Plutonium

    no group (f-block) · period 7 · f-block · actinide

    fullPlutonium is not relevant to ordinary water treatment: it reaches water only from weapons fallout, accidents and fuel cycle and weapons waste, and at those sites its behaviour is set by oxidation state, with Pu(IV) hydrolysed, sorbed and held near 10⁻8 to 10⁻10 mol/L by hydrous PuO₂ while Pu(V) and carbonate complexes move; the WHO guidance level is 1 Bq/L for plutonium-239, the Euratom derived concentration 0.6 Bq/L for plutonium-239 and -240, and gross alpha screening is what catches it.

    Typical wastewaters

    • nuclear fuel processing and weapons production waste (legacy site surface water and groundwater) Pu(IV) sorbed and on colloids, with PuO₂⁺ and the hydroxo carbonate Pu(OH)₂(CO₃)₂²⁻ dissolved in oxic carbonate water; plutonium-238, -239 and -240 dissolved in surface water and groundwater at 9 of 45 Superfund NPL sites measured values are in the Hanford, Savannah River and Rocky Flats entries below
    • drinking water treatment residuals (floc, carbon, resin, reverse osmosis concentrate) Pu(IV) on iron or aluminium hydroxide floc and carbon, charged and colloidal forms on resin and in the RO concentrate every process in WHO Table 9.4 that works concentrates plutonium into a transuranic waste
    • spent fuel reprocessing liquid effluent to sea (Sellafield, Irish Sea) plutonium alpha (Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-240) and beta emitting Pu-241 in treated effluent discharged by pipeline 2022: plutonium alpha 0.07 TBq and Pu-241 0.73 TBq against permit limits of 0.29 and 6 TBq per year (2018: 0.14 and 1.9 TBq); the marine critical group dose, 72 µSv in 2022, is dominated by plutonium alpha and Am-241 from historic discharges
    • spent fuel reprocessing liquid effluent to sea (La Hague, English Channel; OSPAR reporting) Pu-239+240 and Pu-241 within the reported total alpha; OSPAR states total alpha from nuclear sites is mainly Pu-239, Pu-240 and Am-241 (OSPAR 2010) 2023, TBq per year: La Hague Pu-239+240 0.00245, Pu-241 0.244, total alpha 0.0322; Sellafield, reported under decommissioning in 2023, Pu-239+240 0.0645, Pu-241 0.591, total alpha 0.0648
    • plutonium finishing plant acidic processing waste discharged to ground (Hanford 216-Z-9 trench) plutonium in about pH 2.5, 5 M nitrate waste with organic processing solvents; in the organic phase it moves almost unhindered through sediment at pH below 4, in aqueous fluid only at pH below 4 and mostly below 2 over 4 million litres released; plutonium has migrated 37 m below the trench; columns: 14 percent breakthrough in aqueous fluid at pH below 2, 94 and 86 percent in organic solvent at pH 1 and 3
    • legacy site groundwater (Hanford 200 West, well 299-W₁₅-8 beside the Z-9 trench) Pu-239/240 in unfiltered groundwater 8.3 pCi/L on 7 May 1990 and 1.9 pCi/L on 13 November 1991, with Am-241 0.14 and 5.9 pCi/L; the only two plutonium detections in the 200-ZP-1 operable unit before the well went dry
    • reactor cooling reservoir at a weapons site (Pond B, Savannah River Site) reactor derived plutonium at µBq/L in the water column, peaking in shallow water with Fe(III) particulate organic matter at the onset of stratification; most of the inventory retained in shallow sediment isotope ratios show reactor plutonium overwhelms Northern Hemisphere fallout
    • storm runoff and pond discharge from plutonium contaminated soil (Rocky Flats 903 Pad) Pu-239/240 with Am-241, 40 to 90 percent in particles above 0.45 µm and 10 to 60 percent colloidal; the colloidal plutonium is Pu(IV) bound to a 10 to 15 kDa negatively charged organic macromolecule rather than iron oxide or clay spring and summer samples 1998 to 2000; humic and fulvic acids enhance remobilisation during erosion

