Treatment Technologies
Brackish Water Desalination Companies
BWRO providers for inland brackish aquifers, reuse, and industrial streams, high-recovery with concentrate management.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Flat Sheet UF Membranes or Hollow Fiber RO capabilities
- Suppliers with manufacturing sector experience
- Providers operating in China or Italy
- Providers
- 16
- Verified
- 4
- Countries
- 11
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a brackish water desalination provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
4 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Brackish Water Desalination Provider
Showing 1-16 of 16
16 results from 16 matched providers
Brackish Water Reverse Osmosis (BWRO) for Inland and Coastal Aquifers
Brackish water desalination treats source water with TDS 1,000–10,000 mg/L — typical of inland aquifers, coastal wells, oil-and-gas produced water, and agricultural drainage. BWRO operates at feed pressures 8–17 bar (vs. 55–80 bar for seawater RO), delivering 75–85% recovery (vs. 35–50% SWRO) and specific energy 0.4–1.2 kWh/m³ permeate. Membrane element selection prioritizes high-rejection brackish-water elements (ESPA, BW30, TM700, CPA) rated for 99.5% NaCl rejection at 2,000 mg/L feed and 15% recovery per element. Multi-stage configuration (2:1 or 3:2:1 array) compensates for the concentration gradient as recovery rises.
Pre-treatment is the dominant cost and reliability driver. SDI₁₅ <3 (preferably <1) is required to prevent particulate fouling; antiscalant dose (5–10 mg/L of polyacrylate-phosphonate blend) prevents CaCO₃, CaSO₄, BaSO₄, and SiO₂ scaling at high recovery. Wells producing iron (>0.3 mg/L), manganese (>0.05 mg/L), or hydrogen sulfide require oxidation + media filtration upstream. Membrane CIP frequency depends on fouling load: 6–12 months for well-pretreated low-organic feeds, 1–3 months for surface-influenced or high-DOC sources. Concentrate disposal (typically 15–25% of feed at 5,000–40,000 mg/L TDS) drives the inland-plant business case — options include deep-well injection, evaporation ponds, ZLD, or sewer discharge with dilution.
Standards and economics: ASTM D4189 for SDI, AWWA M46 design manual, ISO 17357 for chemical dosing. Capex $0.8–1.5M per ML/day capacity; opex $0.30–0.55/m³ at €0.10/kWh electricity. Concentrate management adds $0.10–0.40/m³. Aguato lists BWRO providers across municipal water supply, agricultural, industrial process, and produced-water sectors with verified references.
Frequently Asked Questions
What recovery rate is realistic for BWRO and what limits it?
Standard BWRO recovery is 75–85%, limited by scaling potential of the most concentrated species in the concentrate stream. CaSO₄ saturation (calculated by Stiff-Davis or LSI index) usually caps recovery at 75–80% for high-sulfate feeds; SiO₂ at >120 mg/L in concentrate caps at 70–75%. Antiscalant + acid dosing extends recovery to 85–90% in optimized designs. For higher recovery, deploy two-pass or HEROⓇ (chemically softened) systems achieving 95–98% — adds capex but useful where concentrate disposal cost exceeds $0.50/m³.
How much does BWRO cost compared to seawater desalination?
Production cost: BWRO $0.30–0.55/m³ vs. SWRO $0.55–1.20/m³ (excluding capex amortization). The 2–3× ratio comes from lower feed pressure (10–17 bar vs. 55–80 bar), higher recovery (80% vs. 45%), and smaller pre-treatment footprint. Capex: BWRO $0.8–1.5M per ML/day vs. SWRO $1.5–2.5M per ML/day. BWRO is the default for inland water supply at 1,000–10,000 mg/L TDS; SWRO only makes sense at coastal sites with ocean intake or where brackish aquifers are unavailable or over-allocated.
What is the right pre-treatment for a BWRO plant?
Surface-influenced wells: coagulation (FeCl₃ 3–8 mg/L) + dual-media filtration or ultrafiltration (UF) to SDI <3. Confined-aquifer wells with low TOC: cartridge filtration (5 μm) + antiscalant + dechlorination (SMBS or activated carbon) often sufficient. Iron/manganese >0.3/0.05 mg/L: KMnO₄ or chlorine oxidation + greensand filtration. H₂S >0.3 mg/L: aeration + scavenger or chlorine dioxide pre-oxidation. Always demand a 14–28 day pilot test before full-scale design — it pays back in avoided membrane fouling and CIP costs within 12 months.
How do I dispose of BWRO concentrate at an inland site?
Four options: (1) deep-well injection into a UIC Class V well (US) or equivalent at $0.20 to $0.50/m3 where geology permits; (2) evaporation pond, capital-intensive at $50 to $150/m2 but zero opex in arid climates; (3) ZLD via brine concentrator plus crystalliser at $1.50 to $3.50/m3 producing solid salt cake; (4) sewer discharge with dilution, only where permit allows and downstream WWTP can handle salt load. EU Water Framework Directive increasingly restricts concentrate discharge to surface water; permit feasibility should be confirmed before plant siting.
