Monitoring & Digital
Solar Water Treatment Companies
Solar-powered pumping, disinfection, and treatment solutions for off-grid and hybrid water projects.
- Providers
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Countries
- 0
Can't find the right fit? Post a brief and let qualified suppliers come to you.
Post a projectHow to choose a solar water treatment provider
Start with providers that clearly operate in your target geography and project footprint.
Look for industry exposure that matches your water challenge, compliance constraints, and deployment context.
Use technologies, service scope, and proof signals to narrow the list before reaching out to suppliers.
Not sure where to start? Our experts can help.
Filter results
Verified providers
0 claimed companies in this category
Find a Solar Water Treatment Provider
Showing 0-0 of 0
No providers found
We haven't listed providers in this category yet.
Solar-Powered Water Treatment: SODIS, UV Photocatalysis, and Solar Thermal Distillation
Solar water treatment uses sunlight directly for water purification through photolytic and thermal mechanisms. Key technologies: Solar Disinfection (SODIS): clear PET bottles (1 to 2 L) filled with water, placed on reflective surface in full sun for 6 hours (clear sky) to 2 days (50 percent cloud cover); UV-A radiation (315 to 400 nm, approximately 8 to 10 percent of solar spectrum) and solar thermal heating (above 50 degrees C synergistic effect) inactivate bacteria, viruses, and protozoa; WHO endorses SODIS for household water treatment where no better option is available (HWTS - Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage guidance, 2011); log reduction: 3 to 4 log E. coli reduction at UV-A dose greater than 4,000 J/m2. Solar pasteurisation: WAPI (Water Pasteurisation Indicator) device uses phase-change material (soybean wax, melting point 69 to 73 degrees C) to indicate pasteurisation temperature has been reached; 60 degrees C for 30 minutes kills all major pathogens. Compound parabolic concentrators (CPC): low-concentration solar collectors (1 to 5 suns concentration) focus solar UV onto water flow-through tubes; increases photodisinfection rate significantly vs flat illumination.
Solar photocatalysis (TiO2/UV-A) is an advanced oxidation process (AOP) applicable at small scale using solar UV. TiO2 (anatase phase, bandgap 3.2 eV) is activated by UV photons (less than 385 nm): generates hydroxyl radicals (OH radical) from water oxidation; OH radicals mineralise organic micropollutants (pesticides, pharmaceuticals) and inactivate pathogens. Solar photocatalytic reactors: compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) type slant-plate reactors (Plataforma Solar de Almeria, Spain PSA-CIEMAT research); slurry (suspended TiO2 at 0.2 to 0.5 g/L) or immobilised TiO2 film on glass fibre or quartz support. Performance: 4 log E. coli inactivation at solar UV dose 500 to 1,000 J/m2 (2 to 4 times faster than SODIS); degradation of recalcitrant organics (atrazine at 10 ug/L: half-life 30 to 60 minutes at 30 mg TiO2/L with 1 sun UV). TiO2 slurry must be filtered out before consumption; immobilised TiO2 eliminates this step. Pilot-scale solar photocatalytic plants deployed in Spain, Morocco, and India for rural drinking water treatment.
Solar thermal distillation produces distillate (pure water) by evaporation using solar energy. Single-effect basin still: black-painted basin covered by sloping glass; solar radiation heats water, vapour condenses on cool glass and runs to collection trough; production rate 2 to 5 L/m2/day (tropical climate, 5 to 7 peak sun hours); low cost (USD 5 to 20/m2 CAPEX), very simple, no energy cost; suitable for individual household, refugee camp water supply. Multi-stage flash (MSF) solar: solar thermal collectors (evacuated tube, flat plate) heat brine to 60 to 90 degrees C; multiple flash chambers at progressively lower pressure produce distillate; production rate 0.5 to 5 m3/day from 10 to 50 m2 collector area; higher production per collector area than basin still but higher CAPEX. Solar-powered RO (most economically efficient): PV electricity drives RO pressure pump (2.5 to 4.0 kWh/m3 for brackish water; higher for seawater) - produces freshwater at far higher rate than distillation per unit of collector area. SODIS, solar pasteurisation, and photocatalysis are used in low-resource settings; solar RO is preferred where economic analysis supports investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar disinfection (SODIS) effective against all pathogens?
