Reuse, Recovery & Stormwater
Stormwater Management Companies
End-to-end stormwater providers spanning design, equipment, and construction for runoff quantity and quality control.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Flat Sheet UF Membranes or Hollow Fiber RO capabilities
- Suppliers with contractors sector experience
- Providers operating in United Kingdom or Netherlands
- Providers
- 38
- Verified
- 3
- Countries
- 9
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a stormwater management provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
3 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Stormwater Management Provider
Showing 1-20 of 38
38 results from 38 matched providers
Stormwater Management: SuDS Design, Drainage Modelling, and Flood Risk Reduction
Stormwater management in the UK is shaped by the requirement to implement Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) under Schedule 3 of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 (mandatory SuDS approval in Wales since 2018; England SuDS standards under NPPF/CIRIA C753). SuDS design hierarchy: source control first (permeable paving, green roofs, rainwater harvesting, soakaway); linear drainage second (swales, filter strips, vegetated channels); attenuation third (detention basins, ponds, underground storage); combined strategies to limit runoff to greenfield rate (typically 1.4 to 5 L/s/ha for 1-in-30-year event). Design standards: CIRIA C753 SuDS Manual (2015) is the primary UK design guide; Welsh Government SuDS Standards under Schedule 3; DEFRA Non-Statutory Technical Standards for SuDS (2015) covering runoff rate, volume, and water quality; LASOO (Lead Local Flood Authority Organisations) implementation guidance. Hydraulic design: peak flow attenuation to greenfield equivalent rate for all events up to 1-in-100-year (QBAR or T100 Q design); climate change uplift applied to rainfall intensity (PFEAs: +20 to +40 percent increase in peak rainfall for 2050 and 2080 climate scenarios per UKCP18); urban creep allowance (10 to 30 percent increase in impermeable area over design life); CIRIA Table 4.3 for runoff coefficient by surface type.
Drainage modelling and hydraulic analysis: urban drainage modelling uses 1D software (Innovyze InfoWorks ICM, Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis, Microdrainage WinDes) to simulate existing sewer network performance and proposed SuDS attenuation; network model calibration from flow monitoring data (electromagnetic or Doppler flow meter, data logger) in existing sewers; design rainfall inputs from the FEH (Flood Estimation Handbook, CEH Wallingford) rainfall statistics; duration-frequency-intensity (DFI) profiles for critical storm durations (15 min to 48 hours); QMED (median annual flood) and FSR rainfall for all return periods. Flood risk assessment: Sequential and Exception Test for development in flood zones (NPPF Table 2); EA Flood Zone Maps and Environmental Flood Risk Assessment data; surface water flood risk mapped using uFMfSW (updated Flood Map for Surface Water); culvert capacity assessment (CIRIA C689); catchment-wide catchment flood management plan (CFMP) context. Integration with Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) reduction: SuDS upstream of combined sewers reduces inflow to combined network during storm events, reducing CSO spill frequency; EA requires CSO reduction plans under WINEP (Water Industry National Environment Programme).
Water quality treatment in SuDS: stormwater runoff carries pollutants from roads (hydrocarbons, heavy metals: Zn from tyres, Cu from brake pads, Pb from historical fuel, Ni, PAHs), roofs (Cu and Zn from flashing and guttering; biocides from roofing membranes), and agricultural land (nitrates, phosphates, sediment). SuDS treatment train: filter strips (first-flush treatment; 20 to 50 m wide; remove 40 to 70 percent of SS) to swales (vegetated channel; remove 50 to 70 percent TSS, 20 to 40 percent heavy metals) to constructed wetland (detention time 24 to 72 hours; remove 60 to 90 percent TSS, 50 to 80 percent BOD, 30 to 70 percent total nitrogen, 40 to 70 percent total phosphorus) to infiltration basin or pond for final polishing. Specific pollutants: zinc from roads (EU EQS for Zn in freshwater 7.8 ug/L dissolved); PAHs (WFD priority substances; EQS for benzo(a)pyrene 17 ng/L annual average; PAH removal by activated carbon-enhanced SuDS); copper (EQS 1 to 3.4 ug/L dissolved dependent on hardness; bioavailability correction factor applies). EA SuDS adoption: public SuDS (serving more than one property) can be adopted by the LLFA or sewerage undertaker under FA 2010 Schedule 3; SuDS adoption standard requires 25-year design life with 100-year maintenance plan.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are SuDS and when are they required in the UK?
Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) are drainage approaches that mimic natural water movement, controlling runoff at source, slowing flow, reducing flood risk, and improving water quality, rather than channelling rainwater as fast as possible to piped drains. SuDS types: source control (permeable paving: BS EN 1338 block paving; green and brown roofs: BS 8495 specification; rainwater harvesting to BS EN 16941-1; soakaways to BS EN 752 and BRE 365 soakage test); collection and conveyance (swales: vegetated channels with side slopes 1:3 to 1:4; filter strips: 5 to 50 m vegetated buffer strips; filter drains: linear drains filled with clean stone, 600 mm to 1,200 mm wide); storage (detention basins: dry basins with permeable base; retention ponds: permanent water body; underground storage: geocellular crates at 90 to 95 percent void ratio). UK mandatory requirements: Wales: Schedule 3 Flood and Water Management Act 2010 commenced January 2019; all new drainage for development above 100 m2 must be SuDS approved by Schedule 3 Approving Body (SAB) at LPA; SuDS must meet National Standards for Sustainable Drainage. England: SuDS required by NPPF (National Planning Policy Framework) policy direction; LPA planning conditions require SuDS unless demonstrated that SuDS are not reasonably practicable; Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) SuDS mandatory for all development in Scotland under SEPA Technical Guidance.
How is the runoff rate from a development calculated for SuDS design?
Greenfield runoff rate calculation for SuDS attenuation design: the greenfield equivalent runoff rate is the pre-development rate of runoff from the site that the SuDS must not exceed after development. Methods: (1) Institute of Hydrology Method 124 (IH124, 1994): QBAR (median annual flood) estimated from catchment area (AREA, km2), base flow index (BFI), standard annual average rainfall (SAAR, mm), and soil permeability index (SPRHOST); urban adjustment applied for post-development impermeable fraction. (2) FEH Statistical Method: catchment descriptors (AREA, SAAR, URBEXT, BFI, FARL) from FEH Web Service; QMED estimated by pooling with gauged catchment data; growth curve scaling for T-year return period flows. (3) Simplified greenfield rate (DEFRA 2015 non-statutory standards): 1.4 L/s/ha for undeveloped sites with sandy soils; 5 L/s/ha for clay soils and steeper slopes; local LLFA may specify pre-set greenfield rates for simplicity in small developments (less than 2 ha, less than 50 dwellings). Climate change: EA and Defra 'Flood risk assessments: climate change allowances' (2019 update) require adding Higher Central or Upper End allowance to peak rainfall or peak flow depending on flood risk vulnerability; for residential development in Flood Zone 1: Higher Central +20 percent peak rainfall depth to 2089 epoch. Storage volume: SuDS storage volume calculated by critical storm method (trial storm durations from 5 to 1,440 minutes; largest storage volume requirement identifies critical duration; typically 30 to 120 minutes for urban catchments).
What is the SuDS approval process in England and Wales?
