Silver

    group 11 · period 5 · d-block · transition metal

    fullSilver has no health based guideline (WHO gives a provisional reference value of 0.1 mg/L, the US a secondary standard of 0.1 mg/L) but it is a treatment reagent, dosed as ions in point of use filters and with copper against Legionella, an emerging nanoparticle contaminant, and a plating and photographic effluent metal with a US metal finishing limit and the tightest metal limit in Abu Dhabi's marine specification (0.005 mg/L).

    Typical wastewaters

    • electroplating and metal finishing (silver plating) Ag⁺ in rinse water, held in solution as cyanide complexes until the cyanide is destroyed; precipitated as AgCl, Ag₂S or into the hydroxide sludge US limit 0.43 mg/L daily, 0.24 mg/L monthly
    • photographic processing (fixer) silver thiosulfate complexes, which keep silver dissolved past chloride precipitation declining since digital photography (WHO); no fixer concentration read
    • municipal sewage (nanoparticles from antimicrobial textiles and consumer products) silver nanoparticles, aggregated and coated, releasing Ag⁺; converted to Ag₂S in sludge and sediment coated nanoparticles are expected to be removed by conventional treatment
    • textile and leather wet processing (antimicrobial silver finishes) total silver as a ZDHC Table 2 metal (0.1 mg/L foundational); sludge threshold 50 mg/kg dry weight
    In the ledger's plant and process records, discharged by: Cleaning-in-place and disinfection (Food and beverage)

    1 · Identity

    Symbol, number
    Ag, 47
    Oxidation states in water
    +1 only: Ag⁺ from silver nitrate and from dissolving nanoparticles; AgCl, slightly soluble, and its chloride complexes in chloride rich water; Ag₂S, the insoluble thermodynamic sink (WHO). 0 as the metal, as silver nanoparticles of 1 to 100 nm that release Ag⁺ at their surface, and as the silver coating of filter media.
    Note
    The element entry gives the nitrate, the halides and the sulfide tarnish. In water everything turns on chloride and sulfide: they decide whether silver is a dissolved biocide, a colloid of AgCl, or a sulfide particle that does nothing.

    2 · Occurrence in water

    Natural sources
    Silver occurs mainly as its very insoluble and immobile sulfide, oxides and some salts (WHO fact sheet); in soil as the chloride or sulfide, mobile only if the sulfide oxidises to sulfate. In river water silver is dissolved by complexation with chloride and humic matter (WHO background document).
    Anthropogenic sources
    Point of use filters with silver spiked activated carbon or silver coated ceramics; copper-silver ionisation in building water systems; silver nanoparticles washed out of antimicrobial textiles and consumer products into sewage; silver plating and metal finishing (US limit 0.43 mg/L daily); photographic fixer (declining since digital photography, WHO); silver and base metal mining. Nanoparticles released via wastewater or industrial discharge can be mobile and enter ground and drinking water supplies (WHO).
    matrixtypical rangenote
    surface water and groundwaterusually below 2; average 0.2 to 0.3 µg/LUS 1988 survey: 99.3 percent of 989 groundwaters below 4 µg/L, 0.4 percent between 18 and 20 µg/L; Texas: 73 of 5,420 groundwater samples had detections, median 1.1 µg/L, one at 112 µg/L
    surface water and groundwater, WHO fact sheet rangeusually below 5; detections above 100 rare µg/L
    drinking water, not treated with silvernot detectable to 5 µg/L
    the French estimate is far above the US and Canadian surveys and is quoted as WHO printed it
    USA; Canadian survey 0.1 percent of tap samples above 1 to 5 µg/L; French agency estimate of mean drinking water silver 8 to 49 µg/L
    drinking water, treated with silver or from silver filtersbelow 25 to 50 (silver spiked carbon cartridges); 50 or higher (water treated with silver, 2003 document) µg/Ldevice dependentin silver treated water most silver is present as non dissociated silver chloride (2003 background document)

