Americium

    no group (f-block) · period 7 · f-block · actinide

    fullAmericium is not relevant to ordinary water treatment: americium-241 reaches water only from fallout (by decay of plutonium-241) and from reprocessing and waste streams, and where it does it behaves like a heavy trivalent lanthanide, Am³⁺ in acid, carbonate complexes at neutral to alkaline pH, hydroxide and hydroxycarbonate solids and Kd values of 1,000 to above 100,000 mL/g that make it one of the most immobile actinides; the WHO guidance level is 1 Bq/L, the Euratom derived concentration 0.7 Bq/L, and gross alpha screening catches it.

    Typical wastewaters

    • nuclear fuel reprocessing and radioactive waste streams Am³⁺ in acid, AmCO₃⁺ and Am(CO₃)₂⁻ at neutral to alkaline pH, humate bound in organic rich water; americium-241 grows in from plutonium-241 measured values are in the Sellafield, La Hague, Hanford and Rocky Flats entries below
    • drinking water treatment residuals (floc, resin, reverse osmosis concentrate) Am(III) sorbed and co-precipitated on iron or aluminium hydroxide floc, on cation resin and in the RO concentrate coagulation, ion exchange and reverse osmosis all concentrate it into a transuranic waste
    • spent fuel reprocessing liquid effluent to sea (Sellafield, Irish Sea) Am-241 in treated effluent discharged by pipeline, part of the total alpha 0.01 TBq in each of 2020 to 2022 (0.02 TBq in 2018 and 2019) against a permit limit of 0.14 TBq per year; the marine critical group dose, 72 µSv in 2022, is dominated by plutonium alpha and Am-241 from historic discharges
    • spent fuel reprocessing liquid effluent to sea (La Hague, English Channel; OSPAR reporting) Am-241 within the reported total alpha; OSPAR states total alpha from nuclear sites is mainly Pu-239, Pu-240 and Am-241 (OSPAR 2010) 2023, TBq per year: La Hague Am-241 0.00343 with total alpha 0.0322; Sellafield, reported under decommissioning in 2023, Am-241 0.00909 with total alpha 0.0648
    • legacy site groundwater (Hanford 200 West, well 299-W₁₅-8 beside the 216-Z-9 trench) Am-241 in unfiltered groundwater beneath a trench that received acidic, organic rich plutonium processing waste 0.14 pCi/L on 7 May 1990 and 5.9 pCi/L on 13 November 1991, with Pu-239/240 8.3 and 1.9 pCi/L; americium detected to 36.7 m below the trench in sediment
    • storm runoff and pond discharge from contaminated soil (Rocky Flats 903 Pad) Am-241 with Pu-239/240, 40 to 90 percent in particles above 0.45 µm and 10 to 60 percent colloidal spring and summer samples 1998 to 2000; colloid bound actinides remobilised by humic and fulvic acids during erosion

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Am, 95
    Oxidation states in water
    +3 in every environmental system, as Am³⁺ and its carbonate, hydroxo, sulfate and fluoride complexes; +4, +5 and +6 are strong oxidants stable only where nothing oxidisable is present (EPA Kd volume III). Americium-241 (half life 432.2 years, alpha with a 60 keV gamma) and americium-243 (7,370 years) are the isotopes in waste.
    Note
    The element entry covers the smoke detector source and the halides. This chapter is about Am³⁺ as a lanthanide look alike in groundwater.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    None; the traces in uranium minerals (element entry) are below any water relevance.
    Anthropogenic sources
    Decay of plutonium-241 in nuclear fallout and in waste streams from fuel reprocessing; americium-241 and -243 in radioactive wastes (EPA Kd volume III). Smoke detector sources are sealed and are not a water discharge. No measured concentration in any water was read.

    3 · Speciation

    In oxidising river water the free ion Am³⁺ dominates from moderately to highly acid pH; at near neutral to alkaline pH the carbonate complexes AmCO₃⁺ and Am(CO₃)₂⁻ take over, Am(CO₃)₃³⁻ growing with dissolved carbonate, and at highly alkaline pH Am(OH)₃ (aq) may exceed the carbonates (EPA Kd volume III, Figure 5.1 at 10⁻12 mol/L). Dissolved americium is capped by Am(OH)₃, AmOHCO₃ and Am₂(CO₃)₃, with AmOHCO₃ the likely control as pH and carbonate rise. Am(III) sorbs readily to minerals, crushed rock and soil, peaking between pH 5 and 6 on single minerals, with soil Kd from 4 mL/g (the screening minimum, pH 7.8) to 225,000 mL/g and typical values of 1,000 to above 100,000 mL/g, though some high values reflect precipitation rather than sorption; it is more mobile at low to moderate pH, where mineral surfaces are positively charged, and in high ionic strength water, and it forms strong complexes with humic substances (EPA Kd volume III).

