Chromium

    group 6 · period 4 · d-block · transition metal

    fullChromium is regulated everywhere (WHO 50 µg/L total, EU 25 µg/L from 2036, US 0.1 mg/L total, California 10 µg/L hexavalent), and everything about it in water turns on whether it is the soluble, carcinogenic chromate anion Cr(VI) or the insoluble, precipitable Cr(III); tannery, plating and chrome dye effluents are its industrial homes.

    Typical wastewaters

    • electroplating and metal finishing Cr(VI) as chromate and dichromate from chromic acid baths in plating rinse water; reduced then precipitated as Cr(OH)₃
    • leather tanning Cr(III) from basic chromium sulfate tanning floats, precipitated as Cr(OH)₃ at pH 8 or above and recoverable
    • textile dyeing with chromium mordant or chromium containing dyes Cr(III) from chrome mordant and metal complex dyeing of wool
    • wool scouring total chromium, mass limited per 1000 kg of wool
    • cooling tower blowdown (once chromate treated) chromate CrO₄²⁻ from chromate corrosion inhibitors; 0.2 mg/L total chromium limit
    • chemical sector effluent (chromium compound production) total chromium 5.0 to 25 µg/L after treatment; may not apply where the load comes from chromium-organic compound production
    • steel and pulp mills total chromium, the US EPA source list
    In the ledger's plant and process records, discharged by: Phosphoric acid (wet process) (Chemicals) · Speciality inorganic pigments (iron oxide, chromium oxide, CIC, zinc sulphide, lithopone) (Chemicals) · Base metal ores (Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn) (Mining) · Bauxite, alumina, magnesite and ilmenite (Mining) · Industrial minerals (potash, salt, kaolin, magnesite and others) (Mining) · Iron ore and other metalliferous ores (Co, Cr, Mn, Mo, V, W) (Mining) · Precious metal ores (Au, Ag, Pt): gold and silver extraction (Mining) · Diazotisation and azo coupling (Pharmaceuticals) · Processes involving heavy metals (Pharmaceuticals) · Wool dyeing (metal-complex, chrome) (Textile)

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Cr, 24
    Oxidation states in water
    +3 as Cr³⁺ and its hydroxy complexes Cr(OH)n^(3-n)+, precipitating as Cr(OH)₃ between about pH 6 and 8 (the element entry) and redissolving only in strong alkali; +6 as chromate CrO₄²⁻, hydrogen chromate HCrO₄⁻ and, at high concentration, dichromate Cr₂O₇²⁻, soluble at every pH and adsorbed poorly.
    Note
    The element entry already sets out the two states and the reduce-then-precipitate rule. This chapter gives the numbers: the limits, the occurrence, the analytical splits and the reactions.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Weathering and erosion of chromium bearing rocks; high natural chromium, including Cr(VI), in groundwater from mafic and ultramafic volcanic and metamorphic rocks, ophiolite complexes and serpentine rich units (WHO background document). Uncontaminated water is usually below 1 µg/L.
    Anthropogenic sources
    Metal finishing and chromium plating (chromic acid baths), leather tanning with basic chromium sulfate, chrome mordant and metal complex dyeing of wool and textiles, chromate pigments and corrosion inhibitors, cooling tower blowdown (once chromate treated), steel and pulp mills (US EPA source list), landfill leachate, and chromium chemical plants in the ledger's chemical chapter. Pre-chlorination or pre-ozonation in a treatment plant can oxidise Cr(III) to Cr(VI) (WHO).
    matrixtypical rangenote
    uncontaminated fresh water and groundwaterbelow 1 µg/Ltotal chromium; UK groundwater below 3 µg/L; Netherlands mean 0.7, maximum 5 µg/L
    surface water, USAup to 84 µg/L
    region-dependent, older surveys
    Rhine below 10 µg/L; half of Indian stream waters below 2 µg/L
    drinking water, generalusually below 5 µg/LEngland and Wales 2016, more than 12,000 compliance samples: none above 50 µg/L, maximum 15, 95th percentile 1 µg/L; Canada median 2, maximum 18.9 (groundwater)
    drinking water, hexavalent chromium, USA (UCMR 3, 2013 to 2015)0.057 to 7.51 µg/Lpresent across all states; the majority of states between 0.1 and 1.0 µg/L; Canada and US averages 0.2 to 2 µg/L; UK background Cr(VI) below 0.1 µg/L
    seawater0.04 to 0.5 µg/Lnatural total chromium; 0.7 µg/L in the North Sea; PubChem gives 0.3 µg/L (3 x 10⁻4 mg/L)
    rainwater0.2 to below 1 µg/Laverage total chromium

