Mercury

    group 12 · period 6 · d-block · transition metal

    fullMercury is regulated in drinking water by WHO (6 µg/L inorganic), the EU (1 µg/L) and the US (2 µg/L), in surface water by the strictest EU quality standard of any metal (0.07 µg/L), and in effluents at nanogram per litre levels; its water story is speciation, methylation in sediments, the chlor-alkali legacy, and removal by sulfide and activated carbon.

    Typical wastewaters

    • chlor-alkali (legacy mercury cells, decommissioning) Hg(II) complexes and dissolved elemental mercury, treated to 3 to 15 µg/L at the outlet of the mercury treatment unit during decommissioning or conversion the mercury cell process was stopped in the EU on 11 December 2017 and cannot be BAT under any circumstances; contaminated sewers and sediments release mercury for years
    • coal fired power (flue gas desulfurisation wastewater) Hg(II) in the scrubber purge, treated to 34 ng/L monthly and 103 ng/L daily under the 2020 US BAT limits raw FGD mercury implied in the microgram per litre range; older or smaller units 356 and 788 ng/L
    • ore mining and dressing (copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver, molybdenum mines and mills) Hg(II) in mine drainage and mill water, limited at 1 µg/L monthly limit, not a measured concentration
    • refineries and factories; landfill and cropland runoff inorganic Hg(II), the US EPA source list for mercury in drinking water no concentration read
    • textile and leather wet processing Hg(II) as a ZDHC restricted metal, limited at 0.01 mg/L foundational, 0.005 progressive and 0.001 aspirational, with sludge thresholds of 1 mg/kg textile and 0.2 mg/kg leather a limit, not a measured occurrence
    In the ledger's plant and process records, discharged by: Lower olefins (steam cracking) (Chemicals) · Phosphoric acid (wet process) (Chemicals) · Base metal ores (Cu, Ni, Pb, Sn, Zn) (Mining) · Bauxite, alumina, magnesite and ilmenite (Mining) · Industrial minerals (potash, salt, kaolin, magnesite and others) (Mining) · Precious metal ores (Au, Ag, Pt): gold and silver extraction (Mining) · Halogenation (Pharmaceuticals) · Processes involving heavy metals (Pharmaceuticals)

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Hg, 80
    Oxidation states in water
    +2 as Hg²⁺, present in water almost entirely as neutral hydroxide and chloride complexes (Hg(OH)₂, HgClOH, HgCl₂) and, in sulfidic water, as HgS and bisulfide complexes; 0 as dissolved elemental mercury, volatile and lost to air; +1 as Hg₂²⁺ only in unusual chemistry; and organic mercury, above all monomethylmercury CH₃Hg⁺, formed by bacteria in sediments. Almost all mercury in uncontaminated drinking water is thought to be inorganic Hg²⁺ (WHO).
    Note
    The element entry gives the metal's reactions and the calomel, cinnabar and chloride compounds. In water the questions are which complex, whether it has been methylated, and how far below 1 µg/L a treatment can go.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Weathering of cinnabar and mercury bearing sulfide deposits; local mineral deposits produce higher groundwater levels (WHO); rainwater carries 5 to 100 ng/L, with means as low as 1 ng/L (WHO background document, IPCS 1990). Methylation of inorganic mercury occurs in both fresh water and seawater (WHO).
    Anthropogenic sources
    Chlor-alkali mercury cells, the process the EU stopped on 11 December 2017 and the BAT conclusions declare not BAT under any circumstances; electrical appliances, dental amalgam and mercury compounds (WHO); refineries, factories, landfill and cropland runoff (US EPA source list); flue gas desulfurisation wastewater at coal fired power plants, regulated in the US at 34 ng/L monthly; ore mining and dressing at 1 µg/L monthly; artisanal gold amalgamation in the ledger.
    matrixtypical rangenote
    surface water and groundwaterbelow 0.5 µg/L
    an upper bound, not a distribution
    inorganic mercury, usually; local mineral deposits may produce higher levels in groundwater; wells on Izu Oshima Island, Japan, reached 5.5 µg/L
    drinking waterabout 0.025 µg/L1990s compilationaverage about 25 ng/L, the same as rain (WHO background document); a small number of US groundwaters exceeded the 2 µg/L MCL
    rainwater0.005 to 0.1 µg/L5 to 100 ng/L; means as low as 1 ng/L reported
    industrial wastewater, flue gas desulfurisationtreated to 34 (monthly) and 103 (daily) ng/L
    limits, not measured raw concentrations
    the 2020 US BAT limits; older or smaller units 356 and 788 ng/L; the limits imply raw FGD mercury in the microgram per litre range
    industrial wastewater, chlor-alkali decommissioning3 to 15 µg/LEU BAT level, not a surveyBAT associated performance level at the outlet of the mercury treatment unit during decommissioning or conversion of mercury cell plants, 24 hour flow proportional composites
    seawaternot read no figuremethylation occurs in seawater (WHO); no concentration figure was read

