Antimony

    group 15 · period 5 · p-block · metalloid

    fullAntimony is regulated in drinking water (WHO 20 µg/L, EU 10 µg/L, US 6 µg/L) although natural water carries almost none; it arrives from PET bottles, solders and fittings, polyester dyehouses (antimony trioxide is the polyester catalyst), flame retardant finishing, mining and smelting, and it behaves like arsenic in water: an oxo-anion that conventional treatment does not touch and that only iron coagulation at low pH takes out.

    Typical wastewaters

    • textile dyeing and finishing (polyester) Sb(III) and Sb(V) released from the antimony trioxide polyester catalyst in the dyeing liquor at pH 4 to 5 and 130 C; antimony trioxide flame retardant synergist from finishing ZDHC limits do not yet apply to polyester wet processing, but antimony must be sampled and reported
    • mine drainage (antimony mining and smelting districts) Sb(OH)₃ (aq) and thioantimonite complexes in reducing, sulfidic mine water, oxidising slowly to Sb(OH)₆⁻ on aeration US EPA source list for the antimony MCL
    • petroleum refining, ceramics, electronics and lead-acid battery manufacture antimonate Sb(OH)₆⁻ in oxic effluent US EPA source list for the antimony MCL; no effluent figure read
    In the ledger's plant and process records, discharged by: Speciality inorganic pigments (iron oxide, chromium oxide, CIC, zinc sulphide, lithopone) (Chemicals) · Base metal ores (Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn) (Mining) · Coal, lignite and peat (Mining) · Industrial minerals (potash, salt, kaolin, magnesite and others) (Mining) · Precious metal ores (Au, Ag, Pt): gold and silver extraction (Mining) · Uranium ore (Mining) · Disperse dyeing of polyester (Textile) · Flame-retardant finishing (Textile)

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Sb, 51
    Oxidation states in water
    +5 as the antimonate anion Sb(OH)₆⁻ in oxic water, the form WHO identifies for antimony leached from materials and the less toxic one; +3 as the neutral Sb(OH)₃ in reducing water and as the soluble potassium antimony tartrate of the toxicology studies, more toxic and genotoxic in vitro and in vivo; -3 (stibine) has no water chemistry. 0 as the metal in lead alloys and solders.
    Note
    The element entry covers stibnite, the trioxide and the halides. In water antimony is the arsenic analogue one row down: an anion in the +5 state, a neutral hydroxide in the +3 state, both poorly adsorbed at neutral pH.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Weathering of stibnite and other antimony minerals; hydrothermal and mining districts. WHO: groundwater below 0.001 µg/L and surface water below 0.2 µg/L in general; drinking water appears to be below 5 µg/L. Antimony is not normally a raw water contaminant.
    Anthropogenic sources
    Dissolution from metal plumbing and fittings, the most common source in drinking water (WHO), with antimony solder replacing lead; leaching from PET bottles, which hold antimony trioxide catalyst residues (213 mg Sb per kg plastic in one brand); antimony trioxide in polyester manufacture and hence polyester dyeing effluent (ZDHC); antimony trioxide flame retardant synergist in textile finishing (element entry); antimony mining and smelting, petroleum refineries, ceramics, electronics and lead-acid battery plants (US EPA source list); the ledger's textile, chemical and mining chapters carry the plant figures.
    matrixtypical rangenote
    groundwaterbelow 0.001 µg/L
    the figure is far below usual detection limits and is quoted as printed
    WHO fact sheet general statement
    surface waterbelow 0.2 µg/L
    drinking waterbelow 5 µg/Lappears to be; dissolution from plumbing is the usual source
    bottled water in PET, south western USA0.095 to 0.521 µg/L
    storage temperature and time dependent
    nine brands; leaching rises with temperature: the model gives 176 days at 60 C, 2.3 days at 80 C and 1.3 days at 85 C to reach the US 6 µg/L limit

    3 · Speciation

    Antimony(V) exists as the antimonate anion Sb(OH)₆⁻ across the whole natural pH range because antimonic acid is a fairly strong acid; antimony(III) is the neutral Sb(OH)₃ up to high pH. Neither is a cation, so neither hydrolyses to a filterable hydroxide, and neither adsorbs well on aluminium hydroxide. Ferric hydroxide adsorbs both: Sb(V) best at pH 4.5 to 5.5 and progressively worse as pH rises, Sb(III) well from pH 4 to 10 (Guo and others 2009). Phosphate and humic acid compete with Sb(V) for the iron surface and barely affect Sb(III). Oxic water holds Sb(V); reducing water and stibnite districts give Sb(III), and the sulfide complexes of Sb(III) keep antimony mobile in sulfidic water. Antimony leached from materials is the Sb(V) oxo-anion (WHO).

