Ruthenium

    group 8 · period 5 · d-block · transition metal

    fullStable ruthenium is negligible in water (about 5 x 10⁻14 mol/L in the ocean) and unregulated, but ruthenium-106, a 372 day fission product, dominated the beta-gamma activity of reprocessing plant liquid discharges (70 to 80 percent at La Hague, about 10 percent at Sellafield in the 1983 figures), travels as non-reacting nitrosyl complexes with low sediment retention, and carries a WHO guidance level of 10 Bq/L.

    Typical wastewaters

    • nuclear fuel reprocessing liquid effluent (nitric acid, La Hague and Sellafield) ruthenium-106 as nitrosyl Ru(III) complexes [RuNO(NO₃)x(NO₂)y(OH)z(H₂O)₅-x-y-z]^(3-x-y-z), 30 to 50 percent insoluble 70 to 80 percent of the beta-gamma activity of La Hague liquid discharges in 1983 figures; sediment Kd only 20 to 50
    • alkaline and diluted nuclear waste (Savannah River, Oak Ridge waste pits) ruthenate RuO₄²⁻ and perruthenate RuO₄⁻ at high pH; about 60 percent anionic nitrosyl species in diluted waste, the rest neutral
    • reactor cooling effluent (Hanford) ruthenium-103, 66 percent particulate, 16 percent cationic, 13 percent anionic and 5 percent nonionic; 91 percent anionic in riverbank springs

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Ru, 44
    Oxidation states in water
    +3 and +4 hydrolysed species Ru(OH)n^(4-n)+ in natural water; nitrosyl Ru(III) complexes RuNO³⁺ with nitrate, nitrite, hydroxide and water ligands in nitric acid effluent; +6 and +7 ruthenate and perruthenate in alkaline waste; +8 as volatile RuO₄ in accidents
    Note
    The element entry covers the metal, RuO₂ and RuO₄. In water the chemistry is complex and ligand driven; the PNNL review is the reference used here.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Platinum group sulfide ores and ophiolite chromitites (element entry); seawater 1.3 ppt in one Indian Ocean measurement, typical ocean 5 x 10⁻14 M (0.005 ppt) and rivers 4.7 x 10⁻9 M (0.48 ppb) as summarised in the review.
    Anthropogenic sources
    Ru-103 and Ru-106 from fuel reprocessing liquid and gaseous effluents (La Hague, Sellafield, Marcoule, Oak Ridge, Hanford tank leaks), reactor accidents (Chernobyl, the 2017 European Ru-106 release), weapons fallout; stable ruthenium from chlor-alkali anode coatings, chip resistors and catalysts (element entry).
    matrixtypical rangenote
    seawater5 x 10⁻14 mol/L
    two very different figures quoted together in the review
    typical ocean value summarised in the review (0.005 ppt); 1.3 ppt measured in the Southern Indian Ocean
    river water4.7 x 10⁻9 mol/Lsingle summary value0.48 ppb, summarised in the review from Johnson et al. 2011

    3 · Speciation

    In seawater ruthenium is expected as pH dependent hydrolysed species Ru(OH)n^(4-n)+; under strongly oxidising conditions perruthenate RuO₄⁻ can occur, and ruthenate and perruthenate dominate alkaline reprocessing waste, disproportionating to RuO₄ and hydrous RuO₂ on acidification or dilution. In nitric acid reprocessing effluent 30 to 50 percent of the ruthenium is insoluble and the rest is a family of nitrosyl complexes [RuNO(NO₃)x(NO₂)y(OH)z(H₂O)₅-x-y-z]^(3-x-y-z), which are the non-reacting species that let Ru-106 travel from La Hague to the North Sea and Barents Sea. Reactor effluent Ru-103 at Hanford was 66 percent particulate, 16 percent cationic, 13 percent anionic and 5 percent nonionic, but 91 percent anionic in riverbank springs.

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    seawaterRu(OH)n^(4-n)+ hydrolysed Ru(IV)Byrne 2002 as cited in the review
    nitric acid reprocessing effluentRuNO³⁺ nitrosyl nitrato, nitro, hydroxo and aqua complexes; 30 to 50 percent insoluble Ruabout 60 percent anionic in diluted Savannah River waste
    alkaline waste, high pHRuO₄⁻, RuO₄²⁻unstable to dilution
    reducing sediment, pH 5 to 7insoluble sulfide or hydrated oxidethe condition under which minerals removed 74 to 85 percent of Ru-106 from Oak Ridge waste
    Solubility
    Ligand and oxidation state dependent; hydrous RuO₂ is insoluble, nitrosyl complexes are soluble and mobile.
    Hydrolysis
    Ru(III) and Ru(IV) hydrolyse strongly at natural pH.
    Complexation
    Nitrosyl, nitrate, nitrite, chloride (polychloro complexes in acid); the review notes that complexation constants for environmentally relevant ligands are incomplete.
    Precipitates
    RuO₂.nH₂O, ruthenium sulfides.

