Infrastructure, Networks & Equipment

    Municipal WWTP Companies

    Municipal wastewater solution providers, plant design, upgrades, retrofits, and nutrient-removal expansions.

    93 providers

    This page is a good fit if you need:

    • Filtration or Ion Exchange capabilities
    • Suppliers with waste management and remediation sector experience
    • Providers operating in United Kingdom or United States
    Providers
    93
    Verified
    4
    Countries
    22

    Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.

    Post a project

    Find a Municipal WWTP Provider

    Showing 1-20 of 93

    93 results from 93 matched providers

    Ecosystems International logo

    Ecosystems International

    Verified
    Indonesia51-200 employees
    Flat Sheet Microfiltration Units · Hollow Fiber MF Systems · Ceramic Microfiltration Modules +80 more
    apac · china · europe +3 more

    PT Ecosystems International (PT ESI) was established at Jakarta on 21st November 2006. We are an industrial effluent treatment systems integrator specializing in electrocoagulation (EC), a unique waste water treatment profile. PT ESI has capabilities in designing complete waste water treatment solutions by combining various effluent treatment systems such as the electro-coagulation, biological, chemical processes and membrane filtration, offering its customers a wide and comprehensive range of solutions, tailored to suit their various needs – ranging from basic effluent treatment for discharge to effluent recycling for water reuse. The Company is experienced in handling the design, engineering, procurement, construction and operation of new Effluent Treatment Plants (“ETP”) and possesses expertise in retrofitting existing ETP to increase the flow rate and treatment capability without any major infrastructure increase PT ESI is also a premier waste water treatment service company specializing in handling waste water generated from Exploration (Drilling) and Produced Water. Customers in Indonesia include major Oil & Gas companies such as Pertamina, Exxon, Chevron, Petro-China and Medco. Operations in Indonesia are provided by both mobile and fixed units. At drill sites where waste-water recycling is required, PT ESI supplement these treatment units with skid mounted mobile Reverse Osmosis systems. The technologies and solutions employed by PT ESI are developed in-house and examples of these are its proprietary Trident™ Electro Contaminant Removal (“ECR”) system, the Stage Contaminant Removal (“SCR”) process and Mobile On-Site Waste-Water Treatment (“OWT”) units

    Reverse Osmosis (RO) Systems
    Ultrafiltration (UF) Systems
    Multi-media Filtration (MMF) Systems
    +63 more
    agriculture
    manufacturing
    Brine Consulting logo

    Brine Consulting

    Verified
    Netherlands1-50 employees
    Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) · Atmospheric Evaporator · Spray Evaporator +130 more
    apac · china · europe +3 more

    BRINE CONSULTING delivers senior-level strategy, technical design, and actionable insight across the full lifecycle of water-related challenges. We support clients with advisory and due diligence, advanced brine management and resource recovery, industrial and municipal water reuse, and MLD/ZLD systems. Our team also leads ESG and climate-resilience strategy, innovation scouting, and international development and PPP advisory. With deep specialization in desalination, brine valorization, circular economy models, and high-impact infrastructure, we help organizations turn water and waste streams into opportunities, providing clear thinking, rapid delivery, and solutions built for real-world results.

    Activated Carbon Filtration
    Reverse Osmosis (RO) Systems
    Ultrafiltration (UF) Systems
    +85 more
    manufacturing
    energy-production
    Hainan Litree Water Purification Technology Industry Co., Ltd. logo

    Hainan Litree Water Purification Technology Industry Co., Ltd.