    3 · Speciation

    Ag⁺ is a soft cation that binds sulfide, chloride and organic sulfur ligands. In low chloride fresh water it stays ionic, complexed by humic matter; as chloride rises it precipitates AgCl and then redissolves as AgCl₂⁻ and higher chloro complexes, so silver in seawater is a dissolved chloride complex. Any sulfide converts it to Ag₂S, which is the final sink for both ions and nanoparticles and is biologically inert. Silver nanoparticles aggregate because of their surface energy (WHO) and release Ag⁺ by surface oxidation; their coating decides whether conventional treatment catches them. Ionic release from nanoparticles makes it hard to say whether silver found in water came from ions or particles (WHO fact sheet).

    conditiondominant speciesnote
    fresh water, low chloride, oxicAg⁺, silver bound to humic matterthe biocidal form
    chloride above a few mg/LAgCl (s) colloid; AgCl (aq); AgCl₂⁻ and AgCl₃²⁻ with more chloridecolloidal silver chloride above 150 µg/L causes opalescence (WHO)
    sulfidic, anoxic, sewage and sedimentAg₂S (s)the thermodynamic sink for nanoparticles (WHO)
    nanoparticle suspensionsAg (s) particles 1 to 100 nm, aggregated, coated; Ag⁺ released at the surfacecoated nanoparticles are expected to be removed by conventional treatment (WHO fact sheet)
    Solubility
    AgCl is slightly soluble; Ag₂S is among the least soluble sulfides; silver nitrate is freely soluble. EPA 200.8 notes silver is only slightly soluble in the presence of chloride unless there is enough chloride to form the soluble chloride complex, which is an analytical and a treatment fact at once. No solubility products quoted; the sources read print none.
    Hydrolysis
    Negligible at natural pH; Ag₂O precipitates only in strong alkali.
    Complexation
    Chloride, humic matter (WHO), thiosulfate (the basis of photographic fixer), ammonia and cyanide in plating baths; all keep silver dissolved past the chloride precipitation.
    Precipitates
    AgCl, Ag₂S, metallic silver from reduction, silver in hydroxide sludge of metal finishing plants.
    AgX++ClXAgCl(s)\ce{Ag^+ + Cl^- -> AgCl (s)}
    chloride in the water; the reason most silver in silver treated water is non dissociated silver chloride (WHO 2003) and the reason unfiltered chloride samples lose silver before analysis (EPA 200.8 section 1.7)
    AgCl(s)+ClXAgClX2X\ce{AgCl (s) + Cl^- <=> AgCl2^-}
    higher chloride, seawater and brines; redissolution as the chloride complex (EPA 200.8 section 1.7; hydrochloric acid is required to keep silver stable in the method's solutions)
    AgCl(s)+2SX2OX3X2Ag(SX2OX3)X2X3+ClX\ce{AgCl (s) + 2 S2O3^2- -> Ag(S2O3)2^3- + Cl^-}
    photographic fixer: thiosulfate pulls silver back off the chloride and holds it as a strongly bound anionic complex, which is why fixer effluent carries silver straight past the chloride precipitation that would catch it in a plating rinse; the sources name the complex, the stoichiometry is written here
    AgX++2CNXAg(CN)X2X\ce{Ag^+ + 2 CN^- -> Ag(CN)2^-}
    silver plating rinse: cyanide holds silver in solution as an anion until the cyanide is destroyed by alkaline chlorination, after which the silver drops out as chloride, sulfide or into the hydroxide sludge; written from standard plating bath chemistry, the CFR sets the limit only and names no complex
    2AgX++HSXAgX2S(s)+HX+\ce{2 Ag^+ + HS^- -> Ag2S (s) + H+}
    any sulfide; the final sink for ionic and nanoparticle silver (WHO); the stoichiometry is written here, the source names the product
    4Ag(s)+OX2+4HX+4AgX++2HX2O\ce{4 Ag (s) + O2 + 4 H+ -> 4 Ag^+ + 2 H2O}
    oxidative dissolution at the surface of silver nanoparticles in oxic water, the step that makes a particle a source of ions; it is the reason WHO says one cannot tell from a measurement whether the silver in a water came from ions or from particles, and the released Ag^+ then meets chloride or sulfide; the stoichiometry is written here, the source describes the surface oxidation in words
    2AgX++2OHXAgX2O(s)+HX2O\ce{2 Ag^+ + 2 OH- -> Ag2O (s) + H2O}
    the hydroxide route, and the reason nobody uses it: silver oxide comes down only in strong alkali, well above lime softening pH, so raising pH does not take silver out the way it takes out copper, nickel or zinc; chloride and sulfide do the work instead. No solubility product was read