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    acid water, pH below about 6Am³⁺, AmSO₄⁺, AmF²⁺the most mobile case; sorption still peaks at pH 5 to 6
    neutral to alkaline, carbonate bearingAmCO₃⁺, Am(CO₃)₂⁻, Am(CO₃)₃³⁻cationic and anionic carbonate complexes; AmOHCO₃ (s) as the solubility control
    highly alkalineAm(OH)₃ (aq)may exceed the carbonate species
    organic rich waterAm(III) humatestrong complexes (Moulin 1992 via EPA)
    Solubility
    Am(OH)₃, AmOHCO₃ and Am₂(CO₃)₃ control dissolved Am(III) at near neutral and alkaline pH; AmF₃ is poorly soluble (element entry). No numeric solubility was read.
    Hydrolysis
    AmOH²⁺, Am(OH)₂⁺ and Am(OH)₃ (aq), the last only at high pH.
    Complexation
    Carbonate strongest at natural pH, then phosphate, sulfate, fluoride, chloride, nitrate weak; humate strong.
    Precipitates
    AmOHCO₃, Am(OH)₃, Am₂(CO₃)₃, AmF₃; americium carried in iron hydroxide floc.
    AmX3++HX2OAmOHX2++HX+\ce{Am^3+ + H2O -> AmOH^2+ + H+}
    first hydrolysis step; it stays minor through the natural range because carbonate takes the ion first, and only at high pH does the series run on to Am(OH)2^+ and Am(OH)3 (aq); EPA names the three species without constants, and no constant is quoted here
    AmX3++3HX2OAm(OH)X3(s)+3HX+\ce{Am^3+ + 3 H2O -> Am(OH)3 (s) + 3 H+}
    the hydroxide solid, one of the three phases EPA names as controlling dissolved americium at near neutral to alkaline pH; written as the hydrolytic precipitation, no solubility product was read
    AmX3++COX3X2AmCOX3X+\ce{Am^3+ + CO3^2- -> AmCO3^+}
    the first carbonate complex, dominant at near neutral pH in EPA's river water calculation
    AmCOX3X++COX3X2Am(COX3)X2X\ce{AmCO3^+ + CO3^2- -> Am(CO3)2^-}
    second carbonate step; the complex turns anionic, which is what stops cation exchange and softening from holding americium in a high alkalinity water
    Am(COX3)X2X+COX3X2Am(COX3)X3X3\ce{Am(CO3)2^- + CO3^2- -> Am(CO3)3^3-}
    third carbonate step, growing with dissolved carbonate in EPA's river water calculation at 10^-12 mol/L americium
    AmX3++SOX4X2AmSOX4X+\ce{Am^3+ + SO4^2- -> AmSO4^+}
    sulfate complex, the one that matters with fluoride in acid water below about pH 6, where americium is at its most mobile; weaker than carbonate at natural pH
    AmX3++OHX+COX3X2AmOHCOX3(s)\ce{Am^3+ + OH- + CO3^2- -> AmOHCO3 (s)}
    the likely solubility control as pH and carbonate rise (Felmy 1990, Vitorge 1992 via EPA); written from the solid named, constants not read
    3AmOX2X++4HX+2AmOX2X2++AmX3++2HX2O\ce{3 AmO2^+ + 4 H+ -> 2 AmO2^2+ + Am^3+ + 2 H2O}
    disproportionation of Am(V) in acid (reference text); the higher states are not found in natural water

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    americium in treatment residuals
    coagulation, ion exchange and reverse osmosis all concentrate it
    the residual is transuranic waste

    5 · Removal and control

    coagulation
    Am(III) sorbed and co-precipitated on iron or aluminium hydroxide floc
    WHO Table 9.4 (Brown, Hammond and Wilkins 2008)
    Efficiency
    above 70 percent
    Interferences
    high carbonate and humics keep americium dissolved
    sand filtration
    particulate americium
    WHO Table 9.4
    Efficiency
    10 to 40 percent
    activated carbon
    sorption of complexed and colloidal americium
    WHO Table 9.4
    Efficiency
    40 to 70 percent
    precipitation softening
    co-precipitation with calcium carbonate
    WHO Table 9.4
    Efficiency
    0 to 10 percent
    Interferences
    carbonate complexation at softening pH
    ion exchange
    Am³⁺ and AmCO₃⁺ on cation resin
    3RNa+AmX3+RX3Am+3NaX+\ce{3 RNa + Am^3+ -> R3Am + 3 Na^+}
    WHO Table 9.4; written in the usual resin notation for a sodium form strong acid bed (R one exchange site); only the free ion and AmCO3^+ exchange, so the removal falls away as carbonate turns americium anionic
    Efficiency
    above 70 percent
    Interferences
    anionic carbonate complexes at high alkalinity
    reverse osmosis
    rejection of the trivalent ion and its complexes
    WHO Table 9.4
    Efficiency
    above 70 percent
    Interferences
    concentrate is transuranic waste

