Strontium

    group 2 · period 5 · s-block · alkaline earth metal

    fullStrontium is in almost every US supply (99.8 percent of UCMR 3 samples), was the one contaminant the EPA preliminarily decided to regulate in 2014, carries a Health Canada limit of 7.0 mg/L, rides with calcium through hardness, softening and sulfate scaling, and as strontium-90 is the bone seeking fission product with a guidance level in every radiological standard.

    Typical wastewaters

    • nuclear fuel cycle releases and weapons test fallout strontium-90 as Sr²⁺, chemically identical to stable strontium in treatment guidance level 10 Bq/L (WHO)
    • water softening residuals (ion exchange regenerant brine, lime softening sludge) Sr²⁺ in the sodium chloride regenerant; SrCO₃ co-precipitated with calcite in lime sludge softeners remove 92 to 98 percent across the bed; blending returns strontium to the finished water
    • desalination concentrate and cooling tower blowdown Sr²⁺ concentrated with calcium; SrSO₄ (celestite) scale in high sulfate brines cited to the MWH membrane chapter, not re-read
    • strontium carbonate, celestite and pyrotechnics manufacture Sr²⁺; the chloride and nitrate are freely soluble named by the element entry; no effluent figure read

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Sr, 38
    Oxidation states in water
    +2 only, Sr²⁺, a hardness cation that follows calcium into carbonate, sulfate and phosphate solids and into bone. Strontium-90, half-life about 28 years, a beta emitter with a yttrium-90 daughter, is the regulated radionuclide; strontium-89 is the shorter lived fission product.
    Note
    The element entry covers celestite, pyrotechnics and magnets; this chapter is the hardness ion and the radionuclide.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Leaching of limestone, celestite and strontium bearing sedimentary rocks; the ionic form Sr²⁺ is the exchangeable, water soluble fraction (Health Canada). Under UCMR 3 strontium was found above the 0.3 µg/L reporting level in 62,799 of 62,913 samples (99.8 percent) from all 4,922 systems, and 1,739 samples (2.8 percent) from 286 systems (5.8 percent) exceeded the 1,500 µg/L health reference level. Seawater carries 7.9 mg/L.
    Anthropogenic sources
    Strontium-90 from weapons test fallout and past releases to the environment, including drinking water sources (WHO chapter 9); strontium carbonate, celestite and pyrotechnics manufacture (element entry); concentration of natural strontium in desalination and cooling tower brines with calcium; ion exchange softener regenerant and lime softening sludge carry the strontium removed from supplies.
    matrixtypical rangenote
    US public water systems (finished water), UCMR 3 2013 to 2015detected in 99.8 percent of samples; 2.8 percent above 1,500 µg/L
    national screening data, US only
    62,799 of 62,913 samples at or above 0.3 µg/L; 1,739 samples and 286 of 4,922 systems above the 1,500 µg/L reference concentration
    groundwater at eight Ohio treatment plants (finished water after softening)0.2 to 4.9 mg/L
    single state, high strontium aquifers
    lime softening plants; ion exchange plants blended to 2.7 to 7.0 mg/L; raw water higher, not stated in the abstract
    seawater7.9 mg/Lsingle abundance figureestimated oceanic abundance, Jefferson Lab via PubChem; strontium is a major ion of seawater
    surface waternot read gapHealth Canada's occurrence tables were not extracted this session

    3 · Speciation

    Strontium is the free Sr²⁺ ion with sulfate and bicarbonate ion pairs; it does not hydrolyse at natural pH and has no redox chemistry. Like calcium it precipitates as the carbonate (strontianite, Ksp 10⁻9.25), the sulfate (celestite, Ksp 10⁻6.46) and the phosphate (Ksp 10⁻27.4) (Health Canada citing Dean 1992 and Najm 2016). In lime softening it co-precipitates with calcite, entering the calcium carbonate lattice and forming strontianite, so its removal tracks calcium removal.

