Infrastructure, Networks & Equipment
Produced Water Treatment Companies
Oil & gas produced water solution providers, de-oiling, desalting, and reuse for fracking, injection, or discharge.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Acid Dosing Systems or Aerated Lagoons, MABR capabilities
- Suppliers with agriculture sector experience
- Providers operating in Indonesia or United Kingdom
- Providers
- 2
- Verified
- 1
- Countries
- 2
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a produced water treatment provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
1 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Produced Water Treatment Provider
Showing 1-2 of 2
2 results from 2 matched providers
Managing High-TDS, High-Metals Produced Water for Reuse and Discharge Compliance
Produced water from oil and gas operations is the largest volume byproduct of hydrocarbon extraction—a single conventional oil field can generate 5–10 barrels of produced water per barrel of oil produced, with unconventional shale operations producing variable but often lower ratios early in field life that increase with well maturity. Produced water composition varies dramatically: TDS from 1,000 mg/L in some basins to over 300,000 mg/L in tight-formation brines, with significant concentrations of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM), dissolved hydrocarbons, scaling ions (barium, strontium, calcium), and bacteria. Each basin's produced water has a distinct chemical signature that drives treatment technology selection.
Treatment pathways for produced water are determined by the intended end use. Hydraulic fracturing reuse—the fastest-growing application—requires removal of suspended solids, iron, bacteria, and scaling ions to fracture fluid compatibility limits, but does not require potable-quality treatment. Agricultural reuse requires much more stringent treatment including heavy metals removal and total dissolved solids reduction to below 1,000 mg/L. Discharge to surface water or publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) triggers technology-based effluent guidelines under 40 CFR Part 435, including benzene, toluene, and oil-and-grease limits. Deep well injection—the dominant management method—requires filtration and suspended solids removal to prevent injectivity loss in the disposal formation.
Zero liquid discharge (ZLD) for produced water is technically achievable through combinations of membrane brine concentrators, thermal evaporators, and crystallizers, but is economically justified only where disposal costs are very high or reuse value is significant. Mechanical vapor recompression (MVR) evaporators have lower energy consumption than multi-effect distillation for smaller ZLD systems. Providers with basin-specific produced water experience are more valuable than general industrial water treatment providers, as the chemical precipitation, scaling, and NORM management challenges differ significantly across geographies.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main treatment steps for produced water reuse in hydraulic fracturing?
A typical produced water treatment train for fracturing reuse includes primary separation (API separator or gun barrel tank to remove free oil and settleable solids), followed by dissolved air flotation (DAF) to remove emulsified oil and fine suspended solids, filtration (multimedia or automatic self-cleaning) to reduce TSS below 50 mg/L, and iron and manganese removal through oxidation and filtration if iron exceeds 5–10 mg/L. Biocide treatment is applied to control sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and prevent biofouling in the fracture formation. The target water quality specifications are set by the completion engineer based on formation compatibility, not regulatory limits.
What is NORM in produced water and how does it affect treatment system design?
NORM (Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials) in produced water consists primarily of radium-226, radium-228, and their decay products, which co-precipitate with barium and strontium sulfate scale in treatment equipment and wellbore tubulars. Treatment equipment handling high-NORM water is subject to state radiation control regulations that may require radiation surveys, worker dose monitoring, and disposal of NORM-contaminated scale and sludge as low-level radioactive waste. Providers operating in Appalachian and Permian basins where NORM activity is elevated must have documented NORM management procedures and trained staff.
How do I evaluate produced water treatment technology proposals from multiple vendors?
Require all vendors to base proposals on the same feedwater analysis—ideally from a representative composite sample rather than a single grab sample. Specify identical performance targets for each end use (TSS, oil and grease, TDS, specific ions, bacteria counts) to enable side-by-side comparison. Evaluate proven scale of operation: a technology that works at 100 bbl/day may not perform at 10,000 bbl/day without engineering modifications. Ask for references from operating systems treating produced water from the same basin or with comparable chemistry to your field.
What is the typical cost range for produced water treatment per barrel?
Treatment costs for produced water vary by source water TDS, target quality, and system scale. Simple settling and filtration for fracturing reuse typically costs $0.10 to $0.50 per barrel. Full desalination by membrane or thermal evaporation for higher-quality reuse or discharge ranges from $1.50 to $6.00 per barrel depending on TDS and recovery requirements. ZLD systems capable of producing distilled water and dry solids from high-TDS brines above 100,000 mg/L TDS can exceed $10 to $20 per barrel in thermal evaporation energy and capital costs. Compare these costs against current disposal costs - typically $0.50 to $2.00 per barrel for deep well injection in most basins - to determine the economic threshold for each treatment level.
