Infrastructure, Networks & Equipment
Concrete Tank Companies
Precast and cast-in-place concrete tank, reservoir, and basin builders for utilities and industrial sites.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Acid Dosing Systems or Aerated Lagoons, MABR capabilities
- Suppliers with asset maintenance & rehabilitation sector experience
- Providers operating in United Kingdom or Indonesia
- Providers
- 25
- Verified
- 1
- Countries
- 4
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a concrete tank provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
1 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Concrete Tank Provider
Showing 1-20 of 25
25 results from 25 matched providers
Concrete Tank Construction for Water Storage, Treatment, and Wastewater
Concrete tanks span cast-in-place reinforced concrete, precast modular, post-tensioned, and prestressed circular configurations from 100 m³ to 200,000 m³ capacity. Construction class is driven by exposure: XC4 (carbonation, alternating wet/dry) for above-grade exterior, XS3 (chloride, marine spray) for coastal sites, XA2/XA3 (chemical attack) for wastewater and sludge tanks per EN 206 / ACI 318. Concrete grade typically C30/37 (30 MPa cylinder) for water-retaining structures per EN 1992-3, with w/c ratio ≤0.45, cement content ≥320 kg/m³, and minimum 50 mm cover to reinforcement on water face.
Crack control is critical for water-tightness: max permissible crack width 0.1–0.2 mm per EN 1992-3 for tanks not designed for leaktightness; <0.05 mm or fully sealed for potable water and aggressive chemicals. Strategies: hydration-heat management (low-heat cement CEM III/B, post-pour cooling), high reinforcement ratio 0.4–0.6% each direction, post-tensioning for tanks >3,000 m³ and >6 m wall height, water-stop joints (PVC, hydrophilic rubber) at construction joints. Internal coating systems: epoxy NSF 61 for potable, polyurea or HDPE membrane for aggressive industrial, sacrificial concrete sleeves for H₂S-rich digesters and force mains.
Codes and design: EN 1992-3 (water-retaining concrete, Europe), ACI 350 (US), AWWA D110/D115 (water tanks), BS 8007 (legacy UK). Watertightness verification by hydrostatic test per ACI 350.5 — 24-h drop ≤0.05% of volume after stabilization. For sludge holding and anaerobic digesters, sulfide attack requires HDPE liner or calcium aluminate cement (CAC). Aguato lists concrete-tank contractors with proven references in potable storage, wastewater clarifiers, anaerobic digesters, sludge holding, and industrial process duty.
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the design life of a concrete water tank?
Properly designed and constructed concrete tanks per EN 1992-3 / ACI 350 achieve 80–120 year service life on potable duty in moderate exposure (XC4), reducing to 40–60 years on aggressive duty (sulfide-rich anaerobic digesters, XA3 with internal liner). Critical factors: w/c ratio ≤0.45 at construction, ≥50 mm cover to reinforcement, crack width <0.1 mm sustained, and periodic internal inspection every 5 years with NDT (cover-meter, half-cell potential, carbonation depth). Coating renewal every 15–25 years on aggressive duty.
When should I choose post-tensioned over conventionally reinforced concrete?
Post-tensioned (PT) circular tanks become economic above 3,000 m³ and >6 m wall height — typical break-even is 5,000 m³ for potable, 10,000 m³ for wastewater. PT advantages: 30–50% less reinforcement, thinner walls (250–400 mm vs. 350–600 mm for RC), inherently crack-free under hoop tension service load, 20–30% faster construction. Disadvantages: specialized tendons + anchorage, requires post-tensioning specialist contractor, higher quality control demand, and tendons must be sealed (greased/sheathed) for long-term durability.
How do I prevent concrete deterioration in anaerobic digesters and sludge tanks?
Anaerobic environments generate H₂S → biogenic sulfuric acid corrosion attacking calcium silicate hydrates at 1–10 mm/year on unprotected OPC concrete. Mitigation: (1) HDPE liner or PVC sheet membrane on internal surfaces above liquid line and headspace (most reliable, 30–50 year life); (2) calcium aluminate cement (CAC) concrete — inherently resistant to acid attack via alumina-rich phases; (3) silica-fume + slag blend reducing permeability; (4) sacrificial concrete overlay 30–50 mm thick replaced every 15–25 years. HDPE liner is the default specification for new builds >2024.
What's the typical leak-tightness test procedure for a new concrete tank?
ACI 350.5 / EN 1992-3 hydrostatic test: fill in stages at 1 m/day to allow gradual loading; hold 24 to 72 hours for absorption stabilisation; measure water-level drop over a 5 to 7 day test period; accept at below 0.05% volume loss per 24 hours after stabilisation (EN) or below 0.1% per 24 hours (ACI 350.5). Failure modes include hairline cracks at construction joints (re-seal water-stop), hydration cracks (epoxy injection), and permeability through inadequate concrete cover. Visual inspection during the test reveals weeping joints and damp spots requiring repair before service.
A water company needed a new 15,000 m3 covered service reservoir to replace a Victorian brick structure with failing waterproofing. The site had a high water table at 2.5 m below formation level and was adjacent to a residential area with strict noise and dust constraints on construction hours.