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    oxic water, pH 4 to 10Sb(OH)₆⁻the drinking water and PET leachate form; the less toxic state (WHO)
    reducing water, mine water, stibnite districtsSb(OH)₃ (aq); thioantimonite complexes where sulfide is presentthe more toxic state; oxidises to Sb(V) on aeration, slowly
    ferric coagulation at pH 4.5 to 5.5Sb(V) adsorbed on ferric hydroxide flocthe removal window (Guo and others 2009)
    polyester dyeing liquor, pH 4 to 5, 130 Cantimony released from the polymer catalyst as Sb(III) and Sb(V)the ZDHC polyester exemption exists because this source is in the fibre, not the dyehouse's chemistry
    Solubility
    No controlling solid in ordinary water; Sb₂O₃ and Sb₂S₃ are the sparingly soluble source minerals and iron antimonates the proposed treatment solids. No solubility products quoted; the sources read print none.
    Hydrolysis
    Both states are fully hydrolysed hydroxo species at natural pH; Sb(OH)₅ is a stronger acid than Sb(OH)₃, hence the anion for Sb(V) and the neutral molecule for Sb(III). The pKa is not printed in the sources read and is not quoted.
    Complexation
    Sulfide (thioantimonites), tartrate (potassium antimony tartrate), organic matter; phosphate and humic acid compete at the iron surface rather than complexing antimony (Guo and others 2009).
    Precipitates
    Antimony adsorbed on and co-precipitated with ferric hydroxide; Sb₂S₃ in sulfidic sediments; iron antimonate proposed in the coagulation literature.
    Sb(OH)X5+HX2OSb(OH)X6X+HX+\ce{Sb(OH)5 + H2O <=> Sb(OH)6^- + H+}
    antimonic acid dissociation; the anion dominates above a low pH throughout natural water (Stumm and Morgan chapter 6 acid base constants, from the chapter, not re-read; the WHO text names the Sb(V) oxo-anion without a formula)
    Sb(OH)X3+HX2OSb(OH)X4X+HX+\ce{Sb(OH)3 + H2O <=> Sb(OH)4^- + H+}
    antimonous acid dissociation; it lies far to the left through the whole natural range, which is why Sb(III) travels as the neutral molecule and adsorbs on iron from pH 4 to 10; the pKa is high but no value is printed in the sources read, so none is quoted (Stumm and Morgan chapter 6, from the chapter, not re-read)
    Sb(OH)X3+3HX2OSb(OH)X6X+3HX++2eX\ce{Sb(OH)3 + 3 H2O -> Sb(OH)6^- + 3 H+ + 2 e-}
    oxidation half reaction of Sb(III) to Sb(V) by oxygen, chlorine or other oxidants in treatment; written here as the electron balance, kinetics not read
    Sb(OH)X3+HOCl+2HX2OSb(OH)X6X+ClX+2HX+\ce{Sb(OH)3 + HOCl + 2 H2O -> Sb(OH)6^- + Cl^- + 2 H+}
    the same two electron oxidation driven by free chlorine, the oxidant a plant actually carries; the overall equation is the half reaction above combined with the hypochlorous acid to chloride couple, no rate or dose was read. Note the consequence: because Guo removes Sb(III) on iron from pH 4 to 10 and Sb(V) only at pH 4.5 to 5.5, pre-oxidation makes antimony harder to take out, the opposite of the arsenic case

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    conventional treatment does not remove antimony
    anionic or neutral species, no hydroxide to filter, poor adsorption on alum floc
    WHO fact sheet; alum coagulation was found impracticable for both states (Guo and others 2009)
    leaching from PET in hot storage
    antimony trioxide catalyst residue migrates into the water faster at higher temperature
    0.2 µg/L rising to the 6 µg/L US limit within days at 80 to 85 C in the model; Westerhoff and others recommend considering alternative plastics in hot climates
    polyester dyehouse antimony
    antimony in the polyester fibre is released in dyeing
    ZDHC: for polyester wet processing facilities the limits do not yet apply, but the parameter must be sampled and reported, with limits intended from 2025 met by antimony free polyester or mitigation
    leaching from solders and fittings
    antimony solder replacing lead in plumbing
    WHO: the most common source appears to be dissolution from metal plumbing and fittings, controlled by product control; little evidence of significant contribution from solder itself
    analytical instability
    antimony hydrolyses and adsorbs out of nitric acid preserved samples
    EPA 200.8: hydrochloric acid is required to maintain stability in solutions containing antimony and silver, at the cost of chloride polyatomic interferences
    sludge
    antimony removed on iron floc ends in the sludge
    ZDHC sludge threshold 5 mg/kg dry weight (textile)
    as a reagent
    none
    antimony is not a water treatment reagent; potassium antimony tartrate is a laboratory reagent