SuDS approval process: Wales (Schedule 3 mandatory since 2019): Developer submits SuDS drainage scheme to Schedule 3 Approving Body (SAB) at the Local Planning Authority (LPA); SAB is separate from planning department; SAB must determine application within 7 weeks of valid submission; SAB checks conformity with National Standards for Sustainable Drainage (Welsh Government 2018); SAB issues approval with conditions or rejection; adoption: SAB adopts public SuDS elements on behalf of LLFA after satisfactory completion inspection and 12-month maintenance bond; adoption gives LLFA responsibility for long-term maintenance of adopted SuDS. England (planning-led, not Schedule 3): SuDS Drainage Strategy submitted with planning application to LPA; Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) consulted as statutory consultee (NPPF Paragraph 167); LLFA issues objection or no-objection response; planning condition typically requires SuDS drainage scheme approval before works commence; discharge of planning condition involves surface water drainage design and management plan (SWMP) submission; adoption: sewerage undertakers may adopt compliant SuDS under Section 7 of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 (voluntary, not mandatory in England); many LLFA refuse adoption leaving long-term maintenance with management company or residents. Scotland: SEPA SuDS mandatory for all development; building standards system; SEPA SuDS design guidance 2015 plus LDP policies.
How do you design a SuDS pond or detention basin?
SuDS pond and detention basin design process: (1) Site assessment: soil permeability (BRE 365 soakage test or full infiltration test per BS EN ISO 22282-2); groundwater level (winter groundwater table must be at least 1 m below SuDS base; CIRIA C753 Section 8); proximity to buildings (minimum 5 m from building foundations; EA groundwater flood risk guidance); contamination risk (EA controlled waters classification; historical site use). (2) Hydraulic design: attenuation volume calculated for critical storm (1-in-100-year plus 40 percent climate change allowance; 15-minute to 24-hour storm duration analysis); pond depth: permanent water depth 0.5 to 1.5 m; flood storage depth above permanent pool 0.3 to 1.0 m; freeboard 0.3 m; side slopes 1:3 minimum (1:5 preferred for mowing and safety; CIWEM safer by design guidance). (3) Outlet structure: control outflow to greenfield rate for all events up to 1-in-100-year; orifice plate size calculated (Q = Cd x A x sqrt(2gh); Cd = 0.6 for sharp-edged orifice); sump and debris screen upstream of orifice; emergency spillway at 1-in-100-year design water level (broad-crested weir, 0.9 m/s max velocity). (4) Water quality treatment: permanent pool provides 24-hour detention for particle settling; planting (native marginals: Phragmites australis, Typha latifolia, Iris pseudacorus; zone 1 to 4 planting per CIRIA C753); sediment forebay at inlet (sized for 10 to 15 percent of total pond volume; stone check dam to slow inlet velocity less than 0.3 m/s). (5) Maintenance plan: sediment removal every 5 to 10 years (when sediment forebay reaches 50 percent capacity); vegetation management (annual cutting; removal of non-native invasive species); outlet structure inspection annually.
A 320-dwelling residential development in Cheshire on a former greenfield site needed to demonstrate SuDS compliance under NPPF policy and achieve greenfield runoff equivalence for a 1-in-100-year storm with 40 percent climate change uplift, while also satisfying the Lead Local Flood Authority's requirement for SuDS adoption.
A treatment train was designed: permeable block paving on the estate road (CBPP to BS EN 1338, 20 percent void ratio) draining to roadside bioretention cells with iron-amended sandy loam media; bioretention overflow directed to a 1,800 m3 retention pond (permanent pool 0.8 m; 1.2 m flood storage; 1:4 side slopes; native planting zones 1 to 3). Outlet was controlled by a 125 mm orifice plate delivering 4.2 L/s (equivalent to 1.4 L/s/ha greenfield rate) to a receiving beckett. CIRIA C753 guidance and FEH rainfall statistics governed all hydraulic calculations.
The SuDS drainage scheme was approved by Cheshire East LLFA's SAB-equivalent process in England; total SuDS capital cost was GBP 285,000 (GBP 890 per dwelling). The retention pond was adopted by the LLFA under the Section 7 Flood and Water Management Act 2010 framework, with a 100-year maintenance plan secured by a Section 106 agreement. Post-construction hydraulic monitoring confirmed peak runoff of 3.9 L/s in a significant storm event against a greenfield target of 4.2 L/s.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
Has the LLFA pre-application process been completed and what are their specific adoption criteria for SuDS on this site?
