Polonium

    group 16 · period 6 · p-block · post-transition metal

    fullPolonium is not a chemical parameter anywhere and is not treated as such: it matters as polonium-210, the last alpha emitter of the uranium-238 chain, which carries the highest dose coefficient of the common natural radionuclides and therefore the lowest WHO guidance level (0.1 Bq/L) and Euratom derived concentration (0.1 Bq/L); it is found in reducing, high pH groundwater, especially confined Coastal Plain aquifers and Nevada basin fill, and it is caught only by gross alpha screening, which it can also evade.

    Typical wastewaters

    • drinking water treatment residuals from radium bearing groundwater (scale, filter media, sludge) Po-210 grown in from Pb-210 on the solids, which is why WHO ties polonium-210 monitoring to high radon supplies on the solids rather than in a liquid effluent; no produced water or phosphate industry polonium figure was read
    • oil and gas produced water, with the NORM scale and sludge it deposits Po-210 grown in from Pb-210 and also emanating directly from the reservoir (IAEA notes Po-210 above its grandparent Pb-210 in gas condensates); partitions to sludge and scale rather than staying in the brine IAEA Table III: produced water 0.002 to 0.08 Bq/L, hard scale 0.02 to 1.5 Bq/g, sludge 0.004 to 160 Bq/g, crude oil 0 to 0.01 Bq/g; produced water is the largest NORM waste by volume at low activity; EPA lists polonium-210 with radium-226, radium-228, lead-210 and radon among the radionuclides of produced water, scale and sludge (EPA TENORM page)
    • shale gas produced fluids (Marcellus) particle reactive polonium: ultrafiltration puts polonium with uranium and thorium on particles while radium and lead stay dissolved in the high ionic strength brine partitioning study with a Pb-203 tracer; no polonium activity is given in the abstract read
    • phosphoric acid production (phosphogypsum slurry discharged to rivers and sea) Po-210 carried with the phosphogypsum into receiving water, sediment and biota IAEA Annex II: discharge of phosphogypsum into surface water bodies has produced significantly elevated Po-210 in water, sediments and biota, with doses of 2 to 10 µSv/a and up to 150 µSv/a where local fish and shellfish are eaten
    • phosphogypsum stack leachate to a river (Wislinka, Martwa Wisla, Poland) dissolved Po-210 and Pb-210 with uranium in river water beside the stack maxima of 2.0 mBq/L Po-210, 3.2 mBq/L Pb-210 and 11.7 mBq/L U-238, Po-210 to Pb-210 activity ratio up to 0.69; the authors judge the impact on the river insignificant
    • uranium mill tailings facility effluent (Jaduguda, India) Po-210 in the tailings pond residual water and the treated effluent, taken up by filamentous algae and sediment rooted plants effluent, surface water and bottom sediment were analysed; the highest plant activity, 4884 Bq/kg fresh weight, was in filamentous algae from residual water of the tailings pond; the effluent activity itself is not given in the abstract read

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Po, 84
    Oxidation states in water
    +2 as Po²⁺ in acid to neutral water, where it is sorbed; +4 as the hydrolysed dihydrogen polonate H₂PoO₃ (aq) at high pH, poorly sorbed and mobile; and, under strongly reducing conditions, the hydrogen polonide anion HPo⁻ (Szabo 2020). Polonium-210 (half life 138 days) is the isotope that matters, supported by lead-210 (22 years) and radon-222 in the aquifer.
    Note
    The element entry covers the discovery, the alpha heat and the neutron and antistatic sources. This chapter is about polonium-210 at millibecquerel to becquerel levels in well water.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Decay of radon-222 and lead-210 in aquifer minerals, then release to water where the chemistry allows. In 1263 US public supply wells across 19 principal aquifers, polonium-210 was above the 0.7 pCi/L risk threshold in 1.5 percent of samples, almost only in confined Coastal Plain aquifers with old, reducing, high pH (above 7.5), high sodium to chloride water from cation exchange; polonium is poorly sorbed at high pH, and iron, manganese and sulfate reduction and cation exchange mobilise it from mineral surfaces (Szabo 2020). In Lahontan Valley, Nevada, 63 wells ranged from 0.01 to 178 pCi/L, median 2.88 pCi/L, the high wells having dissolved oxygen below 0.1 mg/L and commonly pH above 9, with the polonium unsupported by lead-210 and therefore mobilised from the sediments (Seiler 2011). WHO notes that where radon is high, polonium-210 can be a major contributor to dose.
    Anthropogenic sources
    NORM: polonium-210 grows in from lead-210 in radium bearing scale, filter media and sludge, which is why WHO ties polonium-210 monitoring to high radon supplies (WHO chapter 9; see the Ra chapter). Commercial polonium is a Russian reactor product used in sealed sources (element entry) and is not a discharge.
    matrixtypical rangenote
    groundwater, public supply wells, USA1.5 percent of 1263 wells at or above 0.7 pCi/L
    distribution, not a range; 1 pCi/L is 0.037 Bq/L
    filtered untreated groundwater from 19 principal aquifers; 0.7 pCi/L is the lifetime cancer risk threshold the authors use; exceedances almost exclusively in confined Coastal Plain aquifers
    groundwater, Lahontan Valley, Nevada0.01 to 178 pCi/L
    one basin with unusual alkaline, anoxic water; 178 pCi/L is 6.6 Bq/L
    63 domestic and public supply wells, median 2.88 pCi/L; about 25 percent above the 1.1 pCi/L level for a lifetime risk of 1 in 10,000 without exceeding the 15 pCi/L gross alpha standard

