Treatment Technologies
Reverse Osmosis System Companies
RO system integrators for brackish, seawater, and industrial process water, skids, containerized plants, and engineered solutions.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Reverse Osmosis (RO) or Filtration capabilities
- Suppliers with utilities sector experience
- Providers operating in China or Italy
- Providers
- 204
- Verified
- 4
- Countries
- 28
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a reverse osmosis system provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
4 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Reverse Osmosis System Provider
Showing 61-80 of 204
204 results from 204 matched providers
Designing and Procuring Reverse Osmosis Systems for Industrial and Commercial Use
Reverse osmosis performance is governed by three interdependent parameters: applied pressure, membrane flux rate, and system recovery. Higher recovery reduces reject (concentrate) volume and water consumption but increases concentration polarization on the membrane surface, accelerating fouling and scaling. Commercial brackish water RO systems typically operate at 70–80% recovery, while seawater desalination systems run at 40–50% due to osmotic pressure constraints. Specifying recovery targets without also specifying concentrate disposal capacity is one of the most common design oversights in RO project procurement.
Membrane selection is equally critical. Thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide membranes dominate the market and are available in standard 8-inch diameter elements, but temperature rating, pH operating range, and chlorine tolerance vary significantly between manufacturers. Cellulose acetate membranes are an option in chlorinated feed streams where dechlorination is impractical, but offer lower rejection rates. For high-temperature industrial applications above 45°C, only specific membrane materials and element constructions maintain rated performance.
Pre-treatment design determines long-term RO reliability. Inadequate SDI (Silt Density Index) reduction ahead of the membrane array causes irreversible colloidal fouling and shortens membrane life. Chemical scaling—particularly calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, barium sulfate, and silica—requires antiscalant programs sized to the concentrate chemistry, not the feedwater chemistry. When evaluating RO providers, require a full system design report including LSI and Stiff-Davis Index calculations for the concentrate stream at design recovery.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a realistic membrane replacement schedule for an industrial RO system?
Well-maintained brackish water RO membranes in industrial applications typically last 5–7 years. Membrane life shortens significantly with inadequate pre-treatment (SDI above 5 or free chlorine breakthrough), biological fouling in warm climates, or high-pH cleaning cycles that degrade the polyamide active layer. Systems with poor pre-treatment or inconsistent antiscalant dosing may require membrane replacement in 2–3 years. Request the provider's historical membrane replacement intervals for comparable installations before accepting a quoted membrane lifespan.
How do I compare RO system proposals on a like-for-like basis?
Normalize all proposals to the same recovery rate, permeate flow rate, and feedwater quality assumptions. Key metrics to compare are specific energy consumption (kWh/m³ of permeate), normalized permeate flux (L/m²/h at reference conditions), and projected first-year chemical costs including antiscalant and cleaning chemicals. Proposals that omit recovery or concentrate disposal specifications cannot be meaningfully compared against one another.
What is a pressure exchanger and when is it worth specifying?
A pressure exchanger (PX) is an energy recovery device that transfers hydraulic energy from the high-pressure concentrate stream to the incoming seawater feed, reducing the load on the high-pressure pump. In seawater RO systems, PX devices can reduce specific energy consumption from 6–8 kWh/m³ down to 2–3 kWh/m³, with typical payback periods of 2–4 years at current energy prices. They are standard specification for new SWRO plants above 500 m³/day and should be evaluated for any large-scale brackish water system where energy costs are significant.
What questions should I ask about concentrate management before buying an RO system?
Ask the provider to calculate your concentrate volume at design recovery and confirm you have a viable disposal pathway: sewer discharge (check local TDS limits), evaporation pond, deep well injection, or ZLD (zero liquid discharge) crystallization. Confirm that the concentrate chemistry at design recovery does not exceed the solubility limits for calcium sulfate or silica, which are the most common irreversible scaling risks. If your local regulations cap concentrate TDS at sewer discharge, the provider must design recovery around that constraint, not the other way around.
A pharmaceutical site requiring Water for Injection (WFI) pre-treatment was operating an ageing single-pass RO system with increasing permeate conductivity (rising from 2 to 18 microsiemens/cm over 3 years) due to membrane degradation. Pharmaceutical-grade compliance margins were eroding and the site faced a major capital decision on replacement timing.
The provider conducted a full membrane autopsy on representative elements, identifying organic fouling from upstream carbon breakthrough as the primary degradation mechanism. A new two-pass RO system with enhanced pre-treatment (6-micron cartridge filtration plus online TOC monitoring ahead of membranes) and an automated CIP schedule triggered by normalised permeate conductivity was designed and commissioned.
