Thorium

    no group (f-block) · period 7 · f-block · actinide

    fullThorium is regulated only through its radioactivity, with WHO guidance levels of 1 Bq/L for thorium-228, -230 and -232 and the gross alpha screen in the US and EU, and in practice it is never the problem: Th(IV) hydrolyses above pH 3, hydrous thorium oxide holds dissolved thorium below about 1 µg/L, and sorption to iron and manganese oxides and humics takes the rest, so fresh water rarely exceeds 1 µg/L (0.1 pCi/L of thorium-232) while acidic uranium tailings leachate can carry milligrams per litre; the industrial sources are uranium and rare earth processing, monazite sands and phosphate.

    Typical wastewaters

    • uranium and thorium mining, milling and tailings (acid leachate) Th⁴⁺ with ThSO₄²⁺ and fluoro complexes at low pH; up to 38 mg/L thorium, probably thorium-230, in acidic uranium tailings water and milligrams per litre of thorium-232 in high acid groundwater beneath tailings thorium-230, not thorium-232, is the isotope to measure near uranium mills
    • phosphate rock processing and phosphate fertiliser manufacture Th(IV), hydrolysed and particulate at neutral pH; named by ATSDR among the major industrial releases to surface water no concentration read
    • tin processing Th(IV), hydrolysed and particulate; named by ATSDR among the major industrial releases to surface water no concentration read
    • monazite and zircon sand processing (legacy sites) particulate and sorbed Th(IV) in surface water and groundwater at Superfund and NRC decommissioning sites thorium contamination identified at 21 of 45 Superfund NPL sites and 23 of 38 NRC decommissioning sites
    • drinking water treatment residuals (NORM scale, softening and iron removal sludge) thorium and its daughters trapped in solids depositing on sediment and pipe walls, building up over time; radium-228 and thorium-228 join radium-226 in the sludge on the solids rather than in a liquid effluent

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Th, 90
    Oxidation states in water
    +4 only, as Th⁴⁺ below pH 3.5, then the hydroxo complexes Th(OH)₂²⁺, Th(OH)₃⁺ and Th(OH)₄ (aq), and above pH 7.5 the carbonate complex Th(OH)₃CO₃⁻ (EPA Kd volume II). Natural thorium is essentially thorium-232 (half life 1.41 x 10^10 years); thorium-230 (8.0 x 10^4 years) and thorium-234 (24.1 days) come from the uranium-238 chain and thorium-228 (1.913 years) from the thorium-232 chain.
    Note
    The element entry covers monazite, thoria and the reactor hopes. This chapter is about why Th⁴⁺ stays in the sediment and what the radiological limits are.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Thorite, thorianite, monazite and zircon resist weathering and do not dissolve at low temperature; what dissolves is capped by hydrous thorium oxide and by sorption (EPA Kd volume II). Fresh water rarely exceeds 1 µg/L; the US population weighted averages in community supplies were below 0.01 pCi/L thorium-232 and below 0.04 pCi/L thorium-230 (ATSDR, citing Cothern). Thorium-232 rarely exceeds 0.1 pCi/L in natural waters and thorium-230 can reach 0.4 pCi/L; Austrian surface water carried 1.24 to 2.90 µg/L and Austrian groundwater 0.5 to 2.90 µg/L; alkaline Mono Lake reached 1.02, 1.41 and 0.7 pCi/L of thorium-228, -230 and -232 (ATSDR).
    Anthropogenic sources
    Uranium and thorium mining, milling and processing, tin processing, phosphate rock processing and phosphate fertiliser production are the major industrial releases to surface water (ATSDR); acidic leaching of uranium tailings mobilises thorium-230 and thorium (probably thorium-230) has reached 38 mg/L in low pH tailings water (ATSDR), with milligram per litre thorium-232 in high acid groundwater beneath tailings (EPA Kd volume II). Thorium contamination of soil, surface water or groundwater was identified at 21 of 45 Superfund NPL sites and 23 of 38 NRC decommissioning sites, some from monazite and zircon sand processing (EPA Kd volume II). The MWEI BREF data collection had no operator monitoring thorium in extractive waste water (element entry).
    matrixtypical rangenote
    fresh water, general0.01 to 1 µg/LHem 1985 range quoted by EPA; rarely exceeds 1 µg/L, about 0.1 pCi/L thorium-232
    drinking water, US community suppliesbelow 0.01 (thorium-232); below 0.04 (thorium-230) pCi/L1980s datapopulation weighted averages, surface and groundwater derived (Cothern 1986, 1987 via ATSDR)
    surface water and groundwater, Austria1.24 to 2.90 (surface); 0.5 to 2.90 (groundwater) µg/Lregion-dependent; 1980 dataHarmsen and De Haan 1980 via ATSDR; isotope undefined
    seawater0.00004 to below 0.5 µg/kg
    old compilation; the low end is the modern measured level
    world average 0.05 µg/L (Harmsen and De Haan 1980 via ATSDR); dissolved thorium in seawater about 1.3 x 10⁻5 dpm/L against up to 4.9 dpm/L in an alkaline lake
    acidic uranium tailings waterup to 38 mg/Lextreme low pH caseisotope undefined but probably thorium-230 (Harmsen and De Haan 1980 via ATSDR); mg/L thorium-232 in high acid groundwater beneath tailings (Langmuir and Herman 1980 via EPA)