    Verified
    China200+ employees
    Tubular Ultrafiltration Units · Hollow Fiber UF Modules · Flat Sheet UF Membranes +17 more
    apac · china · europe +3 more

    Litree: Pioneering Ultrafiltration for a Water-Secure World Founded in 1992, Litree has dedicated 30+ years to redefining water purification through ultrafiltration (UF) membrane technology—our core expertise and passion立升(Litree). As a global high-tech enterprise rooted in independent innovation, we’ve evolved from a membrane R&D startup to one of the world’s leading water problem solvers, with over 146 core patents and state-of-the-art manufacturing hubs in Haikou and Suzhou, China立升(Litree). Our signature hollow fiber UF membranes are engineered to deliver unmatched performance: 0.01μm precision removes 99.99% of bacteria, viruses, and contaminants while preserving essential minerals—striking the perfect balance between purity and health立升(Litree). This technology powers our diverse solutions, from residential whole-house systems to large-scale municipal projects and industrial wastewater treatment, all designed for sustainability and cost-efficiency. What truly sets us apart is our commitment to making safe water accessible. We’ve completed projects serving 50,000+ residents with centralized purification systems that cut construction costs and footprint by 50% compared to traditional setups—proof that advanced technology can also be affordable. Today, our solutions reach 60+ countries, supporting 3,000+ industrial clients and millions of households worldwide. At Litree, water isn’t just our business—it’s our mission. We believe every drop matters, and we’ll keep pushing boundaries to create a future where clean, safe water is a universal right, not a privilege

    Ultrafiltration (UF) Systems
    Membrane Filtration Technologies
    pH Adjustment and Neutralization
    +64 more
    agriculture
    manufacturing
    RCI Aquatech logo

    RCI Aquatech

    Verified
    India1-50 employees
    Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) · Multiple Effect Evaporator (MEE) · Atmospheric Evaporator +76 more
    apac · europe · latam +1 more
    1 case studies

    Founded in 2009, formerly known as Red Circle Industries (RCI), RCI Aquatech creates custom wastewater solutions based on end users’ requirements, which allow for optimally chosen components resulting in a solution that meets or exceeds customer needs. RCI Aquatech’s wastewater treatment systems combine necessary process technologies to reach required state and federal discharge limits and comply with local regulations. Our systems focus on removal of pollutants such as heavy metals, greases, suspended solids, oils, high salt content, toxic compounds, phosphates and more. Using chemical-physical treatment (coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation), biological treatment (aerobic and anaerobic) and wet chemical oxidation (persistent or toxic organics). Our expertise comprises the following technologies:  Filtration & softening systems  Physicochemical treatment (coagulation-flocculation)  Membrane filtration (UF & RO)  Ion exchange  Chemical oxidation  Biological treatment  Zero liquid discharge (ZLD) system

    Activated Carbon Filtration
    Microfiltration (MF) Systems
    Reverse Osmosis (RO) Systems
    +52 more
    manufacturing
    chemicals-pharmaceuticals
    Liquid X logo

    Liquid X

    Verified
    United Arab Emirates1-50 employees
    Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) Filters · GO–Polymer Composites · Cartridge Filters
    mea

    Liquid X is a water technology consultancy and commercialization platform focused on accelerating the deployment of next-generation filtration solutions, with a core emphasis on graphene-based water treatment. Founded to address the gap between breakthrough innovation and real-world implementation, Liquid X operates at the intersection of advanced material science, water infrastructure, and market deployment. While significant advances in water technologies exist globally, many remain confined to laboratories or early-stage ventures. Liquid X bridges this gap by identifying, validating, and commercializing high-impact solutions—particularly graphene-based filtration systems—within the GCC and wider MENA region. Our consultancy model is built around a full lifecycle approach: from technology scouting and technical evaluation to pilot design, validation, and scaled deployment. We work with asset owners, governments, and enterprises to translate emerging technologies into practical, site-ready solutions. This includes designing pilot programs with measurable performance metrics, enabling data-driven decision-making, and ensuring that innovations are proven under real operating conditions before scale-up. A key focus of Liquid X is the commercialization of graphene-based water filters. Graphene, a two-dimensional material with exceptional strength, permeability, and adsorption capacity, has the potential to fundamentally transform water treatment. Its nano-scale structure allows precise separation of contaminants while enabling faster water flow and lower energy consumption compared to conventional systems. Through strategic partnerships with innovators, researchers, and manufacturers, Liquid X is actively working to bring graphene filtration technologies from concept to market. These systems are being developed to address some of the most critical water challenges, including the removal of PFAS and emerging contaminants, heavy metals, dissolved solids, and industrial pollutants—while significantly reducing waste and energy intensity associated with traditional technologies such as reverse osmosis. Our role extends beyond technology development. Liquid X supports the full commercialization journey, including: Technical due diligence and performance validation Pilot implementation and third-party verification Integration with existing infrastructure Development of scalable deployment models Coordination with EPC contractors, facility managers, and regulators Ongoing monitoring, compliance, and optimization By operating as a vendor-agnostic platform, we ensure that solutions are selected based on performance, suitability, and long-term value—not vendor bias. The MENA region faces some of the world’s most acute water challenges, including scarcity, high desalination dependence, and rising energy costs. Liquid X is positioned to introduce more efficient, decentralized, and sustainable alternatives through advanced filtration technologies. Graphene-based systems, in particular, offer the potential for lightweight, modular, and energy-efficient treatment solutions that can be deployed at scale across residential, commercial, and industrial applications. At its core, Liquid X is not just a consultancy—it is an enabler of the next generation of water infrastructure. By combining deep regional expertise with global innovation networks, we are helping transform how water is treated, distributed, and consumed. Our mission is to accelerate the transition from legacy, resource-intensive systems to smarter, more sustainable water solutions—unlocking the full potential of graphene and other advanced materials to build a more water-secure future.