    3 · Speciation

    Chromium(VI) is an oxyanion: hydrogen chromate HCrO₄⁻ below about pH 6.5, chromate CrO₄²⁻ above it, dichromate only in concentrated acid solutions. It is soluble across the whole pH range, mobile in groundwater, poorly adsorbed except on iron oxides at low pH, and it is what plating and chromate baths discharge. Chromium(III) is a cation that hydrolyses, precipitates as Cr(OH)₃ between about pH 6 and 8 and is adsorbed at relatively high pH (WHO background document), so it leaves water with the sludge. The distribution between the two depends on redox potential, pH, oxidants (chlorine, ozone, manganese oxides) and reductants (organic matter, iron(II), sulfide); Cr(VI) is easily reduced by organic matter in soil (WHO). Treatment therefore reduces Cr(VI) first, or adsorbs it on iron, and precipitates Cr(III); oxidative pre-treatment in a drinking water plant can do the opposite.

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    oxic water, pH 6 to 9, low organic matterCrO₄²⁻ (above pH about 6.5) and HCrO₄⁻the natural Cr(VI) of serpentine groundwater and the plating rinse anion
    reducing or organic rich water, pH 6 to 9Cr(OH)₃ (s), Cr(OH)₂⁺, Cr bound to organic matter and iron oxidesparticulate; passes only as colloid
    acid effluent, pH below 4Cr³⁺ (hexaaqua) dissolved; HCrO₄⁻ and Cr₂O₇²⁻ for Cr(VI)tannery float and pickle liquors; reduction of chromate is run here
    strong alkali, pH above 11Cr(OH)₄⁻ (chromite anion)amphoteric redissolution; keep precipitation at pH 8 to 9
    Solubility
    Cr(OH)₃ is the controlling solid for Cr(III), least soluble around pH 8 to 9 and redissolving in strong alkali; Cr(VI) has no controlling solid in ordinary water except barium and lead chromate at high concentration. Constants are not quoted because the sources read print none.
    Hydrolysis
    Cr³⁺ hydrolyses to Cr(OH)n^(3-n)+ (WHO notation), so chromium(III) salts are acidic and precipitation consumes alkalinity; HCrO₄⁻ is a weak acid with pKa about 6.5 (Stumm and Morgan chapter 3, from the chapter, not re-read).
    Complexation
    Cr(III) forms inert complexes with organic ligands and adsorbs on iron oxides at higher pH; Cr(VI) adsorbs on ferrihydrite, goethite and iron oxide coated sand, more strongly at low pH (WHO treatment section).
    Precipitates
    Cr(OH)₃ (hydroxide precipitation), chromium in ferric hydroxide sludge after reduction with iron(II), chromite and Cr₂O₃ in aged sludge, barium and lead chromate pigments.
    HCrOX4XCrOX4X2+HX+\ce{HCrO4^- <=> CrO4^2- + H+}
    pKa about 6.5; chromate dominates above it
    2HCrOX4XCrX2OX7X2+HX2O\ce{2 HCrO4^- <=> Cr2O7^2- + H2O}
    dichromate condensation at high Cr(VI) concentration in acid; negligible at environmental levels
    CrX2OX7X2+6FeX2++14HX+2CrX3++6FeX3++7HX2O\ce{Cr2O7^2- + 6 Fe^2+ + 14 H+ -> 2 Cr^3+ + 6 Fe^3+ + 7 H2O}
    reduction with ferrous sulfate at acid pH; the CWW BREF lists chemical reduction with ferrous sulfate; the equation is the electron balance as in the book's iron entry
    2CrOX4X2+3HSOX3X+7HX+2CrX3++3SOX4X2+5HX2O\ce{2 CrO4^2- + 3 HSO3^- + 7 H+ -> 2 Cr^3+ + 3 SO4^2- + 5 H2O}
    reduction with sulfite, bisulfite or sulfur dioxide at low pH; electron balance, the BREF names the reagent
    CrX3++3OHXCr(OH)X3(s)\ce{Cr^3+ + 3 OH- -> Cr(OH)3 (s)}
    lime or caustic to pH 8 to 9 after reduction; the tanning BAT conclusions prescribe raising pH to 8 or above with alkaline compounds for chromium precipitation
    Cr(OH)X3(s)+OHXCr(OH)X4X\ce{Cr(OH)3 (s) + OH- <=> Cr(OH)4^-}
    amphoteric redissolution above about pH 11; the reason not to overshoot
    CrX3++2HX2OCr(OH)X2X++2HX+\ce{Cr^3+ + 2 H2O <=> Cr(OH)2^+ + 2 H+}
    stepwise hydrolysis of the hexaaqua ion; this is why chromium(III) salts are acidic and why a plating or tanning liquor needs alkali long before the hydroxide appears; WHO writes the family as Cr(OH)n^(3-n)+ without constants
    CrX2OX7X2+14HX++6eX2CrX3++7HX2O\ce{Cr2O7^2- + 14 H+ + 6 e- -> 2 Cr^3+ + 7 H2O}
    the Cr(VI) to Cr(III) couple in acid, standard potential about +1.33 V, which is why chromate reduction with iron(II), sulfite or dithionite is fast at pH 2 to 3 and sluggish at neutral pH, and why the plating train acidifies before it reduces
    2Cr(OH)X3(s)+3MnOX2(s)+2HX+2CrOX4X2+3MnX2++4HX2O\ce{2 Cr(OH)3 (s) + 3 MnO2 (s) + 2 H+ -> 2 CrO4^2- + 3 Mn^2+ + 4 H2O}
    manganese oxide surfaces oxidise chromium(III) back to chromate in soil, aquifer and on manganese oxide filter media; one of the routes to natural Cr(VI) in serpentine groundwater; WHO names manganese oxides as an oxidant without printing the stoichiometry, this is the electron balance
    2CrX3++3Ca(OH)X22Cr(OH)X3(s)+3CaX2+\ce{2 Cr^3+ + 3 Ca(OH)2 -> 2 Cr(OH)3 (s) + 3 Ca^2+}
    lime precipitation after reduction; 1.5 mol of lime per mol of chromium, about 2.1 mg Ca(OH)2 per mg Cr, plus whatever the free acid of the reduced liquor consumes; caustic substitutes at 3 mol NaOH per mol Cr; the minimum solubility sits at pH 8 to 9

