Water tools

    Secondary clarifier area by loading rates and solids flux

    A secondary clarifier must both clarify (the upflow must stay below the settling velocity) and thicken (the applied solids flux must stay below the limiting flux). Both are checked here, alongside the conventional loading-rate method.

    Conventional 0.67 to 1.33; extended aeration 0.33 to 0.67.
    Conventional 1.7 to 2.0; extended aeration 1.0 to 1.33.
    Conventional 4 to 6; extended aeration 1 to 5.
    Conventional 10; extended aeration 7.
    Recommended area
    898m²

    Solids flux theory governs (clarification).

    Solids flux for the settleability class
    Area, flux theory
    898m²
    Clarification limit
    0.46m/h
    Limiting solids flux
    3.64kg/m²·h
    Area for clarification
    898m²
    Area for thickening
    876m²
    Conventional loading rates
    Area, loading rates
    638m²
    Hydraulic, average
    511m²
    Hydraulic, maximum
    445m²
    Solids, average
    638m²
    Solids, maximum
    471m²

    How it works

    Loading rates at average and maximum flow; the largest of the four areas governs. Only the influent flow has an upward component, so the hydraulic loading uses Q alone:

    A=QHLRA=(Q+Qr)XSLR(1)

    Solids flux theory. The interface settling velocity and the limiting flux are taken by settleability class (very good to very poor, mapped from the sludge volume index):

    v=voe−KCGL=m(Qr/A)n(2)

    Clarification requires the upflow to stay below the settling velocity, thickening requires the applied flux to stay below the limiting flux:

    QA≤voe−KCo(Q+Qr)CoA≤m(Rvoe−KCo)n(3)
    where
    A
    clarifier surface area, m²
    Q
    influent flow, m³/h
    Qr
    return sludge flow, m³/h
    HLR
    hydraulic loading rate, m³/m²·h
    SLR
    solids loading rate, kg/m²·h
    X
    mixed liquor suspended solids, mg/L
    v
    interface settling velocity, m/h
    vo
    settling velocity coefficient, m/h
    K
    settling velocity coefficient, m³/kg
    C,Co
    mixed liquor concentration, kg/m³
    GL
    limiting solids flux, kg/m²·h
    m,n
    flux coefficients by settleability class
    R
    return ratio

    with Co the MLSS in kg/m³ and R the return ratio. The larger area is adopted. Conventional literature loading rates fall between the fair and poor curves. For an overloaded tank, lowering MLSS helps both criteria; raising the return ratio helps thickening only.

    Related reading

    These calculators use standard published formulas and are provided for preliminary engineering guidance. Confirm against measured data and vendor projections before design. Model your full water matrix in Nepti or post your project to compare provider proposals.