A post-tensioned cylindrical reinforced concrete reservoir (26 m diameter, 8.5 m wall height) was designed to EN 1992-3 Class T (water-tightness required). Walls were cast in 15 m pours with CEM III/B low-heat cement to control hydration heat below 70 degrees C peak. Post-tensioning tendons at 500 mm centres provided crack-free hoop performance. Internal surfaces were coated with DWI-approved food-grade epoxy at 500 microns DFT.
Hydrostatic test achieved 0.02% volume loss per 24 hours, well within the EN 1992-3 Class T acceptance criterion. Construction noise was maintained within EA permit limits throughout. Structural design life of 100 years confirmed by independent review. WRAS approval for the epoxy coating was confirmed before water contact.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What EN 1992-3 water-tightness class (0, T, or W) are you designing to and what crack-width limit does that impose on the design?
Tightness class selection drives the entire structural design philosophy. Class 0 (no self-sealing required) may be appropriate for non-potable storage; Class T (crack width below 0.05 mm with external waterproofing) or Class W (no crack width limit if membrane provided) are required for potable water. Misclassification leads to leakage from day one.
- 2
What cement type and hydration heat management strategy do you propose for large pours, and how will you monitor pour temperature?
Large concrete pours above 1 m thickness or 400 tonne can generate peak internal temperatures above 70 degrees C. Thermal gradient between the core and surface above 20 degrees C causes thermally-induced cracking. CEM III/B or CEM II/A-S with embedded thermocouples and post-pour curing is standard practice for water-retaining structures.
- 3
What internal coating system do you specify for potable water contact surfaces and does it carry WRAS approval?
Internal coatings for potable storage must carry WRAS approval or be on the DWI list of approved products. Epoxy coatings at 300 to 500 microns DFT are the standard. Coatings not carrying WRAS approval require a DWI risk assessment, which can delay commissioning by 3 to 6 months.
- 4
How will you manage groundwater hydrostatic pressure during construction and at tank empty conditions?
Concrete tanks with a high water table must resist uplift when empty. Uplift design requires either a thick base slab (dead weight resistance), a drainage blanket with relief valves, or ground anchors. Failures at tank empty condition have caused base slab uplift and catastrophic structural loss at UK and European sites.
- 5
What is your hydrostatic test protocol and when does it occur relative to coating application?
Hydrostatic testing before coating application tests the structural concrete only. Testing after coating tests both concrete and coating but may conceal leakage from coating delamination. The correct sequence is: structural test (uncoated), repair any defects, apply coating, final acceptance test (coated). Skipping the structural test before coating removes the ability to locate and repair concrete defects.
What Drives Cost in This Category
Post-tensioned cylindrical tanks at above 3,000 m3 cost 15 to 25% less in reinforcing steel than conventionally reinforced rectangular alternatives. Cylindrical tanks also have better leak-resistance due to hoop stress distribution. Rectangular tanks are preferred where site geometry or operational-access requirements override structural economy.
Tanks on competent chalk or gravel require a 300 to 400 mm mass concrete raft. Tanks on soft clay or made ground require driven or CFA piles (GBP 80 to GBP 250/m) adding GBP 200K to GBP 800K to foundation cost for a 15,000 m3 tank. Ground investigation before tender is essential to avoid foundation cost surprises.
DWI-approved food-grade epoxy coating at 300 to 500 microns DFT costs GBP 40 to GBP 80/m2 applied, adding GBP 100K to GBP 300K to a 15,000 m3 tank. Polyurea or spray-applied HDPE liners cost GBP 80 to GBP 150/m2 but give superior chemical resistance for wastewater or sludge duty. Both require WRAS approval for potable applications.
Covered service reservoirs require ventilated roofs to prevent chloramine build-up and condensation. Flat concrete roofs with screened ventilation add GBP 50 to GBP 100/m2 of covered area. Domed prestressed concrete roofs for large tanks add 20 to 35% to the superstructure cost but eliminate waterproofing membrane maintenance.
Key Regulations & Standards
The Eurocode design standard for water-retaining concrete structures, incorporated into UK practice via BS EN 1992-3 and the UK National Annex. Specifies tightness classes, crack-width limits, concrete durability requirements, and materials specifications for water-contact structures.
All internal coatings, liners, sealants, and cement types in contact with drinking water must be on the DWI List of Approved Products or carry WRAS approval. Non-listed materials require a DWI risk assessment under Regulation 31. This applies to new build and to internal renovation work on existing service reservoirs.
BS 8007 was the legacy UK design standard for water-retaining concrete structures. It has been superseded by EN 1992-3 but is still referenced in existing asset design records. CIRIA C660 provides detailed guidance on controlling early-age thermal cracking in concrete, critical for water-retaining construction.
Construction of a service reservoir in proximity to sensitive receptors (residential areas, watercourses, SSSI) may require a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) as a condition of planning permission or Environmental Permit. The CEMP covers noise, vibration, dust, surface-water run-off control, and site waste management.
Explore Related Categories
Related Tank Materials
Civil Components
Browse the full provider directory
Comparing concrete tank companies is one slice of a larger shortlisting decision. Explore the complete directory of wastewater treatment companies, then filter by region, sector, and technology before you request scoped proposals.
Open the directory


















