Reuse, Recovery & Stormwater
Water Resource Recovery Companies
Resource recovery facilities turning wastewater into water, nutrients, energy, and other reusable materials.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Acid Dosing Systems or Alkali Dosing Systems capabilities
- Suppliers with contractors sector experience
- Providers operating in United Kingdom or United States
- Providers
- 13
- Verified
- 2
- Countries
- 8
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a water resource recovery provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
2 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Water Resource Recovery Provider
Showing 1-13 of 13
13 results from 13 matched providers
Water Resource Recovery Facilities: Advanced STW Operations Delivering Circular Economy Outcomes
Water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) is the modern terminology for sewage treatment works (STWs) that have been redesigned or reconceptualised to maximise recovery of energy, nutrients, and materials from wastewater rather than simply treating it for disposal. The concept positions wastewater as a resource-rich feedstock rather than a waste, aligning with circular economy principles embedded in UK government policy (Resources and Waste Strategy 2018; Critical Minerals Strategy 2023; Net Zero Strategy 2021). WRRF resource streams: energy: biogas from anaerobic digestion (AD) of sludge (30 to 65 percent of STW electricity demand from on-site generation for energy-efficient large works; target 100 percent electrical self-sufficiency at large UK STWs by 2030 per Water UK Net Zero Routemap); nutrients: struvite (MgNH4PO4.6H2O, slow-release fertiliser, NPK 5-28-0; 60 to 85 percent P recovery from reject water); ammonium sulphate (from ammonia stripping of centrate; nitrogen fertiliser); cellulose from primary screenings (soil improver or biofuel feedstock); water: treated effluent reused for irrigation or non-potable industrial uses (Class A reuse under ISO 16075-2: E. coli less than 10 CFU/100 mL, BOD5 less than 10 mg/L, TSS less than 10 mg/L); heat: large heat pumps recovering low-grade heat (10 to 20 degrees C) from final effluent for district heating. IWA (International Water Association) endorses WRRF as the operational paradigm for 21st-century municipal wastewater infrastructure, reflected in the IWA Resource Recovery Cluster and IWA Cities of the Future programme.
Technology integration at WRRFs: thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment (THP): Cambi BioThelys or Veolia Biothelys process (pressure cooking of sludge at 165 to 180 degrees C, 6 bar, 30 minutes; cell lysis releases intracellular material making it more biodegradable; VS destruction in AD increases from 45 to 55 percent to 55 to 65 percent; biogas yield increase 20 to 30 percent; dewatered cake DS increases from 25 to 30 percent (without THP) to 35 to 45 percent (with THP), reducing transport and disposal costs); installed at Anglian Water Cliff Quay STW, Thames Water Beckton STW, Yorkshire Water Esholt STW. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR): combines AD with membrane filtration (hollow fibre UF membrane submerged in anaerobic reactor); treats dilute wastewater anaerobically (conventionally anaerobic treatment requires high-strength effluent or high-temperature feed); AnMBR at ambient temperature (20 to 25 degrees C) generates biogas from municipal wastewater; energy positive treatment concept (net energy output after membrane aeration energy input); pilot installations at Cranfield University and commercial scale at Leeuwarden (Netherlands). Nutrient recovery integration: struvite crystalliser (Ostara Pearl) installed in centrate return line after centrifuge; struvite pellets removed from crystalliser and dried; reduces orthophosphate in centrate return (which otherwise contributes 20 to 40 percent of total P load to STW inlet from internal recycles); reduces total P at STW inlet by 10 to 20 percent; reduces chemical P precipitation costs.
