Treatment Technologies
Seawater Desalination (SWRO) Companies
SWRO solution providers, intake design, high-pressure RO, energy recovery devices, and post-treatment for coastal and offshore use.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Reverse Osmosis (RO) or Flat Sheet UF Membranes capabilities
- Suppliers with food-beverage sector experience
- Providers operating in China or Italy
- Providers
- 14
- Verified
- 4
- Countries
- 10
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a seawater desalination (swro) provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
4 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Seawater Desalination (SWRO) Provider
Showing 1-14 of 14
14 results from 14 matched providers
Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination: Feed Pre-treatment, Membrane Performance, and Energy Recovery
Seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalination is the globally dominant technology for freshwater production from seawater (TDS typically 32,000 to 45,000 mg/L, osmotic pressure 26 to 32 bar). SWRO operating pressure: 55 to 85 bar to overcome osmotic pressure plus hydraulic losses across the membrane; typical system recovery 40 to 50 percent (producing 1 m3 product from 2.0 to 2.5 m3 of seawater). Global SWRO capacity: approximately 65 percent of worldwide desalination capacity as of 2023 (Global Water Intelligence data); total global desalination capacity exceeds 100 million m3/day. Leading SWRO membrane manufacturers: DuPont FilmTec (SW30 HR/XLE series), Toray (TM820 series), Nitto Hydranautics (SWC series), LG Chem (SW 400), Koch Fluid Systems. SWRO membrane performance: salt rejection greater than 99.6 to 99.8 percent; product water TDS 200 to 400 mg/L from seawater; flux 8 to 14 L/m2/h (LMH); design recoveries limited by concentrate osmotic pressure buildup and concentration polarisation.
Feed water pre-treatment for SWRO is critical for membrane protection and sustained performance: source water quality determines pre-treatment intensity. Silt Density Index (SDI15): SWRO membrane manufacturers require SDI15 less than 3.0 (ideally less than 2.0) at membrane inlet; SDI measures colloidal fouling potential. Pre-treatment trains: conventional (coagulation + dual-media pressure filtration with anthracite/sand, 0.5 to 1.0 mm media): achieves SDI less than 3 for good quality seawater; ultra-low pressure UF/MF membranes (0.02 to 0.2 micron): achieves SDI less than 1 regardless of source water quality - now preferred for biologically variable feed waters; dissolved air flotation (DAF) at 400 to 600 kPa, recycle ratio 5 to 15 percent: removes algae (HAB events), oil and grease, and light colloidal particles before filtration. Biofouling control: continuous low-dose chlorination (0.5 to 1.0 mg/L) with dechlorination (sodium bisulphite, 1.5 to 2.0 mg/L per mg/L Cl2) before RO; intermittent shock chlorination; UV treatment at 40 mJ/cm2. Antiscalant dosing at 2 to 5 mg/L for concentrate scale control.
Energy recovery in SWRO is essential for economic operation. SWRO concentrate (brine) exits the high-pressure membrane system at 55 to 75 bar with approximately 50 to 60 percent of feed pressure remaining. Energy Recovery Devices (ERDs): isobaric ERDs (pressure exchangers): ERI PX series, Danfoss iSave - efficiency 94 to 98 percent; transfer concentrate pressure directly to incoming seawater feed using ceramic rotor or pistons; typical ERD reduces net HP pump energy from 7.0 to 8.0 kWh/m3 to 2.0 to 3.5 kWh/m3 product. Pelton wheel turbines (Pelton recovery turbines): efficiency 85 to 90 percent; simpler, lower CAPEX, less common than isobaric; used in smaller systems. Overall SWRO SEC with best-available ERD and VFD pumps: 2.2 to 3.5 kWh/m3 for large plants; 3.5 to 5.0 kWh/m3 for smaller systems. World's largest SWRO plants: Ras Al Khair, Saudi Arabia (1,036,000 m3/day); Taweelah, UAE (909,200 m3/day); Sorek, Israel (624,000 m3/day).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the typical cost of seawater desalination?
