Water Purification Companies
Water purification providers delivering multi-barrier treatment trains for drinking, process, and high-purity applications.
43 specialist providers · 2 related · 12 countries
Qualified suppliers come to you.
Filter results
Country
Industry
Technology
Not sure where to start?
Showing 1-20 of 45
Specialists in water purification
Providers whose services or self-declared specialties match this category.
Guangdong Xinjieyuan Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.
VerifiedChina · 51-200 employees
Guangdong Xinjieyuan Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. is a professional manufacturer specializing in industrial water purification equipment. We focus on RO, ultrafiltration, EDI and desalination systems, holding ISO & CE certifications. With over 10 years of technical experience, we supply customized pure water solutions for food, pharmacy, agriculture and aquaculture, supporting OEM & ODM and exporting to global markets. All units adopt top-grade membrane and pump parts, with strict factory testing and one-year full warranty.
Buyer's guide
The buyer's guide to water purification
Selecting a Water Purification Technology for Your Application
Water purification is not a single technology; it is a process train. Reverse osmosis removes dissolved salts and organic micropollutants but requires sediment and carbon pre-treatment to protect membranes. UV disinfection inactivates pathogens without adding chemicals, while activated carbon adsorption targets taste, odor, chlorine, and low-molecular-weight organics. Ion exchange resins polish specific contaminants like nitrates, heavy metals, or silica that RO cannot fully reject. Selecting the right combination depends on your source water analysis, target effluent quality, and regulatory limits.
When evaluating purification providers, request a full technology gap analysis based on your feedwater characterization report. Providers should be able to demonstrate rejection rates, recovery ratios, and expected consumable lifespans under your operating conditions. Certifications to NSF/ANSI 58 (RO), NSF/ANSI 55 (UV), and NSF/ANSI 42/53 (carbon) are baseline expectations for potable applications. For industrial or pharmaceutical-grade purification, ask about validation protocols and how the system handles upset conditions such as turbidity spikes.
Use Aguato to filter purification providers by the specific technologies they deploy and the industries they serve. A provider with deep experience in semiconductor ultrapure water production operates very differently from one focused on municipal drinking water. Reviewing proof assets such as datasheets, performance certificates, and project references before your first call will sharpen your evaluation criteria and accelerate the shortlisting process.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between water purification and water filtration?
Filtration removes suspended particles and turbidity through physical media, while purification encompasses a broader process train designed to achieve defined chemical, biological, and microbiological standards. Purification typically combines pre-filtration, membrane separation (RO or nanofiltration), disinfection (UV or ozone), and polishing steps like activated carbon or ion exchange. The distinction matters when specifying systems because compliance targets and technology selection differ significantly between the two.
How do I choose between RO, UV, and activated carbon for my project?
Start with a detailed feedwater analysis covering turbidity, TDS, microbial load, and target contaminants. RO is the right choice when you need to reduce dissolved salts, heavy metals, or organic micropollutants to very low levels. UV is most effective as a final disinfection barrier against bacteria and viruses without chemical residuals. Activated carbon targets chlorine, chloramines, taste, odor, and certain trace organics. Most industrial and municipal applications use all three in sequence rather than choosing one.
What should I ask a water purification company before signing a contract?
Ask for a process guarantee tied to your specific effluent quality targets, not just equipment specifications. Confirm that the system design is based on your actual feedwater characterization, including seasonal variation. Request the expected membrane replacement schedule and consumable costs over a five-year period, and verify that the provider offers commissioning support, operator training, and a service contract with defined response times.
How much does a commercial water purification system cost?
Capital costs vary by technology train, flow rate, and effluent targets. A small commercial RO system treating 5 to 20 m3/day typically ranges from $15,000 to $80,000 installed, while large industrial multi-stage systems treating hundreds of cubic meters per hour can exceed $2M. Operating costs - energy, membranes, chemicals, and maintenance - often equal or exceed the annualized capital cost, so always request a total cost of ownership model alongside the capital quote.