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Pu, 94
    Oxidation states in water
    +3, +4, +5 and +6 can all exist in environmental water; Pu(III) dominates under reducing conditions up to about pH 8.5, above which Pu(IV) takes over; under oxidising conditions above pH 4 the +4, +5 and +6 states coexist, many workers holding Pu(V) as PuO₂⁺ to be the dominant dissolved state, while EPA's own calculation for river water gives the Pu(IV) hydroxo carbonate Pu(OH)₂(CO₃)₂²⁻ as about 90 percent of dissolved plutonium above pH 6.5 (EPA Kd volume II). Plutonium-238 (half life 86 years), -239 (24,400), -240 (6,580) and -241 (13.2, beta) are the isotopes of concern.
    Note
    The element entry covers the discovery, the allotropes and the metal's reactions. This chapter is about the four dissolved states and the sorption that keeps plutonium in the sediment.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    None at measurable levels; the traces in uranium ores are below any water relevance.
    Anthropogenic sources
    Accidental releases and disposal of wastes from fuel processing and from the production and detonation of nuclear weapons; contamination by plutonium-238, -239 or -240 was identified at 9 of 45 Superfund NPL sites as airborne particulate, soil and plutonium dissolved in surface water and groundwater (EPA Kd volume II). Global fallout plutonium in German soils 30 to 40 years after deposition was less than 1 percent readily exchangeable, more than 57 percent bound to organic matter and much of the rest in the oxide and mineral fractions (Bunzl 1995 via EPA).
    matrixtypical rangenote
    surface water, alkaline lake (Mono Lake, California)up to 3.2 x 10⁻10 mg/L
    one lake chosen for its alkalinity
    maximum plutonium-239 and -240 in 33 samples (Simpson 1984 via EPA), 1.36 x 10⁻15 mol/L, the concentration EPA used for its speciation calculation; a fallout signal in a highly alkaline, carbonate rich lake

    3 · Speciation

    Dissolved plutonium complexes with hydroxide, carbonate, nitrate, sulfate, phosphate, the halides, natural organic acids and humics, and with EDTA; Pu(IV) has the highest ionic potential and so hydrolyses most readily and forms the strongest complexes, in the order Pu(IV), Pu(III), Pu(VI), Pu(V). Chloride and nitrate complexes are weak (log K 1 to 2), fluoride, sulfate, phosphate, citrate and oxalate strong (log K 6 to 30), and the mixed hydroxo carbonate complexes such as Pu(OH)₂(CO₃)₂²⁻ are among the strongest; humic complexes may dominate below pH 5 to 6 (EPA Kd volume II). In EPA's river water calculation PuF₂²⁺ and PuO₂⁺ dominate at pH 3 to 3.5, PuO₂⁺ at pH 4 to 5, PuO₂⁺ with Pu(OH)₂(CO₃)₂²⁻ at 5.5 to 6.5, and Pu(OH)₂(CO₃)₂²⁻ with minor Pu(OH)₄ (aq) above 6.5. Polymeric plutonium does not form at environmental concentrations, which are at least seven orders of magnitude too low. Amorphous hydrous PuO₂ controls dissolved plutonium near 10⁻8 mol/L under oxidising conditions, aged partly crystalline PuO₂ about two orders lower, about 10⁻10 mol/L without carbonate, and alkaline high carbonate water can raise it to micromolar; under reducing conditions PuO₂ limits it above pH 8 and Pu₂(CO₃)₃ below. Disproportionation is not significant at trace concentrations in oxidising water. Plutonium sorbs to clays, oxides, oxyhydroxides, aluminosilicates and organic matter with Kd from 11 to 300,000 mL/g; iron hydroxides adsorb Pu(V) and Pu(VI) and reduce them to Pu(IV) at the surface, manganese dioxide oxidises sorbed Pu(IV) and Pu(V) to Pu(VI), light speeds these surface redox changes, and carbonate lowers sorption of Pu(IV) and Pu(V) on goethite, so plutonium is most mobile in high pH carbonate rich groundwater (EPA Kd volume II).