SWRO water production cost (LCOW - Levelised Cost of Water) depends on plant scale, energy cost, financing, and feedwater quality. Large-scale SWRO (greater than 100,000 m3/day): LCOW USD 0.35 to 0.70 per m3 in MENA (low energy cost, high solar potential, favourable financing); USD 0.60 to 1.20 per m3 in US, Europe, and Australia (higher energy and labour costs). Small-scale SWRO (less than 10,000 m3/day): LCOW USD 1.50 to 4.00 per m3 due to higher CAPEX per unit volume and less favourable economics. Cost breakdown (indicative for large plant): capital repayment 30 to 40 percent; energy 30 to 40 percent; O&M (membranes, chemicals, labour) 20 to 30 percent. Membrane replacement: SWRO membranes last 5 to 10 years typically (replacement cost USD 10 to 30 per m3/day annual capacity). Energy costs are the largest variable: at USD 0.10 per kWh and 3.0 kWh/m3 SEC: energy cost USD 0.30 per m3; at USD 0.05 per kWh (Middle East): USD 0.15 per m3. IDA and GWI track global desalination project costs; recent completed contracts (Israel, UAE, Spain) confirm USD 0.50 to 0.80 per m3 LCOW range for large competitive-tender projects.
How does seawater pre-treatment affect RO membrane life?
Pre-treatment quality directly determines SWRO membrane fouling rate and cleaning frequency, which are the primary drivers of membrane life. Without adequate pre-treatment: colloidal fouling (SDI greater than 3.0) causes rapid flux decline and requires cleaning every 1 to 4 weeks; biofouling (inadequate disinfection) causes trans-membrane pressure (TMP) increase of 0.5 to 2 bar per week; scaling (inadequate antiscalant or incorrect dosing) causes irreversible flux loss and shortened membrane life. With good pre-treatment (UF/MF, SDI less than 1): cleaning interval extends to 3 to 12 months; membrane life 7 to 10 years. Key pre-treatment parameters: SDI15 less than 3.0 (target less than 1.5 for UF pre-treated); turbidity less than 0.1 NTU; free chlorine less than 0.1 mg/L before RO (TFC membranes are chlorine-sensitive, degrading above 200 to 1,000 ppm-hours cumulative exposure); iron less than 0.05 mg/L; oil and grease less than 0.1 mg/L. Autopsy of fouled membranes (destructive testing) identifies fouling type: X-ray fluorescence for inorganic scale; ATP (adenosine triphosphate) analysis for biofouling; SEM/EDX imaging for morphology.
What is an energy recovery device and how much energy does it save?
An energy recovery device (ERD) captures the pressure energy in SWRO concentrate (brine) and transfers it to the low-pressure seawater feed, dramatically reducing the net energy demand of the high-pressure pump. Without ERD: HP pump must pressurise all feed seawater (2.0 to 2.5 m3 feed per m3 product at 40 to 50 percent recovery) to 60 to 80 bar; specific energy 7 to 10 kWh/m3 product. With isobaric ERD (ERI PX, Danfoss iSave, 94 to 98 percent efficiency): concentrate at 55 to 70 bar pressurises approximately 50 to 60 percent of feed directly via pressure exchange; HP pump only pressurises the remainder; net SEC 2.2 to 3.5 kWh/m3 - saving 50 to 70 percent of energy vs no ERD. ERD selection: isobaric (PX) devices preferred for large SWRO; most efficient; ERI PX300 handles 50 to 300 m3/hr concentrate per unit; multiple units for large plants. Pelton turbine ERDs: 85 to 92 percent efficiency; simpler hydraulic design; suitable where concentrate pressure variation is significant. Francis/Pelton turbine ERDs used on older plants (pre-2000) are being retrofitted with isobaric ERDs to modernise energy consumption.
What is the environmental impact of seawater desalination?
SWRO environmental impacts and mitigation: (1) Energy and CO2: grid-powered SWRO at 3 kWh/m3 and average grid CO2 intensity of 0.3 kg CO2/kWh emits 0.9 kg CO2 per m3 water produced; renewable-powered SWRO reduces this to near zero; compare to UK mains water supply at approximately 0.3 kg CO2/m3 including treatment and distribution; (2) Brine discharge: SWRO concentrate at 70 to 90 g/L TDS (approximately double seawater) is discharged to sea; dense brine sinks and creates hypersaline layer affecting benthic communities; mitigation: dilution with cooling water or effluent, diffuser outfalls achieving greater than 40:1 dilution within 100 m; UNEP 2019 study found global brine production of 141.5 million m3/day (1.5 times freshwater produced); (3) Marine organism impingement and entrainment at intake: open ocean intakes kill fish and plankton; subsurface beach well intakes (infiltration galleries) eliminate this impact but limited to small-to-medium plants; wedgewire screens with less than 1 mm aperture and through-screen velocity less than 0.15 m/s reduce impingement (per USEPA 316(b)); (4) Chemical use: antiscalants, acids, biocides in discharge - assessed under Environmental Permit (UK EA) or NPDES permit (US EPA) with discharge limits.
