan chapter 6 from memory of the text, not re-read this session.
    • The precipitation equations are written here; the CWW BREF names hydroxide and sulfide precipitation without printing them.
    • No seawater or municipal wastewater nickel concentration was read; the 2021 WHO background document read was the May 2021 public review draft, not the final WHO/HEP/ECH/WSH/2021.6 (iris.who.int returned 403).
    • Plating rinse and pickling effluent concentrations were not read; only the limits are quoted.
    • EU law was read on legislation.gov.uk mirrors because eur-lex did not respond; the eur-lex urls are kept for consistency.
    • Abu Dhabi values cover two media (marine 0.1 mg/L, sewer 10 mg/L); other GCC states not read.
    • Standard Methods and ISO method numbers other than those in the sources read (EPA 200.8, ISO 17294-2 and the methods the WHO documents cite) are quoted from memory and were not confirmed this session.

    Gaps

    • No seawater, municipal wastewater or raw plating effluent nickel concentration was read.
    • No solubility products or complex stability constants are quoted; the textbooks were not re-read.
    • Reverse osmosis and lime softening for nickel are not covered because no read source gives figures for them.
    • The EU textiles BAT conclusions (2022/2508) were not read for a nickel BAT-AEL.
    • EU law was read on legislation.gov.uk mirrors; the final 2021 WHO background document was not reachable.
    • Other GCC discharge standards (Saudi, Oman, Qatar) were not read.
    • The chelating resin equation is written in the resin convention from the mechanism WHO describes; the document names the resin type without a stoichiometry.
    • The nickel carbonate equation is cited to Metcalf and Eddy chapter 6, from the chapter, not re-read.

    Sources

    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), chapter 12 chemical fact sheet, Nickel (pp. 436 to 437)
    WHO, Nickel in drinking-water, background document for development of WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality, draft for public review (May 2021), sections 2.1 and 7.1 to 7.3
    Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast), Annex I Part B (read on the legislation.gov.uk mirror of the directive)
    US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (table of MCLs and treatment techniques)
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 12 Table 3 and footnotes c, d and g (read on the legislation.gov.uk mirror)
    Best Available Techniques Reference Document for Common Waste Water and Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical Sector (CWW BREF 2016), chapter 3 (chemical precipitation with hydroxide and sulfide, ion exchange)
    Directive 2013/39/EU amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances, Annex I Part A (read as the legislation.gov.uk PDF of the adopted directive)
    40 CFR 433.14, Effluent limitations (BAT), metal finishing point source category
    Abu Dhabi Specification ADS 23/2017, Environmental Specifications for Land-Based Liquid Discharges to the Marine Environment (Environment Agency Abu Dhabi), Table 1
    Abu Dhabi Department of Energy, Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022 (DoE/PD/R01/005, effective 1 January 2022), Appendix Table A4 Metals
    ZDHC Wastewater Guidelines Version 2.1 (November 2022), Table 2 heavy metals and Table 4A sludge
    US EPA Method 200.8, Revision 5.4 (1994), Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by ICP-MS, sections 1.7 and 7.1, Table 1 (instrument detection limits)
    US EPA, National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, Aquatic Life Criteria Table
    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (online edition), 3111 (flame AAS), 3120 (ICP-OES), 3125 (ICP-MS)
    Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J., Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 1996), chapter 6 (metal ions in aqueous solution: hydrolysis and complexation) and chapter 7 (precipitation and dissolution)
    Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill, 2014), chapter 6 (chemical precipitation of heavy metals; hydroxide and sulfide solubility versus pH)
    The Element Book, nickel entry (data/reference/text/Ni.json reactivity), copper-nickel alloys in desalination tubing

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.