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    Ru-106 in reprocessing liquid effluent
    soluble non-reacting nitrosyl species pass through effluent treatment and the receiving sea; sediment Kd of only 20 to 50 in the La Hague mixing experiment
    a major fraction of Cs isotopes, Ru-106 and Sb-125 in the effluent is transported to the Northern Seas

    5 · Removal and control

    anion exchange
    anionic nitrosyl ruthenium complexes exchange; neutral complexes pass
    diluted Savannah River Plant waste: about 60 percent of Ru species anionic and removed on an anion column, the rest neutral and captured by neither cation nor anion columns
    Efficiency
    about 60 percent
    Interferences
    neutral complexes
    sorption on minerals under reducing conditions
    Ru forms insoluble sulfide or hydrated oxide at pH 5 to 7 with sodium hydrosulfite
    Oak Ridge waste pit solution; fuchsite, zirconium phosphate, barium chromate, cuprite, allophane and halloysite; several days contact
    Efficiency
    74 to 85 percent
    Interferences
    oxidising conditions (pH above 13 with persulfate) gave poorer removal

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    gamma spectrometry (germanium detector)routine radiometric method; no standard number readnot readRu-106 is measured through its 30 s daughter Rh-106; Ru-103 directly
    ICP-MS for stable ruthenium isotope signaturesresearch methodsnot readRu-99 and Ru-101 are isobars for Tc-99 and other masses
    Sampling pitfalls
    Speciation decides everything: the La Hague study fractionated effluent mixed with seawater by ultracentrifugation and hollow fibre ultrafiltration with on line ion exchange over 62 hours because particulate, cationic, anionic and neutral fractions behave differently. RuO₄ is volatile and toxic; oxidising sample treatment can lose ruthenium as the tetroxide.

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ Table A₆.110 Bq/Lruthenium-106; ruthenium-103 100 Bq/L; guidance levels at 0.1 mSv per year
    US EPA NPDWR (40 CFR 141.66)4 mrem per yearbeta particle and photon emitters; no Ru-106 derived concentration was read
    EU (Euratom Directive 2013/51)0.1 mSv per yearindicative dose; gross beta screening 1.0 Bq/L; Ru-106 not among the derived concentrations read
    WHO GDWQ 4th ed. with addenda (2022), chemical tablesno guideline stable ruthenium is in neither Table A₃.2 nor A₃.3
    EU DWD 2020/2184not set not an Annex I parameter
    US EPA NPDWRnot regulated no chemical MCL
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902), BAT 12not set not a BAT 12 parameter

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Radiological for the fission isotopes; chemically, gaseous RuO₄ is toxic with an ozone-like smell, and hydrous RuO₂ is retained in the deep lung after inhalation. Gastrointestinal absorption of ingested ruthenium is low (about 0.01 for chloro complexes of Ru(III) and Ru(IV), 0.03 for nitrosyl Ru(III), Yamagata 1969 as cited).
    Bioaccumulation
    Ru-106 Kd in soils: 6.6 x 10^3 L/kg inorganic soils, 55 sand, 990 loam, 400 clay (medians), all lower than Cs-137, so Ru-106 is the more mobile; it binds preferentially to organic matter. Brown algae and estuarine saltmarsh sediments in tidally inundated zones accumulate Ru-106 (Ravenglass).
    Ecotoxicity
    Not read.

    Flags

    • The review is a PNNL manuscript with visible editorial comments; the ocean and river ruthenium figures it summarises differ by orders of magnitude between sources and are quoted as given.
    • The discharge shares (70 to 80 percent at La Hague, 10 percent at Sellafield) are 1983 figures and do not describe current discharges.
    • No Bq/L concentration of Ru-106 in seawater or effluent was read.

    Gaps

    • No measured Ru-106 activity concentration in seawater, river water or effluent was read.
    • No stable ruthenium data for groundwater, municipal or industrial wastewater were read.
    • No complexation constants; the review itself states they are incomplete.
    • No standard method number for Ru-106 in water was read.
    • No GCC standard was read.
    • No balanced equation is written: the sources read describe ruthenium hydrolysis and nitrosyl complexes in words only, without stoichiometry.

    Sources

    Boglaienko, D., Hall, G. B., D'Annunzio, N. L. and Levitskaia, T. G. (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Ruthenium Speciation and Distribution in the Environment: A Review (author manuscript via OSTI 2483546): sections on natural occurrence, nuclear sources, speciation, environmental sampling and human health
    Radionuclide speciation in effluent from La Hague reprocessing plant in France, Health Physics (2003), doi 10.1097/00004032-200309000-00007 (abstract, PubMed 12938721)
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), Annex 6 Table A6.1 guidance levels for radionuclides in drinking-water (individual dose criterion 0.1 mSv per year, levels rounded to the nearest order of magnitude)
    40 CFR 141.66 Maximum contaminant levels for radionuclides (beta particle and photon radioactivity 4 mrem/year; gross alpha 15 pCi/L; combined radium 5 pCi/L; uranium 30 µg/L)
    Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom on radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption, Annex I (radon 100 Bq/l, tritium 100 Bq/l, indicative dose 0.1 mSv), Annex III screening (gross alpha 0.1 Bq/l, gross beta 1.0 Bq/l) and derived concentrations (annexes read on legislation.gov.uk)
    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), Annex 3 chemical summary tables: Table A3.2 chemicals for which guideline values have not been established and Table A3.3 guideline values for chemicals of health significance
    Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast), Annex I Parts B, C and D (annexes read on legislation.gov.uk)
    US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (table of MCLs; inorganic chemicals and radionuclides; beta particle and photon emitters 4 millirem per year)
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 12 Tables 1 to 3 (TOC, COD, TSS, TN, Ninorg, TP, AOX, Cr, Cu, Ni, Zn) (annex read on legislation.gov.uk)
    The Element Book, element entry and reference text for Ru (platinum group metal, RuO2 anode coatings, RuO4, catalysts) (data/elements/Ru.json, data/reference/text/Ru.json)

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.