A water authority in a drought-stressed coastal region of Southern Europe needed to augment supply by 50,000 m3/day to meet growing demand without further stressing its overallocated river catchment. Seawater TDS was 38,000 mg/L with seasonal algal bloom events causing elevated SDI and biofouling risk during summer months.
A SWRO plant was designed with dissolved air flotation pre-treatment ahead of hollow-fibre UF membranes (Pentair X-Flow Aquaflex), achieving consistent SDI below 1.5 through bloom periods. Two-pass RO (pass 1: 55 bar SWRO achieving TDS 380 mg/L; pass 2: 12 bar BWRO achieving TDS 28 mg/L for blending) was used to meet drinking water quality. ERI PX-300 isobaric energy recovery devices reduced net specific energy to 2.8 kWh/m3. Brine was discharged via a submerged multiport diffuser achieving 50:1 dilution within 80 m.
Plant achieved 94.8% availability in year one. Membrane cleaning interval was maintained at 90 days through bloom periods (versus design target of 60 days), reducing chemical cleaning costs. Product water TDS averaged 32 mg/L, well within the WS(WQ)R 2016 limit of 250 mg/L for chloride. Brine monitoring confirmed salinity at the diffuser mixing zone fell below 40 g/L at 150 m distance, complying with the Marine Environmental Permit.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What is the seawater TDS, temperature range, SDI, and seasonal biological variability at the proposed intake location?
Seasonal algal blooms and elevated SDI drive pre-treatment design; failure to characterise seasonal variability leads to inadequate pre-treatment and accelerated membrane fouling.
- 2
What target product water quality is required and is a single-pass or two-pass RO design needed?
Single-pass SWRO typically achieves TDS 200 to 400 mg/L; two-pass is required where boron removal (below 0.5 mg/L per EU DWD), product TDS below 50 mg/L, or specific ion targets cannot be met with one-pass operation.
- 3
What energy recovery device is specified and what specific energy consumption is the design target?
Isobaric ERDs (94 to 98% efficiency) reduce SWRO energy from 7 to 8 kWh/m3 to 2.2 to 3.5 kWh/m3; energy is typically 30 to 40% of LCOW so ERD selection is the largest single-point totex decision.
- 4
What is the brine disposal route and what marine environmental permit conditions apply?
Dense SWRO brine requires dilution via multiport diffuser to achieve regulatory mixing zone compliance; beach well intakes eliminate impingement but restrict plant scale; open intakes require intake velocity less than 0.15 m/s screens per USEPA 316(b) equivalent.
- 5
What is the target plant availability and what redundancy philosophy (n+1, n+2) is required?
Desalination plants supplying critical drinking water supply need 95% availability or greater; this requires standby pre-treatment trains, redundant HP pumps, and membrane spares holding equivalent to 5% of total membrane count.
What Drives Cost in This Category
HP pumps and ERDs represent 20 to 30% of total SWRO plant capex; isobaric ERDs cost USD 1.5 to 4 million per 10,000 m3/day capacity but deliver 50 to 70% energy savings versus no ERD.
UF/MF pre-treatment costs USD 200 to 400 per m3/day capacity compared to conventional filtration at USD 80 to 150 per m3/day; however UF reduces membrane fouling and cleaning chemicals, typically delivering positive NPV for biologically active feedwaters.
Energy at 2.5 to 3.5 kWh/m3 represents 30 to 40% of LCOW at typical grid electricity prices; large plants increasingly specify co-located solar PV or purchase Power Purchase Agreements to hedge against energy price volatility.
Offshore open channel intakes and diffuser outfalls cost USD 5 to 25 million for medium-scale plants; beach well intakes cost more per m3/day capacity but avoid marine impact permitting and impingement risk.
Key Regulations & Standards
Product water from SWRO plants supplying UK potable water must meet all WS(WQ)R 2016 parameters; remineralisation post-RO must use DWI-approved products; boron parametric value 1.5 mg/L from 2026 requires attention for SWRO two-pass design.
Marine brine discharge from SWRO requires an EA Environmental Permit and may require a Marine Licence under the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009; application must include dispersion modelling and assessment against the UK Marine Strategy Framework Directive quality standards.
Specifies minimum quality, monitoring, and risk management requirements for water produced from desalination for agricultural use within the EU; sets limits for key ions including sodium, chloride, and boron in recovered water.
International Desalination Association best practice guidelines for procurement (BOOT/DBO/DBM contracts), performance testing (IDA test protocols, ASTM D4195), and membrane warranty conditions (manufacturer-specified pre-treatment compliance); non-compliance with pre-treatment specification voids membrane warranty.