    5 · Removal and control

    ferric chloride coagulation, flocculation and sedimentation
    adsorption of Sb(V) and Sb(III) on ferric hydroxide floc, modelled with a diffuse layer model; precipitation and co-precipitation excluded as the main mechanism
    Fe(OH)X3(s)+Sb(OH)X6XFe(OH)X2Sb(OH)X6(s)+OHX\ce{Fe(OH)3 (s) + Sb(OH)6^- -> Fe(OH)2Sb(OH)6 (s) + OH-}
    Sb(V) optimum pH 4.5 to 5.5, removal falling with further pH increase; Sb(III) removed effectively from pH 4 to 10; coagulant type, antimony species and pH matter more than dose and initial concentration; the adsorption step is written as the ligand exchange this book uses for arsenate on ferric hydroxide, Guo fits the data with a diffuse layer model and prints no surface species; the Sb(III) surface complex is not written because none was read
    Efficiency
    effective for both states with ferric chloride; percentages not printed in the abstract read
    Interferences
    phosphate and humic acid markedly impede Sb(V) removal, insignificant effect on Sb(III); aluminium sulfate gives very low removal of both
    pre-oxidation then iron coagulation at neutral pH
    where the source is Sb(III) it is removed at plant pH on iron; where it is Sb(V) the pH must be lowered or the iron dose raised
    follows from the pH dependence above; not a read design rule
    Efficiency
    not quoted
    Interferences
    as above
    product control
    certification of solders, fittings and materials in contact with drinking water
    WHO: control of antimony from plumbing sources is by product control

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    ICP-MSEPA 200.8 (mass 123); ISO 17294-2; Standard Methods 31250.1 to 1 µg/L (WHO); EPA 200.8 instrument detection limit 0.08 µg/L scanning, 0.008 µg/L selected ion monitoringhydrochloric acid needed for stability; apply the chloride interference corrections (EPA 200.8 section 7.1)
    electrothermal AASISO 155860.01 µg/L (WHO); graphite furnace 0.8 µg/L
    hydride generation AASno numbered standard read (WHO cites hydride generation AAS; Standard Methods 3114 covers arsenic and selenium, not antimony)5 µg/L (WHO)prereduction to Sb(III) needed for total antimony
    Sampling pitfalls
    Preserve with hydrochloric acid, not nitric alone: antimony is unstable in nitric acid solutions and adsorbs out (EPA 200.8). Speciation (Sb(III) against Sb(V)) needs prompt analysis; oxic storage converts Sb(III). PET sample bottles are an antimony source; use glass or polyethylene. Bottled water results depend on storage temperature and age.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ 4th ed. with addenda (2022)0.02 mg/L20 µg/L from a TDI of 6 µg/kg body weight (NOAEL 6.0 mg/kg per day for reduced weight gain in a 90 day rat study with potassium antimony tartrate, uncertainty factor 1000), 10 percent allocation, 60 kg, 2 L/day; assessment 2003
    EU DWD 2020/218410 µg/LAnnex I Part B
    US EPA NPDWR0.006 mg/LMCL and MCLG 0.006 mg/L; health effects listed as increase in blood cholesterol and decrease in blood sugar; sources listed as petroleum refineries, fire retardants, ceramics, electronics, solder
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902)not set antimony is not among the metals with a BAT-AEL
    US EPA 40 CFR 433.14, metal finishing (BAT)not set antimony is not among the regulated pollutants of the metal finishing category
    Abu Dhabi ADS 23/2017, discharge to the marine environment (EAD)0.1 mg/L
    region-dependent; marine discharge only
    Table 1 maximum allowable concentration at the point of discharge
    Abu Dhabi DoE Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022, discharge to sewernot set region-dependentantimony has no row in Table A₄ Metals
    industry thresholds
    sectorbodylimitnote
    textile and leatherZDHC Wastewater Guidelines v₂.1 (2022), Table 20.1 foundational; 0.05 progressive; 0.01 aspirational mg/Ltextile and leather; footnote a: for polyester wet processing facilities the limits do not yet apply unless required by law or adopted voluntarily, but antimony must be sampled and reported, with limits intended by 2025; methods ISO 17294, EPA 200.8, 6010C, 6020A; sludge threshold 5 mg/kg dry weight, textile only (Table 4A)

