Reuse, Recovery & Stormwater
Brine Valorization Companies
Resource recovery from brine, salts, minerals, and chemicals turned into revenue instead of disposal cost.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Acid Dosing Systems or Alkali Dosing Systems capabilities
- Suppliers with agriculture sector experience
- Providers operating in Indonesia or Italy
- Providers
- 3
- Verified
- 2
- Countries
- 3
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a brine valorization provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
2 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Brine Valorization Provider
Showing 1-3 of 3
3 results from 3 matched providers
Brine Valorization: Turning Reject Streams Into Commercial Products
Brine valorization converts concentrated reject brines from desalination, mining, and industrial processes into commercial products — sodium chloride for chlor-alkali, magnesium hydroxide for refractories, calcium carbonate for fillers, lithium carbonate for batteries, bromine for flame retardants, and potassium sulfate for fertilizers. Conventional discharge or ZLD-to-landfill destroys $50–500/m³ of recoverable mineral value depending on brine composition. Recovery pathways: selective electrodialysis (sED) for monovalent/divalent separation, nanofiltration for divalent enrichment, fractional crystallization (cooling, evaporative, antisolvent), liquid-liquid extraction for high-value species (Li, Br, B), and direct lithium extraction (DLE) sorbents for oilfield and geothermal brines.
Process economics depend on brine composition and species concentration. Seawater RO concentrate (≈70,000 mg/L TDS) has limited valorization beyond NaCl ($40–100/tonne) due to dilute minor species; geothermal brines (5,000–25,000 mg/L Li, B, K) and oilfield produced water (200–1,500 mg/L Li, 2,000–8,000 mg/L Br) are the high-value targets. Salar brines (Atacama, Uyuni, Hombre Muerto) at 0.5–1.5% Li drive 60% of global Li production at $4,000–8,000/tonne LCE production cost. EU Critical Raw Materials Act 2024 lists lithium, magnesium, and boron as critical, accelerating European brine-mining investment in geothermal (Vulcan Energy, Eramet) and oilfield (E3 Lithium, Standard Lithium) sectors.
Standards and certification: ISO 9001 for product quality, food/pharma-grade NaCl per FCC and USP/EP, battery-grade Li₂CO₃ at 99.5%+ purity per IEC 62660, GMP for pharmaceutical-grade KCl. Pilot demonstrations of 6–18 months are standard before scale-up given the variability of industrial feedstocks. Aguato lists brine-valorization specialists across mining, oil-and-gas produced water, geothermal, and seawater-desal sectors.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the economics of lithium extraction from brine?
Conventional salar brine processing: $4,000–8,000/tonne LCE production cost (90% margin at $25,000/tonne market price 2024). Direct lithium extraction (DLE) from geothermal or oilfield brines at 100–500 mg/L Li: $5,000–12,000/tonne LCE, viable when paired with revenue from geothermal power (Vulcan model) or oilfield water-handling fees. Capex $40,000–80,000/tonne annual LCE capacity. DLE eliminates 18–24 month evaporation cycle and 70% water consumption of traditional salar process — environmentally preferred in water-stressed Chile and Argentina.
Can I valorize seawater RO concentrate at scale?
Limited economics on minor species (Mg, K, Br, Li at <1,500 mg/L combined) due to dilution. The viable products are NaCl ($40–100/tonne, mainly chlor-alkali) and Mg(OH)₂ via lime precipitation ($300–600/tonne refractory-grade, $1,500–3,000/tonne pharmaceutical). Best results from co-located plants: Eilat Israel, Sorek Israel, and Khalifa UAE pair SWRO with chlor-alkali for vertically-integrated NaCl/Cl₂/NaOH. Standalone seawater valorization beyond NaCl rarely pays back without subsidy or critical-mineral mandate.
How does selective electrodialysis differ from conventional ED?
Conventional electrodialysis (ED) uses standard ion-exchange membranes that transport all ionic species. Selective ED uses monovalent-selective membranes (MVA, MVK series) that preferentially transport Na⁺ and Cl⁻ while rejecting Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, SO₄²⁻ — enabling NaCl recovery from mixed brines without prior softening, and concentration of divalents in the diluate for separate recovery. Energy 1.5–4 kWh/m³ vs. 0.5–2 kWh/m³ for conventional ED; capex 30–50% higher but enables 90%+ purity products from complex brines unsuitable for direct crystallization.
What pilot duration should I plan for brine valorization projects?
Minimum 6 months continuous pilot at 1 to 10 m3/hr to capture seasonal feed variability and validate sorbent/membrane life. 12 to 18 months is preferred for full lifecycle data, especially for DLE sorbents (lithium aluminate, manganese oxide, titanium oxide) which can show 20 to 40% capacity loss over 200 to 500 cycles. Pilot deliverables should include product purity histograms, raw material consumption (acid, base, reagents per kg product), sorbent/membrane regeneration cycle data, and waste stream characterisation. Skipping the pilot is the leading cause of valorisation project failure at scale.
