By Challenge / Contaminant
Pathogen Removal & Disinfection Companies
Multi-barrier pathogen removal, filtration, UV, chlorine, ozone, and membranes for bacteria, viruses, and cysts.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) Filters or Cartridge Filters capabilities
- Suppliers with manufacturing sector experience
- Providers operating in United Kingdom or China
- Providers
- 20
- Verified
- 3
- Countries
- 9
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a pathogen removal & disinfection provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
3 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Pathogen Removal & Disinfection Provider
Showing 1-20 of 20
20 results from 20 matched providers
Pathogen Removal in Water Treatment: Log Reduction Targets, CT Values, and Multi-Barrier Design
Pathogen removal and inactivation in drinking water treatment uses a multi-barrier approach combining physical removal (coagulation, sedimentation, filtration) and chemical or UV inactivation (disinfection). US EPA Surface Water Treatment Rule (SWTR) requires: 3-log (99.9 percent) Giardia removal/inactivation, 4-log (99.99 percent) virus removal/inactivation, and 2-log (99 percent) Cryptosporidium removal (LT2ESWTR). Physical removal credit: conventional treatment (coagulation-sedimentation-filtration) = 2.5-log Giardia, 2.0-log virus, 3.0-log Cryptosporidium credit. Remaining credit must come from disinfection. Direct filtration (no sedimentation) = 2.0-log Giardia, 1.0-log virus, 2.5-log Cryptosporidium. Membrane filtration (UF/MF, direct integrity testing) = 4.0-log Giardia and Cryptosporidium.
Disinfection CT (concentration times contact time, mg per L times minutes) required for inactivation credits at specific pH and temperature conditions. Free chlorine for 1-log Giardia inactivation (7 degrees C, pH 7.0): CT = 65 mg per L-min; 1-log virus (7 degrees C, pH 7.0): CT = 2 mg per L-min. Free chlorine for 3-log Giardia at pH 7, 15 degrees C: CT approximately 78 mg per L-min; a system with 1.5 mg per L free chlorine and 52-minute contact time achieves this. Cryptosporidium is chlorine-resistant (3-log inactivation requires CT above 7,200 mg per L-min - impractical); UV at 40 mJ per cm2 achieves 3-log Cryptosporidium inactivation (US EPA UVDGM). Ozone for 3-log Cryptosporidium: CT = 5 to 20 mg per L-min depending on temperature.
UK Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) and WHO Guidelines use a different framework for E. coli (less than 0 per 100 mL, absolute standard), Cryptosporidium (Regulations 2000: all surface water treatment works must have a 3 to 6-log reduction standard based on catchment risk assessment under the Cryptosporidium Risk Assessment programme), and Regulation 28 (requiring risk assessment and monitoring for Cryptosporidium and Giardia at all surface water sources). WHO QMRA (Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment) methodology calculates the required log reduction based on source water pathogen concentration and tolerable disease burden (10 to the -6 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per person per year for acceptable risk level).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most effective disinfectant for drinking water?
No single disinfectant is best for all pathogens and situations. Chlorine (free): widely used, cost-effective, provides residual in distribution, effective against bacteria and viruses (CT 2 to 10 mg per L-min for 4-log virus); poor against Cryptosporidium (CT 7,200 mg per L-min). Chloramine (combined chlorine): weaker primary disinfectant but more stable residual in distribution (persists for days vs hours for free chlorine); less prone to forming trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids (DBPs). UV (254 nm, 40 mJ per cm2): no DBP formation, effective against Cryptosporidium (3-log), Giardia (3-log), and viruses (4-log); no distribution residual (used at plant, chlorine applied for residual). Ozone: most powerful primary disinfectant, effective against all pathogens, no DBP formation from NOM (but bromate risk if bromide present); no distribution residual. Best practice: multi-disinfectant systems (ozone or UV for primary inactivation, chloramine for distribution residual) provide the broadest pathogen coverage.
What does 4-log virus removal mean?
4-log removal means a 99.99 percent reduction in virus concentration, or a 10,000-fold reduction. A source water containing 100 viruses per litre would contain 0.01 viruses per litre (1 virus per 100 litres) after 4-log removal. US EPA SWTR requires 4-log virus removal/inactivation for all public water systems using surface water. Log removal (LRV) is additive across treatment barriers: coagulation-sedimentation-filtration credit 2.0 LRV + chlorination CT providing 2.0 LRV total = 4.0 LRV. Log reduction is measured in challenge testing using MS2 bacteriophage (surrogate for human enteric viruses) with membrane filtration and UV systems certified to specific LRV at worst-case operating conditions. WHO QMRA targets for virus risk: Norovirus from contaminated source water should achieve 6 to 9 LRV to meet 10 to the -6 DALY per person per year risk target depending on source virus load.
Why is Cryptosporidium difficult to remove from drinking water?
Cryptosporidium parvum and C. hominis are protozoan parasites with oocysts (infective stage, 4 to 6 micron spheres) that have three properties making them particularly challenging: (1) Chlorine resistance - oocysts have a thick, multi-layered wall that prevents chlorine penetration; at practical water treatment chlorine doses (0.5 to 2 mg per L), Cryptosporidium oocysts survive intact indefinitely; 3-log inactivation requires CT above 7,200 mg per L-min - impractical in drinking water; (2) Small size - at 4 to 6 microns, oocysts can pass through poorly functioning or damaged sand filters but are retained by properly coagulated and settled water followed by filtration; (3) Low infective dose - as few as 10 to 100 oocysts can cause cryptosporidiosis; even 2-log treatment failures can result in public health incidents (Milwaukee 1993: 403,000 people sickened). Effective barriers: coagulation-filtration (3-log physical removal credit), UF/MF membranes (4-log absolute barrier), ozone (5 mg per L-min CT gives 3-log), and UV (40 mJ per cm2 gives 3-log).
