Membrane Element Companies
OEM suppliers of MF, UF, NF, and RO membrane elements and modules, spiral-wound, hollow-fiber, and ceramic.
10 specialist providers · 10 related · 8 countries
Qualified suppliers come to you.
Filter results
Country
Industry
Technology
Not sure where to start?
Showing 1-20 of 20
Specialists in membrane element
Providers whose services or self-declared specialties match this category.
Shandong LoyalMem Tech Co., Ltd.
VerifiedChina · 51-200 employees
Shandong LoyalMem Tech Co., Ltd. manufactures reverse osmosis (RO), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) membrane products, along with electrodeionization (EDI) modules, for industrial and municipal water-treatment applications. LoyalMem supplies membrane elements and modules for water-treatment equipment manufacturers, engineering companies and project buyers.
Related providers
Listed for overlapping capabilities, not for membrane element specifically.
Yuncheng Huiston Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.
China · 51-200 employees
Yuncheng Huiston Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in manufacturing advanced filtration products, including PP pleated filters, high-flow filter elements, and reverse osmosis membranes. Serving the manufacturing and utilities sectors, they provide innovative solutions for water treatment and purification across China and the Asia-Pacific region.
Buyer's guide
The buyer's guide to membrane element
Spiral Wound Membrane Element Specifications: Recovery, Rejection, and Fouling Resistance
Reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane elements are manufactured as spiral-wound modules: polyamide thin-film composite (TFC) membrane sheet wound around a central permeate collection tube with feed spacers (0.71 to 1.1 mm thickness) and permeate carriers between alternating layers. Standard commercial element dimensions: 4-inch diameter by 40 inches (101 mm by 1,016 mm) for small systems, 8-inch by 40-inch (201 mm by 1,016 mm) for full-scale plants.
Active membrane area per 8-inch SWRO element: 37 to 42 m2 (standard) up to 48 m2 (high-area). Salt rejection for 8-inch brackish water RO (BWRO) elements at standard test conditions (2,000 mg per L NaCl, 15.5 bar, 25 degrees C): 99.0 to 99.8 percent. SWRO elements at 32,000 mg per L NaCl, 55.2 bar: 99.6 to 99.8 percent rejection.
Membrane selection parameters: feed water salinity determines SWRO (TDS above 10,000 mg per L), BWRO (TDS 500 to 10,000 mg per L), or low-pressure RO (TDS below 500 mg per L). Fouling resistance variants: wide-channel elements (C-HF: 1.0 to 1.1 mm feed spacer) for biologically active or particulate-laden feeds; high-boron-rejection elements (BR-type) for seawater RO where boron below 0.5 mg per L is required (WHO guideline); low-energy elements (LE variants) at 10 to 15 percent lower operating pressure reduce energy consumption at equivalent flux. Low-fouling elements use neutral or negatively charged membrane surfaces that resist deposition of organic foulants.
Plant-level element design: elements are arranged in pressure vessels (4 to 8 elements per vessel, 6- or 7-element vessels common). Inter-stage pumping between first and second pass RO raises pressure to compensate for osmotic pressure increase in the concentrate stream. Energy recovery devices (isobaric ERDs: pressure exchangers from the established manufacturers) transfer hydraulic energy from the high-pressure concentrate to the incoming feed, reducing specific energy consumption from 6 to 8 kWh per m3 (without ERD) to 2.0 to 3.5 kWh per m3 (with ERD) for SWRO. Element replacement every 5 to 10 years (typically 7 years in clean feedwater with good SDI control, 3 to 5 years in biologically active or scaling-prone feeds).
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between BWRO and SWRO membranes?
