Infrastructure, Networks & Equipment
Sludge Equipment Companies
Centrifuges, belt presses, screw presses, and dryer manufacturers for sludge handling and biosolids.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Flat Sheet UF Membranes or Hollow Fiber RO capabilities
- Suppliers with contractors sector experience
- Providers operating in United Kingdom or China
- Providers
- 53
- Verified
- 3
- Countries
- 13
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a sludge equipment provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
3 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Sludge Equipment Provider
Showing 1-20 of 53
53 results from 53 matched providers
Sludge Treatment Equipment: Centrifuges, Belt Presses, Filter Presses, and Digesters
Sludge treatment equipment encompasses the full chain from primary sludge collection through thickening, digestion, dewatering, and drying/disposal. Key equipment categories: gravity belt thickeners (GBT) - Huber BRT, Andritz Separation, Alfa Laval; decanter centrifuges for thickening and dewatering - Alfa Laval ALDEC, GEA Westfalia Separator, Flottweg Sedicanter; belt filter presses (BFP) - Andritz, Ashbrook Simon-Hartley, Bellmer Kiefer; filter presses (plate-and-frame, recessed chamber) - Evoqua, LENSER, JWI; screw presses - HUBER RoS3, Volute VS series, Fournier Volute; anaerobic digesters (mesophilic, thermophilic) with gas holders and CHP systems; polymer conditioning and dosing systems (progressive cavity pumps, inline mixing, dilution water skids). Equipment selection criteria: sludge type (primary, biological, mixed), target DS, throughput, site footprint, and energy availability.
Decanter centrifuge dewatering is the dominant technology for large WwTW (greater than 50,000 PE) due to high throughput, consistent performance, and low footprint. Operating principle: horizontal solid bowl rotating at 2,000 to 3,500 RPM generates 1,500 to 3,000 G centrifugal force; differential speed between bowl and scroll conveyor (typically 1 to 30 RPM differential) conveys settled solids (cake) to discharge end while centrate overflows the weir. Performance: digested mixed sludge dewatering: cake DS 18 to 28 percent; centrate SS 200 to 2,000 mg/L; polymer dose 5 to 12 g/kg DS; throughput 10 to 120 m3/hr per machine. Bowl diameter 300 to 760 mm; bowl length 3 to 6 times diameter (L/D ratio determines separation efficiency and throughput balance). VFD-controlled bowl and differential speed optimise dewatering performance as sludge characteristics change. Power consumption: 10 to 30 kWh per tonne of dry solids dewatered. Leading manufacturers: Alfa Laval (Lynx G3 series), Andritz Separation (D series), Flottweg (Simp Drive), GEA (CF series), Pieralisi.
Belt filter presses (BFPs) and filter presses offer alternatives where operating simplicity and lower energy are priorities. Belt filter press: polymer-conditioned sludge applied to two opposed moving porous belts; gravity drainage zone (belt on horizontal table, free drainage), wedge zone (convergent belts begin pressing), and pressure zone (sludge squeezed between rollers of increasing size and pressure 0.3 to 0.7 MPa). Performance: digested mixed sludge 14 to 22 percent DS; feed polymer dose 4 to 8 g/kg DS; throughput 30 to 200 kg DS/m belt width/hour; wash water for belt cleaning 2 to 4 m3/m/hour. Advantages: low energy consumption (3 to 8 kWh/tonne DS), simple operation, easy inspection. Disadvantages: open system (odour control required), poor performance with bulking or high-clay sludge. Recessed plate filter press (membrane press): highest DS achievement for cake dewatering - 30 to 45 percent DS for digested sludge with membrane squeeze (5 to 15 bar); batch process (fill, press, open, discharge: 30 to 60 minute cycle); high CAPEX, high polymer dose (8 to 15 g/kg DS); used for hazardous waste dewatering, landfill-bound cake, or where cake moisture content is critical for transport economics.
Frequently Asked Questions
What equipment is used to dewater sludge?
Main sludge dewatering equipment types: (1) Decanter centrifuge: most common for large WwTW; 1,500 to 3,000 G; continuous operation; achieves 18 to 30 percent DS for digested sludge; high throughput 10 to 120 m3/hr; moderate energy 10 to 30 kWh/tDS; (2) Belt filter press (BFP): continuous, low energy, simple; 14 to 22 percent DS; lower polymer cost than centrifuge; requires wash water; odour management needed; (3) Screw press: low energy (2 to 5 kWh/tDS), low noise, enclosed; 15 to 22 percent DS; suitable for small-medium WwTW; good for fibrous sludge; (4) Recessed plate filter press: highest DS (30 to 45 percent); batch operation; high CAPEX; used where maximum dewatering is required (hazardous sludge, distant landfill); (5) Vacuum filters (rotary drum, disc): older technology, increasingly replaced by centrifuges or presses; still used for some chemical sludges; (6) Drying beds: simple, low-cost; only suitable for small WwTW and warm, dry climates; 30 to 50 percent DS. Selection factors: sludge type and digestibility, required cake DS, throughput, available space, energy cost, and operational skill level.
