Reuse, Recovery & Stormwater
Erosion & Sediment Control Companies
Silt fence, sediment basin, and turbidity-curtain providers for construction-site runoff and post-construction stabilization.
This page is a good fit if you need:
- Automated pH Control Systems or Acid Dosing Systems capabilities
- Suppliers with accreditations sector experience
- Providers operating in United Kingdom or Netherlands
- Providers
- 27
- Verified
- 3
- Countries
- 6
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a erosion & sediment control provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
3 claimed companies in this category
Country
Industry
Technology
Find a Erosion & Sediment Control Provider
Showing 1-20 of 27
27 results from 27 matched providers
Erosion and Sediment Control for Construction and Water-Infrastructure Projects
Erosion and sediment control (ESC) protects receiving waters from construction-phase sediment loading under regulatory regimes including US EPA NPDES Construction General Permit (CGP), EU Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC, and state and national equivalents. A compliant ESC plan integrates: source control (phased clearing, preserving vegetation, temporary stabilization of bare soil within 14 days per CGP); perimeter controls (silt fence per ASTM D6461, fiber rolls, compost berms, vegetated buffer strips); slope stabilization (RECPs, hydromulch, hydroseed, jute or coir blankets); concentrated-flow controls (check dams, swales, level spreaders); sediment trapping (sediment basins sized for 2-year 24-hour storm, dewatering bags, polymer-assisted clarification); and inlet protection. Inspection and maintenance is typically weekly plus within 24 hours of every 0.5-inch rainfall event.
Discharge monitoring under CGP requires: turbidity sampling at any discharge point, with Numeric Effluent Limit (NEL) of 280 NTU instantaneous max in many states (some tighter); pH 6.0 to 9.0; visible sheen and floatables eliminated. Failure to comply triggers EPA enforcement: 51,796 USD per violation per day (2024 dollars, indexed annually). For large linear projects (pipelines, transmission mains) and watershed-sensitive sites, polymer-enhanced clarification (PEC) using anionic PAM dosed at 1 to 5 mg/L into sediment-laden flow can reduce turbidity from 1,000 to 5,000 NTU influent to under 50 NTU discharge with proper jar-testing and dosing pump control. Dewatering of trench excavations typically requires bag filters plus settling tanks plus PAM treatment to meet NEL.
Aguato lists erosion and sediment control suppliers and service providers across product manufacturers (RECPs, silt fence, fiber rolls), installation contractors, hydroseed and stabilization specialists, and PEC dewatering services. Selection criteria: CPESC (Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control) certified site staff, regional product availability with rapid replenishment, demonstrated NEL compliance on comparable construction sites, and integrated SWPPP (Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan) preparation and inspection capability.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an SWPPP and when is it required?
A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required under the US EPA NPDES Construction General Permit for any construction site disturbing 1 acre or more (or any site within a larger common plan of development). It documents the site-specific BMPs (Best Management Practices) deployed for erosion control, sediment control, pollution prevention, and post-construction stormwater management. SWPPP must be developed before construction starts, signed by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) in some states, maintained on site, updated when site conditions change, and made available to inspectors and the public. Equivalent regimes exist under EU member-state regulations and most national environmental codes.
How is a sediment basin sized?
EPA CGP requires sediment basins for sites with 10-plus acres draining to a common point, sized at minimum 3,600 cubic feet of storage per acre of drainage. Better practice (state stormwater manuals, Caltrans, Florida BMPs): size for the 2-year 24-hour storm runoff volume with 24-hour minimum residence time for settleable solids (Stokes law gives settling velocity of typical sediment 0.001 to 0.01 m/s, requiring depth-to-flow path ratios suitable for fine silts). Include a forebay (10 to 20 percent of volume) for coarse sediment capture and an outlet skimmer floating at the surface to discharge clean water from upper layers. Add PAM dosing block at inlet for fines under 50 micron.
What is polymer-enhanced clarification (PEC) and when should I specify it?