Brackish Water Reverse Osmosis (BWRO) membranes are designed for feed water TDS of 500 to 10,000 mg per L (brackish groundwater, process water). Operating pressure: 8 to 25 bar. Salt rejection: 99.0 to 99.7 percent. Energy consumption: 0.5 to 1.5 kWh per m3 at typical recoveries of 70 to 85 percent. Seawater Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) membranes handle feed TDS of 30,000 to 45,000 mg per L at operating pressures of 55 to 70 bar. Salt rejection: 99.6 to 99.8 percent. Energy: 2.0 to 4.0 kWh per m3 at 40 to 50 percent recovery (with energy recovery device). TFC polyamide chemistry is the same for both; SWRO membranes have denser polyamide layer for higher NaCl rejection at the cost of lower water permeability. Never use BWRO elements on seawater feed; the osmotic pressure of seawater (26 to 28 bar) exceeds BWRO operating pressure, resulting in zero or reverse permeate flow and membrane damage.
How is membrane fouling prevented?
Fouling prevention is achieved by: (1) Feedwater SDI (Silt Density Index) below 5 (below 3 for SWRO); achieved by UF or dual-media filtration pretreatment; (2) Scaling control: anti-scalant dosing (phosphonate or carboxylate polymer at 2 to 5 mg per L) inhibiting CaCO3, CaSO4, BaSO4, and silica precipitation; acid dosing to pH 6.5 to 7.5 to suppress CaCO3 formation; (3) Biological fouling: biocide dosing before cartridge filter (chloramine at 0.1 to 0.2 mg per L for polyamide membranes; free chlorine is prohibited above 0.1 mg per L as it degrades polyamide); (4) Cartridge filter (5-micron absolute) as last pretreatment step before HP pump to protect membranes from particulate damage; (5) Clean-in-place (CIP) protocols: alkaline CIP (NaOH pH 11 to 12 plus EDTA) for biofouling/organic fouling; acid CIP (citric acid pH 3 to 4 or HCl pH 1.5 to 2) for inorganic scaling.
How often do RO membranes need to be replaced?
Under good operating conditions (SDI below 3, scaling controlled, biofouling managed), SWRO membrane elements last 7 to 12 years; BWRO elements 7 to 15 years. Replacement is triggered by: normalised salt passage increase above 15 percent from initial baseline (indicating membrane degradation or physical damage); normalised flux decline below 80 percent of initial despite CIP (indicating irreversible fouling); or pressure vessel hydraulic performance test showing inter-vessel seal failure. Cost of 8-inch SWRO elements: $400 to $800 per element (2026 pricing). A 100 MLD SWRO plant uses approximately 3,000 to 5,000 elements; replacement at year 7 to 10 represents $1.2M to $4M in membrane costs. Accelerated degradation causes: chlorine exposure above 1,000 mg per L-hours cumulative, operating above maximum pressure (BWRO typically 40 bar, SWRO 70 bar), or physical damage from particulate matter (cartridge filter bypass events).
What is the standard RO membrane element size?
The industry standard for full-scale water treatment is the 8-inch by 40-inch (201 mm OD by 1,016 mm long) spiral-wound element. This size contains 37 to 48 m2 of active membrane area. Six to eight elements are loaded into a pressure vessel (housing). Most manufacturers produce 8 x 40-inch elements with interchangeable dimensions. For small-scale systems (under 50 m3 per day), 4-inch by 40-inch elements (8 to 11 m2 area) are standard, loaded 2 to 4 per vessel. New 16-inch (400 mm) diameter elements offering 180 m2 of area are entering the market for very large SWRO plants (above 100 MLD), reducing pressure vessel count and vessel handling cost. For industrial process applications, 2.5-inch and 4-inch elements in single-element housings are common in compact skid-mounted systems.
Illustrative scenario · Municipal water treatment
A composite drawn from typical projects in this category, not a single client engagement. Figures are indicative.
- Challenge
- A UK water company operating a 15 MLD seawater desalination plant on the South Coast of England experienced a 40 percent salt passage increase and 25 percent flux decline after 4 years of operation. Normalised data analysis showed the performance decline was attributable to biofouling (elevated biological oxygen demand in source seawater during summer algal bloom periods) rather than scaling, and was not recovering fully after standard CIP procedures.
- Approach
- Conducted a forensic membrane autopsy on elements from the lead position (worst fouling): SEM imaging confirmed dense biofilm of Pseudomonas and Vibrio species on the feed spacer and membrane surface. Replaced all SWRO elements (the existing 36 pressure vessels with 7 elements each, 252 elements total) with biofouling-resistant low-fouling SWRO elements (surface-modified polyamide with negative surface charge). Strengthened the biocide pretreatment protocol (chloramine dosing to 0.2 mg per L at cartridge filter inlet) and added monthly biocide shock to the pre-membrane train.
