Infrastructure, Networks & Equipment
Marine Water Treatment Companies
Marine and offshore water/wastewater systems for vessels, rigs, and coastal facilities, MARPOL-compliant treatment.
- Providers
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Countries
- 0
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a marine water treatment provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
0 claimed companies in this category
Find a Marine Water Treatment Provider
Showing 0-0 of 0
No providers found
We haven't listed providers in this category yet.
Marine and Offshore Water Treatment: Seawater Desalination, Produced Water, and MARPOL Compliance
Water treatment on marine and offshore platforms addresses three distinct streams: potable water production for crew (by RO desalination of seawater), produced water handling (water co-produced with oil and gas, containing dissolved hydrocarbons, suspended oil, dissolved salts, and naturally occurring radioactive material - NORM), and bilge/ballast water management under MARPOL and IMO BWM Convention. Offshore RO desalination units are compact skid-mounted systems (5 to 200 m3 per day capacity) designed for operation on floating structures; seawater pretreatment uses disc filtration and UF to tolerate algal blooms and biofouling without scale and fouling events. High-flux SWRO membranes (75 percent salt rejection elements) reduce footprint at the cost of slightly lower permeate quality.
Produced water treatment on offshore platforms must achieve oil-in-water below 30 mg per L before overboard discharge (OSPAR Convention North Sea), below 29 mg per L (US EPA 40 CFR Part 435), or zero discharge in sensitive areas (Arctic, Great Barrier Reef). Treatment trains: produced water separators (gravity, 1 to 2 hours HRT), hydrocyclones (remove droplets above 10 microns, no power needed, g-forces of 300 to 1,000 times g), compact flotation units (CFU using dissolved or induced gas, removes droplets above 5 microns), and polishing by fibrous coalescers or compact biological treatment (if long-term operation justifies). Produced water injection (PWI) into reservoir formations is the preferred disposal method in closed systems - avoids discharge to sea and maintains reservoir pressure.
IMO Ballast Water Management Convention (BWM Convention, in force since 2017) requires vessels to treat ballast water to D-2 standard: less than 10 viable organisms per m3 above 50 microns, less than 10 viable organisms per mL for 10 to 50 microns, E. coli below 250 CFU per 100 mL, Intestinal Enterococci below 100 CFU per 100 mL, toxicogenic Vibrio cholerae below 1 CFU per 100 mL. BWM systems use UV disinfection, electrochlorination (generating hypochlorite from seawater), ozonation, or combined filtration plus disinfection. Type Approval required from flag state (IMO Resolution MEPC.279(70) for amended testing procedures). Over 70,000 vessels globally require BWM system installation by 2024.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the discharge limits for produced water offshore?
Produced water discharge limits vary by jurisdiction: OSPAR Convention (North Sea, Northeast Atlantic): maximum 30 mg per L oil-in-water on a monthly average, and operators must achieve zero harmful discharge following the OSPAR Strategy on produced water. US EPA (Gulf of Mexico and other US OCS): 29 mg per L oil-in-water daily maximum (40 CFR Part 435, Offshore Subcategory). Australia NOPSEMA: 30 mg per L oil-in-water monthly average, 45 mg per L daily maximum. Arctic and other sensitive areas: zero discharge policies apply in Norwegian Arctic, US Arctic OCS, and Brazil deepwater. Industry benchmark performance: modern compact flotation units achieve 5 to 15 mg per L oil-in-water discharge; hydrocyclones alone typically achieve 20 to 40 mg per L. Non-compliance results in permit suspension and potential prosecution.
How is potable water made on offshore platforms?
Offshore platforms produce potable water by reverse osmosis desalination of seawater. Compact skid-mounted SWRO units treat 5 to 200 m3 per day per unit. Seawater intake is typically from below the platform hull (300 to 600 m depth on floaters) or at sea level with coarse screening. Pretreatment: disc filter (100 to 200 microns) plus UF (0.02 microns), removing biological and particulate fouling before the high-pressure RO membranes (pump at 55 to 70 bar for seawater at 35,000 mg per L TDS). RO permeate at 300 to 500 mg per L TDS requires post-treatment: remineralisation (CO2 + limestone or lime dosing to raise alkalinity), pH correction, chlorination (0.5 mg per L residual), and UV disinfection. Product water must meet WHO Drinking Water Guidelines or flag state potable water standards. Per capita consumption on offshore platforms: 100 to 200 L per person per day.
What is ballast water treatment and why is it required?