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    reducing, pH below 8.5Pu³⁺ and Pu(III) complexes; Pu₂(CO₃)₃ (s) as the solubility limit at lower pHEPA Kd volume II
    reducing, pH above 8.5Pu(IV), PuO₂ (s)
    oxidising, pH 4 to 5PuO₂⁺EPA river water calculation
    oxidising, pH above 6.5, carbonate bearingPu(OH)₂(CO₃)₂²⁻ (about 90 percent), Pu(OH)₄ (aq) minorthe mobile carbonate case; sorption on goethite falls as carbonate rises
    in contact with soil and particulate organic matterPu(IV) sorbed, hydrous PuO₂the state most observations find on solids
    Solubility
    Amorphous hydrous PuO₂ about 10⁻8 mol/L; aged PuO₂ about 10⁻10 mol/L without carbonate; micromolar in alkaline high carbonate water; Pu₂(CO₃)₃ under reducing acid to neutral conditions (EPA Kd volume II).
    Hydrolysis
    Pu(IV) hydrolyses more readily than any other state, up to four hydroxyls; Pu(V) least.
    Complexation
    Carbonate and hydroxo carbonate strongest among inorganic ligands, then phosphate, fluoride, sulfate; humate, citrate, oxalate, EDTA strong; chloride and nitrate weak.
    Precipitates
    Hydrous PuO₂, Pu₂(CO₃)₃; plutonium carried in iron and manganese oxide and in organic rich sludge.
    3PuX4++2HX2O2PuX3++PuOX2X2++4HX+\ce{3 Pu^4+ + 2 H2O -> 2 Pu^3+ + PuO2^2+ + 4 H+}
    disproportionation, printed by EPA as an example; needs heat, microbes or radiolysis to lower the barrier and is not significant at trace concentrations in oxidising water
    3PuOX2X++4HX+PuX3++2PuOX2X2++2HX2O\ce{3 PuO2^+ + 4 H+ -> Pu^3+ + 2 PuO2^2+ + 2 H2O}
    disproportionation of Pu(V) in acid, printed by EPA as an example
    PuX4++2HX2O+2COX3X2Pu(OH)X2(COX3)X2X2+2HX+\ce{Pu^4+ + 2 H2O + 2 CO3^2- -> Pu(OH)2(CO3)2^2- + 2 H+}
    net formation of the dominant dissolved species above pH 6.5 in EPA's river water calculation; written from the species named, constants (Tait 1995, Yamaguchi 1994) not read
    PuX4++2HX2OPuOX2(s)+4HX+\ce{Pu^4+ + 2 H2O -> PuO2 (s) + 4 H+}
    the hydrolytic precipitation that caps dissolved plutonium: amorphous hydrous PuO2 near 10^-8 mol/L under oxidising conditions, aged partly crystalline PuO2 about two orders lower and near 10^-10 mol/L without carbonate; the hydration water of the solid is omitted
    2PuX3++3COX3X2PuX2(COX3)X3(s)\ce{2 Pu^3+ + 3 CO3^2- -> Pu2(CO3)3 (s)}
    the Pu(III) carbonate that limits plutonium under reducing acid to neutral conditions, below the pH 8 at which PuO2 takes over; written from the phase EPA names, no solubility product was read
    PuOX2X++FeX2++4HX+PuX4++FeX3++2HX2O\ce{PuO2^+ + Fe^2+ + 4 H+ -> Pu^4+ + Fe^3+ + 2 H2O}
    the surface reduction EPA describes when it says iron hydroxides adsorb Pu(V) and Pu(VI) and reduce them to Pu(IV); light speeds it; this is the step that turns mobile plutonium into the sorbed state and the reason iron coagulation works; balanced here as the one electron pair, not printed by EPA
    PuX4++MnOX2(s)PuOX2X2++MnX2+\ce{Pu^4+ + MnO2 (s) -> PuO2^2+ + Mn^2+}
    the opposite surface reaction: manganese dioxide oxidises sorbed Pu(IV) and Pu(V) to the mobile Pu(VI), so a manganese oxide coated medium can release plutonium that an iron oxide would hold; balanced here as the two electron pair, EPA states the direction only

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    colloid and carbonate transport at legacy sites
    Pu(IV) travels on colloids and Pu(V) and hydroxo carbonate complexes travel dissolved in high pH carbonate water
    EPA notes the surface redox reactions on iron and manganese oxides that switch plutonium between mobile and sorbed states
    plutonium in treatment residuals
    every process in WHO Table 9.4 that works concentrates plutonium into floc, carbon, resin or concentrate
    the residual is transuranic waste

