Modular Detention & Retention Companies
Modular crate, vault, and chamber suppliers for underground stormwater detention, retention, and infiltration.
No specialist listed yet · 9 related · 4 countries
Qualified suppliers come to you.
Filter results
Country
Industry
Technology
Not sure where to start?
Showing 1-9 of 9
No provider has listed modular detention & retention as a specialty yet.
The providers below mention related capabilities. Post your project and we route it to qualified suppliers directly.
Related providers
Listed for overlapping capabilities, not for modular detention & retention specifically.
Ecosystems International
VerifiedIndonesia · 51-200 employees
PT Ecosystems International (PT ESI) was established at Jakarta on 21st November 2006. We are an industrial effluent treatment systems integrator specializing in electrocoagulation (EC), a unique waste water treatment profile. PT ESI has capabilities in designing complete waste water treatment solutions by combining various effluent treatment systems such as the electro-coagulation, biological, chemical processes and membrane filtration, offering its customers a wide and comprehensive range of solutions, tailored to suit their various needs – ranging from basic effluent treatment for discharge to effluent recycling for water reuse. The Company is experienced in handling the design, engineering, procurement, construction and operation of new Effluent Treatment Plants (“ETP”) and possesses expertise in retrofitting existing ETP to increase the flow rate and treatment capability without any major infrastructure increase PT ESI is also a premier waste water treatment service company specializing in handling waste water generated from Exploration (Drilling) and Produced Water. Customers in Indonesia include major Oil & Gas companies such as Pertamina, Exxon, Chevron, Petro-China and Medco. Operations in Indonesia are provided by both mobile and fixed units. At drill sites where waste-water recycling is required, PT ESI supplement these treatment units with skid mounted mobile Reverse Osmosis systems. The technologies and solutions employed by PT ESI are developed in-house and examples of these are its proprietary Trident™ Electro Contaminant Removal (“ECR”) system, the Stage Contaminant Removal (“SCR”) process and Mobile On-Site Waste-Water Treatment (“OWT”) units
Buyer's guide
The buyer's guide to modular detention & retention
Modular Underground Detention Systems: Hydraulic Design, Structural Loading, and Installation
Modular underground detention systems use interlocking polypropylene or HDPE crates, cells, or arch units installed below ground to attenuate stormwater runoff and reduce peak discharge rates to greenfield equivalent levels (typically 2 to 5 L per s per hectare). Attenuation volume is calculated from the runoff hydrograph for the critical storm event (1-in-100 year, or as specified by the drainage authority) using the Wallingford procedure, a SuDS calculator, or drainage design software. Void ratio of modular crate systems: 95 to 97 percent (high porosity, water storage per m3 of installed system). Installed depth: typically 1.0 to 4.0 m below finished ground level, with minimum 300 mm cover for untrafficked areas and 600 mm to 1,000 mm for trafficked surfaces.
Structural loading requirements govern system selection. Crate systems must withstand design vertical load: 25 kN per m2 for car parks (in accordance with EN 1991-1-1 imposed loads), 125 kN per m2 for HGV areas, and up to 200 kN per m2 for aircraft pavements. Load testing certification (by independent structural engineer) per CIRIA C737 or manufacturer's structural design certificate must be verified for the specific depth of cover and pavement type.
Geotextile wrap (typically 150 to 200 g per m2 non-woven PP, permeability greater than 10 to the -4 m per s) contains the crate structure and prevents migration of fines into the storage void while allowing water infiltration or outflow through a perforated outlet pipe.
Design and regulatory compliance: Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) requirements in England and Wales (NPPF and PPG) require underground detention systems to meet the required attenuation volume with an empty system at the start of the storm (not accounting for partial pre-filling from antecedent conditions). Outlets are typically designed as orifice control (calibrated orifice plate or throttle pipe, diameter 50 to 150 mm) achieving the target discharge rate.
Bypass overflow (connecting to sewer or surface water) handles flows exceeding storage capacity during extreme events. Installation quality control includes: geotextile damage inspection, crate alignment (maximum 5 mm step between units), backfill compaction (maximum 300 mm layers, compaction to 95 percent modified Proctor), and video survey of internal access pipes.
Frequently asked questions
How is the storage volume of a modular detention tank calculated?
Storage volume is calculated to attenuate design storm runoff to the permitted discharge rate. Method (simplified): (1) Define the critical storm event (typically 1-in-100 year with climate change allowance of 30 to 40 percent uplift per UK Flood Risk Assessment guidance); (2) Calculate inflow volume using rational method (Q = CIA, where C is runoff coefficient, I is rainfall intensity in m per s, A is catchment area) or from hydrograph analysis; (3) Calculate outflow volume over the storm duration at the permitted discharge rate (greenfield runoff rate, typically 2 to 5 L per s per ha); (4) Volume required = inflow volume minus outflow volume at the critical storm balance point; (5) Apply 10 to 20 percent freeboard contingency. For a 1 ha commercial catchment with 1-in-100 year 100 mm critical storm (Wallingford): inflow volume approximately 900 m3, outflow (at 5 L per s per ha = 5 L per s over 6 hours): 108 m3; storage required approximately 792 m3 net volume.
What is the difference between detention and retention in stormwater management?
