Uranium

    no group (f-block) · period 7 · f-block · actinide

    fullUranium is regulated in drinking water as a chemical nephrotoxin at 30 µg/L by WHO (provisional), the EU (from 12 January 2026) and the US, and as a radionuclide at 10 Bq/L for uranium-238; in oxic water it is the uranyl carbonate anion, which is why anion exchange, ferric coagulation at the right pH, lime softening and reverse osmosis all remove it and why mine and mill waters carry it.

    Typical wastewaters

    • uranium mine drainage and mill effluent uranyl carbonate anions UO₂(CO₃)₂²⁻ and UO₂(CO₃)₃⁴⁻ in oxic water, limited in the US at 2 mg/L monthly and 4 mg/L daily limits, not measured concentrations; raw tailings pore water is in the ledger's mining chapter
    • uranium mill tailings uranyl carbonate complexes leaching from the tailings; named by WHO among the anthropogenic sources of uranium in drinking water no concentration read
    • phosphate fertiliser manufacture and use uranium carried in phosphate fertilisers, named by WHO; phosphogypsum and phosphoric acid figures are in the ledger's fertiliser chapter no concentration read
    • drinking water treatment residuals (spent anion exchange brine, coagulation and softening sludge, reverse osmosis concentrate) uranyl carbonate concentrated in the sodium chloride regenerant brine, about 80,000 pCi/L from a 40 µg/L feed over 30,000 bed volumes; 800 pCi/g in dry ferric hydroxide at 50 percent removal and 135 pCi/g in calcium carbonate sludge at 90 percent removal every effective process concentrates uranium and its daughters

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    U, 92
    Oxidation states in water
    +6 as the uranyl ion UO₂²⁺ and, at natural pH, its carbonate complexes UO₂CO₃, UO₂(CO₃)₂²⁻, UO₂(CO₃)₃⁴⁻ and the calcium uranyl carbonates Ca₂UO₂(CO₃)₃ and CaUO₂(CO₃)₃²⁻, the mobile form of oxic water; +4 as insoluble UO₂ and U(OH)₄ in reducing water and sediments, the immobile form; +5 and +3 are transient. Natural uranium is 99.27 percent uranium-238 with 0.72 percent uranium-235 and 0.0054 percent uranium-234 (WHO background document); 1 µg of natural uranium is 0.67 pCi (Clifford).
    Note
    The element entry covers the metal, the oxides, yellowcake and the fluorides. This chapter is about the uranyl carbonate anion in groundwater and how to take it out.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Leaching from granites and other uranium bearing deposits; drinking water uranium is most commonly natural (WHO). It is mobile in oxic, bicarbonate rich groundwater as the uranyl carbonate anions and immobile in reducing aquifers, so small supplies on crystalline bedrock (Finland, Norway, Canada, New Mexico, central Australia) are the classic problem wells.
    Anthropogenic sources
    Release in mill tailings, emissions from the nuclear industry, combustion of coal and other fuels, and phosphate fertilisers that contain uranium (WHO); uranium mine drainage and mill effluents, regulated in the US at 2 mg/L monthly; in situ leach operations; phosphogypsum and phosphoric acid in the ledger's fertiliser chapter.
    matrixtypical rangenote
    drinking watergenerally below 1 µg/Lconcentrations as high as 700 µg/L have been measured in private supplies (WHO fact sheet, Canada); Ontario treated water mean 0.40 µg/L (range 0.05 to 4.21, 130 sites, 1990 to 1995); New York City 0.03 to 0.08 µg/L
    groundwater derived drinking water, USA2.55 mean µg/Lregion-dependent978 sites in the 1980s; concentrations above 20 µg/L in parts of New Mexico
    drilled well water on crystalline bedrockmedian 28 (Finland study population); 18 percent above 20 (476 Norwegian samples) µg/Lregion-dependentFinnish drilled wells carry calcium uranyl carbonate species; a Norwegian granite well in 2025 reached 13 µg/L (0.16 Bq/L)
    mineral water9.20 mean µg/Lsingle studyagainst 0.98 µg/L (0.26 to 1.65) in nine other beverages (Cheng, Lin and Hao 1993 via WHO)
    uranium mine drainage and mill effluenttreated to 2 (monthly) and 4 (daily) mg/L
    limits, not measured concentrations
    US BPT limits for uranium, radium and vanadium ore mines; raw tailings pore water is in the ledger's mining chapter