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    hexavalent chromium passes conventional treatment
    soluble anion, poorly coagulated and adsorbed at neutral pH
    WHO: Cr(VI) requires reduction to Cr(III) before removal by ferric coagulants as part of conventional treatment
    oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) in the plant
    pre-chlorination or pre-ozonation oxidises chromium(III) to chromium(VI), which then passes the filters
    WHO background document
    2Cr(OH)X3(s)+3HOCl+7OHX2CrOX4X2+3ClX+8HX2O\ce{2 Cr(OH)3 (s) + 3 HOCl + 7 OH- -> 2 CrO4^2- + 3 Cl^- + 8 H2O}
    free chlorine or ozone ahead of the filters at pH 7 to 9; the chromium leaves the sludge and passes as chromate, so a plant that was compliant on total chromium can turn its own influent into the regulated species; the equation is the electron balance, WHO names the oxidation without printing it
    speciation is analytically hard
    the WHO guideline is for total chromium because available methods preclude reliable routine speciation; ion chromatography with post-column derivatisation reaches 0.0044 to 0.015 µg/L for Cr(VI) but needs preserved samples
    EPA 218.7 buffers samples above pH 8 with a dechlorinating reagent to hold Cr(VI)
    tannery and plating loads
    basic chromium sulfate tanning floats and chromic acid plating rinses carry chromium at grams per litre before treatment
    the US tannery pretreatment standard allows 12 mg/L daily maximum to sewer; the EU BAT-AEL for direct discharge is below 0.3 to 1 mg/L
    NaX2CrX2OX7+3SOX2+HX2O2Cr(OH)SOX4+NaX2SOX4\ce{Na2Cr2O7 + 3 SO2 + H2O -> 2 Cr(OH)SO4 + Na2SO4}
    the tanning agent itself: sodium dichromate reduced with sulfur dioxide to basic chromium sulfate, which is what the float carries at grams per litre; the element entry names the dichromate to tanning route, the stoichiometry is the standard one for basic chromium sulfate
    chromium in sludge
    all removed chromium ends in Cr(OH)₃ rich sludge that may be hazardous waste
    ZDHC sludge limits: total chromium 50 mg/kg (textile), Cr(VI) 20 mg/kg textile and 2 mg/kg leather
    as a reagent
    chromium recovery in tanning
    spent chrome liquor is precipitated with alkali, the Cr(OH)₃ sludge redissolved in sulfuric acid and reused as tanning agent
    CrX3++3OHXCr(OH)X3(s)\ce{Cr^3+ + 3 OH- -> Cr(OH)3 (s)}
    the tanning BAT conclusions (BAT 24) give two options, reuse of recovered chromium in the tannery or transfer of the chromium sludge to industrial users
    potassium dichromate as laboratory oxidant
    the oxidant of the COD test
    the element entry lists potassium dichromate as the oxidiser for quantitative analysis; the EU wastewater directive names potassium dichromate as the COD reference method reagent