Permeate conductivity stabilised at below 1 microsiemens/cm immediately post-commissioning. Normalised salt rejection remained above 99.5% through the first 18-month monitoring period. CIP frequency dropped to once per quarter versus monthly on the previous system, reducing chemical consumption by 65%.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What is the guaranteed normalised salt rejection at system commissioning, and what is the contractual degradation limit that triggers a remediation obligation?
Performance guarantees without defined remediation triggers leave the buyer exposed to gradual membrane deterioration without recourse.
- 2
What is the designed system recovery, and have you calculated the concentrate chemistry at that recovery including silica and sulphate scaling indices?
Silica and barium sulphate scaling in the concentrate stream is irreversible and often overlooked in proposals that only examine feedwater chemistry.
- 3
What pre-treatment SDI target must be achieved for the membrane warranty to remain valid?
Most membrane manufacturers void warranties if SDI at the membrane inlet exceeds 5; confirming how the provider guarantees this upstream protects the asset.
- 4
What is the specific energy consumption (kWh/m3 of permeate) at design conditions, and is energy recovery equipment included?
Energy is typically the largest operating cost in RO systems; a 0.5 kWh/m3 difference in specific consumption compounds significantly over a 10-year asset life.
- 5
How does the system respond to a sudden feedwater quality exceedance, such as a turbidity or TDS spike?
Automated shutdown or bypass logic protects membranes during upset events; the absence of such logic is a common cause of premature membrane failure.
What Drives Cost in This Category
Seawater systems operating above 55 bar require high-pressure pumps and benefit from pressure exchangers; without energy recovery, power costs can exceed GBP 0.40 per m3 of permeate.
Every 5% increase in recovery reduces reject volume but raises concentrate TDS, requiring more antiscalant and potentially more aggressive CIP cycles, which shortens membrane life.
A two-pass RO configuration doubles the membrane array and pump duty compared to single-pass, but is required for pharmaceutical, electronics, and power generation applications with very low conductivity targets.
Feed sources with high fouling potential (surface water, reclaimed water, seawater) require multi-stage pre-treatment including coagulation, media filtration, and cartridge filtration, each adding capital and operating cost before the RO itself.
Key Regulations & Standards
European standard for small drinking water RO systems, covering performance testing, materials of construction, and minimum rejection rate requirements.
Any new or modified RO process deployed in a public water supply must receive DWI approval before operation, including documentation of membrane materials and chemical dosing agents.
For pharmaceutical applications, RO systems producing water used in sterile manufacturing must be validated under pharmaceutical Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines including water system qualification.
All RO system components in contact with drinking water, including membranes, housings, and fittings, must appear on the WRAS approved products list.
Explore Related Categories
Membrane Technologies
High-Purity & Desalination
Related Articles from Aguato Insider
- CAPEX vs OPEX in Water Treatment: Making the Right Decision
- Water-as-a-Service (WaaS): Is It Right for Your Company?
- How to Write an RFP for a Water Treatment Project
- Technical Due Diligence for Water Treatment Technology
- ZLD vs MLD: Cost-Benefit Analysis for Industrial Plants
- Brine Valorization: Turning Desalination Waste into Value
- Water Circularity in Manufacturing: A Practical Framework
- Food & Beverage Water Treatment: Standards and Systems
- Membrane Fouling: Causes, Prevention and Cleaning Costs
- Demineralized Water Production: Methods and Specifications
- Brine Management & Disposal: Methods, Costs, Compliance
- Industrial Water Reuse & Recycling: ROI and Risk Guide
- Desalination Energy Consumption: Benchmarks & How to Cut It
- Dialysis Water Treatment: Standards, Systems & Risks
- Nanofiltration: How It Works, Costs, and When It Beats RO
- RO vs Nanofiltration vs Ultrafiltration: Industrial Cost Guide
- Ultrafiltration Systems: A Technical Guide for Industrial Applications
- Reverse Osmosis Systems: Industrial Design, Sizing, and Operation
- Zero Liquid Discharge: When ZLD Makes Sense and When It Doesn't
- Industrial Water Purification: Deionisation, EDI, and High-Purity Water Systems
- What Is Nepti? Aguato's AI for Water Treatment Decisions
- What Is a Water Marketplace? Types, How They Work, and Where to Find One
- Mining Wastewater Treatment: Technologies, Compliance, and the Closure Liability Few Operators Cost Properly
- Membrane Filtration System: Choosing Between MF, UF, NF, and RO
- Graphene-Based Water Filtration: Current State and Applications
- How to Size an RO System for Industrial Applications
- Semiconductor Water Treatment: Ultrapure Water, Wastewater, and the 18-Megohm Quality Perimeter
- SWRO vs Thermal Desalination: Cost and Energy Comparison
- How to Evaluate a Desalination Plant Provider
- Brine Disposal from Desalination: Regulatory and Technical Options
- Containerized Desalination: When Is It the Right Solution?