Ships take on seawater ballast to maintain stability when sailing without cargo. Ballast water from one ocean region is discharged at the destination port, potentially introducing non-native aquatic species (invasive species) into a new ecosystem. Over 7,000 species are estimated to be transported in ballast water globally. Invasive species events (zebra mussels in the US Great Lakes, European green crab in Australia) cause billions in economic damage annually. The IMO Ballast Water Management Convention (2004, enforced 2017) requires D-2 biological standard treatment of all ballast water before discharge. Treatment systems: UV (most common, no chemical residue, effective against bacteria and invertebrates, IMO type-approved for most vessel sizes), electrochlorination (generates active chlorine from seawater NaCl, effective but requires neutralisation before discharge in freshwater ports to prevent chlorine environmental harm), and ozone (powerful but hazardous gas requiring careful management). Type approval from flag state classification society is mandatory.
What is NORM in produced water and how is it managed?
Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) in produced water consists primarily of radium-226 and radium-228 (both Ra isotopes), uranium, and thorium co-produced from geological formations along with oil and gas. Ra-226 concentrations in produced water range from 0.1 to 100 Bq per L; total activity levels on some North Sea fields exceed 5,000 Bq per L. NORM scales (barium radium sulphate) accumulate in pipework and processing equipment, creating radiation exposure risk for maintenance personnel. Produced water containing above 1 Bq per L total alpha or 10 Bq per L total beta/gamma requires NORM waste classification and specialist disposal in most jurisdictions. Regulatory limits: OSPAR Recommendation 2012/5 requires operators to measure and report Ra-226 and Ra-228 in produced water discharges; offshore NORM waste (scale, sludge) must be managed under national radioactive waste regulations (Environment Agency in UK, NRC in US).
A North Sea FPSO (Floating Production, Storage and Offloading vessel) producing 25,000 barrels of oil per day was generating 18,000 m3 per day of produced water co-produced from a maturing field with rising water cut. The existing produced water treatment system (gravity separator plus hydrocyclone) was achieving 45 mg per L oil-in-water effluent, exceeding the OSPAR 30 mg per L monthly average limit and triggering OPRED enforcement correspondence.
Retrofitted a compact flotation unit (induced gas flotation, 15-minute HRT) downstream of the hydrocyclones, achieving 8 to 12 mg per L oil-in-water at 200 m3 per hr per cell. Installed online oil-in-water monitoring with automated alarm linked to the produced water injection pump to enable overboard discharge when quality was confirmed compliant. Implemented a produced water injection (PWI) system for non-compliant quality periods, injecting into the reservoir water injection system.
Overboard discharge oil-in-water averaged 11.5 mg per L over 12 months of operation, 62 percent below the OSPAR limit. No further OPRED enforcement correspondence. PWI system handled 3,200 m3 per day of non-compliant water during storm events when overboard discharge was suspended. The monitoring system generated 99.7 percent data availability for OSPAR monthly reporting, satisfying NSTA reporting requirements.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What oil-in-water monitor technology do you propose for compliance verification, and is it approved for OSPAR reporting in the applicable jurisdiction?
OSPAR requires oil-in-water monitoring for compliance reporting. Different monitor technologies (UV fluorescence, IR absorption, laser scattering) have different measurement principles and can give different results on the same sample, particularly for crude oils with low UV fluorescence characteristics. Confirm that the proposed monitor technology is calibrated to the crude oil at your specific field and is approved by the relevant regulator (OPRED in the UK, PSA in Norway) for compliance reporting.
- 2
What is the performance guarantee for the proposed treatment system at our peak water cut, and has it been demonstrated on produced water with a similar crude oil and water chemistry?
Produced water treatment performance is highly specific to the crude oil chemistry (API gravity, asphaltene content, wax content) and water chemistry (TDS, scaling ions, biocide residuals). A compact flotation unit proven on North Sea light crude may underperform on heavy crude or on produced water with high demulsifier carryover from the production separator. Ask for performance data from at least three comparable installations using similar crude and water composition.
- 3
What is the plan for produced water management during periods of poor effluent quality (storm conditions, process upsets), and is there sufficient produced water injection or storage capacity to avoid unplanned overboard discharge?
OSPAR compliance is measured on a monthly average basis, but individual sample exceedances must be reported if above 100 mg per L. During storm conditions, the ability to suspend overboard discharge and route to injection is critical. Confirm the maximum produced water injection rate, injection well availability, and the volume of surge tankage or FPSO slop tanks available to buffer non-compliant quality periods without resorting to overboard discharge.
- 4
What NORM management plan is in place for the produced water treatment equipment, and how is radioactive scale handled during maintenance and equipment decommissioning?