How much polymer is needed for sludge dewatering?
Polymer dosing requirements for sludge dewatering depend on sludge type, dewatering technology, and desired DS: Digested mixed sludge (primary + WAS): centrifuge 5 to 12 g/kg DS; BFP 4 to 8 g/kg DS; screw press 4 to 8 g/kg DS. Raw (undigested) primary sludge: lower polymer requirement 2 to 5 g/kg DS (natural coagulation properties). Undigested WAS: highest polymer demand 8 to 15 g/kg DS (diffuse, negatively charged biological floc). Polymer type: high molecular weight (5 to 15 million Dalton) cationic polyacrylamide (PAM); charge density 20 to 50 percent matched to sludge surface charge. Polymer solution preparation: emulsion or powder polymer made up to 0.2 to 0.5 percent solution using progressive cavity make-up unit; maturation time 20 to 45 minutes before application. Optimisation: lab-scale CST (Capillary Suction Time) test or centrifuge tube test identifies optimum polymer type and dose; polymer trials on full-scale equipment recommended for each new polymer batch. Cost: polymer typically GBP 2 to 6 per kg active; 10 g/kg DS at 25 percent DS cake: polymer cost GBP 0.25 to 1.50 per tonne wet sludge processed. Over-dosing causes free polymer in centrate (foaming in inlet works); under-dosing causes poor DS and high centrate SS.
What is the role of anaerobic digestion in sludge treatment?
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a biological process that stabilises sludge, reduces volatile solids (VS), destroys pathogens, and generates biogas (methane) for energy recovery. Process: in an oxygen-free environment at 35 to 37 degrees C (mesophilic) or 55 degrees C (thermophilic), methanogenic archaea and syntrophic bacteria break down organic polymers (proteins, fats, carbohydrates) through hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis to produce CH4, CO2, and digestate. Key performance indicators: VS destruction 35 to 55 percent (mesophilic), 45 to 60 percent (thermophilic with THP pre-treatment up to 65 percent); specific biogas yield 300 to 450 L/kg VS destroyed; HRT (Hydraulic Retention Time) 15 to 25 days (mesophilic standard); 12 to 20 days (thermophilic); SRT (Solids Retention Time) = HRT for completely mixed digesters. Digester sizing: VS loading rate 1.5 to 3.0 kg VS/m3/day (mesophilic), up to 4.0 kg VS/m3/day (thermophilic). Benefits: pathogen reduction (BS EN 14701 pasteurisation standard for thermal pre-treated sludge); odour reduction; improved dewaterability; compliance with UK Bioresources Market Principles for agricultural land application.
How is biogas from sludge digestion used?
Biogas from anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge (55 to 70 percent CH4, 30 to 45 percent CO2, trace H2S and siloxanes) is a valuable energy resource with multiple utilisation routes: (1) Combined heat and power (CHP): most common route in UK; gas reciprocating engine (Jenbacher, Caterpillar, MAN, Rolls-Royce MTU) at 30 to 40 percent electrical efficiency + 45 to 50 percent thermal efficiency; total efficiency 75 to 90 percent; electricity self-generated displaces grid purchase; heat recovers digester heating and building heating; typical 100,000 PE WwTW generates 500 to 1,000 kWe from biogas CHP; (2) Gas boiler: heat only; simplest, no electricity generation; appropriate for sites with heat demand exceeding electricity value; (3) Biomethane injection to grid: upgraded biogas (greater than 97 percent CH4) injected to gas distribution network; UK: GGSS (Green Gas Support Scheme, Ofgem) pays green gas production tariff; biogas upgrading technologies: pressure swing adsorption (PSA), water scrubbing, membrane, amine scrubbing; achieve less than 1 percent CO2 in biomethane; (4) Vehicle fuel (bio-CNG, bio-LNG): compressed or liquefied biomethane for fleet vehicles; some UK water companies use sewage gas-powered lorries. Pre-treatment: H2S removal (iron sponge, biological desulphurisation) below 100 ppm before engine; siloxane removal (activated carbon) below 1 mg/Nm3 Si to prevent engine wear.
A 320,000 PE WwTW in the North West of England was operating two 1990s-vintage belt filter presses achieving 19% DS on digested mixed sludge. Ageing belts required replacement every 8 months at GBP 18,000 per replacement, and the open-deck belt presses were generating odour complaints from a nearby residential development. Throughput was insufficient during wet weather peak sludge periods, requiring contractor tanker disposal at GBP 55 per tonne.