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    fresh water, pH 6 to 9Sr²⁺, SrSO₄ and SrHCO₃⁺ ion pairsa few percent of calcium in most waters, more in celestite bearing aquifers
    lime softening, pH about 9.5 to 11SrCO₃ co-precipitated with CaCO₃ (calcite, vaterite) and as strontianiteremoval follows calcium removal (bench and full scale studies)
    concentrated brines (RO concentrate, cooling water, geothermal)SrSO₄ (celestite) scalecelestite is among the sparingly soluble salts that set membrane recovery (MWH chapter 17, from the chapter, not re-read)
    bone and biotastrontium substituting for calcium in apatitethe reason strontium-90 is a bone marrow dose and stable strontium a bone effect in infancy
    Solubility
    SrCO₃ Ksp 10⁻9.25, SrSO₄ Ksp 10⁻6.46, Sr₃(PO₄)₂ Ksp 10⁻27.4 (Health Canada); the chloride and nitrate are freely soluble (element entry). Celestite is far more soluble than barite, so strontium sulfate scale forms only in concentrated brines.
    Hydrolysis
    None at natural pH; Sr(OH)₂ is a strong base and strontium stays as the free ion to the highest softening pH.
    Complexation
    Sulfate and bicarbonate ion pairs; strontium is held by cation exchange resins and by inorganic sorbents (zeolites, sodium titanates, silicotitanates) used for radiostrontium (Health Canada). Constants not quoted.
    Precipitates
    SrCO₃ (strontianite, and in calcite lattice), SrSO₄ (celestite), Sr₃(PO₄)₂.
    SrX2++COX3X2SrCOX3(s)\ce{Sr^2+ + CO3^2- -> SrCO3 (s)}
    strontianite, Ksp 10^-9.25; the softening sink
    SrX2++2HCOX3X+2OHXSrCOX3(s)+COX3X2+2HX2O\ce{Sr^2+ + 2 HCO3^- + 2 OH^- -> SrCO3 (s) + CO3^2- + 2 H2O}
    lime softening: lime raises pH to about 9.5 and shifts the carbonate equilibrium; strontium co-precipitates with calcium carbonate, and removal depends on pH, calcium and dissolved inorganic carbon (Health Canada; bench study)
    SrX2++SOX4X2SrSOX4(s)\ce{Sr^2+ + SO4^2- -> SrSO4 (s)}
    celestite, Ksp 10^-6.46; scaling in concentrated sulfate brines
    3SrX2++2POX4X3SrX3(POX4)X2(s)\ce{3 Sr^2+ + 2 PO4^3- -> Sr3(PO4)2 (s)}
    Ksp 10^-27.4; phosphate precipitation carries strontium where phosphate is dosed
    2RNa+SrX2+RX2Sr+2NaX+\ce{2 RNa + Sr^2+ -> R2Sr + 2 Na^+}
    sodium cycle cation exchange softening, R the resin site; 92 to 98 percent strontium removal across the softener, regenerated with brine; strontium elutes with calcium

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    strontium as hardness
    Sr²⁺ behaves as a hardness cation, is removed in parallel with calcium and returns with blending
    ion exchange plants that remove 92 to 98 percent across the softener deliver 2.7 to 7.0 mg/L after blending; lime softening plants finish at 0.2 to 4.9 mg/L; only 2 of 8 Ohio plants met the 1.5 mg/L reference level consistently
    conventional treatment does not remove it
    no floc affinity for a divalent alkaline earth cation
    12 percent with aluminium and 5.9 percent with iron coagulants in jar tests; up to 30 percent in the literature Health Canada reviewed
    celestite scaling
    SrSO₄ exceeds its solubility in membrane concentrate and cooling water
    an antiscalant and recovery design issue in high sulfate waters (MWH chapter 17, flagged)
    strontium-90
    beta emitting bone seeker released in fallout and nuclear discharges; chemically identical to stable strontium in treatment
    guidance level 10 Bq/L (WHO), derived concentration 4.9 Bq/L (Euratom), 8 pCi/L for a 4 mrem per year bone marrow dose (US); best available technologies ion exchange and reverse osmosis
    an unregulated contaminant with a health reference level
    the EPA made a preliminary determination to regulate strontium in 2014 and delayed the final decision in 2016 to consider additional data and treatment information
    the health reference level used for UCMR 3 was 1,500 µg/L; the 2023 plant study reports it lowered to 1.5 mg/L (the same figure in different units); the lifetime health advisory is 4 mg/L