PEC uses anionic polyacrylamide (PAM) flocculant dosed into sediment-laden water to coagulate clay and silt particles (under 50 micron) that will not settle within practical residence times. Application methods: passive (PAM logs in channels, PAM-coated check dams), active (dosing pump into flow upstream of a settling tank or bag filter), or active treatment system (ATS) for high-volume dewatering at 50 to 500 gpm with 30-minute reaction time. Trigger conditions: site soils with over 30 percent silt-clay fraction, NEL-listed receiving water, basin sizing constrained, or dewatering of trenched excavations. Jar-test for dose (typical 1 to 5 mg/L) and PAM type (charge density, molecular weight) before deployment.
What does erosion control cost per acre?
Budget benchmarks (2025 USD, US): perimeter silt fence plus inlet protection plus temporary seeding for a flat 5-acre commercial site: 4,000 to 8,000 USD per acre. Add slope stabilization (RECPs, hydromulch): 6,000 to 15,000 USD per acre for moderate slopes (3:1 to 4:1). Sediment basin: 8,000 to 25,000 USD for a 1 to 5 acre-ft basin including excavation, outlet, riser, skimmer, emergency spillway. PEC dosing system: 2,000 to 6,000 USD per month rental plus 0.50 to 2.00 USD per 1,000 gal in PAM cost. Site monitoring and SWPPP inspections: 8,000 to 20,000 USD per year for a 12-month project. Total ESC budget is typically 1.5 to 4 percent of construction value.
A water main replacement programme in North Yorkshire involved 8 km of 450 mm ductile iron main through agricultural land and crossing two chalk streams classified as chalk stream priority habitat under the England Chalk Stream Strategy. EA discharge consents required turbidity in the streams to remain below 30 NTU at all times during construction.
Appointed an ESC specialist to develop a site-specific Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP). Deployed: jute erosion mats on all temporary topsoil mounds within 10 m of watercourses, silt fencing as secondary perimeter control, temporary coffer dams with dewatering bags and PAM dosing at each stream crossing, and a turbidity logging station (15-minute telemetry) at the downstream end of each crossing. Construction activities near crossings were restricted to periods of low flow.
All stream turbidity readings remained below 25 NTU throughout the 14-month programme. Zero EA enforcement notices. EA inspector confirmed the CEMP as a reference standard for chalk stream construction management. ESC cost 87,000 GBP (1.2 percent of contract value); EA enforcement fine avoided (up to 50,000 GBP per violation per day under EPR 2016). Ecological monitoring confirmed no exceedance of WFD chalk stream quality objectives.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
Is your ESC plan site-specific and does it include a PAM jar-testing protocol for our soil type, and who is the CPESC-certified person responsible for the plan?
Generic ESC plans applied to site-specific conditions routinely fail. PAM dose rate and charge density must be jar-tested against your actual soil (clay percentage, pH, cation exchange capacity) to achieve effective flocculation. A CPESC-certified (UK: IECA Europe certified) individual providing plan oversight is the professional standard for EA-permitted construction sites.
- 2
How frequently will your team inspect and maintain ESC measures, and what is the trigger for immediate remediation after a rainfall event?
ESC measures fail through maintenance neglect. Under EPR 2016 and EA permit conditions for chalk stream crossings, inspection must occur after every significant rainfall event (typically above 5 mm in 24 hours). A contractor who inspects ESC measures only weekly in a rainy autumn is creating regulatory exposure for the client.
- 3
Have you worked on EA-permitted chalk stream or SSSI watercourse crossings before, and can you provide the EA compliance report from that site?
Chalk streams are a priority habitat under the Environment Act 2021 and subject to enhanced scrutiny by Natural England and the EA. Contractors without chalk stream crossing experience are high-risk for EA enforcement action. Request an actual EA compliance report (turbidity monitoring data, event log) from a comparable project.
- 4
What is your protocol for a turbidity exceedance event: at what NTU reading will you halt work, and how quickly can you deploy emergency polymer-enhanced clarification?