Regulatory and financial drivers for WRRFs: EA WINEP (Water Industry National Environment Programme) P limits (0.1 to 0.25 mg/L TP at large STWs in sensitive areas) simultaneously require improved P removal and incentivise P recovery (struvite recovery as compliance solution); Water UK Net Zero 2030 target: all water sector greenhouse gas emissions at net zero by 2030 (Scope 1 and 2) and by 2030 for Scope 3; energy recovery from biogas is the primary lever for electricity emissions reduction (Water UK benchmark: 2.5 to 3.5 kg CO2e/tonne treated for energy-efficient large STWs). UKWIR Carbon Accounting for the Water Industry (UKWIR 22/CL/01/5): standardised carbon accounting methodology for sludge digestion and energy from biogas; Scope 1 emissions from biogas combustion classified as biogenic (zero carbon in CO2e accounting per IPCC guidelines); sludge biosolids land application releases N2O (global warming potential 298 x CO2; 1 to 2 percent of applied N converts to N2O); N2O from biological nitrification-denitrification in aeration tanks: 0.005 to 0.05 percent of influent TN as N2O off-gas. Commercial revenue: struvite product (Crystal Green from Ostara, UK price approximately GBP 250 to 400 per tonne); biosolids to agricultural spreading (avoided landfill cost GBP 100 to 150/tonne DS; agricultural spreading cost GBP 30 to 80/tonne DS; value of nutrients approximately GBP 20 to 40/tonne DS as fertiliser equivalent); RGGO (Renewable Gas Guarantee of Origin) certificates for biomethane injection to grid at approximately GBP 30 to 60/MWh.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a water resource recovery facility and how is it different from a sewage treatment works?
A water resource recovery facility (WRRF) and a sewage treatment works (STW) perform the same core function - treating wastewater before it is discharged to the environment - but differ in their operational philosophy and outputs. Traditional STW: the primary objective is to remove pollutants (BOD, SS, ammonia, phosphorus) to a level that complies with the Environmental Permit discharge consent; by-products (sludge, biogas) are managed primarily as wastes; treatment processes are selected for compliance, not resource extraction. WRRF: reconceptualises wastewater as a carrier of resources (energy, nutrients, water, materials) that should be extracted and recovered; operational objective is zero waste - every output stream is a product; treatment processes are selected for resource recovery as well as compliance. Practical differences: a WRRF will typically: (1) Install anaerobic digestion with thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment to maximise biogas yield and generate electricity from biogas CHP; (2) Recover struvite from centrate reject water and market it as slow-release fertiliser rather than returning all P to the inlet; (3) Treat tertiary effluent for non-potable water reuse rather than discharging all flow to the receiving watercourse; (4) Install heat pumps to recover low-grade thermal energy from final effluent for district heating rather than wasting the heat in the discharge; (5) Recover cellulose from primary screenings rather than sending all screenings to landfill. The term WRRF was introduced by the Water Environment Federation (WEF) in 2013 and endorsed by IWA to reflect this broader operational concept; in the UK, all major STWs operated by water companies are moving towards WRRF principles under Net Zero and circular economy obligations.
How much energy can be recovered from wastewater treatment?
Energy recovery potential from wastewater: theoretical maximum: wastewater contains approximately 3 to 10 kWh of chemical energy per m3 (as organic matter); current state of the art recovers 0.3 to 1.0 kWh/m3 as electrical energy; a typical large STW (greater than 100,000 PE) treating municipal wastewater currently uses 0.3 to 0.6 kWh/m3 in total (aeration is typically 50 to 60 percent of site energy use; pumping 15 to 25 percent; other 15 to 30 percent); if all biogas energy is recovered, energy self-sufficiency ratio: large UK STWs with THP/AD currently achieve 50 to 80 percent electrical self-sufficiency from biogas CHP; theoretical maximum with optimised digestion approximately 100 to 130 percent (energy positive at site boundary). Key technologies: (1) Anaerobic digestion (AD) + CHP: most important recovery route; biogas yield from sewage sludge (at 55 to 65 percent VS destruction with THP): 0.3 to 0.5 Nm3 CH4/kg VS destroyed; calorific value CH4 35.8 MJ/Nm3; CHP electrical efficiency 35 to 42 percent; heat recovery 40 to 45 percent; example: large STW 200,000 PE; sludge production approximately 9,000 tonnes DS/year; biogas generation approximately 7 million Nm3 CH4/year; CHP electricity generation approximately 8 to 10 GWh/year; equivalent to approximately 70 to 80 percent of site electrical demand; (2) Biomethane grid injection: alternative to CHP; upgraded biogas (greater than 97 percent CH4) injected to gas distribution grid under GS(M)R; revenue from RGGO certificates GBP 30 to 60/MWh; (3) Heat pumps: final effluent at 10 to 20 degrees C; large screw or centrifugal heat pump (3 to 5 MW); COP 3 to 5; useful heat output 40 to 45 degrees C; used for district heating (Whitchurch STW, Bristol Water); (4) Micro-hydro: inline turbines at works with available head (greater than 10 m); 5 to 50 kW generation.