    3 · Speciation

    Polonium follows tellurium: in acid to neutral water it is the cation Po²⁺ (its own alpha radiation oxidises solutions toward Po(IV), element entry), which sorbs to iron and manganese oxyhydroxides and clays and so stays put; at high pH it is the hydrolysed, poorly sorbed H₂PoO₃ (aq), and under strongly reducing conditions the hydrogen polonide anion HPo⁻ (Szabo 2020). Reductive dissolution of the iron and manganese oxides that hold it, sulfate reduction and cation exchange release it, which is why the problem water is old, anoxic and alkaline. Volatile polonium has been reported in one Florida well and not in Nevada (Seiler 2011).

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    acid to neutral, oxic groundwaterPo²⁺ sorbed on Fe and Mn oxyhydroxidesattenuated by adsorption (Szabo 2020)
    reducing, pH above 7.5, high Na to Cl, confined aquifersH₂PoO₃ (aq)poorly sorbed, mobile (Szabo 2020)
    strongly reducingHPo⁻Szabo 2020
    Lahontan Valley basin fill, dissolved oxygen below 0.1 mg/L, pH above 9dissolved polonium unsupported by lead-210mobilised from aquifer sediment (Seiler 2011)
    Solubility
    Not solubility controlled at these activities; sorption controls it. No constants read.
    Hydrolysis
    Polonium ions hydrolyse above about pH 1 (element entry); the high pH species is H₂PoO₃ (aq).
    Complexation
    Chloride complexes in acid (the tetrachloride dissolves in hydrochloric acid, element entry); not relevant at groundwater pH.
    Precipitates
    None of its own; carried in Fe and Mn oxide, sulfide and radium bearing scale and sludge.

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    gross alpha screening can miss it
    polonium-210 is in the adjusted gross alpha, but a well can carry 1 to 10 pCi/L of polonium below the 15 pCi/L standard, and volatile polonium is lost from an evaporated planchet
    Seiler proposes a polonium analysis whenever the 72 hour gross alpha exceeds the uranium activity by more than 5 to 10 pCi/L; WHO says to increase gross alpha and beta monitoring where radon is high so that polonium-210 can be assessed
    ingrowth in radium bearing residuals
    radium-226 in scale, media and sludge decays through radon-222 and lead-210 to polonium-210
    the residual grows more alpha active for decades; see the Ra chapter

    5 · Removal and control

    generic radionuclide removal by coagulation, sand filtration, softening, ion exchange and reverse osmosis
    polonium at low pH is sorbed and particulate and leaves with the solids; the mobile high pH species is anionic or neutral and would need reverse osmosis or pH adjustment before sorption
    WHO Table 9.4 gives no polonium row; plants with coagulation, sedimentation and sand filtration may remove up to 100 percent of suspended radioactivity (WHO 9.6)
    Efficiency
    not read for polonium
    Interferences
    high pH keeps it dissolved

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    gross alpha screening by evaporation and countingISO 9696, ISO 10704; WHO Table 9.30.02 to 0.1 Bq/L (evaporation); 0.02 Bq/L (co-precipitation, Standard Methods); Euratom 0.04 Bq/Lscreening levels 0.5 Bq/L gross alpha (WHO), 0.1 Bq/L (Euratom), 15 pCi/L adjusted gross alpha (US EPA); polonium-210 counts in gross alpha unless it volatilises
    polonium-210 by spontaneous deposition on silver or nickel and alpha spectrometryISO 13161 (listed by WHO Annex 6)not readpolonium-209 or -208 tracer; the 138 day half life means the sample date matters and lead-210 supported ingrowth must be corrected
    Sampling pitfalls
    Acidify at collection and count promptly: polonium-210 decays with a 138 day half life and grows in from lead-210, so an unsupported sample falls and a supported one rises between sampling and counting. Evaporating a planchet can lose volatile polonium (Seiler 2011). Do not filter reducing groundwater before acidification if total polonium is wanted, because it is on the particles.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ chapter 9, Table 9.20.1 Bq/Lguidance level for polonium-210, dose coefficient 1.2 x 10⁻6 Sv/Bq, the highest in the table; screening levels 0.5 Bq/L gross alpha and 1 Bq/L gross beta; guidance levels are investigation triggers for the 0.1 mSv/year individual dose criterion
    EU Directive 2013/51/Euratom, Annex III0.1 Bq/Lderived concentration for polonium-210 for the 0.1 mSv indicative dose; recommended screening 0.1 Bq/L gross alpha and 1.0 Bq/L gross beta
    US EPA NPDWR15 pCi/Lgross alpha MCL excluding radon and uranium, MCLG zero; no polonium specific MCL (Seiler 2011 calls adjusted gross alpha the only applicable standard)
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902)not set no radioactivity parameter

