Cesium

    group 1 · period 6 · s-block · alkali metal

    fullStable caesium has no water limit and no treatment role, but radiocaesium (caesium-137 and 134) from reactor accidents and reprocessing is a regulated radionuclide with a WHO guidance level of 10 Bq/L, and its removal by Prussian blue and other hexacyanoferrates is the one caesium technology a treatment engineer meets.

    Typical wastewaters

    • nuclear fuel reprocessing discharges to sea caesium-137 as the free hydrated Cs⁺ ion Sellafield discharged 1.3 TBq in 2022 against a permit limit of 17 TBq
    • reactor accident water (Fukushima cooling and contaminated water) caesium-137 as Cs⁺, 823 Bq/L in one example at pH 12, in high salinity water from seawater cooling treated by a zeolite stage then nickel ferrocyanide, more than 1000 fold reduction
    • reactor emissions and weapons test fallout in raw water supplies caesium-137 and caesium-134 as Cs⁺, passing conventional treatment guidance level 10 Bq/L; ion exchange 40 to 70 percent, reverse osmosis above 70 (WHO Table 9.4)

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Cs, 55
    Oxidation states in water
    +1 only, as the large, weakly hydrated Cs⁺ ion; it does not hydrolyse, forms no precipitates in natural water and is held only by cation exchange on clays and by the lattice cavities of hexacyanoferrates.
    Note
    The element entry covers the metal and the caesium-137 gamma source. In water caesium is an inert cation; the whole story is radiocaesium and how selectively it can be exchanged.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Traces from weathering of potassium minerals; stable caesium in water is at the microgram per litre level or below and is not sourced here.
    Anthropogenic sources
    Caesium-137 and caesium-134 released as fission products in reactor emissions, nuclear weapons tests and accidents (WHO Table 9.2); reprocessing discharges (Sellafield discharged 1.3 TBq of caesium-137 to sea in 2022 against a permit limit of 17 TBq); the Fukushima treatment campaign has processed 482,000 m₃ of contaminated water (Rauwel 2019).
    matrixtypical rangenote
    contaminated water, Fukushima example823 Bq/L caesium-137single exampleone decontamination example at pH 12 quoted in the review
    reprocessing discharge to sea1.3 (2022) TBq per year caesium-137a load, not a concentrationSellafield, permit limit 17 TBq

    3 · Speciation

    Cs⁺ is a free hydrated cation at every pH; it is not precipitated, complexed or oxidised. Selectivity comes from size: Prussian blue analogues capture Cs⁺ in a cavity created by a hexacyanoferrate vacancy whose size matches the hydrated radius of Cs⁺, exchanging it for K⁺ or H⁺; competition follows K⁺ above Ca²⁺ above Mg²⁺ above Na⁺ (Rauwel 2019).

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    any natural waterCs⁺sorbed on illite type clays in sediments, otherwise mobile
    Solubility
    All common caesium salts are freely soluble.
    Hydrolysis
    None.
    Complexation
    Negligible; the hexacyanoferrate lattice is a size selective host, not a ligand.
    Precipitates
    None in natural water; caesium hexacyanoferrates are the engineered solids.
    KFe[Fe(CN)X6]+CsX+CsFe[Fe(CN)X6]+KX+\ce{KFe[Fe(CN)6] + Cs^+ -> CsFe[Fe(CN)6] + K^+}
    potassium Prussian blue exchanging its lattice potassium for caesium; the review describes the exchange of caesium with the hydrophilic vacancy or with K^+; the idealised formula is written here

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    radiocaesium after a release
    caesium-137 (half life about 30 years, element entry) is conservative in water and passes conventional treatment
    WHO Table 9.4: coagulation 10 to 40 percent, sand filtration 10 to 40, activated carbon 0 to 10, precipitation softening 10 to 40, ion exchange 40 to 70, reverse osmosis above 70 percent
    competition from potassium
    K⁺ occupies the same sites on clays, resins and hexacyanoferrates
    selectivity order K⁺ above Ca²⁺ above Mg²⁺ above Na⁺ (Rauwel 2019)
    CsFe[Fe(CN)X6]+KX+KFe[Fe(CN)X6]+CsX+\ce{CsFe[Fe(CN)6] + K^+ -> KFe[Fe(CN)6] + Cs^+}
    potassium rich water drives the capture back off the sorbent; selectivity order K^+ above Ca^2+ above Mg^2+ above Na^+; written here as the reverse of the capture step from that selectivity statement, the review prints the order not the equation
    as a reagent
    none
    caesium is not dosed; caesium formate brines are a drilling fluid in the ledger, not a treatment chemical