A geothermal energy company producing hot saline brine (220 degrees C, 75,000 mg/L TDS, 160 mg/L Li) sought to monetise the lithium content in parallel with power generation. The challenge was extracting lithium at battery-grade purity (above 99.5% Li2CO3) from a complex brine containing high Ca, Mg, K, and silica that defeated conventional evaporative crystallisation.
A direct lithium extraction (DLE) pilot using titanium-oxide sorbent was deployed on a 2 m3/hr brine side-stream. After 400 elution cycles over 8 months, sorbent capacity was 3.8 mg Li/g sorbent with 18% capacity loss. Selective electrodialysis purified the eluate, and precipitation as Li2CO3 achieved 99.6% purity. A 10 m3/hr pilot-scale plant was progressed based on the results.
Lithium recovery at 72% per pass, combined with 3-pass recirculation, achieved an overall 86% Li extraction rate. Production cost was estimated at GBP 7,200/tonne LCE at pilot scale, trending to GBP 5,400/tonne LCE at 500 tonne/year full-scale. The project secured GBP 4.5M in UKRI critical-minerals grant funding based on pilot data.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What is the proven sorbent or membrane selectivity for our target species at our actual brine composition, and what is the cycle life data at scale?
Laboratory selectivity data at idealised ionic strength often overstates performance at real brine compositions with competing ions. DLE sorbents show highly variable cycle life: from 50 cycles (poor) to 500+ cycles (best-in-class). Only pilot data at representative conditions is bankable.
- 2
What is your experience with the specific target ion in brines with similar ionic strength and competing species to ours?
Lithium DLE from a geothermal brine at 75,000 mg/L TDS is fundamentally different from a dilute oilfield brine at 5,000 mg/L. Vendors without references at comparable complexity are piloting at your expense.
- 3
What waste streams does your process generate and how are they classified and disposed of?
DLE acid/base elution reagents generate spent acid and base streams classified as industrial waste. Selective electrodialysis generates a diluate waste brine. Vendors should quantify and price waste disposal in their operating cost models, not leave it undefined.
- 4
What product purity specification can you guarantee and which end markets does your product quality access?
Battery-grade Li2CO3 at 99.5% purity commands $20,000 to $30,000/tonne. Technical grade at 97% commands $8,000 to $12,000/tonne. The purity target drives the entire downstream purification process design and determines whether the project economics work.
- 5
What IP ownership applies to the valorisation process you are proposing, and can we operate independently after commissioning?
Some DLE and selective electrodialysis technologies are proprietary with ongoing royalty obligations. Others are freely licensable. Royalty structures of 3 to 8% of revenue can materially change project IRR and should be disclosed in proposals.
What Drives Cost in This Category
A 6-month, 2 m3/hr DLE pilot costs GBP 400K to GBP 1.2M including sorbent, analytical monitoring, and engineering time. Skipping the pilot and going straight to full scale multiplies risk by 10 to 20 times the pilot cost in potential rework or write-off.
DLE sorbent elution requires HCl at 0.5 to 2 kg acid per kg Li recovered and NaOH for regeneration. At $200/tonne HCl, reagent cost runs $800 to $3,200 per tonne Li recovered. This is a major operating cost that vendors routinely understate in proposals.
Going from lithium chloride eluate (70 to 85% Li purity) to battery-grade Li2CO3 (99.5%+) requires selective electrodialysis plus precipitation plus recrystallisation, adding GBP 1M to GBP 3M capital and GBP 0.80 to GBP 1.50/kg Li operating cost per purification stage.
Geothermal and oilfield brines vary seasonally in temperature, TDS, and target-species concentration. A DLE plant sized for peak Li concentration operates at 60 to 70% of designed recovery during off-peak composition periods, directly reducing annual product volume and revenue.
Key Regulations & Standards
The CRMA designates lithium, magnesium, and boron as strategic raw materials and sets 2030 targets for domestic EU production (10% of annual consumption). UK-based brine valorisation projects targeting these materials may qualify for UKRI critical-minerals funding under the equivalent UK Critical Minerals Strategy.
Brine valorisation operations treating mineral extraction fluids (geothermal, oilfield) may require a Mining Waste Permit or Waste Operation Permit from the Environment Agency depending on brine source classification. The permit covers reagent storage, waste streams, and discharge consents.
Chemicals used in DLE processes (HCl, NaOH, specific sorbent chemicals) and products sold into the EU market (Li2CO3, MgCl2) must comply with UK REACH registration and SVHC (substances of very high concern) restrictions. Battery-grade product must comply with EU Battery Regulation 2023.
Spent sorbents from DLE cycles may contain elevated heavy metals absorbed from the brine. Characterisation of spent sorbent under the Hazardous Waste Regulations 2005 is required before disposal. Hazardous waste disposal to licensed facilities adds GBP 70 to GBP 150/tonne.