The operator replaced the two BFPs with three Alfa Laval ALDEC G3 high-performance decanter centrifuges, each rated at 50 m3/hr feed and polymer-optimised for the site sludge via jar testing. Polymer type was changed from a generic anionic grade to a medium-charge-density cationic PAM (6.5 g/kg DS optimum dose from jar testing). All three centrifuges were enclosed in a factory-assembled building with negative pressure odour extraction to a biofilter.
Cake DS improved from 19% to 26% on the same digested mixed sludge. Contractor tanker disposal was eliminated. Polymer consumption increased from 5.1 g/kg DS (BFP optimum) to 6.5 g/kg DS but at higher throughput; total polymer cost per tonne DS processed fell 12% due to higher volume efficiency. Odour complaints dropped to zero in year one. Annual maintenance cost fell from GBP 43,000 (BFP belt replacement) to GBP 18,000 (centrifuge mechanical seal service).
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What sludge type, DS percentage, and throughput in m3/hr or tonnes DS/day must the dewatering equipment handle?
Equipment sizing and technology selection (centrifuge, BFP, screw press, filter press) depend fundamentally on feed DS, sludge type, and throughput; undersizing causes operational overload and contractor disposal costs.
- 2
What cake DS target is required for the end-use route (agricultural, incineration, co-incineration, landfill)?
Cement kiln co-incineration requires DS above 30% for self-sustaining combustion; landfill requires minimum 20% DS (Landfill Directive); agricultural application accepts 18 to 25% from centrifuge; filter press can achieve 30 to 40% DS for maximum transport and disposal cost savings.
- 3
What polymer type has been evaluated by jar testing and what is the current optimum dose and cost per tonne DS?
Polymer is typically 20 to 40% of centrifuge operating cost; jar testing on actual sludge identifies the best performing polymer at minimum dose; over-specification of polymer contract quantity wastes significant budget.
- 4
Is the equipment to be installed in an enclosed building with odour control and what are the planning conditions on odour?
Open-deck belt presses and exposed screw presses generate H2S and odour; EA Environmental Permits and planning conditions increasingly require enclosed sludge handling with biofilter or chemical scrubber odour treatment.
- 5
What is the CMMS platform and what remote monitoring and predictive maintenance capability is required on the new equipment?
Modern centrifuges and BFPs include OPC-UA data outputs for integration with asset management systems (Maximo, IFS); specifying data connectivity at procurement avoids costly retrofit integration.
What Drives Cost in This Category
Decanter centrifuges (10 to 120 m3/hr) cost GBP 180,000 to 450,000 per unit installed; belt filter presses cost GBP 120,000 to 300,000; filter presses cost GBP 250,000 to 800,000; screw presses cost GBP 80,000 to 250,000.
Polymer accounts for 20 to 40% of dewatering opex; at GBP 3 per kg active and 8 g/kg DS, polymer costs GBP 24 per tonne DS; optimised jar-tested selection reduces dose by 15 to 25% and generates GBP 50,000 to 200,000 savings per year on large sites.
Enclosed sludge dewatering buildings with negative pressure odour extraction and biofilter cost GBP 400,000 to 1.5 million; increasingly required to satisfy EA permit conditions and planning odour management plans.
Higher cake DS from filter press versus centrifuge reduces transported mass; at GBP 55 per tonne and 10 tonnes DS/day, improving DS from 20% to 30% reduces disposed wet mass by 17 tonnes/day, saving GBP 340,000 per year in transport and gate fees.
Key Regulations & Standards
Sludge treatment operations at WwTW require an Environmental Permit; EA H4 Guidance on Odour Management specifies odour emission benchmarks and requires an Odour Management Plan for sites near sensitive receptors; enclosed sludge handling is the primary mitigation measure.
Filter presses operating above 0.5 bar and 250 bar.litres PS.V require a written scheme of examination under PSSR 2000; hydraulic press cylinders must be inspected at intervals defined by the competent person; filter plate integrity inspection is also required.
Dewatered biosolids must meet pathogen reduction standards for the intended agricultural use route; conventionally digested and dewatered sludge qualifies as Conventionally Treated; safe handling of sludge cake during dewatering (gloves, RPE for H2S) is required under COSHH Regulations 2002.
Dewatered sludge cake for agricultural application is removed from Waste Framework Directive classification when meeting the UK Quality Protocol for Biosolids (Bioresources Market Principles); cake not meeting quality protocols must be managed under waste management licence or Environmental Permit as EWC 19 08 05.
Explore Related Categories
Related Hardware
Browse the full provider directory
Comparing sludge equipment companies is one slice of a larger shortlisting decision. Explore the complete directory of water treatment equipment manufacturers, then filter by region, sector, and technology before you request scoped proposals.
Open the directory