    3 · Speciation

    Th⁴⁺ is the largest tetravalent cation and hydrolyses above pH 3: in pure water the uncomplexed ion dominates below pH 3.5 and then Th(OH)₂²⁺, Th(OH)₃⁺ and Th(OH)₄ (aq) in turn, the last two over the widest pH range. In a typical river water fluoride complexes dominate below pH 5, phosphate complexes between 5 and 7 (constants suspect), and above pH 7.5 more than 95 percent of dissolved thorium is Th(OH)₃CO₃⁻ (EPA Kd volume II). Hydrous thorium oxide caps dissolved thorium at about 10⁻8.5 to below 10⁻9 mol/L (0.0007 to 0.0002 mg/L) between pH 5 and 10 in 0.1 M perchlorate, rising to about 600 mg/L as pH falls from 5.0 to 3.2, and its solubility rises by two to three orders of magnitude in 3 M chloride and dramatically in high carbonate (EPA Kd volume II). Goethite and manganese dioxide sorb thorium from 0 percent at pH 2.5 to 3.5 to 90 to 100 percent at pH 5 to 6.5; sulfate lowers sorption and 100 meq/L carbonate alkalinity or EDTA lifts it off again, so carbonate rich alkaline water and organic rich water are where thorium moves (EPA Kd volume II). Humic and citrate, oxalate and EDTA complexes can dominate in organic rich water; ThEDTA (aq) dominates from pH 2 to 8 at the concentrations Langmuir and Herman considered.

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    acid, below pH 3.5, tailings leachateTh⁴⁺, ThSO₄²⁺, ThF³⁺, ThF₂²⁺the mobile case; hydrous oxide solubility hundreds of mg/L at pH 3.2
    river water, pH 5 to 7thorium phosphate complexes such as Th(HPO₄)₃²⁻ (constants suspect), Th(OH)₃⁺, Th(OH)₄ (aq)sorbed to Fe and Mn oxides and humics
    pH above 7.5, carbonate bearing waterTh(OH)₃CO₃⁻, Th(CO₃)₅⁶⁻more than 95 percent as the hydroxo carbonate; carbonate desorbs thorium from goethite
    organic rich waterthorium humate, ThEDTA (aq), citrate and oxalate complexesorganic complexes likely predominate over inorganic ones
    Solubility
    Hydrous thorium oxide about 10⁻8.5 to below 10⁻9 mol/L at pH 5 to 10 in 0.1 M NaClO₄, up to 10⁻2.6 mol/L (600 mg/L) at pH 3.2; higher in brines and in carbonate; crystalline ThO₂, thorite and monazite far lower and kinetically inert (EPA Kd volume II).
    Hydrolysis
    Begins above pH 3; polynuclear species Th₂(OH)₂⁶⁺, Th₄(OH)₈⁸⁺ and Th₆(OH)₁₅⁹⁺ are believed to matter at higher concentration (EPA Kd volume II).
    Complexation
    Fluoride, phosphate, sulfate, chloride weak, carbonate strong at high pH, humics and chelants strongest (EPA Kd volume II).
    Precipitates
    Hydrous thorium oxide, ageing to ThO₂; thorium phosphate in phosphate rich water; thorium carried in Fe and Mn oxide sludge.
    ThX4++2HX2OTh(OH)X2X2++2HX+\ce{Th^4+ + 2 H2O -> Th(OH)2^2+ + 2 H+}
    second hydrolysis step; hydrolysis starts above pH 3 and this species takes over from the free ion at about pH 3.5, which is why an acid tailings leachate carries thorium and a neutral water does not (EPA Kd volume II, Figure 5.4; stepwise constants from Stumm and Morgan chapter 6, not re-read)
    ThX4++3HX2OTh(OH)X3X++3HX+\ce{Th^4+ + 3 H2O -> Th(OH)3^+ + 3 H+}
    third step, one of the two species EPA finds over the widest pH range in pure water; the ion is still a cation here, so it still sorbs on iron and manganese oxide
    ThX4++4HX2OTh(OH)X4(aq)+4HX+\ce{Th^4+ + 4 H2O -> Th(OH)4 (aq) + 4 H+}
    net hydrolysis to the neutral species that dominates pure water from about pH 5 to 10 (EPA Kd volume II, Figure 5.4); stepwise constants from Stumm and Morgan chapter 6, not re-read
    ThX4++3HX2O+COX3X2Th(OH)X3COX3X+3HX+\ce{Th^4+ + 3 H2O + CO3^2- -> Th(OH)3CO3^- + 3 H+}
    the species holding more than 95 percent of dissolved thorium above pH 7.5 in river water (EPA Kd volume II, Osthols 1994 constants)
    Th(OH)X4(aq)ThOX2(s)+2HX2O\ce{Th(OH)4 (aq) -> ThO2 (s) + 2 H2O}
    precipitation of hydrous thorium oxide from oversaturated solution over weeks, ageing to a less soluble crystalline solid (EPA Kd volume II)
    4ThX4++8HX2OThX4(OH)X8X8++8HX+\ce{4 Th^4+ + 8 H2O -> Th4(OH)8^8+ + 8 H+}
    one of the polynuclear species EPA believes matters at higher concentration, with Th2(OH)2^6+ and Th6(OH)15^9+; it belongs to process liquors and leachates, not to the sub microgram per litre thorium of natural water; written from the species named, constants not read
    ThX4++SOX4X2ThSOX4X2+\ce{Th^4+ + SO4^2- -> ThSO4^2+}
    sulfate complex of acid uranium tailings and mill leachate, where the pH is below 3.5 and the sulfate is grams per litre; sulfate also lowers thorium sorption on goethite, so it keeps thorium moving twice over
    ThX4++5COX3X2Th(COX3)X5X6\ce{Th^4+ + 5 CO3^2- -> Th(CO3)5^6-}
    the limiting carbonate complex in high alkalinity water, alongside Th(OH)3CO3^-; at about 100 meq/L carbonate alkalinity carbonate lifts thorium back off goethite, which is the one condition that makes thorium mobile at neutral to alkaline pH