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    TDI 6 µg/kg body weight from a 90 day rat study with the soluble potassium antimony tartrate; the form decides the toxicity: Sb(V) leached from materials is the less toxic, antimony trioxide has low bioavailability, soluble Sb(III) salts are genotoxic in vitro and in vivo. Antimony trioxide is possibly carcinogenic by inhalation (IARC 2B), the trisulfide not classifiable (Group 3); there are no data indicating carcinogenicity by the oral route (WHO fact sheet). US health effects listed: increased blood cholesterol, decreased blood sugar.
    Bioaccumulation
    Not addressed in the sources read; total exposure from environment, food and drinking water is very low compared with occupational exposure (WHO).
    Ecotoxicity
    No US EPA national recommended aquatic life criterion for antimony and no EU EQS; not addressed in the sources read.

    Flags

    • The Sb(OH)₆⁻ and Sb(OH)₃ formulas and the antimonic acid dissociation are textbook speciation, not printed in the WHO text, which names only the antimony(V) oxo-anion; cited to Stumm and Morgan chapter 6 from memory, not re-read.
    • The WHO groundwater figure of below 0.001 µg/L is below the detection limits WHO itself lists and is quoted as printed.
    • Guo and others 2009 was read as the abstract only; removal percentages are in the paper, not the abstract.
    • The pre-oxidation and neutral pH iron removal item is a consequence drawn from the pH dependence, not a design rule read.
    • Westerhoff and others 2008 was read as the abstract; the temperature model figures are from it.
    • EU law was read on legislation.gov.uk mirrors because eur-lex did not respond; eur-lex urls kept for consistency.
    • Abu Dhabi marine value 0.1 mg/L; the sewer regulation has no antimony row; other GCC states not read.
    • Standard Methods and ISO method numbers other than those in the sources read (EPA 200.8, ISO 17294-2 and the methods the WHO documents cite) are quoted from memory and were not confirmed this session.

    Gaps

    • No seawater, municipal wastewater, mine water or polyester dyehouse antimony concentration was read.
    • No pKa, solubility product or adsorption constant is quoted.
    • Adsorbents (iron oxide media, activated alumina), reverse osmosis and ion exchange for antimony are not covered because no read source gives figures.
    • The WHO 2003 background document on antimony was not read; the fact sheet was.
    • The EU textiles BAT conclusions (2022/2508) were not read for an antimony BAT-AEL.
    • EU law was read on legislation.gov.uk mirrors; other GCC discharge standards were not read.
    • No surface complexation constants or surface species formulas for antimony on ferric hydroxide were read; the ligand exchange equation is written by analogy with arsenate.

    Sources

    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), chapter 12 chemical fact sheet, Antimony (pp. 339 to 340)
    Westerhoff, P., Prapaipong, P., Shock, E. and Hillaireau, A., Antimony leaching from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic used for bottled drinking water, Water Research 42(3), 551 to 556 (2008), abstract (PMID 17707454)
    Guo, X., Wu, Z. and He, M., Removal of antimony(V) and antimony(III) from drinking water by coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation (CFS), Water Research 43(17), 4327 to 4335 (2009), abstract (PMID 19595424)
    Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast), Annex I Part B (read on the legislation.gov.uk mirror of the directive)
    US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (table of MCLs and treatment techniques)
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 12 Table 3 and footnotes c, d and g (read on the legislation.gov.uk mirror)
    40 CFR 433.14, Effluent limitations (BAT), metal finishing point source category
    Abu Dhabi Specification ADS 23/2017, Environmental Specifications for Land-Based Liquid Discharges to the Marine Environment (Environment Agency Abu Dhabi), Table 1
    Abu Dhabi Department of Energy, Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022 (DoE/PD/R01/005, effective 1 January 2022), Appendix Table A4 Metals
    ZDHC Wastewater Guidelines Version 2.1 (November 2022), Table 2 heavy metals and Table 4A sludge
    US EPA Method 200.8, Revision 5.4 (1994), Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by ICP-MS, sections 1.7 and 7.1, Table 1 (instrument detection limits)
    US EPA, National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, Aquatic Life Criteria Table
    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (online edition), 3111 (flame AAS), 3120 (ICP-OES), 3125 (ICP-MS)
    Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J., Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 1996), chapter 6 (metal ions in aqueous solution: hydrolysis and complexation) and chapter 7 (precipitation and dissolution)

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.