    3 · Speciation

    Below pH 5 uranium(VI) is the uranyl cation UO₂²⁺; between pH 5 and 6.5 the neutral UO₂CO₃ dominates, between 6.5 and 7.6 the divalent anion UO₂(CO₃)₂²⁻, and above 7.6 the tetravalent anion UO₂(CO₃)₃⁴⁻ (Clifford, at 10⁻2 atm CO₂, 2.38 mg/L uranium, 25 C). In calcium rich water the neutral Ca₂UO₂(CO₃)₃ and the anion CaUO₂(CO₃)₃²⁻ take over, which lowers both toxicity to cells and the affinity for anion resin (WHO background document). Under reducing conditions U(VI) is reduced to U(IV), which hydrolyses to black oxyhydroxide precipitates (element entry) and stays in the sediment.

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    oxic, pH below 5UO₂²⁺ (divalent cation)cation exchange and sorption on oxides work here
    oxic, pH 5 to 6.5UO₂CO₃ (neutral)coagulation with iron or aluminium is best near pH 6 (WHO, Clifford)
    oxic, pH 6.5 to 7.6UO₂(CO₃)₂²⁻ (divalent anion)
    oxic, pH above 7.6UO₂(CO₃)₃⁴⁻ (tetravalent anion); Ca₂UO₂(CO₃)₃ and CaUO₂(CO₃)₃²⁻ in hard waterthe anion exchange window; above pH 10.5 positively charged uranyl hydroxide complexes dominate (Clifford), the lime softening window
    reducing groundwater and sedimentsUO₂ (s), U(OH)₄immobile; the basis of roll front ore bodies and of the natural attenuation that fails when oxic water arrives
    Solubility
    Uranyl salts (nitrate, chloride, ethanoate) are freely soluble; UO₂ and the metal are insoluble (WHO background document Table). Uranium(VI) is limited in natural water not by a solid but by sorption; U(IV) oxide keeps dissolved uranium very low in reducing water.
    Hydrolysis
    UO₂²⁺ hydrolyses to UO₂OH⁺ and polymeric hydroxo species above about pH 5, but in real water carbonate complexation outcompetes hydrolysis until pH 10.5 (Clifford); U(IV) hydrolyses near neutral pH to black oxyhydroxide precipitates (element entry).
    Complexation
    Carbonate is the master ligand; calcium and magnesium form ternary uranyl carbonates; phosphate, sulfate and fluoride complexes matter in acid mine and mill water; uranyl binds phosphate, carboxyl and hydroxyl groups of proteins (WHO background document). Constants not printed in the sources read.
    Precipitates
    UO₂ (uraninite) and U(OH)₄ on reduction; uranyl hydroxide and calcium uranate in lime softening sludge; uranyl phosphates (autunite family) where phosphate is dosed; uranium co-precipitated on Fe(OH)₃ in coagulation; yellowcake U₃O₈ and ammonium diuranate in the mill (element entry).
    UOX2X2++COX3X2UOX2COX3\ce{UO2^2+ + CO3^2- -> UO2CO3}
    pH 5 to 6.5, neutral complex dominant
    UOX2X2++2COX3X2UOX2(COX3)X2X2\ce{UO2^2+ + 2 CO3^2- -> UO2(CO3)2^2-}
    pH 6.5 to 7.6
    UOX2X2++3COX3X2UOX2(COX3)X3X4\ce{UO2^2+ + 3 CO3^2- -> UO2(CO3)3^4-}
    pH above 7.6; the species that anion resin takes
    2CaX2++UOX2X2++3COX3X2CaX2UOX2(COX3)X3\ce{2 Ca^2+ + UO2^2+ + 3 CO3^2- -> Ca2UO2(CO3)3}
    hard, bicarbonate groundwater (Finnish drilled wells); neutral, low cell toxicity, and not exchangeable on anion resin
    4RCl+UOX2(COX3)X3X4RX4UOX2(COX3)X3+4ClX\ce{4 RCl + UO2(CO3)3^4- -> R4UO2(CO3)3 + 4 Cl^-}
    strong base anion exchange, chloride form, pH about 8; regenerated with 2 to 4 M NaCl after 10,000 to 50,000 bed volumes (Clifford)
    UOX2X2++2HX2OUOX2(OH)X2(s)+2HX+\ce{UO2^2+ + 2 H2O -> UO2(OH)2 (s) + 2 H+}
    hydrolysis and precipitation in carbonate free water or at the high pH of lime softening; general chemistry from Stumm and Morgan chapter 6, not re-read
    UOX2X2++2eXUOX2(s)\ce{UO2^2+ + 2 e- -> UO2 (s)}
    the reduction that immobilises uranium: uraninite is the sink of reducing groundwater, of roll front ore bodies and of any anoxic barrier or bioreduction zone; the couple runs the other way as soon as oxic water arrives, which is how a stable ore body becomes a plume. No potential is quoted, the sources read print none
    UX4++4HX2OU(OH)X4(s)+4HX+\ce{U^4+ + 4 H2O -> U(OH)4 (s) + 4 H+}
    hydrolysis of the reduced ion near neutral pH to the black oxyhydroxide the element entry describes; U(IV) has no carbonate escape route at treatment pH, which is why reduced uranium stays in the sediment
    CaX2++UOX2(COX3)X3X4CaUOX2(COX3)X3X2\ce{Ca^2+ + UO2(CO3)3^4- -> CaUO2(CO3)3^2-}
    the first calcium ternary complex; it halves the charge the resin sees, and the second calcium takes it to the neutral Ca2UO2(CO3)3, which does not exchange at all. This is why the same resin and the same pH give a short run on hard Finnish groundwater and a long one on soft water
    CaX2++2UOX2X2++2POX4X3Ca(UOX2)X2(POX4)X2(s)\ce{Ca^2+ + 2 UO2^2+ + 2 PO4^3- -> Ca(UO2)2(PO4)2 (s)}
    autunite, the uranyl phosphate that forms where phosphate is present or dosed; the reason phosphate amendment is used to fix uranium in place rather than to remove it from water, and the reason phosphogypsum and fertiliser streams carry uranium
    2RCl+UOX2(COX3)X2X2RX2UOX2(COX3)X2+2ClX\ce{2 RCl + UO2(CO3)2^2- -> R2UO2(CO3)2 + 2 Cl^-}
    the divalent uranyl dicarbonate exchanges as well as the tetravalent anion, which is why anion exchange still works at pH 6.5 to 7.6 and not only above pH 7.6; R is the strong base resin site in the chloride form