What nutrient recovery technologies are being deployed at UK STWs?
Nutrient recovery technologies deployed or in active trial at UK sewage treatment works: (1) Struvite crystallisation: most commercially mature technology; Ostara Pearl reactor (fluidised bed crystalliser) or NuReSys reactor installed in centrate return line from sludge dewatering centrifuges; centrate feed: NH4-N typically 500 to 1,500 mg/L, PO4-P 50 to 300 mg/L; MgCl2 dosed (Mg:P molar ratio 1.2 to 1.5) at pH 7.5 to 8.2; struvite crystals (MgNH4PO4.6H2O) grow on seed material and harvested at 1 to 5 mm diameter; product marketed as Crystal Green (Ostara, NPK 5-28-0 plus 10 percent Mg) or equivalent; UK installations: Slough STW (Thames Water), Davyhulme STW (United Utilities), Avonmouth STW (Wessex Water), Southam STW (Severn Trent); P recovery 60 to 85 percent of centrate P; annual struvite production UK sector: approximately 2,000 to 4,000 tonnes per year (growing with WINEP P obligations). (2) Ammonium stripping: steam or air stripping of ammonia from centrate (or digested sludge liquors) at elevated temperature (80 to 90 degrees C) and pH (10.5 to 12.0); ammonia transferred to gas phase; absorbed into H2SO4 to produce ammonium sulphate solution (21 percent N) or ammonium nitrate; product used as nitrogen fertiliser; UK trials at Minworth STW (Severn Trent Water); full-scale commercial in Netherlands and Germany; applicable where centrate NH4-N exceeds 500 mg/L. (3) Ion exchange for ammonia: zeolite clinoptilolite (NH4+ selective ion exchange; regenerated with NaCl or NaNO3 brine; concentrated eluate undergoes stripping or struvite precipitation); lower operating cost than steam stripping; UK research scale. (4) Cellulose recovery from primary screenings: mechanical screening (0.5 mm fine screen) captures cellulose fibres from primary sewage; dewatered and dried; used as biofuel or soil conditioner; UK installations: Anglian Water, Wessex Water; approximately 1,000 to 3,000 tonnes dry cellulose per year per large STW.
What are the regulations for biosolids use in agriculture from UK STWs?
Biosolids (dewatered digested sludge from sewage treatment works) applied to agricultural land in the UK are regulated under: (1) Sludge Use in Agriculture Regulations 1989 (SI 1989/1263, as amended), implementing EU Sewage Sludge Directive 86/278/EEC (UK retained); regulations set maximum metal concentrations in soil receiving biosolids: Zn less than 200 to 300 mg/kg (depends on soil pH); Cu less than 80 to 100 mg/kg; Ni less than 50 to 75 mg/kg; Cd less than 3 mg/kg; Pb less than 300 mg/kg; Hg less than 1 mg/kg; Cr less than 400 mg/kg; also set maximum application rates (250 kg total N/ha/year for untreated sludge; 250 kg/ha/year for treated sludge); requirements for soil and sludge testing before application (soil pH greater than 5.0; soil metal analysis); minimum soil pH maintained above 5.0 during and after application. (2) Safe Sludge Matrix (SSM): voluntary agreement between Water UK (formerly Water Services Association), ADAS, and the major food industry bodies (LEAF, Fresh Produce Consortium); SSM specifies: no untreated (raw) sludge on any agricultural land for food production; treated sludge (conventional pasteurisation at 70 degrees C for 30 minutes, or thermophilic digestion) restricted on certain food crops (salad crops, soft fruit); enhanced treated sludge (advanced digestion at greater than 55 degrees C plus pH greater than 12, or THP + AD) may be applied with shorter harvest intervals; compliance with SSM is required by supermarket supply chain standards (Red Tractor, LEAF Marque). (3) EA Environmental Permit or exemption: spreading biosolids under Sludge Regulations uses a registered exemption (U9 exemption for spreading treated sludge; limits 10 tonne DS/ha per application; soil and sludge records to EA). (4) Nitrates Regulations: in Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZs), total N from all organic manures (including biosolids) limited to 250 kg N/ha/year; closed periods for spreading (1 September to 31 January on sandy or shallow soils).