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    NORM in treatment residuals and scale
    thorium and its daughters are trapped in solids depositing on sediment and distribution pipe walls, so levels build up over time (ATSDR, citing Lytle 2014)
    the thorium-232 chain adds radium-228 and thorium-228 to radium-226 in softening and iron removal sludge; see the Ra chapter
    gross alpha exceedance traced to thorium-230 near uranium mills and tailings
    acid leaching mobilises thorium-230 from tailings into surface water and groundwater (ATSDR)
    thorium-230 is the isotope to measure, not thorium-232

    5 · Removal and control

    coagulation, sedimentation and filtration
    at neutral pH thorium is particulate or sorbed to iron and manganese oxides and goes with the floc; sorption on goethite and MnO₂ is 90 to 100 percent above pH 5 to 6.5
    WHO 9.6: plants with coagulation, sedimentation and sand filtration may remove up to 100 percent of suspended radioactivity; no thorium row in WHO Table 9.4
    Efficiency
    not read for thorium specifically
    Interferences
    high carbonate alkalinity, sulfate, EDTA and humics keep thorium dissolved
    lime neutralisation of acid mine and tailings water
    raising pH above 5 precipitates hydrous thorium oxide and co-precipitates thorium with iron and aluminium hydroxides
    ThX4++2Ca(OH)X2ThOX2(s)+2CaX2++2HX2O\ce{Th^4+ + 2 Ca(OH)2 -> ThO2 (s) + 2 Ca^2+ + 2 H2O}
    from the solubility curve of hydrous thorium oxide, hundreds of mg/L at pH 3.2 falling to below 1 µg/L by pH 5 (EPA Kd volume II); written as the lime dose that carries the hydrolysis, two moles of lime per mole of thorium, with the hydrous oxide as the product and its hydration water omitted; EPA gives the solubility curve, not the dosing equation
    Efficiency
    not read
    Interferences
    the sludge is NORM