- Outcome
- After element replacement and pretreatment enhancement, normalised salt passage returned to within 5 percent of original new-element baseline. Normalised flux recovered to 98 percent of new-element performance. Specific energy consumption fell from 4.8 to 3.9 kWh per m3 permeate (18 percent reduction). The new low-fouling elements showed no measurable normalised salt passage increase after 18 months of operation, versus 15 percent increase in the equivalent period with the original elements.
Questions to ask shortlisted providers
5
- 01
What is the lead-position element's normalised salt passage (NSP) after the last six months of operation, and has this been corrected for temperature and pressure variations per ASTM D4516?
Normalised salt passage (NSP) corrected per ASTM D4516 is the accepted method for tracking membrane performance degradation independent of operating condition variations. A 10 to 15 percent NSP increase from baseline indicates early fouling or degradation; above 20 percent indicates significant degradation requiring root cause investigation. Raw (un-normalised) salt passage data is unreliable for trend analysis as it varies with feed temperature and pressure.
- 02
What is the SDI of the water entering the RO membrane train, and has SDI been consistently below the manufacturer's maximum (typically SDI below 5 for BWRO, below 3 for SWRO)?
SDI (Silt Density Index, measured per ASTM D4189) is the primary pretreatment quality indicator for RO membranes. Feed SDI above the maximum causes colloidal fouling that CIP cannot fully reverse, reducing element service life from 10 to 15 years to 3 to 5 years. SDI above 5 invalidates membrane manufacturer warranties. If SDI data has not been logged continuously, ask for the last 12 months of SDI measurement records at minimum.
- 03
What is the identity and concentration of each chemical component in your anti-scalant, and have you modelled scaling potential for our concentrate stream at the proposed recovery rate?
Anti-scalant selection must be matched to the specific scaling salts in the concentrate stream: calcium carbonate (LSI-based control), sulphate scales (CaSO4, BaSO4, SrSO4), and silica (requires specific polymeric dispersant at temperatures above 40 degrees C). An anti-scalant optimised for CaCO3 control may be ineffective against BaSO4 precipitation. Langelier Saturation Index modelling of the full concentrate ionic balance at the proposed system recovery rate is mandatory before anti-scalant selection.
- 04
What is your element replacement lead time, and do you hold stock in the UK or require 8 to 16 week lead times from the manufacturer?
SWRO element replacement on a large plant (hundreds of elements) requires a minimum of 3 to 6 months planning. BWRO and SWRO element stock from major manufacturers is typically held in European distribution warehouses at 4 to 8 week lead time; specialty elements (high-boron-rejection, low-fouling surface-modified) may be 12 to 20 weeks. A plant without a planned element replacement programme and procurement strategy risks extended downtime when elements reach end of life.
- 05
For the pressure vessels, what is the rated burst pressure and what is the current operating maximum working pressure, and when were the vessels last hydraulic pressure tested?
RO pressure vessels (GRP or stainless steel) are rated to maximum working pressure (typically 40 to 85 bar depending on application). Pressure vessels that have been operating at high pressure with high-SDI water may have microcracking in the GRP shell that is not visible during operation but can cause catastrophic failure under pressure transients. Pressure vessels should be hydraulic pressure tested or inspected per PSSR 2000 Written Scheme of Examination at intervals not exceeding 5 years.
What drives cost in this category
4
- Element specification (BWRO vs SWRO vs specialty)
- Standard 8-inch BWRO element: 150 to 300 GBP per element. Standard 8-inch SWRO element: 400 to 700 GBP per element. High-rejection SWRO (99.8 percent NaCl): 500 to 900 GBP per element. Low-fouling surface-modified element: 600 to 1,100 GBP per element. PFAS-rejection specialty element: 800 to 1,500 GBP per element. For a 10 MLD plant with 300 elements, upgrading from standard BWRO to low-fouling SWRO adds 90,000 to 240,000 GBP in element cost, often justified by 2 to 4 year service life extension.