Even with best-practice ESC, rainfall-induced exceedances occur. The response protocol (work halt trigger, PAM dosing deployment time, EA notification procedure) determines whether an exceedance becomes an enforcement notice. Confirm the contractor has PAM dosing equipment on-site (not on 24-hour call) at all active crossings.
- 5
How will you dispose of settled sediment and PAM-treated water from dewatering operations, and have you confirmed the disposal route complies with EA Regulatory Position Statement CCP3?
Dewatering water from trench excavations near watercourses must be settled and treated before disposal. EA Regulatory Position Statement CCP3 sets conditions for dewatering discharge to surface water or sewer. PAM-treated water contains polyacrylamide residuals that must be below the EA's guidance level (0.5 mg/L acrylamide monomer) before discharge.
What Drives Cost in This Category
Standard ESC for construction away from watercourses costs 0.8 to 1.5 percent of contract value. Sites with EA discharge permits for chalk stream or SSSI watercourse crossings add 50 to 150 percent to ESC cost (turbidity monitoring, PAM dewatering, environmental clerks of works, EA compliance reporting). This premium is unavoidable and should be budgeted at tender.
Passive PAM (logs or coated check dams) costs 500 to 2,000 GBP per crossing. Active PEC dosing systems (pump, reaction tank, settling unit) cost 2,000 to 8,000 GBP per month to rent and 1 to 5 GBP per m3 in PAM chemical cost. For a 14-month pipeline programme with 6 crossings, active PEC adds 40,000 to 80,000 GBP to ESC cost but is required by EA discharge consent conditions at chalk stream crossings.
Fixed turbidity loggers with 15-minute telemetry and automatic SMS/email alert systems cost 2,000 to 5,000 GBP per unit to rent plus 200 to 500 GBP per month for data transmission. For a chalk stream programme, 2 to 4 loggers are required per active crossing. Total monitoring cost 15,000 to 50,000 GBP for a year-long programme; the alternative is an EA enforcement penalty of up to 50,000 GBP per violation per day.
Reinstating disturbed ground to equivalent pre-construction condition (topsoil replacement, seeding, establishment monitoring) costs 15,000 to 40,000 GBP per hectare of disturbed agricultural land. Ecological enhancement conditions (chalk stream bank revegetation, riparian buffer strips) required by EA can add 20,000 to 80,000 GBP per crossing on top of like-for-like restoration.
Key Regulations & Standards
Discharging dewatering water or surface run-off to a watercourse during construction requires an Environmental Permit or compliance with an EA Regulatory Position Statement (CCP3 for dewatering). Permit conditions for chalk stream crossings typically specify: turbidity below 30 NTU, no PAM residuals above acrylamide monomer limit, immediate work stoppage if turbidity monitoring shows exceedance. Operating without a permit or in breach of permit conditions is an offence under Regulation 12 EPR 2016.
Construction activities near watercourses must demonstrate compliance with the no-deterioration principle of the Water Framework Directive (retained via SI 2017/407). Chalk streams are priority habitat under the Environment Act 2021. EA officers applying WFD at chalk stream sites have successfully required construction programmes to be redesigned (alternative alignments, HDD crossings) to avoid in-channel disturbance.
Construction activities within 500 m of a Special Area of Conservation or SSSI (including chalk streams designated under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981) require assessment of likely significant effects. Where significant effects cannot be ruled out, the competent authority must carry out an Appropriate Assessment before granting consent. Failure to secure HRA can result in the planning consent being judicially reviewed.
The Environment Act 2021 mandates biodiversity net gain (BNG) of at least 10 percent for new developments in England from February 2024. Chalk streams are a specific priority habitat in the BNG biodiversity metric. Infrastructure construction affecting chalk stream riparian habitats requires a BNG assessment and potentially off-site habitat creation or purchase of statutory biodiversity credits to meet the 10 percent net gain requirement.
Explore Related Categories
Stormwater System
Browse the full provider directory
Comparing erosion & sediment control companies is one slice of a larger shortlisting decision. Explore the complete directory of water treatment suppliers, then filter by region, sector, and technology before you request scoped proposals.
Open the directory


