    3 · Speciation

    Dissolved inorganic mercury in oxic fresh water is not the free ion but neutral Hg(OH)₂, HgClOH and HgCl₂, with the chloride complexes winning as chloride rises (HgCl₃⁻ and HgCl₄²⁻ in seawater); natural organic matter binds Hg(II) strongly at reduced sulfur sites, so most river mercury is organically bound or on particles. In anoxic sulfidic water mercury is HgS, one of the least soluble solids known, unless excess sulfide or organic thiols redissolve it. Bacteria in anoxic sediments methylate Hg(II) to methylmercury, the form that bioaccumulates; the balance between methylation and demethylation sets the methylmercury level (WHO).

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    oxic fresh water, pH 6 to 9, low chlorideHg(OH)₂, HgClOH, HgCl₂; Hg bound to natural organic matter and particlesthe WHO fact sheet: almost all mercury in uncontaminated drinking water is inorganic
    brackish water and seawaterHgCl₂, HgCl₃⁻, HgCl₄²⁻chloride complexes dominate; anionic complexes sorb poorly
    anoxic, sulfidic sediment and groundwaterHgS (s), HgS₂²⁻ and HgHS₂⁻ at excess sulfide; CH₃Hg⁺ from bacterial methylationmethylation occurs in fresh water and seawater; bacteria isolated from fish slime and soil methylate mercury (WHO background document)
    treatment plant with sulfide dosingHgS (s)best in the near neutral pH range; efficiency falls above pH 9 and excess sulfide redissolves mercury (EPA capsule report)
    Solubility
    Mercury(II) chloride and nitrate are soluble; mercury sulfide has a very low solubility (WHO background document). No solubility product is printed in the sources read; the Stumm and Morgan table gives HgS among the least soluble sulfides (from the chapter, not re-read).
    Hydrolysis
    Hg²⁺ hydrolyses at low pH: Hg(OH)₂ is the dominant species above about pH 4 in chloride free water, which is why mercury behaves as a neutral, poorly sorbed molecule rather than a cation (Stumm and Morgan chapter 6, from the chapter).
    Complexation
    Chloride (HgCl⁺, HgCl₂, HgCl₃⁻, HgCl₄²⁻), hydroxide, sulfide and bisulfide, and the reduced sulfur groups of natural organic matter; constants not printed in the sources read.
    Precipitates
    HgS (cinnabar or metacinnabar) from sulfide precipitation and in anoxic sediments; Hg(OH)₂ and HgO only at high pH and high concentration; mercury co-precipitated on Fe(OH)₃ and Al(OH)₃ flocs in coagulation.
    HgX2++2HX2OHg(OH)X2+2HX+\ce{Hg^2+ + 2 H2O -> Hg(OH)2 + 2 H+}
    hydrolysis complete above about pH 4 in chloride free water; neutral molecule
    HgX2++2ClXHgClX2\ce{Hg^2+ + 2 Cl^- -> HgCl2}
    chloride above a few mg/L; the dominant species in chlorinated tap water and brackish water
    Hg(OH)X2+ClX+HX+HgClOH+HX2O\ce{Hg(OH)2 + Cl^- + H+ -> HgClOH + H2O}
    the competition between hydroxide and chloride in fresh water: a few mg/L of chloride is enough to put part of the mercury into the mixed chloro hydroxo molecule; Stumm and Morgan chapter 6, from the chapter, not re-read
    HgX2++HSXHgS(s)+HX+\ce{Hg^2+ + HS^- -> HgS (s) + H+}
    sulfide precipitation, near neutral pH; the EPA capsule report writes it with S^2-
    HgClX2+2ClXHgClX4X2\ce{HgCl2 + 2 Cl^- -> HgCl4^2-}
    brackish water and seawater; the higher chloride complexes are anionic, sorb poorly on flocs and pass a cation exchanger, which is why mercury is harder to take out of saline effluent than out of fresh water; Stumm and Morgan chapter 6, from the chapter, not re-read
    HgS(s)+HSXHgSX2X2+HX+\ce{HgS (s) + HS^- -> HgS2^2- + H+}
    excess sulfide redissolves the precipitate by the common ion effect, one of the four drawbacks of sulfide treatment listed by EPA
    HgS(s)+2OX2HgX2++SOX4X2\ce{HgS (s) + 2 O2 -> Hg^2+ + SO4^2-}
    oxidation of a sulfide sludge or sediment in air; the EPA report lists the release of mercury from the sludge as one of the drawbacks of sulfide precipitation, so the sludge has to be stabilised and kept out of oxidising conditions
    HgX2++SnX2+Hg(l)+SnX4+\ce{Hg^2+ + Sn^2+ -> Hg (l) + Sn^4+}
    the cold vapour step of the analytical methods: after oxidation of the sample with bromine monochloride and destruction of the free halogen with hydroxylamine, stannous chloride reduces Hg(II) to elemental mercury, which is purged from the sample onto a gold trap (EPA 1631E); the same reduction is the basis of cold vapour AAS
    2RSH+HgX2+(RS)X2Hg+2HX+\ce{2 RSH + Hg^2+ -> (RS)2Hg + 2 H+}
    a thiol functional chelating resin, R the resin backbone; the sulfur sites hold Hg(II) and strip it out of the neutral chloride and hydroxide molecules that a cation resin cannot touch; written here from the mechanism the EPA report describes, which names the resin type without a stoichiometry