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    nephrotoxicity from small groundwater supplies
    uranyl carbonate is mobile in oxic bicarbonate groundwater and reaches hundreds of µg/L in drilled wells
    WHO: where supplies exceed 30 µg/L, precipitate action should be avoided and alternative sources considered first
    radioactive residuals
    every effective process concentrates uranium and its daughters in brine or sludge
    40 µg/L feed and a 30,000 bed volume run leave about 80,000 pCi/L in the spent anion exchange brine; 50 percent removal of 40 µg/L by ferric coagulation gives 800 pCi/g in the dry Fe(OH)₃; 90 percent by lime softening gives 135 pCi/g in the CaCO₃ (Clifford)
    RX4UOX2(COX3)X3+4ClX4RCl+UOX2(COX3)X3X4\ce{R4UO2(CO3)3 + 4 Cl^- -> 4 RCl + UO2(CO3)3^4-}
    regeneration with 2 to 4 M sodium chloride; the uranium concentrated over a run of 10,000 to 50,000 bed volumes comes off in the regenerant, which is why the brine and not the product water is the disposal problem
    calcium uranyl carbonate
    the neutral Ca₂UO₂(CO₃)₃ complex does not exchange
    hard water lowers anion exchange capacity for uranium (WHO background document on the Finnish speciation)
    activated carbon desorption
    GAC reduces uranium to 1 µg/L only briefly and then releases it above the influent
    WHO background document after Sorg 1988
    radiological versus chemical
    30 µg/L natural uranium is about 20 pCi/L (0.74 Bq/L), below the 10 Bq/L WHO guidance level for uranium-238, so chemistry governs the limit
    WHO: only chemical aspects addressed in the fact sheet; radiological in chapter 9
    as a reagent
    none in water treatment
    uranium is never dosed
    the fuel cycle uses uranyl nitrate and the fluorides (element entry)