    5 · Removal and control

    hexacyanoferrate sorbents (Prussian blue and its copper, nickel and cobalt analogues)
    size selective capture of Cs⁺ in lattice vacancies; used as powders, granules, on cellulose or carbon nanotube supports, and with magnetite for magnetic recovery
    KFe[Fe(CN)X6]+CsX+CsFe[Fe(CN)X6]+KX+\ce{KFe[Fe(CN)6] + Cs^+ -> CsFe[Fe(CN)6] + K^+}
    distribution coefficients 0.115 to 568 L/g and capacities up to 465 mg/g (graphene composite) and 310 mg/g (carbon nanotube copper hexacyanoferrate) in the review; at Fukushima a zeolite stage followed by nickel ferrocyanide reduced contamination by more than 1000 fold
    Efficiency
    decontamination factor above 1000 in the Fukushima train
    Interferences
    potassium, calcium, magnesium; hexacyanoferrate dissolution at high pH releases cyanide
    zeolites and cation exchange
    Cs⁺ exchange on natural or synthetic zeolites and strong acid resin
    RNa+CsX+RCs+NaX+\ce{RNa + Cs^+ -> RCs + Na^+}
    the first stage at Fukushima; WHO rates ion exchange 40 to 70 percent for caesium; written in the usual resin notation for a sodium form strong acid bed (R one exchange site), WHO gives the percentage not the exchange step
    Efficiency
    40 to 70 percent (WHO Table 9.4)
    Interferences
    high salinity seawater used for cooling
    reverse osmosis
    membrane rejection
    WHO Table 9.4
    Efficiency
    above 70 percent
    Interferences
    concentrate is the waste

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    gamma spectrometryWHO Annex 6 (ISO methods); gross beta screening ISO 9697gross beta screening level 1 Bq/L (WHO), 1.0 Bq/L (Euratom); Euratom gross beta detection 0.4 Bq/Lcaesium-137 counted through its barium-137m gamma line; caesium-134 by its own lines
    ICP-MS for stable caesiumISO 17294-2 (not confirmed to list caesium this session)not read
    Sampling pitfalls
    Acidify to keep Cs⁺ off the bottle wall and sediment; note the potassium-40 background when gross beta is used as the screen (WHO subtracts potassium-40 from measured potassium).

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ chapter 910 (caesium-137); 10 (caesium-134) Bq/Lguidance levels for 0.1 mSv/year; dose coefficients 1.3 x 10⁻8 and 1.9 x 10⁻8 Sv/Bq
    EU Directive 2013/51/Euratom11 (caesium-137); 7.2 (caesium-134) Bq/LAnnex III derived concentrations for the 0.1 mSv indicative dose
    WHO GDWQ 4th ed. with addenda (2022)no guideline no chemical fact sheet; radionuclide guidance levels, where they exist, are in chapter 9 and Annex 6
    EU DWD 2020/2184not set not an Annex I parameter
    US EPA NPDWRnot regulated no MCL
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902)not set not a BAT 12 parameter
    industry thresholds
    sectorbodylimitnote
    textileZDHC Wastewater Guidelines v₂.1 (2022)not set not a ZDHC parameter

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Stable caesium is of low toxicity and unregulated; caesium-137 is a whole body gamma and beta dose, distributed like potassium in soft tissue (the guidance level is 10 Bq/L, WHO).
    Bioaccumulation
    Follows potassium into muscle of fish and animals; the food chain, not water, is the dominant pathway after fallout (not sourced here beyond WHO's fission product note).
    Ecotoxicity
    not relevant

    Flags

    • Stable caesium occurrence in water was not sourced; only radiocaesium is quantified.
    • The hexacyanoferrate exchange equation is an idealised formula written here from the review's description of K⁺ exchange.
    • The Fukushima figures (823 Bq/L, 1000 fold, 482,000 m₃) are quoted from a materials review, not from the plant operator.
    • Sellafield discharge is a yearly load, not a water concentration.

    Gaps

    • No source read gives stable caesium in groundwater, surface water, seawater or wastewater.
    • Zeolite selectivity coefficients and the clay (illite frayed edge) sorption that governs caesium in sediments are not sourced.
    • The hexacyanoferrate dissolution and cyanide release at high pH is a known drawback not quantified in the sources read.
    • No GCC document mentions caesium.
    • No exchange stoichiometry or selectivity coefficient for caesium on zeolite or strong acid resin was read; the resin equation is the standard monovalent exchange written in the book's notation.

    Sources

    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), Annex 6 Supporting information on radionuclides, Table A6.1 guidance levels
    Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast), Article 11, Annex I Part B, Annex II Part D and Annex III
    US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (table of MCLs and MCLGs, inorganic chemicals and radionuclides)
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 12 Tables 1 and 2
    ZDHC Wastewater Guidelines Version 2.1 (November 2022), Table 2 heavy metals and Table 4 sludge parameters
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first addendum, chapter 9 Radiological aspects (sections 9.2 to 9.7, Tables 9.2 and 9.4, Box 9.5)
    Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom laying down requirements for the protection of the health of the general public with regard to radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption, Annex I (parametric values and notes) and Annex III (screening, derived concentrations, performance characteristics)
    Rauwel, P. and Rauwel, E., Towards the extraction of radioactive cesium-137 from water via graphene/CNT and nanostructured Prussian blue hybrid nanocomposites: a review, Nanomaterials 9 (2019) 682, doi 10.3390/nano9050682
    Sellafield Ltd, Annual Review of Environmental Performance 2022/23 (published 7 November 2023), liquid discharges to sea
    The Element Book, element entry and reference text for Cs (data/elements/Cs.json, data/reference/text/Cs.json)

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.