SODIS effectiveness varies by pathogen type and UV-A dose received: Bacteria (E. coli, Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella typhi): 3 to 6 log inactivation at UV-A dose 4,000 to 8,000 J/m2 (achievable in 6 hours full sun); WHO Guideline endorsement for SODIS in absence of better options. Viruses (Rotavirus, Hepatitis A, Poliovirus): generally more resistant than bacteria but inactivated at UV-A dose 10,000 to 20,000 J/m2 (one full sunny day or two cloudy days). Protozoa: Cryptosporidium and Giardia cysts are the most UV-resistant relevant pathogens; SODIS requires extended exposure (greater than 4 days of full sun in clear 1.5L PET bottles) for reliable 3 log Cryptosporidium reduction - not reliably achieved under all conditions; for high Cryptosporidium risk, additional filtration or boiling recommended alongside SODIS. Limitations: turbidity greater than 30 NTU reduces UV penetration; coloured bottles reduce UV transmission; bottles must be clear PET or glass; water temperature must not exceed 55 degrees C (prevents re-contamination growth but above 70 degrees C reduces UV effect). WHO SODIS endorsement: applicable as a household water treatment option for reducing diarrhoeal disease where no other treatment is available.
How does solar thermal distillation compare to RO for water purification?
Comparison of solar still distillation vs solar-powered RO: Production rate per unit of solar area: Solar basin still 2 to 5 L/m2/day of still surface area; Solar PV + BWRO (at 0.5 kWh/m3, 5 peak sun hours, 150 Wp/m2 PV panel): approximately 1,500 L/m2/day PV area - a factor of 300 to 750 times more productive per m2. CAPEX per m3/day capacity: Solar still USD 100 to 500/m3/day; Solar PV + BWRO USD 500 to 2,000/m3/day (small scale). OPEX: Solar still near-zero (no moving parts, no membranes, no chemicals); Solar RO: membrane replacement every 5 to 10 years, periodic chemical cleaning, filter replacements. Water quality output: Solar still: essentially distilled water (TDS less than 5 mg/L), suitable for drinking directly; Solar BWRO: TDS 30 to 500 mg/L depending on feed TDS and recovery; suitable for drinking. Appropriate applications: Solar still: individual household (1 to 20 persons), emergency water supply, remote locations with extreme simplicity requirements, saline groundwater. Solar PV + RO: community-scale (50 to 5,000+ persons), where land for solar collectors is limited, where economic analysis supports higher CAPEX for higher productivity.
What is a compound parabolic concentrator for solar water treatment?
A compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) is a non-imaging solar optical device that focuses sunlight from a wide acceptance angle onto a tubular receiver without requiring sun-tracking, making it suitable for diffuse as well as direct solar radiation. Water treatment application: CPCs designed with concentration ratio 1 to 5 suns focus solar UV-A and UV-B radiation onto borosilicate glass tubes containing water; the higher UV irradiance compared to flat-plate illumination increases photodisinfection reaction rates by the same factor. CPC collectors have a trough shape with two parabolic reflectors (aluminium or stainless steel mirror finish, reflectance greater than 85 percent) that accept radiation from a wide half-angle (approximately 60 to 90 degrees) and concentrate it onto the cylindrical tube at the focal point. For solar photocatalytic treatment (TiO2/UV-A), CPCs are specifically preferred over tracked parabolic trough concentrators because: (1) they use both direct and diffuse UV (important since diffuse UV contributes 30 to 50 percent of total UV in temperate climates); (2) no tracking required (lower complexity and maintenance); (3) uniform irradiance distribution prevents hot spots that can over-heat photocatalyst. Research scale CPC photocatalytic plants at Plataforma Solar de Almeria (Spain) have demonstrated pesticide degradation in drinking water at pilot scale (100 to 1,000 L/hour).
Can solar treatment remove chemicals as well as pathogens?
Solar treatment effectiveness for chemical contaminants depends on the mechanism: Solar UV (SODIS, basic): primarily inactivates biological pathogens; has minimal direct effect on dissolved chemical contaminants (nitrates, heavy metals, pesticides, PFAS); UV-A at solar intensities does not generate sufficient reactive oxygen species for significant chemical oxidation. Solar photocatalysis (TiO2/UV-A): can mineralise a wide range of organic chemical contaminants through hydroxyl radical attack (OH radical rate constants 10 to the 8 to 10 to the 10 M-1 s-1): pesticides (atrazine, lindane, malathion) - half-lives 30 to 120 minutes at 0.5 g/L TiO2, 1 sun UV; pharmaceuticals (ibuprofen, diclofenac) - similar degradation rates; dyes and industrial pollutants; cyanotoxins (microcystin-LR: greater than 99 percent removal in 30 to 60 minutes). Limitations: TiO2 photocatalysis does not remove inorganic contaminants (nitrate, fluoride, arsenic, heavy metals) - these require ion exchange, activated alumina, or coagulation. Solar thermal distillation: produces pure distilled water removing all dissolved salts, heavy metals, fluoride, nitrate, and organic contaminants (only highly volatile organics co-distil with water vapour). Combined approach: solar photocatalysis for organic/pathogen removal + solar distillation for inorganic removal is used in some research programmes.