    5 · Removal and control

    strong base anion exchange
    UO₂(CO₃)₃⁴⁻ and UO₂(CO₃)₂²⁻ exchange for chloride on type 1 macroporous resin; very high selectivity from the high negative charge
    4RCl+UOX2(COX3)X3X4RX4UOX2(COX3)X3+4ClX\ce{4 RCl + UO2(CO3)3^4- -> R4UO2(CO3)3 + 4 Cl^-}
    pH 6 to 8.2 effective, best about pH 8; 8000 to 20,000 bed volumes at 200 to 300 µg/L before 15 µg/L breakthrough in pilot tests (WHO); 10,000 to 50,000 bed volumes then 2 to 4 M NaCl regeneration (Clifford); calculated capacity 55 mg/mL resin; US BAT
    Efficiency
    99 percent; 90 to 100 percent (WHO); above 95 percent (Clifford)
    Interferences
    sulfate and chloride shorten runs; calcium uranyl carbonate does not exchange; brine is radioactive
    coagulation and filtration with iron or aluminium salts
    sorption and co-precipitation on Fe(OH)₃ or Al(OH)₃ flocs
    Fe(OH)X3(s)+UOX2X2+FeO(OH)X2UOX2X++HX+\ce{Fe(OH)3 (s) + UO2^2+ -> FeO(OH)2UO2^+ + H+}
    ferric sulfate 3 to 7 mg/L iron at pH 6 or 10 removes 70 to 90 percent, but below 30 percent at pH 4 and 8; alum 1.5 to 4 mg/L about 95 percent at pH 10, 50 to 85 percent at pH 6, below 40 percent at pH 4 and 8 (Sorg 1988 via WHO); a full scale lake water plant with 6 mg/L aluminium at pH 6 removed 87 percent by coagulation and 92 percent after filtration from 0.12 µg/L; US BAT (enhanced coagulation and filtration). Written as a surface complexation of the uranyl ion on the hydroxide, which is why removal peaks near pH 6, where the neutral and cationic uranyl species meet a sorbing surface, and collapses at pH 8, where carbonate complexation wins
    Efficiency
    80 to 89 percent (Lowry and Lowry); above 95 percent at pH 10 (Aieta); 50 to 90 percent near pH 6 and 10 (Clifford)
    Interferences
    pH 4 and 8 are the poor windows; sludge carries uranium at hundreds of pCi/g
    lime softening
    uranium precipitates and co-precipitates with calcium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide at high pH
    UOX2X2++2HX2OUOX2(OH)X2(s)+2HX+\ce{UO2^2+ + 2 H2O -> UO2(OH)2 (s) + 2 H+}
    50 to 250 mg/L lime gave 85 to 90 percent (WHO); higher pH gives greater removal and magnesium helps above pH 10.6 (Clifford); US BAT
    Efficiency
    85 to 99 percent
    Interferences
    needs the high pH; sludge holds 135 pCi/g for 90 percent removal of 40 µg/L
    reverse osmosis
    rejection of the multivalent anion
    four membranes achieved more than 99 percent from 300 µg/L groundwater (WHO after Sorg 1988); point of use RO for households; US BAT
    Efficiency
    above 99 percent; 90 to 99 percent (Lowry and Lowry)
    Interferences
    concentrate disposal; effective but expensive (Clifford)
    activated alumina
    sorption of the uranyl carbonate anions
    bench columns took 273 to 432 µg/L to about 1 µg/L for up to 2000 bed volumes (WHO)
    Efficiency
    90 percent (Lowry and Lowry)
    Interferences
    short runs compared with anion resin
    radionuclide overview
    WHO Table 9.4 ratings for uranium
    coagulation above 70 percent, sand filtration 0 to 10, activated carbon 10 to 40, precipitation softening above 70, ion exchange above 70, reverse osmosis above 70 percent
    Efficiency
    as listed