Produced water treatment equipment on mature North Sea fields accumulates NORM scale (barium radium sulphate) on internal surfaces of separators, hydrocyclones, and heat exchangers. NORM-contaminated equipment requires radiation surveys before maintenance, radiological monitoring for workers during scale removal, and specialist NORM waste disposal under the Environmental Permitting Regulations 2016 (radioactive substance activity). Failure to manage NORM correctly is both a regulatory offence and an unquantified operator liability.
- 5
How does the solution comply with IMO MARPOL Annex I for oily water discharge if the vessel operates outside OSPAR Convention waters?
OSPAR applies only to the North East Atlantic. Vessels operating globally must comply with MARPOL Annex I (below 15 mg per L oil-in-water for overboard discharge in non-special areas, zero discharge in special areas including Arctic, Mediterranean, Black Sea). Treatment systems designed to 30 mg per L for OSPAR compliance may not achieve the 15 mg per L MARPOL standard. Confirm that the proposed system meets the more stringent of the applicable standards for all waters where the vessel or installation may operate.
What Drives Cost in This Category
A 1,000 m3 per day produced water treatment system (gravity separator plus hydrocyclone) for a 30 mg per L target costs 500,000 to 2,000,000 USD in CAPEX (offshore-rated equipment, explosion-proof). Adding a compact flotation unit to achieve 10 to 15 mg per L adds 800,000 to 2,500,000 USD. At 10,000 m3 per day (large FPSO or platform), the treatment train costs 5 to 20 million USD. Space and weight constraints on offshore platforms add 30 to 60 percent to onshore equivalent equipment costs due to compact footprint requirements.
Produced water injection (PWI) into reservoir formations eliminates overboard discharge entirely but requires injection well infrastructure (1 to 5 million USD per well), injection pumps, and produced water quality treatment for reservoir compatibility (suspended solids below 2 mg per L for good injectivity). PWI adds 2 to 8 million USD to the produced water handling capital cost but eliminates regulatory discharge risk and contributes to reservoir pressure maintenance (enhanced oil recovery value).
OSPAR non-compliance triggers OPRED investigation and may result in enforcement notices, permit conditions, and production restriction. Monetary penalties under UK regulations can reach 250,000 GBP per incident. Production delays caused by enforcement action (inspections, required treatment upgrades, production restriction while non-compliant) typically cost 1 to 10 million USD per month of restricted production on a large FPSO, vastly exceeding the cost of compliant treatment from the outset.
OSPAR requires continuous online oil-in-water monitoring and data submission to OPRED monthly. A certified online monitor (Jorin, Emerson, Turner Designs) costs 50,000 to 150,000 USD installed, plus 10,000 to 30,000 USD per year in calibration and maintenance. Data management systems for OSPAR reporting add 5,000 to 20,000 USD per year. The cost of non-compliant discharge identified through the monitoring system (automatic suspension of overboard discharge, diversion to injection) is lower than the cost of an enforcement notice based on spot sample exceedances.
Key Regulations & Standards
The OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North East Atlantic requires oil-in-water concentrations in produced water discharged overboard to remain below 30 mg per L on a monthly average basis. OSPAR Decision 2000/3 on the Management of Produced Water from Offshore Installations on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, and equivalent UK OPRED guidance, requires quarterly sampling, annual reporting, and use of approved oil-in-water monitoring methodologies. Derogations may be sought for mature field production where technical achievement of 30 mg per L is not feasible, subject to OPRED and OSPAR agreement.
MARPOL Annex I applies globally to oil discharges from ships (including FPSOs and drillships). Regulation 15 prohibits discharge of oily water above 15 mg per L oil content in non-special areas; zero discharge applies in special areas (Arctic Ocean, Mediterranean, Black Sea, Baltic, Red Sea, Gulfs). Vessels must carry an Oil Record Book Part I for machinery space operations. Type-approved oil discharge monitoring equipment is required; non-compliance detected by port state control results in vessel detention and prosecution under flag state law.
EPR 2016 (radioactive substances regulations) classifies produced water treatment equipment containing NORM scale above 1 Bq per g Ra-226 or Ra-228 as radioactive waste. Operators must register with the Environment Agency for NORM waste management, maintain NORM contamination records for all equipment, and arrange specialist disposal through a licensed radioactive waste handler. Radiation workers involved in NORM scale removal must be classified under the Ionising Radiation Regulations 2017 if annual dose is likely to exceed 1 mSv.
FPSOs and offshore support vessels (OSVs) taking on seawater ballast in one ocean region and discharging in another must comply with the IMO BWM Convention D-2 standard (below 10 viable organisms per m3 above 50 microns, below 10 viable per mL for 10 to 50 microns). BWM Convention entered into force in 2017; all vessels must have a type-approved ballast water management system by the next IOPP renewal survey. Offshore vessels operating in the North Sea are subject to enforcement by UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency port state control inspections.