    4 · Role in treatment

    as a problem
    argyria from long term ingestion
    silver deposited in skin and organs oxidises to Ag₂S and discolours them
    WHO: the only obvious sign of silver overload; LOAEL 0.6 mg/kg per day of colloidal silver over 16 months in one case report
    opalescence
    colloidal silver chloride
    above 150 µg/L (WHO); silver ions and nanoparticles at up to 100 µg/L have no effect on taste, colour or odour
    unproven disinfection
    any effect needs higher concentrations and long contact times
    WHO does not recommend silver for disinfection of drinking water, including point of use devices
    nanoparticles passing treatment
    coated nanoparticles are mobile and reach effluents; their sink is Ag₂S in sludge and sediment
    WHO fact sheet: nanoparticles can be present in water bodies from wastewater or industrial discharges
    analytical loss
    silver precipitates as AgCl or adsorbs unless digested or held in chloride
    EPA 200.8: low recoveries in undigested samples; digest before determining silver
    as a reagent
    bacteriostatic silver in point of use filters
    silver coated or silver spiked activated carbon and ceramic filters release Ag⁺ to limit biofilm growth in the filter
    4Ag(s)+OX2+4HX+4AgX++2HX2O\ce{4 Ag (s) + O2 + 4 H+ -> 4 Ag^+ + 2 H2O}
    2003 WHO document: antiseptic 15 to 50 µg/L, bacteriostatic up to 100 µg/L, disinfectant above 150 µg/L; cartridges release below 25 to 50 µg/L; WHO 2021: devices should be certified not to exceed 0.1 mg/L over their useful life and the use as a disinfectant is not recommended; the dosing step is the oxidative dissolution of the metal on the medium, so the release depends on dissolved oxygen and pH and falls away as the surface tarnishes to Ag2S; the stoichiometry is written here, the documents describe the release in words
    copper-silver ionisation for Legionella in buildings
    electrolytic release of copper and silver ions into the hot water system
    Ag(s)AgX++eX\ce{Ag (s) -> Ag^+ + e-}
    effective in many cases on long contact times (WHO 2018 cited); calibrate and monitor the dosing; silver usually in the low µg/L range; the risk of legionellosis outweighs the risk from low levels of silver (fact sheet); the equation is the anodic half reaction that does the dosing, so the current sets the concentration
    silver nanoparticles in experimental point of use treatment
    AgNP in ceramic filters
    under test, not standard (WHO background document)

    5 · Removal and control

    coagulation, sedimentation and filtration
    ionic silver co-precipitates and adsorbs on hydroxide flocs; coated nanoparticles are removed with the particles
    WHO fact sheet: conventional treatment effective for ionic silver and expected to be effective for coated silver nanoparticles
    Efficiency
    not quoted as a figure
    Interferences
    uncoated or stabilised nanoparticles; chloride complexes
    lime softening
    silver precipitates with the calcium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide sludge
    WHO fact sheet lists lime softening as effective for ionic silver
    Efficiency
    not quoted
    chloride, sulfide or hydroxide precipitation (metal finishing effluent)
    AgCl or Ag₂S precipitated from rinses; silver caught in the plant's hydroxide sludge
    AgX++ClXAgCl(s)\ce{Ag^+ + Cl^- -> AgCl (s)}
    the US metal finishing limit of 0.43 mg/L daily and 0.24 mg/L monthly is met this way; the CWW BREF describes chemical precipitation generally
    Efficiency
    to 0.24 mg/L monthly in the US rule; no lower figure read
    Interferences
    cyanide and thiosulfate complexes hold silver in solution