    5 · Removal and control

    reduction then hydroxide precipitation
    Cr(VI) reduced with ferrous sulfate, sulfite, bisulfite or sulfur dioxide at acid pH, then lime or caustic to pH 8 to 9 to precipitate Cr(OH)₃ (with Fe(OH)₃ when iron is the reductant), settled and filtered
    CrX2OX7X2+6FeX2++14HX+2CrX3++6FeX3++7HX2O\ce{Cr2O7^2- + 6 Fe^2+ + 14 H+ -> 2 Cr^3+ + 6 Fe^3+ + 7 H2O}
    the classic plating and tannery train; the CWW BREF describes chemical reduction and precipitation; tanning BAT 11 sets pH 8 or above
    Efficiency
    to the BAT-AEL of below 0.3 to 1 mg/L total chromium in tanning and 5 to 25 µg/L in the chemical sector with good solid separation
    Interferences
    excess oxidant, complexing agents holding Cr(III), overshoot to pH above 11
    coagulation, sedimentation and filtration (drinking water)
    Cr(III) coagulated with the ferric floc; Cr(VI) only after reduction
    WHO: conventional treatment requires Cr(VI) reduction to Cr(III)
    Efficiency
    not quoted as a figure
    Interferences
    Cr(VI)
    adsorption on iron oxides
    ferrihydrite, goethite and iron oxide coated sand adsorb chromate at low pH and Cr(III) at higher pH
    Fe(OH)X3(s)+CrOX4X2+HX+Fe(OH)X2CrOX4X+HX2O\ce{Fe(OH)3 (s) + CrO4^2- + H+ -> Fe(OH)2CrO4^- + H2O}
    removal of both states requires pH changes and staged operation (WHO). Written as a surface ligand exchange, which is why chromate sorption rises as pH falls and the surface protonates, the opposite of the Cr(III) case
    Efficiency
    not quoted
    Interferences
    competing anions
    ion exchange
    strong base anion resin for chromate, cation resin for Cr(III)
    2RCl+CrOX4X2RX2CrOX4+2ClX\ce{2 RCl + CrO4^2- -> R2CrO4 + 2 Cl^-}
    effective for both Cr(III) and Cr(VI). R is a strong base anion exchange site in the chloride form; divalent chromate is held hard, so the spent brine is a concentrated Cr(VI) stream that has to be reduced and precipitated in its turn
    Efficiency
    80 to 96 percent (WHO)
    Interferences
    sulfate competition; regenerant brine carries the chromium
    reverse osmosis and nanofiltration
    membrane rejection of the chromate anion and Cr(III) species
    considered among the best available technologies (WHO)
    Efficiency
    reverse osmosis 82 to 97 percent; nanofiltration similar
    Interferences
    concentrate disposal
    biological reduction
    bacteria reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) under anaerobic conditions
    CrOX4X2+4HX2O+3eXCr(OH)X3(s)+5OHX\ce{CrO4^2- + 4 H2O + 3 e- -> Cr(OH)3 (s) + 5 OH-}
    not practical for drinking water because optimum removal requires anaerobic conditions (WHO); used in industrial and groundwater remediation. The half reaction the bacteria drive at neutral pH; the electron donor is the organic substrate, which has no single formula, so only the acceptor side is written
    Efficiency
    not quoted
    Interferences
    oxygen