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    meeting sub microgram limits
    mercury exists as neutral complexes and on organic matter, so conventional coagulation leaves 20 percent of inorganic and 60 to 80 percent of organic mercury
    WHO: coagulation, sedimentation and filtration remove up to 80 percent of inorganic mercury but only 20 to 40 percent of organic mercury; below 1 µg/L is achievable for raw waters that are not grossly contaminated
    methylation downstream
    inorganic mercury in effluents or sediments is methylated by bacteria in anoxic zones and enters fish
    the reason the EU sets the mercury EQS in biota at 20 µg/kg wet weight and the water EQS at 0.07 µg/L, and the reason the EPA aquatic criterion warns it may under protect where methylmercury is a large fraction
    chlor-alkali legacy
    mercury cells contaminated soils, sewers and sediments; decommissioning releases mercury for years
    EU BAT level 3 to 15 µg/L at the treatment outlet during decommissioning; the mercury cell process itself cannot be BAT under any circumstances (Decision 2013/732/EU)
    mercury in sulfide sludge
    mercury can resolubilise from sulfide sludges under oxidising or excess sulfide conditions
    EPA capsule report; the sludge is a hazardous waste that must be stabilised
    HgS(s)+2OX2HgX2++SOX4X2\ce{HgS (s) + 2 O2 -> Hg^2+ + SO4^2-}
    oxidising conditions in a landfilled or aerated sulfide sludge; excess sulfide does the same by the soluble HgS2^2- route
    analytical contamination
    mercury at ng/L is lost to and gained from bottles, samplers and laboratory air
    EPA 1631E requires the clean sampling of Method 1669; discrete samplers contaminate samples at the ng/L level
    as a reagent
    none in treatment
    mercury is never dosed; the historical uses were as a catalyst and in mercury cell electrolysis
    Regulation (EU) 2017/852 prohibits chlor-alkali production with a mercury electrode from 11 December 2017 and mercury catalysts from 1 January 2018