    6 · Analytics

    methodstandarddetection limitnote
    ICP-MSEPA 200.8 (mass 107); ISO 17294-2; Standard Methods 31255 ng/L (WHO); EPA 200.8 instrument detection limit 0.05 µg/L scanning, 0.004 µg/L selected ion monitoringEPA 200.8 total recoverable digestion is suitable to 0.1 mg/L silver; dilute wastewater until the analysis solution is below 0.1 mg/L
    graphite furnace AASISO 15586; Standard Methods 31132 µg/L (WHO)
    neutron activation analysisno numbered standard2 ng/L (WHO)research method
    dithizone colorimetryspectrographic and colorimetric method cited by WHO10 µg/L for a 20 mL sample
    single particle ICP-MS with asymmetric flow field-flow fractionationnot standardised (WHO)1 to 5 ng/L for nanoparticles (WHO citing Hetzer 2017)distinguishes nanoparticles from dissolved silver
    Sampling pitfalls
    Silver precipitates as AgCl and adsorbs on container walls unless the sample is digested or carries enough chloride to form the chloride complex (EPA 200.8 section 1.7); the method requires hydrochloric acid to keep silver and antimony stable and recommends digestion before determination. Dissolved silver by filtration therefore understates silver in chloride bearing water. Ionic silver released from nanoparticles cannot be told from ionic silver present as such without particle methods (WHO).

    7 · Regulatory limits

    Limits change, and many are set locally. Treat these as the published values to start from, not as your compliance target: check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit.

    drinking water
    bodylimitnote
    WHO GDWQ 4th ed. with addenda (2022)no guideline data inadequate for a health based value and silver usually well below health concern; assessment 2021
    WHO GDWQ, provisional reference value0.1 mg/La bounding value for where silver is used in point of use devices or copper-silver systems; derived from a colloidal silver LOAEL of 0.6 mg/kg per day with an uncertainty factor of 100, 80 percent allocation, 60 kg, 2 L/day, and supported by the 10 g lifetime NOAEL; WHO states reference values are too uncertain to be used for developing regulations or standards
    EU DWD 2020/2184not set silver is not a parameter of Annex I
    US EPA0.1 mg/LNational Secondary Drinking Water Regulation, non enforceable; effects listed as skin discolouration and greying of the white part of the eye; no primary MCL
    discharge
    bodylimitnote
    EU CWW BREF BAT-AEL (Decision 2016/902)not set silver is not among the metals with a BAT-AEL (Cr, Cu, Ni, Zn)
    US EPA 40 CFR 433.14, metal finishing (BAT), silver (total)0.43 daily maximum; 0.24 monthly average mg/Lwith cadmium 0.69 and 0.26, copper 3.38 and 2.07, nickel 3.98 and 2.38 mg/L
    Abu Dhabi ADS 23/2017, discharge to the marine environment (EAD)0.005 mg/L
    region-dependent; marine discharge only
    Table 1 maximum allowable concentration at the point of discharge; the lowest metal value in the table after mercury
    Abu Dhabi DoE Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022, discharge to sewer5 mg/L
    region-dependent; sewer discharge, not receiving water
    Table A₄ Metals; a thousand fold above the marine value
    industry thresholds
    sectorbodylimitnote
    textile and leatherZDHC Wastewater Guidelines v₂.1 (2022), Table 20.1 foundational; 0.05 progressive; 0.005 aspirational mg/Ltextile and leather alike; sludge total silver threshold 50 mg/kg dry weight, textile only (Table 4A); antimicrobial silver finishes are the textile source

    8 · Health and environmental effects

    Toxicity
    Argyria, the blue grey discolouration of skin and organs by deposited Ag₂S, is the only established effect of chronic oral silver; the lowest human LOAEL is about 0.6 mg/kg per day of colloidal silver for 16 months, and 10 g of silver over a lifetime is taken as a NOAEL (WHO). Animal data on nanoparticles at high doses hint at effects of unclear relevance to the low µg/L found in drinking water (WHO background document).
    Bioaccumulation
    Silver deposits in skin, kidney and liver as insoluble sulfide after ingestion of ions or nanoparticles (WHO); aquatic bioaccumulation is not addressed in the sources read.
    Ecotoxicity
    Silver ion is among the most toxic metals to aquatic life: US EPA aquatic life criteria 3.2 µg/L freshwater acute and 1.9 µg/L saltwater acute (1980), no chronic criteria; the biocidal use and the ecotoxicity are the same property, and sulfide and chloride complexation blunt both.