An offshore platform producing approximately 4,000 m3/day of produced water was operating a legacy hydrocyclone and induced gas flotation (IGF) system that was consistently exceeding the OSPAR 30 mg/L oil-in-water discharge limit during high-water-cut periods. Non-compliant discharges were attracting OPRED enforcement attention and risked suspension of production.
A compact electrocoagulation polishing stage was installed downstream of the existing IGF unit, integrated within the existing process deck space without requiring structural modifications. The electrocoagulation unit removed residual dispersed oil and solids to below 5 mg/L oil-in-water at peak throughput, providing a reliable compliance buffer against the 30 mg/L OSPAR limit.
Discharged water oil-in-water concentration fell to a consistent average of 8 mg/L, providing a 73% compliance margin against the OSPAR limit. OPRED enforcement correspondence was resolved following 60 days of compliant monitoring data. No production curtailment was required at any point during the upgrade project.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What produced water TDS range and oil-in-water concentration envelope is your treatment system designed to handle, and how does performance change at the upper end of those ranges?
Produced water quality varies significantly over field life; treatment systems must be designed to handle the worst-case composition, not the average, to maintain compliance.
- 2
How does the system manage high-scaling-index produced water, and what chemical treatment is required to prevent scale deposition in membranes or heat exchange surfaces?
Scaling by barium sulphate, calcium carbonate, or silica is the dominant cause of membrane and equipment failure in produced water treatment; the anti-scaling strategy must be verified against the actual produced water chemistry.
- 3
What is the minimum and maximum oil-in-water concentration in the feed at which your separation technology guarantees compliance with the OSPAR or Environmental Permit discharge limit?
Without a defined performance envelope, the treatment guarantee provides no protection during the high-water-cut periods when oil-in-water spikes and compliance risk is greatest.
- 4
What NORM management procedures do you have in place for maintenance and decommissioning of equipment handling high-NORM produced water?
NORM-contaminated equipment requires specific handling, surveying, and disposal procedures under radiation protection regulations; these costs and obligations must be understood before installation.
- 5
Is your system designed and certified for offshore or hazardous area installation, including ATEX classification, weight, and footprint constraints relevant to our platform or vessel?
Offshore treatment equipment faces space, weight, vibration, corrosion, and ATEX certification constraints that eliminate many onshore technologies from consideration.
What Drives Cost in This Category
Simple solids and oil removal for re-injection costs a fraction of full desalination for freshwater reuse; the chosen end use target is the single biggest determinant of treatment system capital and operating cost.
Produced water volumes typically increase over field life as the water cut rises; treatment systems undersized for late-field water rates create expensive retrofit obligations and compliance risk.
Offshore installation requires ATEX certification, weight and footprint optimisation, corrosion-resistant materials, and offshore lifting and installation, adding 30 to 100% to the equivalent onshore system cost.
The difference between treating to a 30 mg/L oil-in-water OSPAR limit and a 1 mg/L limit for agricultural irrigation reuse typically represents a tenfold difference in system complexity and capital cost.
Key Regulations & Standards
Regulates the discharge of oil in produced water from offshore installations in the North-East Atlantic, setting a 30 mg/L monthly average oil-in-water discharge limit.
UK implementation of OSPAR discharge controls, with OPRED (Offshore Petroleum Regulator) as the competent authority for enforcement of produced water discharge permits.
Requires ATEX zone classification and explosion protection for all process areas handling hydrocarbons, including produced water treatment systems on offshore installations.
Onshore produced water disposal to surface water or groundwater requires an Environmental Permit specifying oil-in-water, TDS, and specific chemical limits relevant to the receiving environment.
Explore Related Categories
Related Treatment
Water Reuse & Recovery
Common Challenges
Related Articles from Aguato Insider
- Sludge Dewatering: Methods, Equipment and Disposal Costs
- Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF): How It Works and Costs
- Heavy Metals Removal from Industrial Water: A Guide
- Brine Management & Disposal: Methods, Costs, Compliance
- Offshore Produced Water Treatment: The 30 mg/L Compliance Train
- Ceramic Membranes: The 15-Year TCO Case Against Polymeric UF
- Oil & Gas Produced Water Treatment: Options and Regulations
- Induced Gas Flotation (IGF): Guide for Oily Water Treatment
- Shale Flowback Water Treatment: Options for Oil & Gas Operators