    5 · Removal and control

    sulfide precipitation
    sodium sulfide, sodium hydrosulfide or another sulfide salt precipitates HgS; pH adjustment, flocculation, settling and filtration follow
    HgX2++HSXHgS(s)+HX+\ce{Hg^2+ + HS^- -> HgS (s) + H+}
    most effective at near neutral pH; efficiency declines significantly above pH 9; drawbacks are soluble mercury sulfide species at excess sulfide, difficult real time control of sulfide, toxic residual sulfide, and sludge that can release mercury
    Efficiency
    99.9 percent and more from initial mercury above 10 mg/L; the lowest achievable effluent appears to be about 10 to 100 µg/L (EPA after Patterson 1985)
    Interferences
    excess sulfide, high pH, oxidants
    coagulation and co-precipitation with iron or aluminium
    adsorptive co-precipitation on Fe(OH)₃ or Al(OH)₃ flocs, enhanced by bulk solids and pH control
    domestic sewage spiked to 60 µg/L: 94 to 98 percent removal by iron or alum; iron treatment effluents 0.5 to 12.8 µg/L; lime coagulation at 500 µg/L gave 70 percent after filtration (EPA capsule report); WHO: ferric sulfate more effective than alum, better with high suspended solids
    Efficiency
    up to 80 percent inorganic and 20 to 40 percent organic mercury in drinking water treatment (WHO); 94 to 98 percent in the sewage tests
    Interferences
    organic mercury, low solids
    activated carbon adsorption
    powdered carbon dosed into coagulation or granular carbon columns adsorb inorganic and organic mercury
    PAC effective for inorganic and organic mercury and used to enhance coagulation; GAC also effective (WHO after Sorg 1979)
    Efficiency
    not quoted as a percentage; part of the route to below 1 µg/L
    Interferences
    natural organic matter competes
    ion exchange and chelating resins
    thiol or other sulfur functional resins bind Hg(II) and its chloride complexes
    2RSH+HgX2+(RS)X2Hg+2HX+\ce{2 RSH + Hg^2+ -> (RS)2Hg + 2 H+}
    an alternative method (WHO after Chiarle 2000); the EPA capsule report finds coagulation and ion exchange achieve the lowest effluent concentrations
    Efficiency
    lowest effluent concentrations of the established technologies (EPA)
    Interferences
    anionic chloride complexes need anion or chelating, not cation, resin
    reverse osmosis
    membrane rejection
    membrane processes
    Efficiency
    typically 80 to 90 percent rejection of mercury (EPA capsule report)
    Interferences
    neutral complexes pass more readily than ions