    Flags

    • The WHO 0.1 mg/L is a provisional reference value that WHO says must not be used for regulations; it is listed separately from the no guideline row.
    • The French 8 to 49 µg/L mean drinking water estimate is quoted as WHO printed it; it sits far above the US and Canadian surveys.
    • The 2021 WHO background document read is the December 2020 public review draft (iris.who.int returned 403 for the final WHO/HEP/ECH/WSH/2021.7).
    • The sulfide precipitation equation is written here; WHO names Ag₂S as the sink without printing it.
    • The metal finishing removal train is inferred from the limit and the CWW BREF's generic precipitation chapter; no silver specific effluent treatment source was read.
    • Abu Dhabi values cover two media (marine 0.005 mg/L, sewer 5 mg/L); other GCC states not read.
    • Standard Methods and ISO method numbers other than those in the sources read (EPA 200.8, ISO 17294-2 and the methods the WHO documents cite) are quoted from memory and were not confirmed this session.

    Gaps

    • No seawater silver concentration and no photographic or plating effluent concentration was read; silver recovery from fixer is not covered.
    • No solubility products for AgCl and Ag₂S and no chloride complex constants are quoted.
    • Copper-silver ionisation silver doses in µg/L are given by WHO only as 'low µg/L'; no design figure was read.
    • EU law was read on legislation.gov.uk mirrors; other GCC discharge standards were not read.
    • The nanoparticle oxidative dissolution is written here from the surface oxidation the WHO background document describes; no rate or solubility figure was read.
    • No stability constants were read for the thiosulfate or cyanide complexes; both equations are written from the complexes the sources name.

    Sources

    WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th ed. incorporating the first and second addenda (2022), chapter 12 chemical fact sheet, Silver (pp. 461 to 462)
    WHO, Silver in Drinking-water, background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, draft for public review (December 2020; final WHO/HEP/ECH/WSH/2021.7), sections 2.3, 2.4, 3.1, 8.1, 8.2 and 9; and the 2003 document WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/14 for the antiseptic, bacteriostatic and disinfectant ranges
    WHO, Silver in Drinking-water, background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/14 (2003), major uses (antiseptic, bacteriostatic and disinfectant ranges), analytical methods and water levels
    US EPA, Secondary Drinking Water Standards: Guidance for Nuisance Chemicals
    Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast), Annex I Part B (read on the legislation.gov.uk mirror of the directive)
    Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/902 establishing BAT conclusions for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW), BAT 12 Table 3 and footnotes c, d and g (read on the legislation.gov.uk mirror)
    40 CFR 433.14, Effluent limitations (BAT), metal finishing point source category
    Abu Dhabi Specification ADS 23/2017, Environmental Specifications for Land-Based Liquid Discharges to the Marine Environment (Environment Agency Abu Dhabi), Table 1
    Abu Dhabi Department of Energy, Trade Effluent Control Regulations 2022 (DoE/PD/R01/005, effective 1 January 2022), Appendix Table A4 Metals
    ZDHC Wastewater Guidelines Version 2.1 (November 2022), Table 2 heavy metals and Table 4A sludge
    US EPA Method 200.8, Revision 5.4 (1994), Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by ICP-MS, sections 1.7 and 7.1, Table 1 (instrument detection limits)
    US EPA, National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, Aquatic Life Criteria Table
    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (online edition), 3111 (flame AAS), 3120 (ICP-OES), 3125 (ICP-MS)

    Conventions

    Valence electrons are counted by the usual convention: the outer shell for s- and p-block elements, ns and (n-1)d for the d-block, ns, (n-1)d and (n-2)f for the f-block. Lanthanides and actinides are placed in the f-block with no group number. Electrical conductivity is the reciprocal of the printed resistivity. Ionic radii are Shannon effective radii, six-coordinate unless noted. Where a field reads “not in sources” the value was not found; it is a gap, not a zero. Regulatory limits are the published values and change often, so check the standard in force at your site and the numbers written into your own permit before you design to them.

    Data

    Element records, isotopes, radii and the descriptive text come from PubChem (NCBI), the Los Alamos National Laboratory periodic table, IUPAC CIAAW and the IAEA Atomic Mass Data Center. Appearance, thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, crystal structure, discovery and the origin of each name come from Wikipedia and Periodic-Table-JSON, used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Hazard classifications come from the ECHA C&L inventory via PubChem. Ionic radii follow R. D. Shannon (1976). The water chapters cite their own sources at the foot of each entry, and are written to the level of Snoeyink and Jenkins, Stumm and Morgan, MWH's Water Treatment and Metcalf and Eddy.