    5 · Removal and control

    lime or lime-soda softening
    strontium co-precipitates with calcium carbonate, entering the calcite or vaterite lattice and forming strontianite; removal is directly associated with calcium removal
    SrX2++2HCOX3X+2OHXSrCOX3(s)+COX3X2+2HX2O\ce{Sr^2+ + 2 HCO3^- + 2 OH^- -> SrCO3 (s) + CO3^2- + 2 H2O}
    pH about 9.5 or higher; removal affected by pH, calcium concentration and dissolved inorganic carbon; the final strontium is proportional to the initial strontium
    Efficiency
    up to 78 percent from natural strontium bearing groundwater in jar tests; 44 to 95 percent on average at six full scale plants, finished water 0.2 to 4.9 mg/L; 50 to 85 percent in 1954 studies up to 1.9 mg/L influent (Health Canada)
    Interferences
    low calcium and low carbonate limit the sink; raw water strontium sets the floor
    cation exchange softening (sodium cycle)
    Sr²⁺ exchanged with calcium and magnesium; regenerated with brine, so the strontium goes to the regenerant waste
    2RNa+SrX2+RX2Sr+2NaX+\ce{2 RNa + Sr^2+ -> R2Sr + 2 Na^+}
    full scale softeners at two Ohio plants; utilities blend softened and raw water, which returns strontium
    Efficiency
    92 to 98 percent across the softener; 67 to 81 percent overall after blending, 2.7 to 7.0 mg/L finished
    Interferences
    blending; hardness competition; sodium added to the water
    reverse osmosis and nanofiltration
    rejection of the divalent cation
    Health Canada lists reverse osmosis among municipal and residential technologies effective for strontium; nanofiltration studies exist in the radiostrontium literature; the US best available technologies for beta and photon emitters are ion exchange and reverse osmosis
    Efficiency
    not quantified in the sources read
    Interferences
    celestite and calcite scaling of the membrane
    inorganic sorbents for radiostrontium
    zeolites, sodium titanates and silicotitanates exchange strontium and are stable to ionising radiation, unlike organic resins
    radioactive waste and contaminated sites; regeneration usually not considered
    Efficiency
    not quantified in the sources read
    Interferences
    calcium and magnesium compete
    conventional coagulation and filtration
    little affinity
    aluminium and iron coagulants on natural waters
    Efficiency
    12 percent (aluminium) and 5.9 percent (iron) in jar tests; up to 30 percent in the literature

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    ICP-MSEPA 200.8 Revision 5.4 (UCMR 3 method for strontium); ISO 17294-2; Standard Methods 3125UCMR 3 minimum reporting level 0.3 µg/L; strontium is not among the 21 elements of the EPA 200.8 Table 1 detection limit listisotope 88; no serious interference at drinking water levels
    ICP-OESEN ISO 11885; Standard Methods 3120not readadequate at mg/L levels in hard water
    strontium-90 by radiochemical separation and beta countingnational radiological methods; Euratom Annex III sets performance requirementsnot readstrontium-90 is measured as activity after separation from calcium and yttrium-90 ingrowth
    Sampling pitfalls
    Acidify for total strontium; no speciation issue. For treatment assessment sample raw, softened and blended water separately, since blending decides the finished concentration. For strontium-90 the sample volume and the yttrium-90 ingrowth time govern the result.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ 4th ed. with addenda (2022), stable strontiumno guideline no chemical fact sheet or background document for stable strontium; nothing exists at the WHO 2022 fact sheet address
    WHO GDWQ, strontium-9010 Bq/LTable 9.2 guidance level (dose coefficient 2.8 x 10⁻8 Sv/Bq), rounded to the nearest order of magnitude, for the 0.1 mSv per year individual dose criterion
    EU DWD 2020/2184not set stable strontium is not an Annex I parameter; radioactivity is covered by Directive 2013/51/Euratom
    EU Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom4.9 Bq/L strontium-90Annex III derived concentration for the 0.1 mSv per year indicative dose; gross beta screening level 1.0 Bq/L
    US EPA NPDWR, stable strontiumnot regulated preliminary determination to regulate (2014) and delayed final determination (2016); UCMR 3 reference concentration 1,500 µg/L; lifetime health advisory 4 mg/L, one day and ten day 25 mg/L, RfD 0.6 mg/kg per day, DWEL 20 mg/L (2018 table)
    US EPA 40 CFR 141.66, strontium-908 pCi/LTable A average annual concentration assumed to produce a 4 mrem per year bone marrow dose under the beta particle and photon MCL
    Health Canada (2019)7.0 mg/Lmaximum acceptable concentration for total strontium, based on bone effects with the first year of life the most sensitive period
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902)not set strontium is not a BAT 12 parameter
    Abu Dhabi ADS 23/2017 and DoE Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022not set region-dependentstrontium does not appear in the tables read
    industry thresholds
    sectorbodylimitnote
    textileZDHC Wastewater Guidelines v₂.1 (2022)not set strontium is not a ZDHC parameter