A farm group abstracting from a chalk-gravel aquifer was finding TDS rising from 1,200 mg/L to 2,400 mg/L due to saline intrusion following drought years. Crop-quality data showed chloride above 250 mg/L was damaging lettuce and spinach yields. A BWRO plant was needed at 600 m3/day.
A two-stage BWRO system (BW30-400 elements, 3:2 array, 78% recovery) with antiscalant dosing at 8 mg/L and cartridge pre-filtration was installed. Concentrate (132 m3/day at 9,500 mg/L TDS) was disposed to a consented evaporation lagoon on non-agricultural land. Permeate TDS averaged 48 mg/L and chloride 12 mg/L.
Crop-quality damage eliminated in the first season. Lettuce and spinach yield improved 18% against the pre-treatment baseline. The GBP 185,000 plant capital was recovered in avoided crop losses within 2.4 years. Annual operating cost was GBP 28,500 including membranes, chemicals, and electricity.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What pre-treatment do you propose based on our specific feed-water analysis (SDI, iron, manganese, silica, TOC)?
BWRO membrane fouling is dominated by the pre-treatment quality. Without feed-specific pre-treatment design, vendors are guessing at the right approach and the buyer bears the risk of premature membrane failure and high CIP frequency.
- 2
At what recovery rate is the system sized, and what is the scaling risk at that recovery for our feed chemistry?
BWRO recovery above 80% risks CaSO4, BaSO4, or SiO2 scaling in the concentrate-side channels. Vendors should provide Stiff-Davis or Langelier Saturation Index calculations for the specified recovery and antiscalant dose.
- 3
What is your concentrate disposal strategy and have you confirmed regulatory consent feasibility with the Environment Agency?
Inland BWRO concentrate disposal is the most common project-failure point. Sewer consent, evaporation lagoon, and deep-well injection all require EA engagement before plant design is finalised. Vendors who leave this to the buyer are not managing the project risk correctly.
- 4
What CIP protocol and frequency is specified for our feed-water quality, and what are the expected membrane replacement intervals?
CIP frequency of every 3 months versus every 12 months has a factor of 4 difference in CIP chemical cost and membrane life impact. Membrane replacement cost (GBP 0.08 to GBP 0.15/m3 treated) is a major operating cost driver often underquoted at proposal stage.
- 5
Can you provide 12-month operating data from a reference plant on a similar feed-water chemistry in the UK or Northern Europe?
Cold winter temperatures (8 to 12 degrees C) reduce RO permeate flux 25 to 35% below design conditions at 25 degrees C. UK BWRO references validate that the plant is properly temperature-corrected and sized for seasonal flux variation.
What Drives Cost in This Category
Cartridge-only pre-treatment costs GBP 15K to GBP 40K. Ultrafiltration pre-treatment adds GBP 80K to GBP 250K but extends membrane life and reduces CIP frequency by 50 to 70% for surface-influenced or high-SDI feeds. The right choice depends on SDI15 measurement from the actual source.
Recovery at 75% produces 25% concentrate by volume; at 85%, only 15%. Every percentage point of additional recovery reduces concentrate disposal volume and cost. At GBP 3/m3 disposal cost, improving from 75% to 85% recovery on a 1,000 m3/day plant saves GBP 110,000/year.
High-rejection BW30 or equivalent elements cost GBP 400 to GBP 800 per element. A 1,000 m3/day plant uses 40 to 80 elements. Replacement every 5 to 7 years at GBP 30K to GBP 60K/replacement is a significant lifecycle cost that should be included in TCO comparisons.
Sewer disposal with dilution is cheapest at GBP 0.50 to GBP 2/m3 where permitted. Evaporation pond capital is GBP 50 to GBP 150/m2 of pond surface but opex is near zero. ZLD adds GBP 1.50 to GBP 3.50/m3 but eliminates all liquid discharge. Route choice drives 20 to 40% of total project cost.
Key Regulations & Standards
The brackish groundwater source requires an abstraction licence from the EA. Licence conditions may specify maximum abstraction volume, aquifer monitoring obligations, and flow augmentation requirements to protect the water environment.
BWRO concentrate discharge to a river, estuary, or groundwater requires an Environmental Permit from the Environment Agency. Discharge to sewer requires Trade Effluent Consent from the local sewerage undertaker specifying TDS, chloride, and conductivity limits.
The WFD requires no deterioration of water body status. BWRO concentrate discharge to rivers or groundwater must demonstrate no adverse impact on receiving water body quality. Environmental Impact Assessment may be required for large-volume discharges.
All membrane elements, housings, pipework, and chemical dosing materials in contact with permeate must carry WRAS approval for potable water applications in England and Wales. Unlisted materials require DWI risk assessment before use in public water supply.
Explore Related Categories
Desalination Technologies
Common Challenges
Browse the full provider directory
Comparing brackish water desalination companies is one slice of a larger shortlisting decision. Explore the complete directory of water treatment suppliers, then filter by region, sector, and technology before you request scoped proposals.
Open the directory