    Activated Carbon Filtration
    Nanofiltration (NF) Systems
    Point-of-Use (POU) Filtration Systems
    +11 more
    food-beverages
    hospitality-tourism

    Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Design: Activated Sludge Parameters, Nutrient Removal, and Effluent Standards

    Municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) process domestic, commercial, and industrial sewage through primary (screening, grit removal, sedimentation, 30 to 50 percent BOD removal), secondary (biological treatment, 85 to 95 percent BOD and SS removal), and tertiary (nutrient removal, filtration, disinfection, meeting advanced effluent standards) stages. Secondary treatment by activated sludge (AS) uses aerobic bacteria to oxidise soluble BOD at food-to-microorganism ratios (F:M) of 0.05 to 0.25 kg BOD per kg MLVSS per day, with mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) of 2,000 to 4,000 mg per L, dissolved oxygen maintained at 1.5 to 4.0 mg per L, and sludge retention time (SRT) of 5 to 15 days for BOD removal, 10 to 20 days for nitrification at 15 degrees C.

    Biological nutrient removal (BNR) extends activated sludge to remove nitrogen and phosphorus. Nitrification converts ammonia to nitrate (Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter bacteria, minimum SRT 8 to 12 days at 15 degrees C, DO above 1.5 mg per L in aerobic zones). Denitrification converts nitrate to nitrogen gas in anoxic zones (no DO, using BOD as electron donor); 5-stage Bardenpho or Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) configurations achieve total nitrogen below 10 mg per L TN. Biological phosphorus removal (EBPR: Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal) uses anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic (A2O) or similar configurations where polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) take up excess phosphorus; achieves TP below 1 mg per L. Chemical phosphorus removal (dosing aluminium sulphate or ferric chloride, 5 to 20 mg per L) provides compliance backup.

    EU Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (91/271/EEC, revised 2022 as proposal) sets effluent standards by catchment size: for sensitive areas, BOD below 25 mg per L, SS below 35 mg per L, COD below 125 mg per L, total nitrogen below 10 to 15 mg per L, total phosphorus below 1 to 2 mg per L. US EPA secondary treatment standards: BOD below 30 mg per L (30-day average), SS below 30 mg per L. UK standards from Environment Agency discharge consents are site-specific but typically BOD below 20 mg per L, SS below 30 mg per L, ammonia below 5 mg per L for rivers above a certain flow standard. Effluent disinfection is required in the US (UV or chlorination plus dechlorination) but not universally mandated in the UK and EU.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between primary, secondary, and tertiary wastewater treatment?