Different LLFAs apply substantially different standards for SuDS adoption; early pre-application engagement prevents designing to CIRIA C753 only to find the LLFA has additional requirements that require costly redesign.
- 2
How are climate change rainfall uplifts applied in your hydraulic calculations and which UKCP18 epoch and vulnerability class have you used?
The EA's flood risk climate change allowances differ by vulnerability class and epoch; residential development in Flood Zone 1 uses different uplifts from highly vulnerable development in Flood Zone 2, and using the wrong values voids the hydraulic calculations.
- 3
What BNG (Biodiversity Net Gain) contribution will the SuDS features provide and how have they been scored under the Defra BNG Metric version 4.0?
Mandatory 10 percent BNG from April 2024 means SuDS must be designed as habitat features, not just hydraulic structures; wetland pond and native planting scores can make the difference between achieving BNG on-site or purchasing expensive statutory biodiversity credits.
- 4
What sediment forebay sizing and maintenance protocol have you assumed and who is responsible for dredging under the adoption agreement?
Sediment forebays fill at 2 to 5 percent per year in typical residential catchments; if the maintenance protocol requires dredging every 5 years and that obligation is not clearly assigned to the estate management company, it will fall back to the developer.
- 5
Have you modelled the interaction between the proposed SuDS attenuation and the downstream sewer capacity in a 1-in-10-year event?
Planning conditions often require SuDS to also protect the downstream combined sewer from surcharging at intermediate return periods; a design optimised for 1-in-100-year flood storage may not protect the 1-in-10-year sewer.
What Drives Cost in This Category
A well-designed SuDS scheme for a 2-hectare residential site requires 8 to 15 percent of site area for attenuation and treatment features; in a high-value urban location where each m2 of developable land is worth GBP 500 to 1,500, SuDS area has a real land opportunity cost that drives pressure to minimise pond size.
Clay soils (k less than 10-6 m/s) preclude infiltration-based SuDS entirely; all attenuation must be above-ground or in oversized geocellular storage, increasing cost by 30 to 60 percent compared to a free-draining sandy site where soakaways provide storage.
Designing a SuDS pond as a rich habitat feature (native planting to CIRIA C753 Zone 1 to 4; loafing banks for wildfowl; varied substrate) rather than a bare engineered basin adds GBP 15,000 to 40,000 in specification but generates BNG units that may avoid GBP 42,000 to 650,000 per biodiversity credit costs from the EA.
A SuDS pond not adopted by the LLFA or sewerage undertaker must be maintained by a management company indefinitely; annual SuDS maintenance costs of GBP 3,000 to 10,000 per year, capitalised at 3.5 percent over 100 years, represent a GBP 85,000 to 285,000 long-term liability that should be priced into the development appraisal.
Key Regulations & Standards
All major planning applications in England must demonstrate compliance with NPPF SuDS policy and DEFRA's non-statutory technical standards covering runoff rate (greenfield equivalent), volume, and water quality; LPAs use these standards as the basis for planning conditions.
In Wales, Schedule 3 has been mandatory since January 2019; all new drainage serving more than 100 m2 must be SuDS approved by the SAB at the Local Planning Authority before construction; SuDS must meet Welsh Government National Standards for Sustainable Drainage.
From April 2024, all new major developments in England must achieve a minimum 10 percent net gain in biodiversity units calculated using the Defra Statutory Biodiversity Metric 4.0; SuDS features including wetland ponds and bioretention cells with native planting contribute habitat units toward the mandatory BNG target.
Sequential and Exception Tests for development in flood zones require the EA's current climate change allowances to be applied to all flood risk assessments and drainage designs; for residential development in Flood Zone 1, the Higher Central allowance (+20 percent peak rainfall depth to 2089 epoch) must be applied as a minimum.