How is disinfection effectiveness monitored at a water treatment plant?
Disinfection performance monitoring uses multiple measures: (1) CT compliance - continuous measurement of disinfectant residual concentration (amperometric analyser for free chlorine, accuracy plus or minus 0.05 mg per L; UV intensity sensor for UV dose, accuracy plus or minus 5 percent) times hydraulic contact time (calculated from tracer study T10 divided by T, the time for 10 percent of a tracer pulse to appear at the outlet); log-inactivation credit claimed only when CT exceeds the required value for the temperature and pH measured; (2) Turbidity - continuous turbidity monitoring before disinfection (target below 0.3 NTU pre-disinfection per US EPA, below 0.1 NTU per enhanced filtration guidance); high turbidity interferes with UV disinfection (particles shield microorganisms) and chemical disinfection (demand); (3) Microbiological compliance monitoring - daily E. coli samples from treated water, weekly coliform counts, and quarterly Cryptosporidium and Giardia monitoring per site-specific DWI or EPA requirement.
A DWI Cryptosporidium risk assessment rated a surface water source as high risk following the detection of 10 to 80 oocysts per 10 litres during winter flood events. The existing treatment train (coagulation, sedimentation, dual-media filtration, chlorination) could not reliably demonstrate 6-log Cryptosporidium reduction required by the risk assessment outcome, and chlorination alone provided negligible Cryptosporidium inactivation.
A medium-pressure UV system (four UV reactors, 30 MLD each, validated at 40 mJ per cm2 for 3-log Cryptosporidium credit) was installed downstream of filtration. The hydraulic contact model was validated by tracer testing. UV dose monitoring sensors were calibrated against a NIST-traceable reference lamp. Turbidity interlocks prevented UV credit from being claimed when pre-UV turbidity exceeded 0.5 NTU.
DWI accepted the UV installation as providing 3-log Cryptosporidium inactivation credit, achieving the required 6-log barrier when combined with coagulation-filtration. No Cryptosporidium-related compliance events occurred in the 3 years following commissioning. UV energy consumption was 0.03 kWh per m3, adding 30,000 GBP per year to energy OPEX for the 30 MLD plant.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What Cryptosporidium risk assessment has been completed and what log reduction target does the DWI require for this site?
The required LRV determines the treatment barrier needed; the risk assessment framework under Cryptosporidium Regulations 1999 sets site-specific targets that govern UV dose and system design.
- 2
What is the pre-disinfection turbidity and how is it monitored to ensure CT credit is valid?
High turbidity reduces UV transmittance and chlorine CT credit; interlock logic must prevent credit being claimed outside the validated turbidity range.
- 3
How will CT be calculated and documented for regulatory purposes and what tracer test will validate the hydraulic model?
Regulatory CT credit requires a validated T10/T baffling factor established by a USEPA or DWI-accepted tracer methodology; this must be re-validated after any hydraulic modification.
- 4
What UV validation protocol was used and what was the validated dose at worst-case UVT and flow?
UV reactor validation must follow an approved protocol (DVGW W294, USEPA UV Disinfection Guidance Manual, or equivalent); the validated dose at minimum UVT and maximum flow is the credited dose.
- 5
What chlorine residual is targeted at the site boundary and furthest point of the distribution system?
DWI requires a maintained residual of 0.05 to 0.5 mg per L free chlorine in distribution; the disinfection design must confirm adequate residual at the hydraulically worst-case point.
What Drives Cost in This Category
Medium-pressure UV reactors for 10 to 50 MLD cost 200,000 to 800,000 GBP each installed; lamp replacement (every 12 to 18 months) adds 10,000 to 50,000 GBP per reactor per cycle.
Bulk sodium hypochlorite storage and dosing systems cost 50,000 to 250,000 GBP; sodium hypochlorite at current market prices of 0.15 to 0.30 GBP per litre at 12 percent concentration adds 30,000 to 120,000 GBP per year for a 30 MLD plant at 1 mg per L dose.
Continuous chlorine analysers (amperometric, 0 to 5 mg per L, 2-stream duty-standby) cost 15,000 to 40,000 GBP per installation point; UV intensity monitors, turbidity analysers, and flow meters add further capital and calibration OPEX.
DWI approval for new disinfection technology requires independent expert review, validated performance data, and ongoing monitoring; total regulatory process adds 50,000 to 150,000 GBP and 6 to 24 months to the project programme.
Key Regulations & Standards
Require E. coli to be zero per 100 mL in all treated water samples; Cryptosporidium oocysts must be managed through DWI-approved treatment barriers as determined by the Cryptosporidium Risk Assessment programme.
Require risk assessment and monitoring of all surface water sources in England and Wales; treatment standard (log reduction requirement) is set by the DWI-approved risk assessment methodology for each site.
Sets validation requirements for UV reactor credit in English and Welsh water supplies; validated dose at worst-case UVT and flow must be demonstrated using DVGW W294, NWRI/AWWA, or equivalent validated protocol.
All disinfectant chemicals and UV equipment in contact with treated water must appear on the APL or receive individual DWI approval; sodium hypochlorite suppliers must be WRAS-approved.