    Primary treatment (physical): Screens (6 to 25 mm bar screens) remove gross solids (rags, plastics). Grit chambers remove sand and grit (settling velocity above 0.2 m per s) to protect downstream equipment. Primary sedimentation (clarifiers, HRT 1.5 to 2.5 hours, surface loading 25 to 40 m3 per m2 per day) removes 50 to 70 percent of suspended solids and 30 to 40 percent of BOD as primary sludge (3 to 6 percent DS). Secondary treatment (biological): Activated sludge aeration tanks (HRT 4 to 8 hours) with secondary clarifiers remove 90 to 95 percent of BOD and 85 to 92 percent of SS from settled sewage. Produces secondary sludge (0.5 to 1.5 percent DS from secondary clarifier returns). Tertiary treatment (advanced): Removes nitrogen, phosphorus, residual SS, or pathogens. Includes sand filtration, UV, chemical phosphorus precipitation, constructed wetlands, or advanced oxidation. Achieves effluent suitable for sensitive receiving waters or reuse.

    How is ammonia removed in wastewater treatment?

    Ammonia removal requires biological nitrification: aerobic bacteria (Nitrosomonas converts NH4+ to NO2-, Nitrobacter converts NO2- to NO3-) oxidise ammonia to nitrate in the aeration basin. Design requirements: dissolved oxygen above 1.5 to 2.0 mg per L in all aerobic zones (below 1.0 mg per L suppresses Nitrosomonas); pH 6.5 to 8.5 (optimal 7.5 to 8.0); sludge retention time (SRT) sufficient for slow-growing nitrifiers (SRT above 8 days at 15 degrees C, above 12 days at 10 degrees C, above 20 days at 5 degrees C; cold temperatures slow nitrification significantly). Nitrification converts NH4-N to NO3-N (not full nitrogen removal); denitrification in anoxic zones (DO near zero) with organic carbon as electron donor then reduces NO3- to N2 gas. Combined nitrification-denitrification (Modified Ludzack-Ettinger, A2O, SBR) achieves total nitrogen below 10 mg per L.

    How much energy does a municipal WWTP consume?

    Municipal WWTPs consume 0.3 to 0.7 kWh per m3 of treated wastewater for conventional activated sludge with secondary treatment only; 0.5 to 1.0 kWh per m3 for full nutrient removal with tertiary treatment. The dominant energy consumer is aeration (50 to 60 percent of total WWTP energy): fine bubble diffuser systems at 1.2 to 2.4 kg O2 per kWh are standard (coarse bubble at 0.6 to 1.2 kg O2 per kWh is less efficient but lower capital cost). Pumping (primary, return activated sludge, sludge handling): 20 to 25 percent. Biogas generated from anaerobic digestion of primary and secondary sludge can offset 50 to 100 percent of WWTP electricity demand (gas generation 0.25 to 0.35 m3 CH4 per kg VS destroyed; electricity generation in CHP at 35 to 40 percent efficiency). Some modern energy-neutral WWTPs (Strass, Austria; DC Water Blue Plains, USA) generate more energy from biogas than they consume, achieving net energy positive operation through optimised primary treatment maximising sludge capture.

    How is sludge from municipal WWTPs disposed of?

    Municipal sewage sludge (biosolids) disposal routes in descending preference (UK Environment Agency 'safe sludge matrix'): (1) Agricultural land application - beneficial reuse as soil amendment and fertiliser (phosphorus, nitrogen, organic matter), subject to limit values for heavy metals (Sludge Use in Agriculture Regulations 1989 in UK; US EPA 40 CFR Part 503); 60 to 70 percent of UK sludge is land-applied; (2) Enhanced anaerobic digestion plus land application - thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment (THP: 160 to 165 degrees C, 6 bar) produces pasteurised Class A biosolids with higher biogas yield; (3) Incineration - for sludge unsuitable for land application (high metal content, pharmaceutical micropollutant concerns); co-incineration in cement kilns or standalone sludge combustion (phosphorus recovery from ash is an emerging driver); (4) Landfill - minimum use, declining due to landfill tax; prohibited in several EU countries. Global trend: phosphorus recovery from sludge (struvite precipitation, thermal treatment ash) is gaining regulatory support as part of circular economy policy.