Detention (attenuation) stores runoff temporarily during the storm event and releases it slowly after the storm, reducing peak discharge rate but not reducing runoff volume. Designed to release all stored water between storms (typically within 24 to 48 hours); the tank is empty and ready for the next storm event. Retention (infiltration basin or soakaway) stores runoff and allows it to infiltrate to ground, reducing both peak discharge and total runoff volume. Feasibility depends on ground permeability: infiltration rate above 10 to the -5 m per s (sandy or gravelly soil) is suitable for soakaways; clay or rock soils require conveyance to water body or sewer. Hybrid systems (detention with partial infiltration, overflow to sewer or water body) are common where ground permeability is moderate. UK CIRIA SuDS Manual C753 categorises these as attenuation (detention) and infiltration (retention) SuDS components with different design procedures.
How long do modular underground detention systems last?
Polypropylene modular crate systems have design service lives of 50-plus years based on material properties, structural certification, and proper installation. Manufacturer structural warranties are typically 25 to 30 years. Key durability factors: PP and HDPE are inert to most soil environments (no corrosion, no biological degradation under soil-contact conditions), resistant to dilute acids and alkalis in stormwater; UV degradation is irrelevant for buried installations. Geotextile wrap (PP non-woven): 50-plus year service life when buried (UV degradation is the primary failure mode for geotextiles, which is absent underground). Outlet control structure (concrete manhole or HDPE chamber): 50 to 80 years. CCTV inspection inside accessible chambers and along perforated pipes is recommended at 5 to 10 year intervals to check for siltation, debris accumulation, and structural condition.
What permits are needed for an underground detention system?
Permits and approvals required vary by jurisdiction and discharge destination. UK: (1) Local planning authority drainage approval - Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) and Environment Agency review drainage strategy and attenuation design as material planning conditions; (2) If discharge is to an ordinary watercourse: consent from Lead Local Flood Authority; (3) If discharge is to a main river: consent from Environment Agency; (4) If discharge is to sewer: agreement with the sewerage undertaker (Section 104 agreement under Water Industry Act 1991 for adoption); (5) CDM regulations apply (construction design and management), requiring structural engineering sign-off on tank design for buried loads. US: MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System) stormwater permit compliance; state and local stormwater management regulations (vary by state); Engineer of Record stamp on structural design drawings. Adoption by utility/authority requires standard inspection and test protocol completion.
Illustrative scenario · Residential housing developer, South East England
A composite drawn from typical projects in this category, not a single client engagement. Figures are indicative.
- Challenge
- A 120-unit housing estate in a Flood Zone 2 area required greenfield runoff rates of 3 L per s per hectare for the 1-in-100-year plus 40 percent climate change event. The site had clay sub-soil with permeability below 10 to the -8 m per s, ruling out infiltration. Available land for above-ground attenuation was limited to 200 m2 due to site density.
- Approach
- A 580 m3 modular polypropylene crate system was installed under the estate road and visitor parking bays at 1.2 m depth with 300 mm structural concrete pavement above. The system used 95 percent void-ratio crates certified to 125 kN per m2 with a calibrated orifice outlet (85 mm diameter) controlling discharge to the adopted highway drain at 2.8 L per s. Geotextile wrap (150 g per m2 non-woven PP) was specified per CIRIA C737.
- Outcome
- The system passed Lead Local Flood Authority and Highways England drainage review at planning stage. Section 104 adoption was completed 18 months post-completion. MNF analysis during monitoring confirmed zero surface flooding in three consecutive design-level rainfall events over a two-year period.
Questions to ask shortlisted providers
5
- 01
What structural load certificate covers the crate system at my specified depth and pavement type?
Load certification must match the exact depth of cover and pavement construction; generic manufacturer data may not cover site-specific conditions.
- 02
What is the void ratio of the proposed crate system and how was it tested?
Void ratio directly determines storage volume per unit installed; unverified claims can lead to undersized systems that fail during design storms.
- 03
How is the outlet control designed and how is blockage risk managed?
Orifice plates and throttle pipes are common failure points; specify rodding-eye access and confirm the LLFA's maintenance adoption requirements.
- 04
What geotextile specification is used and what is the permeability at design head?
Geotextile that is too tight can restrict inflow during a storm event, reducing effective storage volume below design.
- 05
What maintenance access does the system provide and what is the CCTV survey protocol?
LLFA adoption and long-term performance depend on accessible inspection chambers and a documented maintenance plan.
What drives cost in this category
4
- Installed depth and pavement loading class
- Deeper installation requires higher-rated crates, thicker structural slabs, and more excavation, increasing installed cost by 30 to 60 percent versus shallow untrafficked installations.
- Storage volume required
- Volume directly scales crate quantity and excavation; unit cost falls from around 350 to 450 GBP per m3 for small systems to 180 to 250 GBP per m3 for large installations due to fixed mobilisation costs.
- Groundwater and contamination
- High groundwater tables require dewatering during installation; contaminated ground requires geomembrane lining and specialist disposal of arisings, adding 15 to 40 percent to total cost.
- Outlet control structure complexity
- Simple orifice-controlled manholes add minimal cost; flow-control chambers with multiple return periods or motorised throttles can add 20,000 to 80,000 GBP to the package.
Key regulations and standards
4
- CIRIA C737 (2015)
- Structural design guidance for buried modular stormwater structures; covers load certification, depth-of-cover requirements, and geotextile specification.
- Flood and Water Management Act 2010 / Schedule 3
- Requires SuDS approval by the Lead Local Flood Authority for all new major developments in Wales (2019) and England (pending); governs adoption and maintenance of attenuation systems.
- Water Industry Act 1991 Section 104
- Legal basis for adoption of private drainage infrastructure by sewerage undertakers; Section 104 agreement sets maintenance standards for adopted underground detention systems.
- CDM Regulations 2015
- Construction Design and Management requirements apply to underground detention installations; Principal Designer must manage structural design risk and ensure structural engineer sign-off on buried loads.
From the Insider