By Challenge / Contaminant
Ammonia Removal Companies
Ammonia removal providers, nitrification/denitrification, stripping, breakpoint chlorination, and IX.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Automated pH Control Systems or Cartridge Filters capabilities
- Suppliers with manufacturing sector experience
- Providers operating in United Kingdom or United States
- Providers
- 76
- Verified
- 6
- Countries
- 17
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a ammonia removal provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
6 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Ammonia Removal Provider
Showing 1-20 of 76
76 results from 76 matched providers
Selecting Ammonia Removal Technology for Industrial and Municipal Wastewater
Ammonia removal targets effluent limits of 1–5 mg/L for sensitive receiving waters under EU UWWTD and US NPDES permits. Dominant technologies are biological nitrification (autotrophic Nitrosomonas + Nitrobacter conversion at SRT >10 days, DO 2–3 mg/L, pH 7.0–8.5, alkalinity 7.14 mg/L CaCO₃ per mg NH₄⁺), air or steam stripping (pH >10.5 with NaOH, packed-tower stripper, condenser for ammonium-sulfate recovery), and ion exchange on clinoptilolite or strong-acid cation resin regenerated with brine.
Anammox (anaerobic ammonium oxidation) is the energy-disruptive technology for high-strength streams >500 mg/L NH₄⁺-N: autotrophic conversion of NH₄⁺ + NO₂⁻ → N₂ at 60% less aeration energy and zero carbon source demand versus conventional nitrification-denitrification. Deployed as DEMON, ANAMMOX®, ANITAMox in >150 full-scale plants worldwide on sludge digester centrate, landfill leachate, and food-processing wastewater. Sidestream deammonification delivers 80–90% nitrogen removal at €0.5–1.5/kg N versus €2–5/kg N for mainstream nitrification.
Selection logic: <50 mg/L NH₄⁺ favors mainstream biological nitrification; 50–300 mg/L benefits from partial nitrification + denitrification; >300 mg/L makes anammox sidestream usually winning on OPEX. Stripping is preferred where ammonium-sulfate or ammonium-nitrate byproduct has fertilizer market value at >25% N. Aguato lists providers across all four technology paths with proven references at flow rates from 50 to 50,000 m³/day.
Frequently Asked Questions
What ammonia limit does a typical NPDES or EU UWWTD permit set?
EU UWWTD requires total nitrogen ≤10–15 mg/L for sensitive areas above 10,000 PE, translating to ammonia ≤1–3 mg/L after full nitrification. US NPDES limits vary by receiving water sensitivity — typical chronic criteria are 1.9 mg/L NH₃-N at pH 7 and 20°C, declining sharply with temperature and pH. Salmonid waters often see permits at 0.5–1 mg/L. Always design 30–50% safety margin below the permit limit.
When is anammox more economic than conventional nitrification-denitrification?
Anammox wins on streams above 300 mg/L NH₄⁺-N at temperatures above 25°C — typical applications are sludge dewatering centrate, landfill leachate, and high-strength industrial effluent. OPEX is 50–70% lower because aeration demand drops from 4.6 to 1.9 kg O₂ per kg N, and external carbon (methanol) is eliminated. CAPEX is 10–30% higher due to biomass-retention reactors (granular SBR, MBBR, or moving-bed) and longer start-up at 3–6 months.
What is the alkalinity requirement for biological nitrification?
Nitrification consumes 7.14 mg of alkalinity as CaCO₃ per mg of NH₄⁺-N oxidized. Maintain at least 50 mg/L residual alkalinity in the aeration basin to keep pH above 6.8, below which nitrifier activity drops sharply. Low-alkalinity influent below 200 mg/L typically requires lime, soda ash, or sodium bicarbonate dosing. Some plants combine nitrification with upstream denitrification to recover 3.57 mg/L alkalinity per mg NO₃⁻-N denitrified, halving chemical cost.
Can ion exchange be used for ammonium removal at municipal scale?
Yes - clinoptilolite zeolite ion exchange is established for sidestream centrate and small-flow polishing. Typical capacity is 8 to 15 mg NH4+ per g zeolite; regeneration uses 1 to 2% NaCl brine, producing concentrated ammonium-brine then biologically or chemically treated by struvite precipitation or anammox. For mainstream municipal flows, biological nitrification is almost always lower cost; IX is typically reserved for small flows below 500 m3/day or polishing duty.