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    ICP-MS, mass 232EPA 200.8 (thorium is a listed analyte); ISO 17294-2estimated instrument detection limit 0.03 µg/L scanning and 0.005 µg/L selected ion monitoring (EPA 200.8 Table 1)measures thorium-232 mass, which can be converted to activity; thorium-230 and -228 need alpha spectrometry
    gross alpha screeningISO 9696, ISO 10704; WHO Table 9.30.02 to 0.1 Bq/L; Euratom 0.04 Bq/Lthorium isotopes count in gross alpha; the WHO screening level is 0.5 Bq/L, Euratom 0.1 Bq/L, US 15 pCi/L
    isotopic thorium by alpha spectrometry after separationmethod number not readnot readneeded to separate thorium-230 (uranium chain) from thorium-228 and -232
    Sampling pitfalls
    Thorium sorbs to bottle walls and particles within minutes at neutral pH: acidify at collection, and filter first only if dissolved thorium is the question. Old thorium Kd values were inflated by precipitation of hydrous thorium oxide during the test (EPA), and the same happens in a spiked sample.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ chapter 9 Table 9.2 and Annex 6 Table A₆.11 (thorium-228, -230, -232); 10 (thorium-227); 100 (thorium-234); 0.1 (thorium-229) Bq/Lguidance levels; dose coefficients 7.2 x 10⁻8 (Th-228), 2.1 x 10⁻7 (Th-230) and 2.3 x 10⁻7 Sv/Bq (Th-232); screening levels 0.5 Bq/L gross alpha and 1 Bq/L gross beta; thorium is not a chemical parameter in Annex 3; the isotopes beyond the chapter 9 table are from Annex 6 Table A₆.1
    EU Directive 2013/51/Euratom, Annex IIInot set no thorium isotope in the derived concentration table; caught by the recommended 0.1 Bq/L gross alpha screening level
    US EPA NPDWR15 pCi/Lgross alpha MCL excluding radon and uranium, MCLG zero; no thorium specific MCL and EPA does not require thorium to be measured (ATSDR)
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902)not set no radioactivity or thorium parameter

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Radiological: bone seeking alpha emitters with ingestion dose coefficients of 7.2 x 10⁻8 to 2.3 x 10⁻7 Sv/Bq (WHO Table 9.2); chemical toxicity is not the basis of any limit. Thorium compounds are not readily absorbed by the body and intakes from water are very low (ATSDR).
    Bioaccumulation
    Plant to soil transfer ratio below 0.01 (ATSDR); thorium concentrates in sediment (0.5 to 31 pCi/g of the three isotopes) rather than in water.
    Ecotoxicity
    Not addressed in the sources read.

    Flags

    • Most concentration data are 1980s compilations quoted by ATSDR and EPA; no modern survey of thorium in water was read.
    • The thorium phosphate constants are suspect and may over predict those complexes, as EPA itself notes.
    • The hydrolysis equations are net reactions written from the species distribution, with constants from Stumm and Morgan chapter 6 not re-read.
    • The Euratom values were read from the retained UK copy of the directive on legislation.gov.uk.
    • EPA 200.8 gives an instrument detection limit for thorium, not a method detection limit; Table 7 was not located in the text read.

    Gaps

    • No measured thorium concentration in municipal wastewater, rare earth processing effluent or monazite plant effluent was read; the ledger's mining chapter and the MWEI BREF note that no operator monitored it.
    • No thorium specific removal efficiency was read; WHO Table 9.4 has no thorium row.
    • Alpha spectrometry method numbers for isotopic thorium were not read.
    • No aquatic toxicity value was read.
    • No GCC discharge standard was read; radioactive waste is prohibited to sewer in Abu Dhabi per the Ra chapter, not re-read here.
    • No surface species or surface complexation constants for thorium on goethite or manganese dioxide were read, so the coagulation row carries no equation.

    Sources

    US EPA, Understanding Variation in Partition Coefficient, Kd, Values, Volume II: Review of Geochemistry and Available Kd Values for Cadmium, Cesium, Chromium, Lead, Plutonium, Radon, Strontium, Thorium, Tritium and Uranium, EPA 402-R-99-004B (August 1999), section 5.9 thorium
    ATSDR, Toxicological Profile for Thorium (2019), chapter 5 Potential for human exposure (NCBI Bookshelf NBK591328)
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first addendum, chapter 9 Radiological aspects (Tables 9.2 to 9.4, section 9.6) and Annex 6 Table A6.1 of the 2022 edition
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), Annex 6 Supporting information on radionuclides, Table A6.1 (NCBI Bookshelf)
    Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom, Annex III (screening levels, derived concentrations, limits of detection), read in the retained UK copy on legislation.gov.uk
    US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (table of MCLs and MCLGs, radionuclides)
    US EPA Method 200.8, Revision 5.4 (1994), Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by ICP-MS, Table 1 estimated instrument detection limits
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 12 Tables 1 to 3
    Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J., Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 1996), chapter 6 (hydrolysis of metal ions)
    The Element Book, element entry and reference text for Th (data/elements/Th.json, data/reference/text/Th.json)

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.