    5 · Removal and control

    coagulation
    Pu(IV) hydrolysed and sorbed on iron or aluminium hydroxide floc; iron hydroxide also reduces Pu(V) and Pu(VI) to Pu(IV) at its surface
    PuOX2X++FeX2++4HX+PuX4++FeX3++2HX2O\ce{PuO2^+ + Fe^2+ + 4 H+ -> Pu^4+ + Fe^3+ + 2 H2O}
    WHO Table 9.4 (Brown, Hammond and Wilkins 2008); the chemistry under the percentage is the surface reduction of Pu(V) to Pu(IV) on the iron hydroxide floc that EPA Kd volume II describes, written here as the electron balance, after which the Pu(IV) hydrolyses onto the floc; WHO prints the percentage only
    Efficiency
    above 70 percent
    Interferences
    carbonate lowers sorption
    sand filtration
    particulate and colloidal plutonium
    WHO Table 9.4
    Efficiency
    10 to 40 percent
    Interferences
    dissolved complexes pass
    activated carbon
    sorption of organically complexed and colloidal plutonium
    WHO Table 9.4
    Efficiency
    40 to 70 percent
    precipitation softening
    co-precipitation with calcium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide
    WHO Table 9.4
    Efficiency
    0 to 10 percent
    Interferences
    high pH carbonate water is where plutonium is most soluble, which explains the poor rating
    ion exchange
    cationic Pu³⁺ and PuO₂⁺ on cation resin, anionic hydroxo carbonate complexes on anion resin
    2RCl+Pu(OH)X2(COX3)X2X2RX2Pu(OH)X2(COX3)X2+2ClX\ce{2 RCl + Pu(OH)2(CO3)2^2- -> R2Pu(OH)2(CO3)2 + 2 Cl^-}
    WHO Table 9.4; the anion exchange written in the usual resin notation for a chloride form strong base bed (R one exchange site), taking the hydroxo carbonate complex that is about 90 percent of dissolved plutonium above pH 6.5 in EPA's river water calculation; a cation bed takes Pu^3+ and PuO2^+ instead
    Efficiency
    above 70 percent
    reverse osmosis
    rejection of all charged and colloidal forms
    WHO Table 9.4
    Efficiency
    above 70 percent
    Interferences
    concentrate is transuranic waste

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    gross alpha screeningISO 9696, ISO 10704; WHO Table 9.30.02 to 0.1 Bq/L; Euratom 0.04 Bq/Lplutonium-238, -239 and -240 count in gross alpha; plutonium-241 is a beta emitter and needs the gross beta screen; WHO screening levels 0.5 and 1 Bq/L, Euratom 0.1 and 1.0 Bq/L, US 15 pCi/L gross alpha
    isotopic plutonium by alpha spectrometry after separation, or ICP-MSmethod number not readnot readalpha spectrometry cannot separate plutonium-239 from -240 (their alpha energies overlap), so the pair is reported together; mass spectrometry resolves them
    Sampling pitfalls
    Fix the oxidation state at collection or the fractionation between dissolved, colloidal and sorbed plutonium changes in the bottle; filter and ultrafilter in the field if the colloid fraction matters, and keep samples out of light, which speeds surface redox changes (EPA).

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ chapter 9 Table 9.2 and Annex 6 Table A₆.11 (plutonium-236, -238, -239, -240, -242, -244); 10 (plutonium-241); 1000 (plutonium-237) Bq/Lguidance levels; plutonium-239 dose coefficient 2.5 x 10⁻7 Sv/Bq; footnote d: may not occur in drinking water in normal situations, lower priority after a screening exceedance; the isotopes beyond the chapter 9 table are from Annex 6 Table A₆.1
    EU Directive 2013/51/Euratom, Annex III0.6 Bq/Lderived concentration for plutonium-239 and plutonium-240 for the 0.1 mSv indicative dose
    US EPA NPDWR15 pCi/Lgross alpha MCL excluding radon and uranium; beta and photon emitters 4 mrem/year covers plutonium-241; no plutonium specific MCL

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Extremely toxic through its radioactivity and accumulates in bone (element entry); ingestion dose coefficient 2.5 x 10⁻7 Sv/Bq for plutonium-239 (WHO Table 9.2).
    Bioaccumulation
    Not addressed for aquatic organisms in the sources read; in soil it binds to organic matter and oxides and becomes non exchangeable over decades (EPA).
    Ecotoxicity
    Not addressed in the sources read.