A humanitarian engineering NGO required a water treatment solution for a refugee settlement of 12,000 people in East Africa. The nearest grid electricity connection was 22 km away, diesel fuel cost was USD 1.60 per litre with unreliable supply, and the surface water source had turbidity up to 180 NTU after rain events and E. coli counts exceeding 1,000 cfu/100 mL.
A solar-powered treatment system was designed combining a 2.4 kWp PV array with a 300 L/hr coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation unit (using aluminium sulphate dosed from a gravity drip system), followed by slow sand filtration (surface loading rate 0.1 m/hr, 1.2 m sand depth) and SODIS in 20 L clear PET carboys as the final disinfection stage for household storage. A solar-powered submersible pump delivered raw water to the treatment train.
Treated water turbidity consistently below 1 NTU after SSF. E. coli in treated water at 0 cfu/100 mL, confirmed by monthly bacteriological testing. SODIS in carboys added a further 3 to 4 log E. coli reduction as a final safety barrier. Diesel consumption was eliminated. The system produced 12,000 L/day at a per-litre cost (amortised over 10 years) of USD 0.012 versus USD 0.048 for the previous diesel-powered option.
Questions to Ask Shortlisted Providers
- 1
What are the source water turbidity, colour, and microbiological contamination levels across seasonal variation?
High turbidity blocks UV penetration in SODIS, requiring pre-treatment by sedimentation or filtration before solar disinfection can achieve adequate log reduction; seasonal variation determines pre-treatment design flow and storage requirements.
- 2
What is the daily water demand and what storage volume is required to buffer solar generation intermittency?
Solar treatment systems must produce water during daylight hours and store it for 24-hour supply; storage sizing (typically 1 to 2 days demand) must account for extended cloudy periods during rainy season.
- 3
What is the solar irradiation profile at the site and what fraction is diffuse versus direct?
SODIS requires minimum 4,000 J/m2 of UV-A irradiation; solar stills require direct radiation; low-irradiation sites or high cloud cover periods require extended exposure times or backup disinfection.
- 4
Is there local technical capacity to operate and maintain the system and what is the supply chain for consumables (coagulant chemicals, filter media)?
Remote solar treatment systems fail permanently when components fault without trained operators or spare parts; design should maximise gravity-fed processes and minimise chemical dependency where local supply chains are unreliable.
- 5
What water quality standards must be met and which WHO or national guidelines apply to the treated water?
Different end uses (drinking water, agricultural irrigation, food processing) require different treatment trains; WHO Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality specify E. coli below detection limit in 100 mL and turbidity below 1 NTU for safe drinking water.
What Drives Cost in This Category
1 to 5 kWp solar PV arrays for small community water systems cost USD 800 to 1,500 per kWp in developing country contexts; solar pump and controller cost USD 1,200 to 4,000 depending on borehole depth and flow requirement.
Slow sand filters at community scale (50 to 500 m3/day) cost USD 3,000 to 25,000 for concrete construction with locally sourced sand media; filter media replacement every 2 to 5 years costs USD 500 to 3,000.
Elevated polyethylene or ferrocement storage tanks at community scale cost USD 1,500 to 12,000 depending on volume and height; gravity distribution pipework from elevated tank typically doubles the storage cost.
Aluminium sulphate coagulant for 12,000 L/day at typical raw water turbidity costs USD 1,500 to 4,000 per year; bacteriological water quality testing costs USD 20 to 80 per sample; monthly testing adds USD 240 to 960 per year.
Key Regulations & Standards
Specifies health-based guideline values for microbiological (E. coli, Giardia, Cryptosporidium), chemical, and physical parameters; provides Water Safety Plan (WSP) framework as the primary risk management approach endorsed by most national regulators.
Specify minimum 15 L/person/day water supply, queue time below 30 minutes, and water quality meeting WHO guidelines; solar treatment systems at refugee settlements must demonstrate compliance for UNHCR programme approval.
Specifies safety and performance requirements for PV-powered water pumping systems including pump-controller compatibility, electrical safety, and performance characterisation; compliance supports donor procurement standards for WASH projects.
National drinking water quality standards in the host country apply to community water systems; water treatment operators must comply with local licensing requirements for water supply; donor agencies (USAID, FCDO, EU) require national regulatory compliance as a grant condition.