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    ICP-MS (total chromium)EPA 200.8 (mass 52); ISO 17294-2EPA 200.8 instrument detection limit 0.07 µg/L scanning, 0.04 µg/L selected ion monitoring; WHO 0.08 to 7 µg/L across ICP-AES, ICP-MS, AES and GFAASArC⁺ and ArO⁺ overlap mass 52 and ArN⁺ mass 54 (EPA 200.8 Table 2); use a collision cell or the correction equations
    ICP-OES and graphite furnace AASEPA 200.7 (205.552 nm); ISO 11885; ISO 15586EPA 200.7 instrument detection limit 6.1 µg/L, total recoverable method detection limit 0.004 mg/L; flame AAS 0.5 mg/L (WHO)WHO recommends FAAS for 0.5 to 20 mg/L and electrothermal AAS below 0.1 mg/L
    Cr(VI) by ion chromatography with post-column diphenylcarbazideEPA 218.7; EPA 218.6; ISO 18412 (ZDHC methods list)EPA 218.7 method detection limits 0.0044 to 0.015 µg/L, lowest concentration minimum reporting levels 0.012 to 0.036 µg/L; WHO 0.0044 to 0.015 µg/Lchromate separated on an anion column, derivatised and read at 530 nm; samples preserved with an ammonium sulfate and ammonium hydroxide buffer above pH 8 with a dechlorinating reagent
    Cr(VI) by diphenylcarbazide colorimetryStandard Methods 3500-Cr B; ISO 11083ISO 11083 range 0.05 to 3 mg/Lred violet complex at 540 nm; the effluent method
    speciation by ion chromatography coupled to ICP-MSno numbered standard read0.5 µg/L for Cr(III) and Cr(VI) (WHO)WHO: reliable validated methods for separate Cr(III) and Cr(VI) analysis are still required
    Sampling pitfalls
    Acidifying a sample for total chromium destroys the speciation: Cr(VI) samples need the alkaline buffer of EPA 218.7 and prompt analysis, and chlorine residual must be quenched or it keeps oxidising Cr(III). Cr(III) adsorbs on container walls and particles, so total chromium needs digestion of the unfiltered sample.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ 4th ed. with addenda (2022), total chromium50 µg/Lbased on achievability by treatment, measurability and toxicology; for total chromium because reliable routine speciation is not available; hyperplasia of the small intestine the most sensitive end point; Cr(VI) compounds IARC Group 1 by inhalation; assessment 2020
    EU DWD 2020/218425 µg/LAnnex I Part B; the 25 µg/L value shall be met at the latest by 12 January 2036, until then the parametric value is 50 µg/L; uncertainty of measurement 30 percent (Annex III)
    US EPA NPDWR, total chromium0.1 mg/LMCL and MCLG 0.1 mg/L; health effect listed as allergic dermatitis; sources discharge from steel and pulp mills and erosion of natural deposits
    California SWRCB, hexavalent chromium0.010 mg/LMCL of 10 µg/L effective 1 October 2024; public health goal 0.02 µg/L (2011)
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902), chromium5.0 to 25 µg/Lapplies if the emission exceeds 2.5 kg/yr; may not apply when the main load originates from the production of chromium-organic compounds
    EU tanning BAT conclusions (Decision 2013/84/EU), total chromiumbelow 0.3 to 1 mg/Ldirect and indirect discharge, monthly average of 24 hour composite samples
    EU textiles BAT conclusions (Decision 2022/2508), chromium0.01 to 0.1 mg/L
    footnote on applicability not read
    direct and indirect discharge, dyeing with chromium mordant or chromium containing dyes
    US EPA 40 CFR 433.15, metal finishing PSES, chromium (total)2.77 daily maximum; 1.71 monthly average mg/Lpretreatment standard for discharge to sewer
    US EPA 40 CFR 425.15, leather tanning PSES, total chromium12 daily maximum; 8 monthly average mg/Lsubpart A; facilities processing fewer than 275 hides a day are exempt from the chromium limit
    US EPA 40 CFR 410.12, textile mills wool scouring BPT, total chromium0.10 daily maximum; 0.05 30-day average kg per 1000 kg of woolproduction normalisedmass based
    US EPA 40 CFR 423.13(d)(1), steam electric cooling tower blowdown (BAT), total chromium0.2 mg/Ldaily maximum and 30-day average; with total zinc 1.0 mg/L
    Abu Dhabi ADS 23/2017, discharge to the marine environment (EAD)total chromium 0.2; chromium(VI) 0.15 mg/L
    region-dependent; marine discharge only
    Table 1 maximum allowable concentrations
    Abu Dhabi DoE Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022, discharge to sewer5 mg/L
    region-dependent; sewer discharge
    Table A₄ chromium (total)
    industry thresholds
    sectorbodylimitnote
    textile and leatherZDHC Wastewater Guidelines v₂.1 (2022), total chromiumtextile 0.2 foundational, 0.1 progressive, 0.05 aspirational; leather 1.5, 0.8, 0.3 mg/LISO 17294, EPA 200.8, 6010C, 6020A; sludge total chromium 50 mg/kg (textile)
    textile and leatherZDHC Wastewater Guidelines v₂.1 (2022), chromium(VI)textile 0.05 foundational, 0.005 progressive, 0.001 aspirational; leather 0.15, 0.05, 0.02 mg/LISO 18412, EPA 218.6, GB 7467; the aspirational value must meet the reporting limit; sludge Cr(VI) 20 mg/kg textile, 2 mg/kg leather