    Flags

    • The speciation distribution is EPA's MINTEQA₂ calculation for a mean river water at one Eh to pH relation and 1.36 x 10⁻15 mol/L; it is illustrative, and the field consensus that Pu(V) dominates oxic water is noted in the same source.
    • The hydroxo carbonate formation equation is written from the species named, not from printed constants.
    • The only concentration is one alkaline lake maximum from 1984.
    • The Euratom values were read from the retained UK copy on legislation.gov.uk; its plutonium detection limit was not returned by the page read.

    Gaps

    • Colloid facilitated transport (the Nevada Test Site kilometre scale migration) was not sourced.
    • No stability constants or solubility products were read as numbers beyond the order of magnitude solubility limits quoted.
    • Isotopic plutonium method numbers and detection limits were not read.
    • The CWW BAT conclusions have no radioactivity parameter; no discharge row is written.
    • No exchange or surface complexation constants for plutonium were read; the resin and iron surface equations are electron and charge balances written from the mechanisms EPA describes in words.

    Sources

    US EPA, Understanding Variation in Partition Coefficient, Kd, Values, Volume II: Review of Geochemistry and Available Kd Values for Cadmium, Cesium, Chromium, Lead, Plutonium, Radon, Strontium, Thorium, Tritium and Uranium, EPA 402-R-99-004B (August 1999), section 5.6 plutonium
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first addendum, chapter 9 Radiological aspects (Tables 9.2 to 9.4) and Annex 6 Table A6.1 of the 2022 edition
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), Annex 6 Supporting information on radionuclides, Table A6.1 (NCBI Bookshelf)
    Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom, Annex III (screening levels, derived concentrations, limits of detection), read in the retained UK copy on legislation.gov.uk
    US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (table of MCLs and MCLGs, radionuclides)
    The Element Book, element entry and reference text for Pu (data/elements/Pu.json, data/reference/text/Pu.json)
    Sellafield Ltd, Annual Review of Environmental Performance 2022/23, Table 1 radioactive discharges to the Irish Sea 2018 to 2022 with permitted limits, and critical group doses (GOV.UK)
    OSPAR Commission, Liquid discharges from nuclear installations, 2023 data submission on ODIMS (spreadsheet OSPAR_Nuclear_Liquid_Discharges_2023.xlsx, sheets T02_NFR reprocessing and T05_Decom decommissioning)
    OSPAR Commission, Liquid discharges from nuclear installations in 2008, Radioactive Substances Series (2010): reporting in TBq per year and the note that total alpha from nuclear sites is mainly Pu-239, Pu-240 and Am-241
    Baumer, T., Zavarin, M., Pearce, C. I., Emerson, H. P. and Kersting, A. B., Subsurface Transport of Plutonium in Organic and Aqueous Acidic Processing Wastes at the Hanford Site, USA, Environmental Science and Technology 58 (2024) 8909 to 8918 (abstract read on Europe PMC)
    Cantrell, K. J., Transuranic Contamination in Sediment and Groundwater at the U.S. DOE Hanford Site, PNNL-18640 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2009), section 3.6.14 on the 216-Z-9 trench
    Wasserman, N. L., Merino, N., Coutelot, F., Kaplan, D. I., Powell, B. A., Kersting, A. B. and Zavarin, M., Sources, seasonal cycling, and fate of plutonium in a seasonally stratified and radiologically contaminated pond, Scientific Reports 13 (2023) 11046 (abstract read on Europe PMC)
    Santschi, P. H., Roberts, K. A. and Guo, L., Organic nature of colloidal actinides transported in surface water environments, Environmental Science and Technology 36 (2002) 3711 to 3719 (abstract read on Europe PMC)

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.