    Case Study·UK regional water company, AMP8 wastewater investment programme
    Challenge

    A 120,000 PE activated sludge WWTP serving a market town in the East Midlands was routinely failing its Environment Agency ammonia consent (5 mg per L) during winter due to cold-temperature nitrification suppression at SRT below 12 days. The EA had issued a regulatory notice requiring compliance within 24 months.

    Approach

    A process review identified aeration control as the bottleneck. Dissolved oxygen control was upgraded from on/off blower switching to variable-speed drives with NH4-based aeration control (ammonia sensor feedback loop maintaining DO at 1.8 to 2.5 mg per L). SRT was increased from 10 to 15 days by reducing WAS frequency. A chemical phosphorus dosing system (ferric sulphate, 10 mg per L) was added for TP compliance ahead of a future EBPR retrofit.

    Outcome

    Ammonia compliance rate improved from 78 to 99.1 percent within two operational seasons. Aeration energy fell by 22 percent year on year due to DO optimisation. The EA regulatory notice was formally closed 19 months after the upgrade programme began.

    Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers

    1. 1

      What are the EA consent limits for BOD, SS, ammonia, and phosphorus for this discharge point?

      Consent limits define the treatment standard required; tight ammonia or phosphorus limits often require BNR or chemical dosing systems that significantly affect capital and operating costs.

    2. 2

      What is the design population equivalent and the 20-year flow and load growth projection?

      Undersizing secondary treatment for population growth causes consent failures within 5 to 10 years; hydraulic and organic capacity must be assessed at present and future peak loads.

    3. 3

      How is sludge produced and what is the proposed disposal route?

      Sludge disposal represents 20 to 40 percent of WWTP OPEX; the availability of agricultural land, AD with biogas, or incineration significantly affects whole-life cost.

    4. 4

      What energy recovery options are included and what is the target energy balance?

      Modern WWTPs can achieve 50 to 100 percent energy offset from biogas CHP; the energy strategy should be integral to the design, not an afterthought.

    5. 5

      What resilience provisions apply if the secondary treatment stage is taken out of service?

      EA permits typically require an emergency response plan; bypass arrangements and storm storage must be designed to meet regulatory requirements during maintenance or failure events.

    What Drives Cost in This Category

    Design population equivalent and peak flow factor

    Tank and blower sizing scales with PE and the storm flow ratio; a 2.5 times DWF storm allowance adds 20 to 40 percent to aeration tank and final clarifier capital cost versus dry weather sizing.

    Consent standard (standard vs nutrient removal)

    BNR for total nitrogen below 10 mg per L and phosphorus below 1 mg per L doubles or trebles biological treatment capital cost versus BOD-only removal; chemical P dosing is a lower-cost interim option.

    Sludge treatment and disposal route

    Anaerobic digestion plus CHP adds 2 to 8 million GBP capital for a 50,000 to 200,000 PE works but significantly reduces OPEX; thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment adds further capital for enhanced biogas yield.

    Site constraints and ground conditions

    Urban WWTP sites with poor access, contaminated ground, or high groundwater tables can add 20 to 50 percent to civil construction costs.

    Key Regulations & Standards

    Urban Wastewater Treatment (England and Wales) Regulations 1994 (UWWTR)

    Transposes EU UWWTD 91/271/EEC; sets secondary treatment requirements for all agglomerations above 2,000 PE and more stringent nutrient limits for sensitive area discharges.

    WIA 1991 Trade Effluent Consent and EPR 2016

    Environmental permitting controls all WWTP effluent discharges; the EA issues site-specific permits with consent conditions for BOD, SS, ammonia, phosphorus, and other parameters.

    Sludge Use in Agriculture Regulations 1989 (SI 1989/1263)

    Governs land application of sewage biosolids in England and Wales; sets heavy metal limit values and requires soil and sludge testing before each application.

    IED 2010/75/EU and BAT Conclusions

    Large WWTPs (above 100,000 PE or receiving significant industrial load) must meet IED BAT-associated emission levels; BAT Conclusions published by the EU Commission define best available techniques.