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Chromium(VI) is more toxic than chromium(III) and is a human carcinogen by inhalation (IARC Group 1); orally it is rapidly and efficiently reduced to Cr(III) in the gut, though a proportion may remain available. In two year drinking water studies tumours of the oral cavity in rats and small intestine in mice appeared at 0.77 and 0.38 mg/kg body weight per day, attributed to a threshold mode of action; environmental Cr(VI) levels are orders of magnitude below the doses tested, so WHO kept 50 µg/L total chromium (fact sheet, 2020). Chromium(III) is an essential trace element (the element entry).
    Bioaccumulation
    Cr(VI) is reduced in gastric fluid (70 percent within a minute at pH 2) and Cr(III) is poorly absorbed; no bioaccumulation concern is raised in the sources read.
    Ecotoxicity
    US EPA aquatic life criteria (1995): chromium(VI) freshwater 16 µg/L acute and 11 µg/L chronic, saltwater 1,100 and 50 µg/L; chromium(III) freshwater 570 µg/L acute and 74 µg/L chronic, expressed as a function of hardness.

    Flags

    • The EU 25 µg/L value applies only from 12 January 2036; 50 µg/L until then.
    • The California Cr(VI) MCL is a state standard effective 1 October 2024; no federal Cr(VI) MCL exists.
    • The HCrO₄⁻ pKa and the dichromate condensation are cited to Stumm and Morgan chapter 3 from memory.
    • The reduction equations are electron balances; the CWW BREF names ferrous sulfate and sulfite without printing them.
    • The occurrence figures are 1980s to 2010s surveys compiled by WHO; the UCMR 3 Cr(VI) range is quoted through WHO, not from the EPA data files.
    • The textile BAT-AEL footnote 8 on chromium was not read.
    • The tannery pretreatment exemption and the wool scouring mass based limit are not comparable with concentration limits.
    • Abu Dhabi values cover two media (marine 0.2 and 0.15 mg/L; sewer 5 mg/L); other GCC states not read.
    • Tannery and plating raw effluent chromium concentrations were not read; only the limits are quoted.

    Gaps

    • No raw effluent chromium concentrations for tanneries, plating shops or dye houses were read; the ledger's chapters hold them.
    • No solubility product for Cr(OH)₃ or adsorption constants on iron oxides were read.
    • The WHO 80 to 96 percent ion exchange figure is quoted as printed without the matrix it refers to.
    • EPA 218.6 and ISO 18412 are cited by number from the ZDHC methods table; their texts were not opened.
    • Other GCC discharge standards (Saudi, Oman, Qatar) were not read.
    • The dichromate half reaction potential, the Cr(III) hydrolysis step and the lime stoichiometry are from Stumm and Morgan chapters 3, 6 and 8 and Metcalf and Eddy chapter 6, from the chapter, not re-read.
    • The manganese oxide oxidation, the chlorine oxidation of Cr(III) and the chromate ligand exchange on ferrihydrite are electron and mass balances written from mechanisms the WHO background document describes in words; no rate constants, surface constants or yields were read.