A 160,000 PE sewage treatment works in the West Midlands was facing tightening WINEP phosphorus consent (total P from 2.0 to 0.5 mg/L) while simultaneously needing to reduce its Mogden-formula trade effluent charges by GBP 180,000 per year from a high-strength industrial discharge that was contributing to internal recycle P loading through the sludge centrate return stream.
An Ostara Pearl 200 struvite crystalliser was installed on the centrate return line from the belt press dewatering stage, removing 78 percent of orthophosphate from the centrate (reducing centrate-return P load from 62 to 14 kg/day, which had previously represented 28 percent of total inlet P load). This allowed the chemical P precipitation system (ferric sulphate dosing) to be reduced from 18 mg/L to 8 mg/L, achieving consistent final effluent TP below 0.45 mg/L. The industrial trade effluent P contribution was addressed by negotiating a revised Trade Effluent Consent with the industrial discharger, incorporating on-site P pre-treatment.
WINEP consent compliance of TP below 0.5 mg/L achieved within 8 months of commissioning. Struvite Crystal Green production of 620 tonnes per year sold at GBP 310 per tonne (GBP 192,200 per year revenue). Ferric sulphate cost reduced by GBP 95,000 per year. Total capital cost of Pearl installation GBP 740,000; simple payback 2.6 years. Carbon savings: 140 tonnes CO2e per year from reduced ferric sulphate production and transport. Water UK Net Zero pathway reporting acknowledged the struvite system as an AMP8 circular economy exemplar.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What is the current energy self-sufficiency ratio at your STW (percentage of site electricity demand met from biogas CHP), and has a THP pre-treatment option been assessed to increase biogas yield?
Large STWs (above 50,000 PE) with mesophilic AD achieving less than 50 percent electrical self-sufficiency typically have an economic case for Cambi THP installation (increasing VS destruction from 48 to 62 percent and biogas yield by 20 to 30 percent); the capital cost of GBP 3 to 8 million is typically recovered within 5 to 8 years through energy savings, reduced sludge volumes, and dewatered cake solids improvement.
- 2
Is there a phosphorus return load from centrate or liquors that is not captured in the site mass balance, and has a struvite recovery system been assessed for the centrate stream?
Centrate recycle from sludge dewatering typically contributes 15 to 30 percent of total inlet P to the works while representing only 1 to 3 percent of total flow; without struvite recovery on the centrate, ferric sulphate dose must be sized for the full P load including this internal recycle, creating a significantly higher chemical cost than a hybrid ferric plus struvite system.
- 3
What is the current end use of your biosolids and does it comply with the Safe Sludge Matrix (SSM) for all receiving farms in your sludge-to-land programme?
Supermarket supply chain audits (Red Tractor, Leaf Marque) require biosolids applied to contracted farms to comply with SSM; any non-compliance (e.g. enhanced treated sludge applied to salad crops within an excluded harvest interval) exposes the water company to supply chain rejection and potential Sludge Regulations enforcement by the EA.
- 4
Has your STW assessed and applied for RGGO (Renewable Gas Guarantee of Origin) certificates for biomethane injected to the gas grid or for biogas used in on-site CHP generation?
RGGO certificates for biomethane qualify for the Non-Domestic RHI (Renewable Heat Incentive) at approximately GBP 30 to 60 per MWh under the tariff applicable at the time of accreditation; for a 100,000 PE works generating 5 million Nm3 CH4 per year, unclaimed RGGO revenue represents GBP 50,000 to 100,000 per year in missed income.
- 5
What is the WINEP investment timeline for phosphorus compliance at your works, and has an integrated process design been completed comparing chemical-only, biological (EBPR), and hybrid P removal approaches?
