Treatment Technologies

    Industrial Water Filtration Companies

    Heavy-duty filtration solution providers for industrial process water, including self-cleaning, multimedia, and high-flow filtration platforms.

    161 providers

    This page is a good fit if you need:

    • Filtration or Ion Exchange capabilities
    • Suppliers with manufacturing sector experience
    • Providers operating in China or United Kingdom
    Providers
    161
    Verified
    5
    Countries
    26

    Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.

    Post a project

    Find a Industrial Water Filtration Provider

    Showing 81-100 of 161

    161 results from 161 matched providers

    High-Flow Pre-Treatment Filtration for Process Cooling, Reuse, and Membrane Protection

    Industrial water filtration at high flow rates demands robust equipment that can handle variable inlet quality, high suspended solids loads, and continuous operation without frequent operator intervention. Automatic backwash filters with stainless steel screens in the 10–200 micron range protect heat exchangers, cooling tower nozzles, and spray heads in process cooling circuits. For RO and ultrafiltration membrane pre-treatment, ultrafiltration (UF) membranes are increasingly specified over conventional media filtration because they deliver consistent SDI below 3 regardless of feedwater turbidity variation—a critical factor for membrane reliability.

    Clarification systems—dissolved air flotation (DAF), lamella plate settlers, and high-rate solids contact clarifiers—handle the high suspended solids loads typical of industrial process water intakes, wash water recovery, and stormwater reuse circuits. DAF is preferred for low-density particles and emulsified oils; lamella settlers excel at handling high-density inorganic solids. Sizing these systems requires pilot testing under representative feedwater conditions rather than relying on design data from different applications.

    Lifecycle cost analysis in industrial filtration must account for backwash water volume as a fraction of system output (typically 2–5% for automatic filters, up to 10% for media beds), media or membrane replacement intervals, and energy consumption for pumping and backwash air scouring. Providers who present only capital cost comparisons without operating cost modeling create an incomplete basis for decision-making. Require a 5-year total cost of ownership model with sensitivity analysis on feedwater quality variation.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    When should ultrafiltration replace conventional media filtration as RO pre-treatment?

    Ultrafiltration (UF) as RO pre-treatment is the superior choice when feedwater quality is variable or turbid (SDI above 5 or turbidity above 1 NTU regularly), when footprint is constrained, or when consistent membrane protection is more important than minimizing capital cost. UF delivers SDI below 3 regardless of inlet quality variations, whereas conventional media filtration performance degrades significantly during turbidity spikes. The higher capital cost of UF is typically recovered through reduced RO cleaning frequency, longer membrane life, and lower chemical consumption.

    What flow rate and pressure specifications do I need before contacting industrial filter vendors?

    At minimum, provide peak design flow rate, minimum and average operating flow rates, inlet water quality (TSS, turbidity, particle size distribution if available), target filtrate quality (turbidity or SDI), and the downstream equipment being protected. Also confirm operating pressure range, available pressure drop budget across the filter, and whether backwash water can be discharged to drain or must be recovered. Without these parameters, vendors can only provide budgetary estimates rather than accurate equipment sizing.

    How do automatic self-cleaning filters compare to manual cartridge filters in industrial applications?

    Automatic self-cleaning filters (screen or disc type) are specified for high-flow industrial applications where continuous operation is required and frequent cartridge change-outs would be operationally impractical or costly. They backwash automatically on a timer or differential pressure signal, consuming a small volume of filtrate for the flush cycle. Cartridge filters provide finer filtration ratings (down to 1 micron absolute) and are appropriate for polishing applications at lower flow rates where the solids loading is low enough to achieve practical cartridge life between replacements.

    What is Silt Density Index (SDI) and what target should I require for RO pre-treatment?

    SDI is a standardized test (ASTM D4189) measuring the rate at which 0.45 micron membrane filters plug under 30 psi pressure, used as a proxy for the colloidal fouling potential of RO feedwater. Spiral-wound RO membrane manufacturers require feedwater SDI below 5 (preferably below 3) to maintain warranty coverage and rated performance. Feedwater SDI above 5 causes rapid colloidal fouling of the membrane feed spacer channels, increasing differential pressure and reducing permeate output within weeks to months of startup.