    Sources

    WHO GDWQ 4th ed. with addenda (2022), chapter 12 fact sheet, Chromium (pp. 367 to 369)
    WHO, Chromium in Drinking-water, background document, WHO/HEP/ECH/WSH/2020.3 (2020), sections 1.5, 2.1 and 7
    Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast), Annex I Parts B and C and Annex III
    US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (table of MCLs and treatment techniques)
    California State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water, Hexavalent Chromium MCL page (read 2026-09-05)
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 12 Tables 1 and 2
    Best Available Techniques Reference Document for Common Waste Water and Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical Sector (CWW BREF 2016), chapter 3 (chemical reduction, chemical precipitation)
    Commission Implementing Decision 2013/84/EU establishing BAT conclusions for the tanning of hides and skins, BAT 10 to 12, BAT 24 and Tables 3 and 4
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2508 establishing BAT conclusions for the textiles industry, BAT-AELs for direct and indirect discharges (OJ L 325, 20.12.2022, pp. 141 to 142)
    40 CFR 433.15, Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES), metal finishing point source category
    40 CFR 425.15, Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES), leather tanning and finishing, subpart A (hair pulp, chrome tan, retan-wet finish)
    40 CFR 410.12, Effluent limitations representing BPT, textile mills, subpart A (wool scouring)
    40 CFR 423.13, Effluent limitations guidelines representing BAT, steam electric power generating point source category
    Abu Dhabi Specification ADS 23/2017, Environmental Specifications for Land-Based Liquid Discharges to the Marine Environment (Environment Agency Abu Dhabi), Table 1
    Abu Dhabi Department of Energy, Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022 (DoE/PD/R01/005, effective 1 January 2022), Appendix Tables A2 and A4
    ZDHC Wastewater Guidelines Version 2.1 (November 2022), conventional parameters, anions and metals tables and sludge Table 4A
    Directive (EU) 2024/3019 concerning urban wastewater treatment (recast), Annex I Table 1 (COD reference method with potassium dichromate)
    US EPA, National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, Aquatic Life Criteria Table (chromium III and chromium VI, 1995)
    US EPA Method 200.8, Revision 5.4 (1994), Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by ICP-MS, Table 1 (instrument detection limits) and Table 2 (molecular ion interferences)
    US EPA Method 200.7, Revision 4.4 (1994), Determination of metals and trace elements in water and wastes by ICP-AES, Table 1 (wavelengths and instrument detection limits), Table 4 (method detection limits) and Table 5 (argon plasma conditions)
    US EPA Method 218.7, Determination of hexavalent chromium in drinking water by ion chromatography with post-column derivatization and UV-visible spectroscopic detection, EPA 815-R-11-005 (November 2011), sections 1.2, 2 and 8
    ISO 17294-2:2023, Water quality. Application of ICP-MS. Part 2: Determination of selected elements including uranium isotopes
    ISO 11885:2007, Water quality. Determination of selected elements by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES)
    ISO 15586:2003, Water quality. Determination of trace elements using atomic absorption spectrometry with graphite furnace (Ag, Al, As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Tl, V, Zn)
    ISO 11083:1994, Water quality. Determination of chromium(VI). Spectrometric method using 1,5-diphenylcarbazide
    Standard Methods (online edition), 3500-Cr Chromium (B. colorimetric diphenylcarbazide method, C. ion chromatographic method)
    PubChem element summary for chromium; estimated oceanic abundance 3 x 10^-4 mg/L (PUG View, reference 5, Jefferson Lab)
    The Element Book, layer 1 entry for chromium (data/elements/Cr.json and data/reference/text/Cr.json)
    The Element Book, water chapter for iron (data/water/Fe.json), chromate reduction with ferrous iron
    Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J., Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 1996), chapter 3 (acids and bases: chromic acid) and chapter 7 (precipitation: chromium hydroxide)
    Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill, 2014), chapter 6 (chemical precipitation of heavy metals: lime and caustic dose, hydroxide solubility versus pH)

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.