WINEP P consent tightening at large STWs to 0.5 mg/L or below cannot reliably be achieved by ferric sulphate dosing alone at high flow conditions; biological P removal (EBPR via anaerobic selector) combined with post-precipitation can achieve 0.3 mg/L TP at lower chemical cost, but EBPR performance is sensitive to industrial discharge composition and must be validated against site-specific influent data before adoption.
What Drives Cost in This Category
Cambi THP system for a 100,000 PE STW (8 tonnes DS/day sludge feed) costs GBP 4.5 to 7 million installed; the return on investment comes from: biogas increase (20 to 30 percent, GBP 80,000 to 150,000/year extra electricity generation); dewatered cake DS improvement from 27 to 38 percent (reducing haulage and disposal cost by GBP 100,000 to 200,000/year); sludge volume reduction of 15 to 25 percent; combined savings of GBP 200,000 to 350,000/year support a 14 to 25-year payback on capital.
Ferric sulphate dosing at 15 mg/L for a 10,000 m3/day STW costs GBP 80,000 to 120,000/year in chemical alone, plus disposal of ferric sludge (approximately 30 percent increase in sludge production from chemical precipitation); EBPR (Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal) via anaerobic selector costs GBP 5,000 to 15,000/year in operational monitoring but has higher capital cost (GBP 200,000 to 800,000 for zone modification); the break-even typically occurs at works above 30,000 PE with sustained operation.
Agricultural spreading of digested biosolids costs GBP 30 to 80 per tonne DS (haulage, spreading, and farm liaison) and earns a nitrogen fertiliser credit of approximately GBP 20 to 40 per tonne DS; landfill disposal costs GBP 120 to 200 per tonne DS; the risk premium for agricultural spreading is the regulatory compliance requirement (SSM, NVZ, EA exemption records), and any disqualifying event (heavy metal exceedance, SSM violation) forces emergency diversion to landfill at a cost uplift of GBP 80 to 150 per tonne DS.
An Ostara Pearl 200 unit (suitable for 60,000 to 120,000 PE works with centrate P load of 30 to 80 kg/day) costs GBP 600,000 to 900,000 installed; revenue from Crystal Green product (GBP 250 to 400 per tonne struvite) plus chemical savings (ferric sulphate reduction) and potential reduction in Mogden-formula trade charges typically delivers a payback of 3 to 6 years; payback shortens significantly where WINEP P consent requires investment in additional chemical precipitation capacity that struvite recovery displaces.
Key Regulations & Standards
WINEP sets legally binding phosphorus discharge consents for STWs in sensitive catchments under the EA Environmental Permit; consent tightening to 0.5 mg/L TP (AMP8, 2025 to 2030) applies to approximately 850 STWs in England; investment must be in place by 2027 for the majority of works; Ofwat AMP8 allows GBP 2.2 billion for WINEP nutrient obligations across the sector.
Biosolids applied to agricultural land must comply with soil and sludge metal limits; application requires prior soil analysis; the Safe Sludge Matrix (Water UK/ADAS voluntary framework) further restricts use of untreated sludge near food crops; EA enforces compliance through the registered U9 exemption system; any breach can result in exemption withdrawal, requiring emergency alternative disposal routes.
Struvite produced from wastewater can be placed on the market as a CE-marked fertilising product under EU FPR Regulation 2019/1009 (UK retained) Component Material Category 12 (CMC 12) for struvite; product must contain minimum 5 percent P2O5 and meet heavy metal and contaminant limits; CE marking allows sale across GB and EU markets; Crystal Green by Ostara is registered under CMC 12 in the UK market.
STWs with anaerobic digestion generating significant biogas volumes (above COMAH Lower Tier threshold: 50 tonnes) or with ammonia stripping using anhydrous ammonia (above 50 tonnes Lower Tier) are subject to COMAH 2015; duty to prepare a Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP); HSE and EA are joint competent authority; resource recovery technologies that increase on-site chemical inventories must be assessed for COMAH threshold implications.
Explore Related Categories
Resource Recovery
Water Reuse
Browse the full provider directory
Comparing water resource recovery companies is one slice of a larger shortlisting decision. Explore the complete directory of industrial water treatment companies, then filter by region, sector, and technology before you request scoped proposals.
Open the directory