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    cold vapour atomic fluorescence after bromine monochloride oxidation, purge and trapEPA 1631 Revision E; ISO 17852MDL 0.2 ng/L, minimum level 0.5 ng/L, range 0.5 to 100 ng/L; 0.05 ng/L with larger volume and lower BrClthe method behind the ng/L effluent limits; all mercury oxidised to Hg(II) with BrCl before analysis; needs the clean sampling of Method 1669
    cold vapour atomic absorptionEPA 245.1; Standard Methods 3112 B; ISO 128460.05 µg/L (WHO fact sheet)the ZDHC accepted method with 245.7 and ICP-MS
    ICP-MSEPA 200.8 (direct analysis only); ISO 17294-20.2 µg/L direct analysis in EPA 200.8 Table 7; total recoverable digestion not applicable because it is unsuitable for organomercury; 0.6 µg/L by ICP (WHO)severe memory effects; 100 µg/L gold in the rinse clears 5 µg/L mercury; keep standards at or below 5 µg/L
    flame atomic absorption5 µg/L (WHO)too insensitive for drinking water
    Sampling pitfalls
    Preserve with bromine monochloride (EPA 1631E) or acid; mercury adsorbs to and volatilises from ordinary bottles, so use acid cleaned glass or fluoropolymer and follow Method 1669 clean hands technique. Discrete autosamplers contaminate at the ng/L level (EPA 1631E). Samples above 100 ng/L must be diluted; iodide above tens of µg/L interferes with the purge. Methylmercury needs a separate, unoxidised aliquot.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ 4th ed. with addenda (2022)6 µg/Lfor inorganic mercury, the form found in drinking water; TDI 2 µg/kg body weight from a NOAEL of 0.23 mg/kg per day for kidney effects in rats, uncertainty factor 100; 10 percent allocation, 60 kg, 2 L/day; the previous value applied to total mercury; assessment 2004
    EU DWD 2020/21841.0 µg/LAnnex I Part B chemical parameter; uncertainty of measurement 30 percent of the parametric value (Annex III)
    US EPA NPDWR0.002 mg/LMCL and MCLG for inorganic mercury; sources listed as erosion of natural deposits, discharge from refineries and factories, runoff from landfills and croplands
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902)not set mercury is not among the BAT 12 parameters (Cr, Cu, Ni, Zn are the metals with AELs); mercury limits in EU chemical plants come from permits and the chlor-alkali conclusions
    EU chlor-alkali BAT conclusions (Decision 2013/732/EU), decommissioning or conversion of mercury cell plants3 to 15 µg/LBAT associated environmental performance level at the outlet of the mercury treatment unit, 24 hour flow proportional composite samples taken daily; the mercury cell technique cannot be considered BAT under any circumstances; no AEL for normal production
    US EPA 40 CFR 415.63, chlor-alkali mercury cell process (BAT)0.00023 daily maximum; 0.00010 30-day average kg mercury per kkg of producta mass based limit for a process the EU has prohibited since 11 December 2017
    US EPA 40 CFR 423.13(g)(1)(i), steam electric FGD wastewater (2020 BAT)103 daily maximum; 34 30-day average ng/L total mercury
    time-sensitive: the 2024 steam electric rule changed applicability dates
    compliance by 31 December 2025; subcategory (g)(2)(ii) 788 and 356 ng/L; voluntary incentives programme (g)(3)(i) 23 and 10 ng/L by 31 December 2028; gasification wastewater (j)(1)(i) 1.8 and 1.3 ng/L; combustion residual leachate (l)(2)(i)(A) 788 and 356 ng/L by 30 April 2035
    US EPA 40 CFR 440.103, copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver and molybdenum ore mines and froth flotation mills (BAT)0.002 daily maximum; 0.001 30-day average mg/Lno discharge of process wastewater from mills using cyanidation
    Abu Dhabi ADS 23/2017, discharge to the marine environment (EAD)0.001 mg/L
    region-dependent; marine discharge only
    Table 1 maximum allowable concentration at the point of discharge
    Abu Dhabi DoE Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022, discharge to sewer0.5 mg/L
    region-dependent; sewer discharge, not receiving water; 500 times the marine value
    Table A₄ maximum allowable concentration for trade effluent to the sewer network
    industry thresholds
    sectorbodylimitnote
    textile and leatherZDHC Wastewater Guidelines v₂.1 (2022)0.01 foundational; 0.005 progressive; 0.001 aspirational mg/Lmethods ISO 17294, EPA 200.8-SIM, 6020A-SIM, 245.1, 245.7, cold vapour AAS; sludge threshold 1 mg/kg textile, 0.2 leather

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Inorganic mercury targets the kidney in humans and animals (tubular necrosis, proteinuria); acute oral poisoning causes haemorrhagic gastritis and colitis; mercury(II) chloride can raise benign tumours where tissue is damaged and is weakly genotoxic without point mutations (WHO). Mean dietary intake 2 to 20 µg/day; JECFA PTWI for total mercury 5 µg/kg body weight with no more than 3.3 µg/kg as methylmercury (1972, reassessed 1988 and 2003; WHO background document). Methylmercury is the neurotoxin of Minamata and of fish advisories.
    Bioaccumulation
    Methylmercury bioaccumulates and biomagnifies in aquatic food chains; the EU EQS in biota is 20 µg/kg wet weight, set because the water column value cannot protect predators and humans eating fish (Directive 2013/39/EU). Inorganic mercury in drinking water is not the exposure route of concern; food is (WHO).
    Ecotoxicity
    US EPA aquatic life criteria: freshwater 1.4 µg/L acute and 0.77 µg/L chronic, saltwater 1.8 and 0.94 µg/L (1995), with the caution that they may not protect where methylmercury is a substantial part of total mercury. EU EQS: 0.07 µg/L annual average and maximum in inland and other surface waters, biota 20 µg/kg.