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    ICP-MSEPA 200.8; ISO 17294-2 (including uranium isotopes)0.01 µg/L (WHO fact sheet); 0.1 µg/L (WHO background document, Boomer and Powell 1987); EPA 200.8 Table 7 MDL 0.1 µg/L scanning modemass 238; the compliance method for the µg/L limits; isotope ratios by high resolution or collision cell ICP-MS
    solid fluorimetry (laser or UV excitation), kinetic phosphorescenceEPA 908.0 (fluorometric)0.1 µg/L (WHO fact sheet)the older radionuclide rule method
    ICP-AES with chelating resin preconcentration0.2 µg/L (WHO)
    alpha spectrometryISO methods listed in WHO Annex 6Euratom performance characteristic 0.02 Bq/L for uranium-238 and uranium-234recovery often variable because of the low specific activity of natural uranium (WHO); needed when the 234 to 238 activity ratio matters
    Sampling pitfalls
    Acidify with nitric acid to pH below 2 after filtration if dissolved uranium is wanted; unfiltered acidified samples give total uranium including particulate U(IV). Anoxic samples oxidise and release sorbed uranium on standing. Report both µg/L and Bq/L when the radiological guidance levels are in play; the conversion depends on the isotope ratio and is 0.67 pCi/µg only for natural abundance.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ 4th ed. with addenda (2022)30 µg/Lprovisional because of scientific uncertainties on uranium toxicity; TDI 60 µg/day from the lower 95 percent confidence limit of the 95th percentile exposure in a Finnish population, uncertainty factor 10; 2 L/day; chemical toxicity only, nephritis the end point; assessment 2003, revised 2011
    WHO GDWQ chapter 9, uranium-238 and uranium-23410 (uranium-238); 1 (uranium-234) Bq/Lguidance levels for 0.1 mSv/year; uranium-235 and uranium-236 1 Bq/L (Annex 6)
    EU DWD 2020/218430 µg/LAnnex I Part B; new parameter to be complied with by 12 January 2026 (Article 11); uncertainty of measurement 30 percent (Annex III)
    EU Directive 2013/51/Euratom3.0 (uranium-238); 2.8 (uranium-234) Bq/LAnnex III derived concentrations for the 0.1 mSv indicative dose; gross alpha screening 0.1 Bq/L
    US EPA NPDWR30 µg/LMCL since 8 December 2003, MCLG zero; gross alpha MCL 15 pCi/L excludes uranium and radon
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    US EPA 40 CFR 440.32, uranium, radium and vanadium ore mine drainage (BPT)4 daily maximum; 2 30-day average mg/Lwith dissolved radium-226 10 and 3 pCi/L, total radium-226 30 and 10 pCi/L, COD 200 and 100 mg/L, zinc 1.0 and 0.5, TSS 30 and 20, pH 6 to 9; mills and in situ leach operations have the radium and TSS limits with arsenic 1.0 and 0.5 mg/L and ammonia 100 mg/L but no uranium value
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902)not set uranium is not among the BAT 12 parameters
    Abu Dhabi ADS 23/2017 (marine outfall) and DoE Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022 (sewer)not set
    region-dependent; other GCC states not read
    uranium is not a listed parameter; the DoE regulation prohibits radioactive waste to sewer under Federal Law No. 1 of 2002
    industry thresholds
    sectorbodylimitnote
    textileZDHC Wastewater Guidelines v₂.1 (2022)not set uranium is not a ZDHC parameter

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Nephritis is the primary chemically induced effect in humans; epidemiological studies of exposed populations show correlations with urinary alkaline phosphatase and beta microglobulin and modest proximal tubular changes, within the normal range and not consistent; no clear evidence of effects below 30 µg/L; carcinogenicity data insufficient (WHO). Gastrointestinal absorption is 1 to 2 percent; the uranyl ion replaces calcium in bone (WHO background document).
    Bioaccumulation
    Uranium accumulates in the skeleton and kidney; highest food concentrations in shellfish (WHO background document); not a food chain biomagnifier.
    Ecotoxicity
    Not addressed in the sources read; no US EPA aquatic life criterion or EU EQS exists for uranium.