- Pretreatment quality and achieved SDI
- The single largest driver of membrane element service life is feed SDI. A plant achieving SDI below 2 (UF pretreatment, good coagulation) can expect 10 to 15-year element life. SDI of 3 to 5 (multimedia filter only) reduces expected life to 5 to 8 years. SDI above 5 (inadequate pretreatment) reduces life to 2 to 4 years. The lifetime cost difference between SDI below 2 and SDI 3 to 5 for a 300-element plant (at 500 GBP per element) is 45,000 to 90,000 GBP in additional replacement cost per 5-year period.
- Energy recovery device configuration
- SWRO without energy recovery: 6 to 8 kWh per m3 specific energy. With turbocharger ERD (for small plants below 200 m3 per day): 3 to 5 kWh per m3. With isobaric pressure exchanger ERD (for plants above 200 m3 per day): 2.0 to 3.5 kWh per m3. For a 10 MLD SWRO plant at 0.15 GBP per kWh, the difference between 6 kWh per m3 and 3 kWh per m3 is 1,642,500 GBP per year in energy cost. Isobaric ERD capital cost of 500,000 to 2,000,000 GBP pays back in 3 to 12 months.
- CIP chemical cost and cleaning frequency
- SWRO CIP uses: NaOH (pH 12) plus EDTA for organic/biofouling removal, citric acid (pH 3 to 4) or HCl for inorganic/carbonate scale. Chemical cost per CIP event for a 300-element plant: 2,000 to 6,000 GBP in chemicals plus 1,000 to 3,000 GBP in labour and plant downtime. Quarterly CIP frequency (4 per year) costs 12,000 to 36,000 GBP per year. Biofouled plants requiring monthly CIP cost 48,000 to 144,000 GBP per year in cleaning alone, excluding the accelerated membrane degradation from repeated chemical contact.
Key regulations and standards
4
- Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2016: DWI Approval for Membranes in Potable Water
- RO and NF membranes used in drinking water production must be listed on the DWI List of Approved Products (Regulation 31 approval) or hold WRAS approval confirming that membrane materials do not impart harmful substances to the treated water. DWI approval testing evaluates membrane element materials for organic extractables, microbiological safety, and compliance with BS EN 14652 (membranes for drinking water treatment). Non-DWI-approved elements used in public supply are a regulatory non-compliance, reportable under Regulation 35.
- Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000: RO Pressure Vessels and Pipework
- RO pressure vessels operating above 0.5 bar and containing a stored pressure-volume product above 250 bar-litres are regulated under PSSR 2000. A Written Scheme of Examination (WSE) must be prepared by a competent person (typically an insurance inspection body such as Lloyd's Register, Bureau Veritas, or TUV). The WSE specifies the maximum allowable working pressure, the inspection interval (typically 2 to 5 years), and the inspection method (visual inspection plus hydraulic pressure test or ultrasonic wall-thickness measurement for GRP vessels).
- ASTM D4516: Standardised Method for Reporting RO Membrane Performance
- ASTM D4516 (Standard Practice for Standardizing Reverse Osmosis Performance Data) is the accepted method for normalising RO membrane performance data to standard test conditions (25 degrees C, standard pressure, specific feed composition). UK water companies and their consultants use ASTM D4516 normalisation to track membrane performance trends, identify fouling events, and justify element replacement decisions in regulatory asset management reporting to Ofwat. Membrane suppliers provide normalisation calculation tools based on ASTM D4516 methodology.
- Environment Agency: RO Concentrate Disposal Environmental Permit
- Discharge of RO concentrate to surface water or controlled waters requires an Environmental Permit from the Environment Agency under EPR 2016. Concentrate TDS is typically 3 to 5 times feed TDS; the elevated chloride, sulphate, and potentially scaling ions must be assessed against receiving water quality standards. Inland BWRO concentrate disposal to sewer requires trade effluent consent. SWRO coastal concentrate disposal requires Marine Management Organisation consent under the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 for structures or discharges in UK coastal waters.