A closed landfill site was generating 400 m3/day of leachate with ammonia concentrations ranging from 800 to 2,400 mg/L NH4-N, well above the 5 mg/L NH4-N Environmental Permit consent for discharge to the receiving watercourse. The existing biological treatment plant was failing to nitrify consistently during winter when temperatures in the leachate reactor fell below 10 degrees C.
A partial nitritation/anammox (deammonification) reactor was installed to treat a concentrated sidestream of the leachate after mechanical pre-treatment. The anammox process removed 88% of ammonia at half the aeration energy of conventional nitrification-denitrification and without external carbon source addition. A polishing nitrification stage on the bulk leachate provided the final quality step to meet the 5 mg/L consent.
Effluent ammonia fell consistently below 3 mg/L NH4-N across all seasonal monitoring periods including winter. Aeration energy for the treatment facility fell by 42% compared to the previous full nitrification-denitrification approach. External carbon (methanol) addition was eliminated, saving approximately GBP 85,000 per year in reagent costs.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What is the ammonia concentration range and seasonal variability in our effluent, and have you designed for the worst-case peak load rather than the annual average?
Ammonia removal systems that are sized for average load fail compliance during peak discharge events that are precisely when permit risk is highest.
- 2
For biological nitrification, what is the minimum design temperature, and how does nitrification rate change between summer and winter operating conditions at our site?
Nitrification rate halves for every 10 degree drop in temperature; systems designed for summer temperatures will fail in winter without additional biomass inventory or supplemental heating.
- 3
If proposing anammox, what minimum influent ammonia concentration is required for stable granule activity, and how was this validated in your reference installations?
Anammox granules can washout or degrade below approximately 100 mg/L NH4-N; the technology is not suitable for mainstream municipal sewage without a concentration step.
- 4
What is the alkalinity consumption of the proposed process, and have you included lime or bicarbonate dosing costs in the operating cost calculation?
Nitrification consumes 7.14 mg alkalinity as CaCO3 per mg NH4-N oxidised; low-alkalinity influent significantly increases reagent cost and this is often omitted from initial OPEX estimates.
- 5
What byproducts does the process produce (nitrous oxide, ammonium sulphate, struvite) and how are these managed or recovered?
Ammonia removal processes can produce greenhouse gas emissions (N2O) and generate concentrated brine or precipitate streams that require their own disposal management and potentially EA permit conditions.
What Drives Cost in This Category
Higher ammonia concentrations require more aeration capacity or larger ion exchange beds; the mass loading of nitrogen (kg N/day) is the primary sizing parameter that drives both capital and operating cost.
Cold climates or cold influent streams (below 15 degrees C) may require reactor heating to maintain nitrification rates, adding both capital infrastructure cost and ongoing heating energy cost.
Nitrification destroys alkalinity; low-alkalinity influent requires lime, soda ash, or bicarbonate dosing at a rate that can represent 20 to 35% of total treatment chemical cost.
Full nitrogen removal to below 10 mg/L TN typically requires external carbon (methanol, acetate, or molasses) for denitrification; carbon cost scales directly with the nitrogen load being denitrified and is often the largest single operating cost item.
Key Regulations & Standards
Discharges of ammonia to controlled waters in England require an Environmental Permit with a specific NH4-N or total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) consent condition based on the receiving water quality standard.
Requires sewage treatment works serving agglomerations above 10,000 PE discharging to sensitive areas to achieve total nitrogen removal, including full nitrification and denitrification.
Standard covering water quality and ammonia determination in water, used as the reference analytical method for permit compliance monitoring of ammonia in treated effluent.
Sets the ammonia and nitrogen quality standards for industrial effluent accepted into the public sewer under trade effluent consent, which indirectly determines the degree of on-site pre-treatment required.
Explore Related Categories
Treatment Technologies
Related Challenges
Browse the full provider directory
Comparing ammonia removal companies is one slice of a larger shortlisting decision. Explore the complete directory of water treatment equipment manufacturers, then filter by region, sector, and technology before you request scoped proposals.
Open the directory