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Stable strontium is non toxic at environmental levels and has no biological role; high doses cause adverse bone effects in animals and a few human studies, with the first year of life the most sensitive period (Health Canada MAC 7.0 mg/L). The EPA reference dose is 0.6 mg/kg per day. Strontium-90 lodges in bone and is a bone marrow dose (US Table A critical organ).
    Bioaccumulation
    Incorporated into bone and shell in place of calcium (element entry); the reason strontium-90 was the fallout nuclide of concern in milk and bone.
    Ecotoxicity
    Not addressed in the sources read; no US EPA aquatic criterion appears in the table.

    Flags

    • US occurrence is UCMR 3 screening data for 2013 to 2015; no natural water survey outside the US was read.
    • The Ohio plant figures are eight groundwater plants in one high strontium region.
    • The celestite scaling statement is cited to the MWH membrane chapter from memory, not re-read.
    • The softening equation is a mass balance written here; the papers describe co-precipitation with calcite without printing it.
    • The EPA health reference level is quoted as 1,500 µg/L in the 2017 UCMR 3 summary and as 1.5 mg/L in the 2023 paper; the same value.
    • Health Canada occurrence data were not extracted; only the MAC and treatment sections were read.
    • No GCC standard lists strontium; the row records the absence.

    Gaps

    • No surface water or non US groundwater concentration range was read.
    • No reverse osmosis or nanofiltration rejection figure for strontium was read.
    • Strontium-90 analytical detection limits and the Euratom Annex III performance figure were not extracted.
    • The EPA 2014 preliminary determination and its health reference level derivation were not read; the Federal Register page did not load.
    • Strontium in desalination brines and cooling water as concentrations was not read.
    • Other GCC discharge standards were not read.

    Sources

    US EPA, Third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 3), Table 1 (contaminants, minimum reporting levels and methods)
    US EPA, The Third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 3): Data Summary, January 2017, EPA 815-S-17-001, Table 3 (reference concentrations and occurrence)
    US EPA, Regulatory Determination 3 (preliminary determination to regulate strontium, 2014; final determination delayed, 2016)
    US EPA, 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories Tables, EPA 822-F-18-001 (March 2018)
    Health Canada, Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality: Guideline Technical Document, Strontium (May 2019), sections 1, 4 and 7
    Removal of strontium from drinking water by conventional treatment and lime softening in bench-scale studies, Water Research 103:319 to 333 (2016), doi 10.1016/j.watres.2016.06.036 (PMC7334999, abstract read)
    Removal of strontium by ion exchange and lime softening at eight drinking water treatment plants, Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology 9(8):2140 to 2151 (2023), doi 10.1039/d2ew00987k (PMC13137700, abstract read)
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), chapter 9 Radiological aspects, Table 9.2 guidance levels for common radionuclides (NCBI Bookshelf copy)
    Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom laying down requirements for the protection of the health of the general public with regard to radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption, Annex I and Annex III (derived concentrations for the indicative dose)
    40 CFR 141.66, Maximum contaminant levels for radionuclides, Table A (beta and photon emitters) and Table B (best available technologies)
    Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast), Annex I Parts B and C and Annex III Table 1
    US EPA Method 200.8, Revision 5.4 (1994), Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by ICP-MS, Table 1 instrument detection limits
    ISO 17294-2:2023, Water quality. Application of ICP-MS. Part 2: Determination of selected elements including uranium isotopes
    Standard Methods (online edition), 3125 Metals by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry
    MWH Water Treatment: Principles and Design, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 2012), chapter 22 (corrosion) and chapter 17 (reverse osmosis)
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 4 and BAT 12 Table 3 with footnotes 24 to 29
    Abu Dhabi Specification ADS 23/2017, Environmental Specifications for Land-Based Liquid Discharges to the Marine Environment (Environment Agency Abu Dhabi), Table 1
    ZDHC Wastewater Guidelines Version 2.1 (November 2022), Table 1M (organotins), Table 2 (heavy metals) and Tables 4A and 4B (sludge)
    The Element Book, own entry for strontium (data/elements/Sr.json and data/reference/text/Sr.json)
    PubChem element summary for strontium; estimated oceanic abundance 7.9 mg/L from Jefferson Lab

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.