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    gross alpha screeningISO 9696, ISO 10704; WHO Table 9.30.02 to 0.1 Bq/L; Euratom 0.04 Bq/Lamericium-241 counts in gross alpha; WHO screening level 0.5 Bq/L, Euratom 0.1 Bq/L, US 15 pCi/L
    americium-241 by gamma spectrometry (60 keV) or alpha spectrometry after separationISO 10703 for gamma spectrometry (WHO Annex 6 list); alpha method number not readnot readthe 60 keV gamma line allows direct counting of concentrated samples without chemistry
    Sampling pitfalls
    Am³⁺ sorbs to bottle walls and particles at neutral pH; acidify at collection and filter first if the dissolved fraction is wanted. Humic rich samples carry americium as colloids that pass a 0.45 µm filter.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ chapter 9 Table 9.2 and Annex 6 Table A₆.11 (americium-241, -243, -242m); 1000 (americium-242) Bq/Lguidance levels; americium-241 dose coefficient 2.0 x 10⁻7 Sv/Bq; footnote d: may not occur in drinking water in normal situations, lower priority after a screening exceedance; the isotopes beyond the chapter 9 table are from Annex 6 Table A₆.1
    EU Directive 2013/51/Euratom, Annex III0.7 Bq/Lderived concentration for americium-241 for the 0.1 mSv indicative dose
    US EPA NPDWR15 pCi/Lgross alpha MCL excluding radon and uranium; no americium specific MCL

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Toxic through its radioactivity (element entry); ingestion dose coefficient 2.0 x 10⁻7 Sv/Bq for americium-241 (WHO Table 9.2).
    Bioaccumulation
    Not addressed in the sources read.
    Ecotoxicity
    Not addressed in the sources read.

    Flags

    • The speciation distribution is EPA's calculation for a mean river water at 10⁻12 mol/L; it is illustrative.
    • The AmOHCO₃ equation is written from the solid named as the solubility control, not from printed constants.
    • Kd values span five orders of magnitude and EPA warns that the highest reflect precipitation; site specific values are essential.
    • No measured americium concentration in any water was read.
    • The Euratom values were read from the retained UK copy on legislation.gov.uk; its americium detection limit was not returned by the page read.

    Gaps

    • No stability constants or solubility products were read as numbers; the Silva 1995 NEA review is cited by EPA but was not opened.
    • Alpha spectrometry method numbers and detection limits for americium were not read.
    • No aquatic toxicity value was read.
    • The CWW BAT conclusions have no radioactivity parameter; no discharge row is written.
    • No surface complexation stoichiometry was read for americium on iron or aluminium hydroxide floc, so the coagulation row carries no equation; WHO Table 9.4 gives percentages only.

    Sources

    US EPA, Understanding Variation in Partition Coefficient, Kd, Values, Volume III: Review of Geochemistry and Available Kd Values for Americium, Arsenic, Curium, Iodine, Neptunium, Radium and Technetium, EPA 402-R-04-002C (July 2004), section 5.2 americium
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first addendum, chapter 9 Radiological aspects (Tables 9.2 to 9.4) and Annex 6 Table A6.1 and method list A6.3 of the 2022 edition
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), Annex 6 Supporting information on radionuclides, Table A6.1 (NCBI Bookshelf)
    Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom, Annex III (screening levels, derived concentrations, limits of detection), read in the retained UK copy on legislation.gov.uk
    US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (table of MCLs and MCLGs, radionuclides)
    The Element Book, element entry and reference text for Am (data/elements/Am.json, data/reference/text/Am.json)
    Sellafield Ltd, Annual Review of Environmental Performance 2022/23, Table 1 radioactive discharges to the Irish Sea 2018 to 2022 with permitted limits, and critical group doses (GOV.UK)
    OSPAR Commission, Liquid discharges from nuclear installations, 2023 data submission on ODIMS (spreadsheet OSPAR_Nuclear_Liquid_Discharges_2023.xlsx, sheets T02_NFR reprocessing and T05_Decom decommissioning)
    OSPAR Commission, Liquid discharges from nuclear installations in 2008, Radioactive Substances Series (2010): reporting in TBq per year and the note that total alpha from nuclear sites is mainly Pu-239, Pu-240 and Am-241
    Cantrell, K. J., Transuranic Contamination in Sediment and Groundwater at the U.S. DOE Hanford Site, PNNL-18640 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2009), section 3.6.14 on the 216-Z-9 trench
    Santschi, P. H., Roberts, K. A. and Guo, L., Organic nature of colloidal actinides transported in surface water environments, Environmental Science and Technology 36 (2002) 3711 to 3719 (abstract read on Europe PMC)

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.