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    A pure alpha emitter with a dose coefficient of 1.2 x 10⁻6 Sv/Bq by ingestion (WHO Table 9.2), about four times that of radium-226; Szabo puts the lifetime cancer risk threshold at 0.7 pCi/L and Seiler the 1 in 10,000 level at 1.1 pCi/L. Chemical toxicity is irrelevant at these masses.
    Bioaccumulation
    Not addressed in the sources read for water; polonium-210 is known to concentrate in seafood but no figure was read.
    Ecotoxicity
    Not addressed in the sources read.

    Flags

    • The US figures are from abstracts: the national survey gives a percentage above a threshold, not a range, and the Nevada range is one alkaline basin.
    • The 0.7 and 1.1 pCi/L risk thresholds are the authors' values, not regulatory limits.
    • Speciation species are as named in the Szabo abstract; no thermodynamic data were read.
    • The Euratom values were read from the retained UK copy of the directive on legislation.gov.uk, not from EUR-Lex.
    • ISO 13161 is cited from the WHO Annex 6 list; the method text was not read.

    Gaps

    • No polonium specific removal efficiency was read; WHO Table 9.4 has no polonium row.
    • The Euratom detection limit for polonium-210 was not returned by the page read; only the gross alpha and beta limits are written.
    • EU DWD 2020/2184 defers radioactivity to the Euratom directive and was not read this session.
    • The polonium-210 (138 days) and lead-210 (22 years) half lives are standard values, not read this session.
    • No balanced equation is written: the sources read describe polonium speciation and sorption in words only, without stoichiometry.

    Sources

    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first addendum, chapter 9 Radiological aspects (sections 9.2 to 9.7, Tables 9.2 to 9.4)
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), Annex 6 Supporting information on radionuclides, Table A6.1 and the method list A6.3 (NCBI Bookshelf)
    Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom, Annex III (screening levels, derived concentrations, limits of detection), read in the retained UK copy on legislation.gov.uk
    US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (table of MCLs and MCLGs, radionuclides)
    Szabo, Z., Stackelberg, P. E. and Cravotta, C. A., Occurrence and geochemistry of lead-210 and polonium-210 radionuclides in public drinking water supplies from principal aquifers of the United States, Environmental Science and Technology 54 (2020) 7236 to 7249 (abstract via Europe PMC)
    Seiler, R. L., 210Po in Nevada groundwater and its relation to gross alpha radioactivity, Ground Water 49 (2011) 160 to 171 (abstract via Europe PMC)
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 12 Tables 1 to 3
    The Element Book, element entry and reference text for Po (data/elements/Po.json, data/reference/text/Po.json)
    IAEA Safety Reports Series No. 34, Radiation Protection and the Management of Radioactive Waste in the Oil and Gas Industry (2003), section 5 (NORM in oil and gas production, Table III concentrations of NORM in oil, gas and by-products) and section 6 (NORM wastes)
    Nelson, A. W., Johns, A. J., Eitrheim, E. S., Knight, A. W., Basile, M., Bettis, E. A., Schultz, M. K. and Forbes, T. Z., Partitioning of naturally-occurring radionuclides (NORM) in Marcellus Shale produced fluids influenced by chemical matrix, Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts 18 (2016) 456 to 463 (abstract read on Europe PMC)
    US EPA, TENORM: Oil and Gas Production Wastes (web page; radionuclides of produced water, scale and sludge)
    IAEA Safety Reports Series No. 78, Radiation Protection and Management of NORM Residues in the Phosphate Industry (2013), Annex II (discharge of phosphogypsum to surface water)
    Olszewski, G., Borylo, A. and Skwarzec, B., The radiological impact of phosphogypsum stockpile in Wislinka (northern Poland) on the Martwa Wisla river water, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 307 (2016) 653 to 660 (abstract read on Europe PMC)
    Jha, V. N., Tripathi, R. M., Sethy, N. K., Sahoo, S. K. and Puranik, V. D., Uptake of 210Po by aquatic plants of a fresh water ecosystem around the uranium mill tailings management facility of Jaduguda, India, International Journal of Radiation Biology 89 (2013) 770 to 781 (abstract read on Europe PMC)

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.