Illustrative scenario · Food and beverage manufacturer, East Midlands, UK
A composite drawn from typical projects in this category, not a single client engagement. Figures are indicative.
- Challenge
- A soft drinks production facility drawing from a hard borehole source (TDS 620 mg/L, hardness 380 mg/L as CaCO3) was experiencing inconsistent product taste and repeated scaling on heat exchangers, leading to 4 to 6 unplanned shutdowns per year. Existing in-house carbon filters were not removing chloramines adequately.
- Approach
- A two-stage purification train was engineered: a dual-media pre-filter, followed by a catalytic carbon stage for chloramine removal, then a two-pass brackish water RO system operating at 75% recovery. A UV disinfection unit at 40 mJ/cm2 was installed as the final barrier before the product buffer tank.
- Outcome
- TDS in purified water fell to below 15 mg/L and total hardness to below 2 mg/L as CaCO3, fully within the site's quality specification. Unplanned shutdowns from scaling were eliminated in the 18 months following commissioning, and product consistency scores in quarterly sensory panels improved significantly.
Questions to ask shortlisted providers
5
- 01
What feedwater quality parameters do you need from us before you will size or guarantee the system?
A provider who cannot specify the required input data upfront is likely to design to generic assumptions rather than your actual source water.
- 02
Can you provide normalized performance data (NPD) reports from a comparable installation after 12 and 24 months of operation?
NPD reports reveal how rapidly membranes are fouling and whether initial performance guarantees are holding over time.
- 03
What is the minimum and maximum feed TDS range the system is designed to handle without re-engineering?
Source water quality can vary seasonally; a system sized only for average conditions may underperform during peak TDS events.
- 04
How is CIP (clean-in-place) chemical waste from membrane cleaning managed and disposed of?
CIP waste streams require trade effluent consent and compatible materials of construction; this is frequently overlooked in early-stage specifications.
- 05
What remote monitoring or SCADA integration does the system support, and what alarms trigger an automatic shutdown?
Undetected membrane integrity failures can result in off-spec product reaching process; automated shutdown on conductivity or turbidity breach is essential.
What drives cost in this category
4
- Feed water TDS
- Higher dissolved solids require greater applied pressure (and therefore more energy) and reduce system recovery, increasing both capital and operating costs per cubic metre of permeate produced.
- Target permeate quality
- Moving from single-pass to two-pass RO to achieve very low TDS (below 10 mg/L) roughly doubles membrane surface area and pump duty, significantly increasing capital cost.
- Pre-treatment complexity
- High-turbidity or biologically active feed sources require multimedia filtration, antiscalant dosing, and possibly iron/manganese removal ahead of membranes, each adding capital and chemical operating cost.
- Flow rate and redundancy
- Standby duty configurations (N+1 or 50:50) protect production continuity but increase installed membrane and pump capacity by 50 to 100%, directly raising the capital cost envelope.
Key regulations and standards
4
- Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2016
- Sets legally binding parametric values for drinking water quality in England, including TDS, turbidity, and microbiological limits that purification systems must reliably achieve.
- NSF/ANSI 58
- US standard adopted as a market reference in the UK for RO systems, specifying structural integrity, materials safety, and contaminant reduction claims for point-of-use and point-of-entry systems.
- DWI Regulation 31
- Requires that any new treatment process or chemical used in drinking water supply obtains prior approval from the Drinking Water Inspectorate before being brought into service.
- BS EN ISO 9308-1
- Specifies the method for detection and enumeration of E. coli and coliform bacteria in water, providing the microbiological benchmark that purification systems must satisfy post-treatment.
From the Insider
- Food & Beverage Water Treatment: Standards and Systems
- High Purity Water for Pharmaceuticals: USP Standards Explained
- Water Treatment Plant O&M: Build vs Buy vs Outsource
- Ion Exchange Systems: A Complete Guide for Industrial Users
- Forward Osmosis: Emerging Industrial Applications
- Water-as-a-Service vs Ownership: Total Cost of Water Analysis