    Flags

    • Occurrence figures are national surveys of the 1980s to 2000s compiled by WHO; the 700 µg/L maximum is one Canadian private supply.
    • The speciation pH boundaries are Clifford's for one CO₂ pressure and uranium concentration; they shift with alkalinity and calcium.
    • The uranyl hydroxide precipitation equation and the hydrolysis statement are cited to Stumm and Morgan from memory of the text, not re-read.
    • The removal percentages come from three reviews and one bench study quoted by WHO (Aieta 1987, Lowry and Lowry 1988, Sorg 1988) and from Clifford's slides; they disagree at the margins and are all quoted.
    • The residual activities (80,000 pCi/L brine, 800 pCi/g, 135 pCi/g) are Clifford's worked examples for a 40 µg/L feed, not plant data.
    • The 30 µg/L to 20 pCi/L conversion uses Clifford's 0.67 pCi per µg for natural abundance.
    • The GCC tables list no uranium; other GCC states not read.

    Gaps

    • No source read gives uranium in seawater, surface water as a survey, municipal wastewater or measured mill effluent; the ledger's mining and fertiliser chapters hold the tailings and phosphogypsum figures.
    • In situ leach restoration, bioreduction and zero valent iron barriers for uranium plumes were not sourced.
    • EPA 908.0 and alpha spectrometry detection limits in the drinking water methods were not read; the Euratom performance characteristic stands in.
    • Aquatic toxicity of uranium was not sourced.
    • Other GCC discharge standards (Saudi, Oman, Qatar) were not read.
    • Stability constants of the uranyl carbonate and calcium uranyl carbonate complexes, the U(VI) to U(IV) reduction potential and the surface complexation constants on ferric hydroxide are not printed in the sources read; the reduction, hydrolysis and sorption equations are written from Stumm and Morgan chapters 6, 8 and 9 and the book's own uranium entry, from the chapter, not re-read.
    • No equation is written for calcium uranate in lime softening sludge: the sources name the solid without a composition that can be balanced with confidence.

    Sources

    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), chapter 12 chemical fact sheet, Uranium (pp. 478 to 480)
    WHO, Uranium in Drinking-water, background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/118/Rev/1 (2012), sections 1, 2.2, 6.1 and 6.2
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first addendum, chapter 9 Radiological aspects (sections 9.2 to 9.7, Tables 9.2 and 9.4, Box 9.5)
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), Annex 6 Supporting information on radionuclides, Table A6.1 guidance levels
    Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast), Article 11, Annex I Part B, Annex II Part D and Annex III
    Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom laying down requirements for the protection of the health of the general public with regard to radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption, Annex I (parametric values and notes) and Annex III (screening, derived concentrations, performance characteristics)
    US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (table of MCLs and MCLGs, inorganic chemicals and radionuclides)
    Clifford, D., Fundamentals of Radium and Uranium Removal from Drinking Water Supplies, US EPA radionuclides treatment workshop slides (University of Houston)
    US EPA, Radionuclides in Drinking Water: A Small Entity Compliance Guide, EPA 815-R-02-001 (February 2002), sections 2 to 6
    40 CFR 440.32, Effluent limitations (BPT), uranium, radium and vanadium ores subcategory, ore mining and dressing point source category
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 12 Tables 1 and 2
    Abu Dhabi Department of Energy, Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022 (DoE/PD/R01/005, effective 1 January 2022), Appendix Tables A2 and A4
    ZDHC Wastewater Guidelines Version 2.1 (November 2022), Table 2 heavy metals and Table 4 sludge parameters
    US EPA Method 200.8, Revision 5.4 (1994), Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by ICP-MS, Table 7 (method detection limits)
    ISO 17294-2:2023, Water quality. Application of ICP-MS. Part 2: Determination of selected elements including uranium isotopes
    Aarsand, A. S., Popic, J. M. and Teien, H.-C., Analysis of short-term temporal variations of 222Rn, other naturally occurring radionuclides, stable elements and environmental parameters in groundwater and surface drinking water in Norway, Frontiers in Public Health (2025), doi 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1620899
    Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J., Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 1996), chapter 6 (metal ions in aqueous solution, hydrolysis and complex formation) and chapter 7 (precipitation and dissolution, solubility products)
    The Element Book, element entry and reference text for U (data/elements/U.json, data/reference/text/U.json)

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.