Water tools
Secondary clarifier area by loading rates and solids flux
A secondary clarifier must both clarify (the upflow must stay below the settling velocity) and thicken (the applied solids flux must stay below the limiting flux). Both are checked here, alongside the conventional loading-rate method.
Solids flux theory governs (clarification).
How it works
Loading rates at average and maximum flow; the largest of the four areas governs. Only the influent flow has an upward component, so the hydraulic loading uses Q alone:
Solids flux theory. The interface settling velocity and the limiting flux are taken by settleability class (very good to very poor, mapped from the sludge volume index):
Clarification requires the upflow to stay below the settling velocity, thickening requires the applied flux to stay below the limiting flux:
- clarifier surface area, m²
- influent flow, m³/h
- return sludge flow, m³/h
- hydraulic loading rate, m³/m²·h
- solids loading rate, kg/m²·h
- mixed liquor suspended solids, mg/L
- interface settling velocity, m/h
- settling velocity coefficient, m/h
- settling velocity coefficient, m³/kg
- mixed liquor concentration, kg/m³
- limiting solids flux, kg/m²·h
- flux coefficients by settleability class
- return ratio
with Co the MLSS in kg/m³ and R the return ratio. The larger area is adopted. Conventional literature loading rates fall between the fair and poor curves. For an overloaded tank, lowering MLSS helps both criteria; raising the return ratio helps thickening only.
Related reading
These calculators use standard published formulas and are provided for preliminary engineering guidance. Confirm against measured data and vendor projections before design. Model your full water matrix in Nepti or post your project to compare provider proposals.