    Case Study·Automotive components manufacturer, West Midlands, UK
    Challenge

    A manufacturer using large volumes of deionised water in a parts cleaning line was experiencing RO membrane fouling within 8 months of membrane replacement cycles that the system was designed to run for 3 to 4 years. Investigation identified inadequate pre-filtration as the root cause, with SDI at the RO inlet regularly exceeding 8.

    Approach

    The provider replaced the existing 50-micron cartridge pre-filter with a pressurised ultrafiltration unit producing consistent SDI below 2 regardless of incoming mains water quality. An automatic backwash sequence with online turbidity monitoring was integrated with the existing RO control panel to flag any UF integrity issues before they reached the membranes.

    Outcome

    RO membrane SDI at the inlet stabilised at 1.5 to 2.0 across all monitored weeks post-installation. Membrane replacement cycles extended from under 8 months to over 36 months, reducing annual membrane spend by approximately GBP 28,000. Overall system availability improved from 91% to 98.5% by eliminating emergency membrane change-outs.

    Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers

    1. 1

      What SDI or turbidity value do you guarantee at the filter outlet, measured under worst-case inlet conditions, and is this backed by a performance bond?

      For RO and UF membrane protection, SDI at filter outlet is the single most critical pre-treatment parameter and should be contractually specified.

    2. 2

      What is the designed filtration rate (m/h surface loading) and how does this compare with your reference installations on similar water sources?

      Oversized surface loading rates are the primary cause of filter breakthrough and shortened backwash cycles that compromise downstream membrane protection.

    3. 3

      How does the backwash control system respond to a sudden inlet turbidity spike, and what is the maximum inlet turbidity the filter is designed to handle?

      Industrial water intakes often experience turbidity events during heavy rainfall; the filter must be designed for worst-case inlet conditions, not only typical conditions.

    4. 4

      What is the backwash water volume as a percentage of daily throughput, and where does the backwash waste discharge to?

      High backwash volumes reduce net output and create trade effluent consent obligations that must be factored into the project cost.

    5. 5

      Is the filter skid designed for outdoor installation without a building, and what are the temperature operating limits?

      Many industrial sites lack indoor space for filtration equipment; temperature rating affects materials selection, insulation requirements, and freeze protection costs.

    What Drives Cost in This Category

    Technology type (media vs UF vs automatic screen)

    Ultrafiltration provides superior and consistent SDI reduction but costs significantly more per unit flow than multimedia or automatic screen filtration, with a higher operating energy requirement.

    Inlet water quality and variability

    Highly variable or seasonally turbid sources require larger equalization or pre-treatment capacity, increasing both civil and mechanical costs compared to stable groundwater or treated mains supplies.

    Backwash water disposal route

    Sites without direct sewer access must store and pump backwash waste, adding tankage and pumping costs; sites with trade effluent consent may face discharge fees based on backwash volume and suspended solids load.

    Automation and remote monitoring

    Fully automated industrial filtration systems with online turbidity monitoring, automatic backwash, and remote SCADA connectivity carry a 20 to 35% premium over manually operated systems but reduce operator labour and improve process reliability.

    Key Regulations & Standards

    ASTM D4189

    Standard test method for Silt Density Index of water, used to characterise the fouling potential of RO and nanofiltration feedwater and to set pre-treatment performance targets.

    BS EN 13443-2

    Specifies requirements for mechanical water conditioning devices in building water supply systems, including filter performance, materials, and testing.

    WRAS Approval

    All filter media, housings, and associated materials in contact with drinking water must be listed on the Water Regulations Advisory Scheme approved products database.

    Environment Agency Trade Effluent Consent

    Industrial backwash waste discharged to public sewer must comply with trade effluent consent conditions; suspended solids and pH limits typically apply.