    Flags

    • The occurrence figures are 1990s IPCS compilations in the WHO 2005 background document; no modern survey was read.
    • The FGD and chlor-alkali numbers are limits, not measured effluent concentrations.
    • The hydrolysis and chloride speciation equations are cited to Stumm and Morgan chapter 6 from memory of the text; the mechanism of methylation (sulfate reducers, hgcAB genes) is not sourced and is left as 'bacteria in anoxic sediments' as WHO puts it.
    • The HgS redissolution equation is written here from the EPA statement about soluble mercury sulfide species at excess sulfide.
    • The US steam electric mercury limits carry compliance dates and were revised in 2024; check applicability before quoting.
    • Abu Dhabi values cover two media (marine 0.001 mg/L, sewer 0.5 mg/L); other GCC states were not read.
    • The Minamata Convention text was not reachable this session; the chlor-alkali ban date is cited to the EU mercury regulation.

    Gaps

    • No source read gives mercury in seawater, municipal wastewater influent or specific industrial effluents as measured ranges; only limits and 1990s compilations are quoted.
    • Solubility products, hydrolysis and chloride complexation constants and methylmercury formation rates are not printed in the sources read.
    • The Minamata Convention (adoption, entry into force, Annex B dates) was not read; the EU regulation stands in.
    • Mercury removal by chemical reduction (borohydride, stannous chloride) and by membrane extraction, described in the EPA capsule report chapters 5 and 6, was not read in detail.
    • EPA 245.1 and 245.7 detection limits were not read; the WHO 0.05 µg/L figure stands for cold vapour AAS.
    • Other GCC discharge standards (Saudi, Oman, Qatar) were not read.
    • Bacterial methylation of Hg(II) to methylmercury is described by WHO as a pathway and no source read prints a stoichiometry or a rate for it, so no methylation equation is written.
    • The thiol resin equation is written in the resin convention from the mechanism the EPA capsule report describes.

    Sources

    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), chapter 12 chemical fact sheet, Mercury (pp. 425 to 426)
    WHO, Mercury in Drinking-water, background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, WHO/SDE/WSH/05.08/10 (2005), sections 1.4, 2.2, 6.1, 6.2 and 7
    Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast), Article 11, Annex I Part B, Annex II Part D and Annex III
    US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (table of MCLs and MCLGs, inorganic chemicals and radionuclides)
    Directive 2013/39/EU amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances, Annex I Part A (environmental quality standards)
    US EPA, National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, Aquatic Life Criteria Table
    Regulation (EU) 2017/852 on mercury, Article 7 and Annex III Part I (manufacturing processes in which the use of mercury is prohibited)
    Commission Implementing Decision 2013/732/EU establishing BAT conclusions for the production of chlor-alkali, BAT 1 and the BAT on decommissioning of mercury cell plants
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 12 Tables 1 and 2
    40 CFR part 415 subpart F (chlor-alkali), section 415.63, mercury cell process BAT effluent limitations
    40 CFR 423.13, Effluent limitations (BAT), steam electric power generating point source category
    40 CFR 440.103, Effluent limitations (BAT), copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver and molybdenum ores subcategory
    Abu Dhabi Specification ADS 23/2017, Environmental Specifications for Land-Based Liquid Discharges to the Marine Environment (Environment Agency Abu Dhabi), Table 1
    Abu Dhabi Department of Energy, Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022 (DoE/PD/R01/005, effective 1 January 2022), Appendix Tables A2 and A4
    ZDHC Wastewater Guidelines Version 2.1 (November 2022), Table 2 heavy metals and Table 4 sludge parameters
    US EPA, Capsule Report: Aqueous Mercury Treatment, EPA/625/R-97/004 (July 1997), chapters 1 to 4
    US EPA Method 1631, Revision E (2002), Mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry, sections 1.2 to 1.4 and 2
    US EPA Method 200.8, Revision 5.4 (1994), Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by ICP-MS, Table 7 (method detection limits)
    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (online edition), 3112 B Metals by cold-vapor atomic absorption spectrometry (mercury)
    ISO 12846:2012, Water quality. Determination of mercury. Method using atomic absorption spectrometry with and without enrichment
    ISO 17852:2006, Water quality. Determination of mercury. Method using atomic fluorescence spectrometry
    ISO 17294-2:2023, Water quality. Application of ICP-MS. Part 2: Determination of selected elements including uranium isotopes
    Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J., Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 1996), chapter 6 (metal ions in aqueous solution, hydrolysis and complex formation) and chapter 7 (precipitation and dissolution, solubility products)
    The Element Book, element entry and reference text for Hg (data/elements/Hg.json, data/reference/text/Hg.json)

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.